Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:44:44.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pilot evaluation of a group stabilisation intervention for refugees and asylum seekers with PTSD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2021

Mary Griggs ,
Cheng Liu  and
Kate Cooper Open the ORCID record for Kate Cooper [Opens in a new window]
Mary Griggs*
Affiliation:
Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust
Cheng Liu
Affiliation:
Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust Vita Health Group
Kate Cooper
Affiliation:
University of Bath Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust
*
*Corresponding author. Email: mary.griggs@nhs.net
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is commonly experienced by asylum seekers and refugees (ASR). Evidence supports the use of cognitive behavioural therapy-based treatments, but not in group format for this population. However, group-based treatments are frequently used as a first-line intervention in the UK.

Aims:

This study investigated the feasibility of delivering a group-based, manualised stabilisation course specifically developed for ASR. The second aim was to evaluate the use of routine outcome measures (ROMs) to capture psychological change in this population.

Method:

Eighty-two participants from 22 countries attended the 8-session Moving On After Trauma (MOAT) group-based stabilisation treatment. PHQ-9, GAD-7, IES-R and idiosyncratic outcomes were administered pre- and post-intervention.

Results:

Seventy-one per cent of participants (n = 58) attended five or more of the treatment sessions. While completion rates of the ROMs were poor – measures were completed at pre- and post-intervention for 46% participants (n = 38) – a repeated-measures MANOVA indicated significant improvements in depression (p = .001, ηp2 = .262), anxiety (p = .000, ηp2 = .390), PTSD (p = .001, ηp2 = .393) and idiosyncratic measures (p = .000, ηp2 = .593) following the intervention.

Conclusions:

Preliminary evidence indicates that ASR who attended a low-intensity, group-based stabilisation group for PTSD experienced lower mental health scores post-group, although the lack of a comparison group means these results should be interpreted with caution. There are significant challenges in administering ROMs to individuals who speak many different languages, in a group setting. Nonetheless, groups have benefits including efficiency of treatment delivery which should also be considered.

Keywords

asylum seekerPTSDrefugeetrauma
Type
Brief Clinical Report
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , January 2022 , pp. 111 - 116
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beck, A., Naz, S., Brooks, M., & Jankowska, M. (2019). Improving Access to Psychological Therapies: Black and minority ethnic service user positive practice guide. British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies (BABCP).Google Scholar
Carswell, K., Blackburn, P., & Barker, C. (2011). The relationship between trauma, most-migration problems and psychological well-being of refugees and asylum seekers. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 57, 107–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crawford, M. J., Thana, L., Farquharson, L., Palmer, L., Hancock, E., Bassett, P., … & Parry, G. D. (2016). Patient experience of negative effects of psychological treatment: results of a national survey. British Journal of Psychiatry, 208, 260–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, G., Melluish, S., & Welham, A. (2017). Exploring the relationship between postmigratory stressors and mental health for asylum seekers and refused asylum seekers in the UK. Transcult Psychiatry, 54, 653–674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morina, N., Akhtar, A., Barth, J., & Schnyder, U. (2018). Psychiatric disorders in refugees and internally displaced persons after forced displacement: a systematic review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, 433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ter Heide, F. J. J., Mooren, T. M., & Kleber, R. J. (2016a). Complex PTSD and phased treatment in refugees: a debate piece. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 7, 28687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ter Heide, F. J. J., Mooren, T. M., Van de Schoot, R., De Jongh, A., & Kleber, R. J. (2016b). Eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing therapy v. stabilisation as usual for refugees: randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 209, 311–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turrini, G., Purgato, M., Acarturk, C., Anttila, M., Au, T., Ballette, F., … & Hall, J. (2019). Efficacy and acceptability of psychosocial interventions in asylum seekers and refugees: systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 28, 376–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Griggs et al. supplementary material

Griggs et al. supplementary material

Download Griggs et al. supplementary material(File)
File 57.6 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.