Extremal general affine surface areas

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2021.125506Get rights and content

Abstract

For a convex body K in Rn, we introduce and study the extremal general affine surface areas, defined byISφ(K):=supKKasφ(K),osψ(K):=infKKasψ(K) where asφ(K) and asψ(K) are the Lφ and Lψ affine surface area of K, respectively. We prove that there exist extremal convex bodies that achieve the supremum and infimum, and that the functionals ISφ and osψ are continuous. In our main results, we prove Blaschke-Santaló type inequalities and inverse Santaló type inequalities for the extremal general affine surface areas. This article may be regarded as an Orlicz extension of the recent work of Giladi, Huang, Schütt and Werner (2020), who introduced and studied the extremal Lp affine surface areas.

Introduction

The celebrated result of Fritz John [27] says that every convex body K in Rn contains a unique ellipsoid of maximum volume, now called the John ellipsoid of K. The minimum volume ellipsoid containing K is also unique and is called the Löwner ellipsoid of K. The John and Löwner ellipsoids are related by polar duality: If K contains the origin in its interior, then the John ellipsoid is the polar body of the Löwner ellipsoid, and vice versa. These ellipsoids are cornerstones of asymptotic convex geometry, arising in concentration of volume, the reverse isoperimetric inequality, the hyperplane conjecture and many more [1], [11]. Other prominent applications of the John and Löwner ellipsoids can be found in Banach space geometry [10], [15], [44], [55], extremal problems [2], [7], [17], [48], polytopal approximation of convex bodies [20], [33], [52], linear programming [19], [56] and statistics [14], [45], [58].

In this article, we study an analogue of John's theorem when volume is replaced by the general Lφ or Lψ affine surface area, which is defined in terms of a special type of concave function φ or convex function ψ, respectively. More specifically, instead of considering the ellipsoid of maximum (resp. minimum) volume contained in (containing) K, we will consider the convex body of maximum Lφ (minimum Lψ) affine surface contained in (containing) K. For a convex body K in Rn with centroid at the origin, we define the inner maximal Lφ affine surface area ISφ(K) and outer minimal Lψ affine surface area osψ(K) of K byISφ(K):=supKKasφ(K)osψ(K):=infKKasψ(K). Here asφ(K) and asψ(K) denote the general Lφ and Lψ affine surface area of K, respectively, which are extensions of the classical affine surface area defined by Schütt and Werner [51]. The supremum and infimum are taken over all K with centroid at the origin (see Section 2.1 for the definitions).

The special case of (1) when asφ is replaced by the classical affine surface area has attracted considerable interest. Inscribed bodies of maximal affine surface area have found applications to discrete geometry [3], [4], [5], [6], geometric probability [5] and variational problems in differential equations [32], [57]. The existence of a convex body KmaxK of maximum affine surface area follows from the upper semicontinuity of the affine surface area [4], [50]. The regularity properties of Kmax were studied by Sheng, Trudinger and Wang [54]. For planar convex bodies, Bárány proved that Kmax is unique, and showed a remarkable relationship between Kmax and the limit shape of the convex hull of certain lattice points [4], [6] or random points [5] contained in K. Bárány and Prodromou [6] showed that if K is a planar convex body, then Kmax is of elliptic type, and if K is of elliptic type then Kmax=K. Schneider [50] used a new method to extend the latter result to all dimensions, showing that if K is a convex body in Rn of elliptic type, then Kmax=K.

Recently, Giladi, Huang, Schütt and Werner [18] introduced and studied the extremal Lp affine surface areasISp(K):=supKKasp(K)osp(K):=infKKasp(K) where asp(K) is the Lp affine surface area of K. It was shown in [18] that for any convex body K with centroid at the origin, the extremal bodies exist, and continuity and affine isoperimetric inequalities were proved for the functionals ISp and osp. Asymptotic estimates were also given for ISp(K) and osp(K) in terms of powers of the volume of K using the Löwner ellipsoid and thin shell estimate of [21].

When a certain concave or convex function depending on n and p is chosen in (1) or (2), respectively, we recover (3) and (4) as special cases. Thus, the new definitions (1) and (2) may be thought of as Orlicz extensions of the definitions (3) and (4) (see Section 6.4 below for the details). A key difference between the Lp affine surface areas and the general Lφ and Lψ affine surface areas is that the former are homogeneous, while the latter, in general, are not. For our purposes, the lack of homogeneity will only present difficulties for the Lφ affine surface areas. To surmount this obstacle, we will restrict our attention to certain subclasses of concave functions φ satisfying mild growth rate conditions. These subclasses contain many functions that are not homogeneous of any degree, which distinguishes the results in this work from those in [18]. At the same time, these classes contain the homogeneous functions considered in the Lp setting of [18].

In the present paper, we prove existence and continuity of the extremal general affine surface areas (1) and (2). Our main result is a Blaschke-Santaló type inequality for the inner maximal Lφ affine surface area. More specifically, in Theorem 6.4 we show that for any convex body K in Rn with centroid at the origin and any concave function φ satisfying some prescribed conditions,ISφ(K)ISφ(K)ISφ(Bn)2 with equality if and only if K is an ellipsoid (here Bn denotes the Euclidean unit ball in Rn centered at the origin). Finally, we prove an inverse Santaló type inequality for the outer minimal Lψ affine surface area.

In Section 2, we state definitions and notation used throughout the paper, and provide the relevant background on the general Lφ and Lψ affine surface areas. In Section 3, we use a polar duality relation of Ludwig [34] for the Lφ affine surface area to define the subclasses of concave functions φ we will consider. Next, in Section 4 we define the extremal general affine surface areas and state their existence, monotonicity and continuity properties; for the reader's convenience, the proofs of these properties are included at the end of the paper in Section 7. The lemmas that will be used in the proofs of the main results are in Section 5, and in Section 6 we prove affine isoperimetric inequalities for the extremal general affine surface areas. In Subsections 6.2 and 6.3 we prove our main results, which are Blaschke-Santaló type inequalities and inverse Santaló type inequalities for the extremal general affine surface areas.

Section snippets

Background and notation

The standard inner product of x,yRn is denoted x,y. The Euclidean unit ball in Rn centered at the origin o is the set Bn={xRn:x,x1}. The Minkowski sum A+B of two sets A,BRn is defined by A+B={a+b:aA,bB}. We say that a function f:(0,)(0,) is homogeneous of degree r if f(λt)=λrf(t) for all λ,t>0.

A convex body in Rn is a convex, compact set with nonempty interior. Denote the class of convex bodies in Rn that contain the origin in their interiors by Kon. For convex bodies K and L in Rn

Polar duality and the functional setting

If K=rBn for some positive number r, then by definitions (7) and (8) we obtainasφ(rBn)=rnφ(r2n)|Bn|asψ(rBn)=rnψ(r2n)|Bn|. Since ψ is decreasing, the Lψ affine surface areas are increasing on Euclidean balls. More specifically,0<rsasψ(rBn)asψ(sBn). This is not the case for the Lφ affine surface area and a general function φConc(0,). Fortunately, we can control the monotonicity of asφ on Euclidean balls by restricting the growth rate of the ratio of φ and the square root function. We

Extremal general affine surface areas

For a convex body K in Rn with g(K)=o, letCin(K):={KK:K is a convex body in Rn,g(K)=o}Cout(K):={KK:K is a convex body in Rn,g(K)=o}, denote the families of all inscribed and circumscribed bodies with centroid at the origin, respectively. The condition g(K)=o allows us to apply Lemma 2.1, Lemma 2.2. A discussion on this centroid assumption can be found in Subsection 7.4. For φConc(0,), we define the extremal Lφ affine surface areas byISφ(K):=supKCin(K)asφ(K),isφ(K):=infKCin(K)as

Lemmas

The next lemma is elementary. We include the proof for the reader's convenience.

Lemma 5.1

For all φConc(0,),φConc+(0,) and ψConv(0,), we have:ISφ(Bn)=asφ(Bn)=φ(1)|Bn|OSφ(Bn)=asφ(Bn)=φ(1)|Bn|osψ(Bn)=asψ(Bn)=ψ(1)|Bn|isψ(Bn)=asψ(Bn)=ψ(1)|Bn|.

Proof

On one hand, we have ISφ(Bn)=supKCin(Bn)asφ(K)asφ(Bn) since BnCin(Bn). On the other hand, by Lemmas 2.1 and 3.2 we deriveISφ(Bn)=supKCin(Bn)asφ(K)supKCin(Bn)asφ(vrad(K)Bn)=asφ(Bn). Thus ISφ(Bn)=asφ(Bn). By (17), we have OSφ(Bn)=ISφ(Bn)=ISφ(Bn)

Affine isoperimetric inequalities

Affine isoperimetric inequalities are among the most powerful tools in convex geometry. They relate two functionals on the class of convex bodies in Rn, where the ratio of the functionals is invariant under nondegenerate linear transformations. Prominent examples include the classical affine isoperimetric inequality [24], [30], [36] and the Blaschke-Santaló inequality [8], [43], [46]. More recent examples include affine isoperimetric inequalities for the Lp affine surface area [37], [40], [61],

Proof of Lemma 4.1

The proof is similar to that of [18, Lemma 3.2]; we include the arguments for the reader's convenience. Let φConc(0,). By Lemmas 2.1 and 3.2,ISφ(K)=supKCin(K)asφ(K)supKCin(K)asφ(vrad(K)Bn)=supKCin(K)vrad(K)nφ(vrad(K)2n)|Bn|vrad(K)nφ(vrad(K)2n)|Bn|=n|K|φ(vrad(K)2n), which is finite. Hence, there exists a sequence {Ck}kNCin(K) such that for all kN,asφ(Ck)+1ksupKCin(K)asφ(K). On the other hand, asφ(Ck)supKCin(K)asφ(K) since CkCin(K), so by the squeeze theoremlim

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Elisabeth Werner and Deping Ye for the discussions, and the anonymous referee for carefully reading this manuscript and providing valuable comments.

References (68)

  • M. Meyer et al.

    On the p-affine surface area

    Adv. Math.

    (2000)
  • V.D. Milman et al.

    Entropy and asymptotic geometry of non-symmetric convex bodies

    Adv. Math.

    (2000)
  • C. Schütt et al.

    Surface bodies and p-affine surface area

    Adv. Math.

    (2004)
  • M.J. Todd et al.

    On Khachiyan's algorithm for the computation of minimum-volume enclosing ellipsoids

    Discrete Appl. Math.

    (2007)
  • E. Werner et al.

    New Lp-affine isoperimetric inequalities

    Adv. Math.

    (2008)
  • D. Xi et al.

    The Orlicz Brunn-Minkowski inequality

    Adv. Math.

    (2014)
  • D. Ye

    New Orlicz affine isoperimetric inequalities

    J. Math. Anal. Appl.

    (2015)
  • G. Zhu

    The Orlicz centroid inequality for star bodies

    Adv. Appl. Math.

    (2012)
  • D. Zou et al.

    Orlicz-John ellipsoids

    Adv. Math.

    (2014)
  • S. Artstein-Avidan et al.

    Asymptotic Geometric Analysis, Part I

    (2015)
  • K. Ball

    Volume ratios and a reverse isoperimetric inequality

    J. Lond. Math. Soc.

    (1991)
  • I. Bárány

    The limit shape of convex lattice polygons

    Discrete Comput. Geom.

    (1995)
  • I. Bárány

    Affine perimeter and limit shape

    J. Reine Angew. Math.

    (1997)
  • I. Bárány

    Sylvester's question: the probability that n points are in convex position

    Ann. Probab.

    (1999)
  • I. Bárány et al.

    On maximal convex lattice polygons inscribed in a plane convex set

    Isr. J. Math.

    (2006)
  • F. Barthe

    An extremal property of the mean width of the simplex

    Math. Ann.

    (1998)
  • W. Blaschke

    Über affine Geometrie VII: Neue Extremeingenschaften von Ellipse und Ellipsoid

    Ber. Verh. Sächs. Akad. Wiss. Leipz., Math.-Phys. Kl.

    (1917)
  • W. Blaschke

    Vorlesunger über Differentialgeometrie: Affine Differentialgeometrie

    (1923)
  • J. Bourgain et al.

    New volume ratio properties for convex symmetric bodies in Rn

    Invent. Math.

    (1987)
  • S. Brazitikos et al.

    Geometry of Isotropic Convex Bodies

    (2014)
  • L. Davies

    The asymptotics of Rousseeuw's minimum volume ellipsoid estimator

    Ann. Stat.

    (1992)
  • T. Figiel et al.

    The dimension of almost spherical sections of convex bodies

    Acta Math.

    (1977)
  • R.J. Gardner et al.

    General volumes in the Orlicz-Brunn-Minkowski theory and a related Minkowski problem II

    Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ.

    (2020)
  • A.A. Giannopoulos et al.

    Extremal problems and isotropic positions of convex bodies

    Isr. J. Math.

    (2000)
  • Cited by (2)

    View full text