Skip to main content
Log in

Secondary Packages cannot Protect Liquid Biopharmaceutical Formulations from Dropping-Induced Degradation

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purposes

Liquid protein-based biopharmaceutical formulations have been reported to form aggregation and protein sub-visible particles (SbVPs) during dropping (Randolph et al., J Pharm Sci 2015, 104, 602). However, effects of secondary package on liquid biopharmaceutical formulation stability during dropping are overlooked and have not been reported so far. This study reports the first real-world evaluation on effects of secondary package on liquid biopharmaceutical formulation stability during dropping, using two monoclonal antibodies (mAb-1 and mAb-2) and one fusion protein (FP-1) as model biopharmaceuticals.

Methods

The potential protective effects of secondary package and formulation composition on liquid biopharmaceutical formulations during dropping were evaluated with micro-flow imaging (MFI) and dynamic light scattering (DLS).

Results

The dropping-induced degradation could be detected with the two sensitive particle analyzing techniques MFI and DLS. Formulation compositions have dramatic impact on biopharmaceutical stability during dropping. Surprisingly, unlike the primary packages that have been reported to impact liquid biopharmaceutical stability, the secondary packaging system as described in our current preliminary design has little or no protective effect during dropping.

Conclusions

Our study is the first real-world data showing that the secondary package system has little to no effect on the liquid biopharmaceutical formulation quality during dropping. On the contrary, the stability of liquid biopharmaceutical formulations during dropping is more relevant to formulation compositions and primary packages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CHO:

Chinese Hamster Ovary

DLS:

Dynamic light scattering

FDA:

U.S. Food and Drug Administration

FP:

Fusion protein

mAb:

Monoclonal antibody

MFI:

Micro-flow imaging

MVSS:

MFI View System Suite

MW:

Molecular weight

PU:

Polyurethane

SbVP:

Sub-visible particle

SP:

Secondary package

References

  1. Das TK, Narhi LO, Sreedhara A, Menzen T, Grapentin C, Chou DK, et al. Stress factors in mAb drug substance production processes: critical assessment of impact on product quality and control strategy. J Pharm Sci. 2020;109:116–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nejadnik MR, Randolph TW, Volkin DB, Schöneich C, Carpenter JF, Crommelin DJA, et al. Postproduction handling and administration of protein pharmaceuticals and potential instability issues. J Pharm Sci. 2018;107:2013–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jiskoot W, Nejadnik MR, Sediq AS. Potential issues with the handling of biologicals in a hospital. J Pharm Sci. 2017;106:1688–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ueda T, Nakamura K, Abe Y, Carpenter JF. Effects of product handling parameters on particle levels in a commercial factor VIII product: impacts and mitigation. J Pharm Sci. 2019;108:775–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rosenberg AS. Effects of protein aggregates: an immunologic perspective. AAPS J. 2006;8:E501–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ratanji KD, Derrick JP, Dearman RJ, Kimber I. Immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins: influence of aggregation. J Immunotoxicol. 2014;11:99–109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Carpenter JF, Randolph TW, Jiskoot W, Crommelin DJA, Middaugh CR, Winter G, et al. Overlooking subvisible particles in therapeutic protein products: gaps that may compromise product quality. J Pharm Sci. 2009;98:1201–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Singh SK, Afonina N, Awwad M, Bechtold-Peters K, Blue JT, Chou D, et al. An industry perspective on the monitoring of subvisible particles as a quality attribute for protein therapeutics. J Pharm Sci. 2010;99:3302–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bee JS, Goletz TJ, Ragheb JA. The future of protein particle characterization and understanding its potential to diminish the immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals: a shared perspective. J Pharm Sci. 2012;101:3580–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zölls S, Tantipolphan R, Wiggenhorn M, Winter G, Jiskoot W, Friess W, et al. Particles in therapeutic protein formulations, part 1: overview of analytical methods. J Pharm Sci. 2012;101:914–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Docket Number: FDA-1997-D-0145. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/container-closure-systemspackaging-human-drugs-and-biologics

  12. Wang M, Li Y, Srinivasan P, Hu Z, Wang R, Saragih A, et al. Interactions between biological products and product packaging and potential approaches to overcome them. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2018;19:3681–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Movafaghi S, Wu H, Francino Urdániz IM, Bull DS, Kelly MD, Randolph TW, et al. The effect of container surface passivation on aggregation of intravenous immunoglobulin induced by mechanical shock. Biotechnol J. 2020;15:e2000096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Singh R, Lloyd W. A streamlined bioanalytical approach to select a compatible primary container system early in drug development: a toolbox for the biopharmaceutical industry. J Pharm Sci. 2020;109:206–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu L, Ammar DA, Ross LA, Mandava N, Kahook MY, Carpenter JF. Silicone oil microdroplets and protein aggregates in repackaged bevacizumab and ranibizumab: effects of long-term storage and product mishandling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:1023–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dill S, Brees K, Stahly A, Cheng E, Carpenter J, Caplan L. Mechanical shock during shipping of medications: the roles of packaging and transportation vendors. J Pharm Sci. 2020;109:670–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Randolph TW, Schiltz E, Sederstrom D, Steinmann D, Mozziconacci O, Schöneich C, et al. Do not drop: mechanical shock in vials causes cavitation, protein aggregation, and particle formation. J Pharm Sci. 2015;104:602–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Torisu T, Maruno T, Hamaji Y, Ohkubo T, Uchiyama S. Synergistic effect of cavitation and agitation on protein aggregation. J Pharm Sci. 2017;106:521–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Duerkop M, Berger E, Dürauer A, Jungbauer A. Impact of cavitation, high shear stress and air/liquid interfaces on protein aggregation. Biotechnol J. 2018;13:e1800062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jiao N, Barnett GV, Christian TR, Narhi LO, Joh NH, Joubert MK, et al. Characterization of subvisible particles in biotherapeutic prefilled syringes: the role of polysorbate and protein on the formation of silicone oil and protein subvisible particles after drop shock. J Pharm Sci. 2020;109:640–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu H, Randolph TW. Aggregation and particle formation during pumping of an antibody formulation are controlled by electrostatic interactions between pump surfaces and protein molecules. J Pharm Sci. 2020;109:1473–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu H, Chisholm CF, Puryear M, Movafaghi S, Smith SD, Pokhilchuk Y, et al. Container surfaces control initiation of cavitation and resulting particle formation in protein formulations after application of mechanical shock. J Pharm Sci. 2020;109:1270–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Valotta Rodrigues R, Puryear M, Sederstrom D, Lengsfeld CS. Parameters influencing cavitation within vials subjected to drop shock. Sci Rep. 2019;9:19210.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang H, Zheng H-J, Wang Z, Bai H, Carpenter JF, Chen S, et al. Formation of protein sub-visible particles during vacuum degassing of etanercept solutions. Int J Biol Macromol. 2014;66:151–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fang W-J, Liu J-W, Barnard J, Wang H, Qian Y-C, Xu J. Effects of secondary package on freeze-dried biopharmaceutical formulation stability during dropping. J Pharm Sci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2021.04.019.

  26. Sharma DK, King D, Oma P, Merchant C. Micro-flow imaging: flow microscopy applied to sub-visible particulate analysis in protein formulations. AAPS J. 2010;12:455–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND DISCLOSURES

We greatly appreciate the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant No. 2018ZX09J18107–002) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81741144) for financial support. We would also like to extend our gratitude to Ms. Haihong Hu at Zhejiang University for lab management.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei-Jie Fang.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fang, WJ., Liu, JW., Gao, H. et al. Secondary Packages cannot Protect Liquid Biopharmaceutical Formulations from Dropping-Induced Degradation. Pharm Res 38, 1397–1404 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-021-03073-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-021-03073-1

KEY WORDS

Navigation