Abstract
Sea ice has an intense impact on the polar environment, ocean circulation, weather and regional climate. Unexpected melting of sea ice, which is considered as one of the climate change effects, has become a potential threat to the Earth’s climate. The regular monitoring of sea ice and its extent has become very important towards understanding of sea ice temporal dynamics. In this study, we present an operational technique of generation of sea ice images and sea ice area (derived from the images) using level-4 data from Indian Scatterometer SCATSAT-1. Using hierarchical classification rules, the threshold-based technique has been developed and applied to generate super-resolution (2.25 km) daily sea ice images over the Antarctic for the years 2017 and 2018. The technique uses four SCATSAT-1 data products, i.e. Gamma0 [Horizontal (H) and Vertical (V)] and Brightness Temperature (H and V) to classify sea ice, open water and other classes. Classification accuracy has been assessed by comparing SCATSAT-1 sea ice images with those obtained from AMSR2 sea ice concentration data. The comparison shows that there is around 96.1% matching of sea ice classification between SCATSAT-1 and AMSR-2 SIC derived sea ice images. Hence, it indicates that the super-resolution data of SCATSAT-1 is well capable of distinguishing sea ice from water.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, H. S., & Long, D. G. (2005). Sea ice mapping method for SeaWinds. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43, 647–657. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2004.842017
Beitsch, A., Kaleschke, L., & Kern, S. (2014). Investigating high-resolution AMSR2 sea ice concentrations during the February 2013 fracture event in the beaufort sea. Remote Sensing, 6, 3841–3856. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6053841
Belmonte Rivas, M., Verspeek, J., Verhoef, A., & Stoffelen, A. (2012). Bayesian sea ice detection with the advanced scatterometer ASCAT. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50, 2649–2657. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2182356
Bhandari, S. M., Dash, M. K., Vyas, N. K., et al. (2002). Microwave Remote Sensing of Ice in the Antarctic Region from OCEANSAT-1. In: Advances in marine and Antarctic science (p. 443). A.P.H. Pub. Corp.
Fetterer, F., Knowles, K., Meier, W. N., et al. (2017). Sea Ice Index, Version 3.0, Boulder, Colorado USA. NSIDC. In: National Snow and Ice Data Center.
Haarpaintner, J., & Spreen, G. (2007). Use of enhanced-resolution QuikSCAT/SeaWinds data for operational ice services and climate research: Sea ice edge, type, concentration, and drift. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45, 3131–3137. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2007.895419
Haarpaintner, J., Tonboe, R. T., Long, D. G., & Van Woert, M. L. (2004). Automatic detection and validity of the sea-ice edge: An application of enhanced-resolution QuikScat/SeaWinds data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42, 1433–1443. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2004.828195
Howell, S. E. L., Tivy, A., Yackel, J. J., & Scharien, R. K. (2006). Application of a SeaWinds/QuikSCAT sea ice melt algorithm for assessing melt dynamics in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111, C07025. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JC003193
Kaleschke, L., Tian‐Kunze, X. (2016). AMSR2 ASI 3.125 km Sea Ice Concentration Data. In: Institute of Oceanography: Universität Hamburg, Germany Digital Media. http://ftp-projects.zmaw.de/seaice/
Kern, S., Spreen, G., Kaleschke, L., et al. (2007). Polynya signature simulation method polynya area in comparison to AMSR-E 89 GHz sea-ice concentrations in the Ross Sea and off the Adelie Coast, Antarctica, for 2002–05: First results. Annals of Glaciology, 46, 409–418. https://doi.org/10.3189/172756407782871585
Kumar, R., Bhowmick, S. A., Chakraborty, A., Sharma, A., Sharma, S., Seemanth, M., Gupta, M., Chakraborty, P., Modi, J., Misra, T., et al. (2019). Post-launch calibration–validation and data quality evaluation of SCATSAT-1. Current Science, 117(6), 973–982.
Li, M., Zhao, C., Zhao, Y., et al. (2016). Polar sea ice monitoring using HY-2A scatterometer measurements. Remote Sens, 8, 688. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8080688
Long, D. G. (2016). Polar applications of spaceborne scatterometers. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 10(5), 2307–2320. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2016.2629418
Long, D. G., Hardin, P. J., & Whiting, P. T. (1993). Resolution enhancement of spaceborne scatterometer data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 31, 700–715. https://doi.org/10.1109/36.225536
NSIDC (2018a). All about sea ice. In: National Snow and Ice Data Center. http://nsidc.org/cryosphere/seaice/index.html. Accessed 20 Jun 2018.
NSIDC (2018b). http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/archives.html.. Accessed on June 2018.
Overland, J. E., Turner, J., Francis, J., et al. (2008). The arctic and antarctic: Two faces of climate change. Eos (washington DC), 89, 177–178. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008EO190001
Oza, S. R., RAJAK DR, K DASH M, , et al. (2017). Advances in ANTARCTIC SEA ICE STUDIES IN India. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy, 83, 427–435.
Oza, S. R., Singh, R. K. K., Srivastava, A., et al. (2011). Inter-annual variations observed in spring and summer Antarctic sea ice extent in recent decade. Mausam, 62, 633–640.
Oza, S. R., Singh, R. K. K., Vyas, N. K., & Sarkar, A. (2012). AN ATLAS OF THE ARCTIC AND THE ANTARCTIC SEA ICE TRENDS (1999-2009)-DERIVED FROM QUIKSCAT SCATTEROMETER DATA.
Rai, S., & Pandey, A. C. (2006). Antarctic sea ice variability in recent years and its relationship with Indian Ocean Sea Surface Temperature. Journal of Indian Geophysics Union, 10(3), 219–229.
Raleigh, M. S. (2013). Quantification of uncertainties in snow accumulation, snowmelt, and snow disappearance dates.
Remund, Q. P., & Long, D. G. (2014). A decade of QuikSCAT scatterometer sea ice extent data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52, 4281–4290. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2013.2281056
Remund, Q. P., & Long, D. G. (1999). Sea ice extent mapping using Ku band scatterometer data. Journal Geophysics Research Ocean, 104, 11515–11527. https://doi.org/10.1029/98JC02373
SCATSAT-1 DPT SCATSAT-1 Level 4 Data Products Format Document. Scatsat-1 Data Product Team. Scientific Report No. SC1/DP/L4FORMAT-DOC/V1.1/JUL2017. Ahmedabad.
Small, D. (2011). Flattening gamma: Radiometric terrain correction for SAR imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 49, 3081–3093.
Teleti, P. R., & Luis, A. J. (2013). Sea ice observations in polar regions: Evolution of technologies in remote sensing. International Journal of Geosciences, 04, 1031–1050. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2013.47097
Turner, J., & Overland, J. (2009). Contrasting climate change in the two polar regions. Polar Research, 28, 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-8369.2009.00128.x
Ulaby, F. T., Long, D., Blackwell, W., et al. (2014). Microwave radar and radiometric remote sensing. University of Michigan Press.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Director, PDPU and Director, Space Applications Centre (SAC), ISRO for giving the opportunity and providing the data sets. We would also like to thank Deputy Director, EPSA for his inspiration and guidance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Upadhyay, K., Tripathi, N., Vachharajani, B. et al. Deriving Sea Ice Images from Super Resolution SCATSAT-1 Data over the Antarctic: Operational Method and Accuracy Assessment. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 49, 2575–2581 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-021-01412-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-021-01412-8