skip to main content
research-article

One-Way Delay Measurement From Traditional Networks to SDN: A Survey

Published:18 July 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We expose the state of the art in the topic of one-way delay measurement in both traditional and software-defined networks. A representative range of standard mechanisms and recent research works, including OpenFlow and Programming Protocol-independent Packet Processors (P4)-based schemes, are covered. We classify them, discuss their advantages and drawbacks, and compare them according to their application environment, accuracy, cost, and robustness. The discussion extends to the reuse of traditional schemes in software-defined networks and the benefits and limitations of the latter with respect to reducing the overhead of network wide measurements. We conclude with a summary of learned lessons and open challenges for future work.

References

  1. Ian F. Akyildiz, Ahyoung Lee, Pu Wang, Min Luo, and Wu Chou. 2016. Research challenges for traffic engineering in software defined networks. IEEE Network 30, 3 (2016), 52–58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Rasool Al-Saadi, Grenville Armitage, Jason But, and Philip Branch. 2019. A survey of delay-based and hybrid TCP congestion control algorithms. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 21, 4 (2019), 3609–3638.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Guy Almes, Sunil Kalidindi, Matthew Zekauskas, and Al Morton. 2016. A One-Way Delay Metric for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM). RFC 7679. IETF. https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC7679Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. V. Altukhov and E. Chemeritskiy. 2014. On real-time delay monitoring in software-defined networks. In Proceedings of IEEE MoNeTeC 2014. 1–6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Brice Augustin, Timur Friedman, and Renata Teixeira. 2010. Measuring multipath routing in the Internet. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 19, 3 (2010), 830–840.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Francois Baccelli, Sridhar Machiraju, Darryl Veitch, and Jean C. Bolot. 2007. On optimal probing for delay and loss measurement. In Proceedings of ACM IMC 2007. 291–302.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Vaibhav Bajpai and Jürgen Schönwälder. 2015. A survey on Internet performance measurement platforms and related standardization efforts. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 17, 3 (2015), 1313–1341.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ran Ben Basat, Sivaramakrishnan Ramanathan, Yuliang Li, Gianni Antichi, Minian Yu, and Michael Mitzenmacher. 2020. PINT: Probabilistic in-band network telemetry. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference. 662–680.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Pankaj Berde, Matteo Gerola, Jonathan Hart, Yuta Higuchi, Masayoshi Kobayashi, Toshio Koide, Bob Lantz, et al. 2014. ONOS: Towards an open, distributed SDN OS. In Proceedings of ACM HotSDN 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Martin Bjorklund. 2010. YANG—A Data Modeling Language for the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF). RFC 6020. IETF. https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC6020Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Burton H. Bloom. 1970. Space/time trade-offs in hash coding with allowable errors. Communications of the ACM 13, 7 (1970), 422–426.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jean-Chrysotome Bolot. 1993. End-to-end packet delay and loss behavior in the Internet. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference. 289–298.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Pat Bosshart, Dan Daly, Glen Gibb, Martin Izzard, Nick McKeown, Jennifer Rexford, Cole Schlesinger, et al. 2014. P4: Programming protocol-independent packet processors. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 44, 3 (2014), 87–95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. C. J. Bovy, H. T. Mertodimedjo, Gerard Hooghiemstra, Henk Uijterwaal, and Piet Van Mieghem. 2002. Analysis of end-to-end delay measurements in Internet. In Proceedings of the PAM Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Djalel Chefrour. 2021. “Evolution of Network Time Synchronization Towards Nanoseconds Accuracy: A Survey.” Manuscript submitted for publication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Stuart Cheshire. 1996. Latency and the quest for interactivity. In White Paper commissioned by Volpe Welty Asset Management, LLC, for the Synchronous Person-to-Person Interactive Computing Environments Meeting.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jin-Hee Choi and Chuck Yoo. 2005. One-way delay estimation and its application. Computer Communications 28, 7 (2005), 819–828.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Cisco. 2012. Introduction to Cisco IOS NetFlow—A Technical Overview. White Paper (last updated May 2012). Cisco.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Cisco. 2018. IP SLAs Overview. Retrieved January 05, 2021 from https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipsla/configuration/15-s/sla-15-s-book/sla_overview.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Alexander Clemm and Eric Voit. 2019. Subscription to YANG Notifications for Datastore Updates. RFC 8641. IETF. https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC8641Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Corvil. 2020. Corvil Appliances. Retrieved June 30, 2020 from https://www.pico.net/corvil-analytics/corvil-classic/corvil-appliances.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Huynh Tu Dang, Han Wang, Theo Jepsen, Gordon Brebner, Changhoon Kim, Jennifer Rexford, Robert Soulé, and Hakim Weatherspoon. 2017. Whippersnapper: A P4 language benchmark suite. In Proceedings of ACM SOSR 2017. 95–101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Luca De Vito, Sergio Rapuano, and Laura Tomaciello. 2008. One-way delay measurement: State of the art. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 57, 12 (2008), 2742–2750.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Stephen Donnelly, Ian Graham, and René Wilhelm. 2001. Passive calibration of an active measurement system. In Proceedings of the PAM Conference. 1–8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. John Eidson and Kang Lee. 2002. IEEE 1588 standard for a precision clock synchronization protocol for networked measurement and control systems. In Proceedings of the 2nd ISA/IEEE Sensors for Industry Conference, Vol. 10. 98–105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Rob Enns, Martin Bjorklund, Andy Bierman, and J. Schoenwaelder. 2011. Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF). RFC 6241. IETF. https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC6241Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Nick Feamster, Jennifer Rexford, and Ellen Zegura. 2013. The road to SDN. ACM Queue 11, 12 (2013), 20–40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Yu Feng, Yue Pan, Bo Zhu, Yuchuan Deng, Jing Wu, and Hao Jiang. 2019. A new framework for network flow queuing delay prediction based on stream computing. In Proceedings of the IEEE 5th BigDataSecurity, HPSC, and IDS Conference. 212–217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Paolo Ferrari, Alessandra Flammini, Emiliano Sisinni, Stefano Rinaldi, Dennis Brandão, and Murilo Silveira Rocha. 2018. Delay estimation of Industrial IoT applications based on messaging protocols. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 67 (2018), 2188–2199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Giuseppe Fioccola, Alessandro Capello, Mauro Cociglio, Luca Castaldelli, Mach Chen, Lianshu Zheng, Greg Mirsky, and Tal Mizrahi. 2018. Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance Monitoring. RFC 8321. IETF. https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC8321Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Jim Gettys and Kathleen Nichols. 2011. Bufferbloat: Dark buffers in the Internet. ACM Queue 9, 11 (2011), 40–54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Ian D. Graham, Stephen Donnelly, Julie Martin, and John G. Cleary. 1998. Nonintrusive and accurate measurement of unidirectional delay and delay variation on the Internet. In Proceedings of INET 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Omer Gurewitz, Israel Cidon, and Moshe Sidi. 2006. One-way delay estimation using network-wide measurements. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 52, 6 (2006), 2710–2724.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Taimur Hafeez, Nadeem Ahmed, Bilal Ahmed, and Asad Waqar Malik. 2017. Detection and mitigation of congestion in SDN enabled data center networks: A survey. IEEE Access 6 (2017), 1730–1740.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Hasanin Harkous, Michael Jarschel, Mu He, Rastin Pries, and Wolfgang Kellerer. 2020. P8: P4 with predictable packet processing performance. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management. Early access, October 12, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Stephen Hemminger. 2005. Network emulation with NetEm. In Proceedings of LCA 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Christian Henke, Carsten Schmoll, and Tanja Zseby. 2008. Empirical evaluation of hash functions for multipoint measurements. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 38, 3 (2008), 39–50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Mukesh Hira and L. J. Wobker. 2015. Improving Network Monitoring and Management with Programmable Data Planes. Retrieved June 28, 2021 from https://opennetworking.org/news-and-events/blog/improving-network-monitoring-and-management-with-programmable-data-planes/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Internet2. 2016. One-Way Ping (OWAMP). Retrieved June 12, 2020 from http://software.internet2.edu/owamp/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Manar Jammal, Taranpreet Singh, Abdallah Shami, Rasool Asal, and Yiming Li. 2014. Software defined networking: State of the art and research challenges. Computer Networks 72 (2014), 74–98.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Sunil Kalidindi, Matthew Zekauskas, and Guy Almes. 1999. A One-Way Delay Metric for IPPM. RFC 2679. IETF. https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC2679Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Sunil Kalidindi and Matthew J. Zekauskas. 1999. Surveyor: An infrastructure for internet performance measurements. In Proceedings of INET 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Murat Karakus and Arjan Durresi. 2017. Quality of Service (QoS) in software defined networking (SDN): A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 80 (2017), 200–218.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Jochen Kögel. 2011. One-way delay measurement based on flow data: Quantification and compensation of errors by exporter profiling. In Proceedings of IEEE ICOIN 2011. 25–30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Ramana Kompella, Kirill Levchenko, Alex C. Snoeren, and George Varghese. 2009. Every microsecond counts: Tracking fine-grain latencies with a lossy difference aggregator. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 39, 4 (2009), 255–266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Diego Kreutz, Fernando M. V. Ramos, Paulo Esteves Veríssimo, Christian Esteve Rothenberg, Siamak Azodolmolky, and Steve Uhlig. 2014. Software-defined networking: A comprehensive survey. Proceedings of the IEEE 103, 1 (2014), 14–76.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Gautam Kumar, Nandita Dukkipati, Keon Jang, Hassan M. G. Wassel, Xian Wu, Behnam Montazeri, Yaogong Wang, et al. 2020. Swift: Delay is simple and effective for congestion control in the datacenter. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference. 514–528.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. James F. Kurose and Keith W. Ross. 2012. End-to-end delay. In Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach (6th ed.). Pearson, 42–43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Myungjin Lee, Nick Duffield, and Ramana Ella. 2012. MAPLE: A scalable architecture for maintaining packet latency measurements. In Proceedings of ACM IMC2012. 101–114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Myungjin Lee, Nick Duffield, and Ramana Kompella. 2010. Not all microseconds are equal: Fine-grained per-flow measurements with reference latency interpolation. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference. 27–38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Myungjin Lee, Nick Duffield, and Ramana Kompella. 2010. Two samples are enough: Opportunistic flow-level latency estimation using netflow. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2010. 1–9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Myungjin Lee, Sharon Goldberg, Ramana Kompella, and George Varghese. 2011. Fine-grained latency and loss measurements in the presence of reordering. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMETRICS Conference. 329–340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Young Lee, Ricard Vilalta, Ramon Casellas, Ricardo Martínez, and Raul Muñoz. 2017. Scalable telemetry and network autonomics in ACTN SDN controller hierarchy. In Proceedings of IEEE ICTON 2017. 1–4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Lingxia Liao and Victor C. M. Leung. 2016. LLDP based link latency monitoring in software defined networks. In Proceedings of IEEE CNSM 2016. 330–335.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Lingxia Liao, Victor C. M. Leung, and Min Chen. 2018. An efficient and accurate link latency monitoring method for low-latency software-defined networks. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 68, 2 (2018), 377–391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. László Lovász. 1993. Random walks on graphs: A survey. Combinatorics, Paul Erdos Is Eighty 2, 1 (1993), 1–46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Wei-Zhou Lu, Wei-Xuan Gu, and Shun-Zheng Yu. 2009. One-way queuing delay measurement and its application on detecting DDoS attack. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 32, 2 (2009), 367–376.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Jan Medved, Robert Varga, Anton Tkacik, and Ken Gray. 2014. OpenDaylight: Towards a model-driven SDN controller architecture. In Proceedings of IEEE WoWMoM 2014. 1–6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Mininet Team. 2018. Mininet: An Instant Virtual Network on Your Laptop (or Other PC). Retrieved July 14, 2020 from http://mininet.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Tal Mizrahi and Yoram Moses. 2016. The Case for Data Plane Timestamping in SDN. Technical Report. Technion. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1602.03342v1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Tal Mizrahi and Yoram Moses. 2016. Time Capability in NETCONF. RFC 7758. IETF. https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC7758Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Maurizio Molina, Fredric Raspall, Saverio Niccolini, Nick Duffield, and Tanja Zseby. 2009. Sampling and Filtering Techniques for IP Packet Selection. RFC 5475. IETF. https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC5475Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Srinivas Narayana, Anirudh Sivaraman, Vikram Nathan, Prateesh Goyal, Venkat Arun, Mohammad Alizadeh, Vimalkumar Jeyakumar, and Changhoon Kim. 2017. Language-directed hardware design for network performance monitoring. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference. 85–98.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Huu-Nghi Nguyen, Thomas Begin, Anthony Busson, and Isabelle Guérin Lassous. 2016. Evaluation of an end-to-end delay estimation in the case of multiple flows in SDN networks. In Proceedings of IEEE CNSM 2016. 336–341.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Kathleen Nichols and Van Jacobson. 2012. Controlling queue delay. Communications of the ACM 55, 7 (2012), 42–50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Anne-Cécile Orgerie, Paulo Gonçalves, Matthieu Imbert, Julien Ridoux, and Darryl Veitch. 2012. Survey of network metrology platforms. In Proceedings of IEEE/IPSJ SAINT 2012. 220–225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Abhinav Pathak, Himabindu Pucha, Ying Zhang, Y. Charlie Hu, and Z. Morley Mao. 2008. A measurement study of internet delay asymmetry. In Proceedings of the PAM Conference. 182–191.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Kevin Phemius and Mathieu Bouet. 2013. Monitoring latency with OpenFlow. In Proceedings of IEEE CNSM 2013. 122–125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Sivaramakrishnan Ramanathan, Yaron Kanza, and Balachander Krishnamurthy. 2018. SDProber: A software defined prober for SDN. In Proceedings of ACM SOSR 2018. 1–7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Alon Riesenberg, Yonnie Kirzon, Michael Bunin, Elad Galili, Gidi Navon, and Tal Mizrahi. 2019. Time-multiplexed parsing in marking-based network telemetry. In Proceedings of ACM SYSTOR 2019. 80–85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Elisa Rojas, Roberto Doriguzzi-Corin, Sergio Tamurejo, Andres Beato, Arne Schwabe, Kevin Phemius, and Carmen Guerrero. 2018. Are we ready to drive software-defined networks? A comprehensive survey on management tools and techniques. ACM Computing Surveys 51, 2 (2018), 1–35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Charalampos Rotsos, Nadi Sarrar, Steve Uhlig, Rob Sherwood, and Andrew W. Moore. 2012. OFLOPS: An open framework for OpenFlow switch evaluation. In Proceedings of the PAM Conference. 85–95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Josep Sanjuàs-Cuxart, Pere Barlet-Ros, Nick G. Duffield, and Ramana Kompella. 2011. Sketching the delay: Tracking Temporally uncorrelated flow-level latencies. In Proceedings of ACM IMC 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Yaron Schwartz, Yuval Shavitt, and Udi Weinsberg. 2010. A measurement study of the origins of end-to-end delay variations. In Proceedings of the PAM Conference. 21–30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Muhammad Shahzad and Alex X. Liu. 2014. Noise can help: Accurate and efficient per-flow latency measurement without packet probing and time stamping. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review 42, 1 (2014), 207–219.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Stanislav Shalunov, Greg Hazel, Jana Iyengar, and Mirja Kuehlewind. 2012. Low Extra Delay Background Transport (LEDBAT). RFC 6817. IETF. https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC6817Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Minsu Shin, Mankyu Park, Deockgil Oh, Byungchul Kim, and Jaeyong Lee. 2011. Clock synchronization for one-way delay measurement: A survey. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Communication and Networking. 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. Zhaogang Shu, Jiafu Wan, Jiaxiang Lin, Shiyong Wang, Di Li, Seungmin Rho, and Changcai Yang. 2016. Traffic engineering in software-defined networking: Measurement and management. IEEE Access 4 (2016), 3246–3256.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Debanshu Sinha, K. Haribabu, and Sundar Balasubramaniam. 2015. Real-time monitoring of network latency in software defined networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE ANTS Conference. 1–3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. Peerapon Siripongwutikorn and Sujata Banerjee. 2002. Per-flow delay performance in traffic aggregates. In Proceedings of IEEE GLOBECOM 2002, Vol. 3. 2634–2638.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. Joel Sommers, Paul Barford, Nick Duffield, and Amos Ron. 2007. Accurate and efficient SLA compliance monitoring. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference. 109–120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Philipp Svoboda, Markus Laner, Joachim Fabini, Markus Rupp, and Fabio Ricciato. 2012. Packet delay measurements in reactive IP networks. IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine 15, 6 (2012), 36–44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. The Open Networking Foundation. 2015. OpenFlow Switch Specification, Version 1.5.1. Retrieved July 2, 2020 from https://www.opennetworking.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/openflow-switch-v1.5.1.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. The OpenConfig Operators Group. 2015. OpenConfig Repository. Retrieved January 8, 2021 from https://github.com/openconfig/public.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. The OpenConfig Operators Group. 2018. gNMI—gRPC Network Management Interface, Version: 0.6.0. Retrieved January 8, 2021 from https://github.com/openconfig/reference/tree/master/rpc/gnmi.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Amin Tootoonchian, Sergey Gorbunov, Yashar Ganjali, Martin Casado, and Rob Sherwood. 2012. On controller performance in software-defined networks. In Proceedings of USENIX Hot-ICE 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Pang-Wei Tsai, Chun-Wei Tsai, Chia-Wei Hsu, and Chu-Sing Yang. 2018. Network monitoring in software-defined networking: A review. IEEE Systems Journal 12, 4 (2018), 3958–3969.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  88. Ahmad Vakili and Jean-Charles Gregoire. 2012. Accurate one-way delay estimation: Limitations and improvements. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 61, 9 (2012), 2428–2435.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  89. Niels L. M. Van Adrichem, Christian Doerr, and Fernando A. Kuipers. 2014. OpenNetNon: Network monitoring in openflow software-defined networks. In Proceedings of IEEE NOMS. 1–8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. Darryl Veitch, Julien Ridoux, and Satish Babu Korada. 2008. Robust synchronization of absolute and difference clocks over networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 17, 2 (2008), 417–430.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. Junfeng Wang, Mingtian Zhou, and Yuxia Li. 2004. Survey on the end-to-end Internet delay measurements. In Proceedings of HSNMC 2004. 155–166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  92. Abdulsalam Yassine, Hesam Rahimi, and Shervin Shirmohammadi. 2015. Software defined network traffic measurement: Current trends and challenges. IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine 18, 2 (2015), 42–50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  93. Curtis Yu, Cristian Lumezanu, Abhishek Sharma, Qiang Xu, Guofei Jiang, and Harsha V. Madhyastha. 2015. Software-defined latency monitoring in data center networks. In Proceedings of the PAM Conference. 360–372.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. Matthew Zekauskas, Anatoly Karp, Stanislav Shalunov, Jeff Boote, and Benjamin Teitelbaum. 2006. A One-Way Active Measurement Protocol (OWAMP). RFC 4656. IETF. https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC4656Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  95. Ting Zhang and Bin Liu. 2019. Exposing end-to-end delay in software-defined networking. International Journal of Reconfigurable Computing 2019 (2019), 7363901.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  96. Yusu Zhao, Pengfei Zhang, and Yaohui Jin. 2016. Netography: Troubleshoot your network with packet behavior in SDN. In Proceedings of IEEE NOMS 2016. 878–882.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  97. Tanja Zseby and Florian Schreiner. 2002. QoS Monitoring and Measurement Benchmarking. Research Report. Fraunhofer FOKUS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. Tanja Zseby, Sebastian Zander, and Georg Carle. 2001. Evaluation of building blocks for passive one-way-delay measurements. In Proceedings of the PAM Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. One-Way Delay Measurement From Traditional Networks to SDN: A Survey

                    Recommendations

                    Comments

                    Login options

                    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                    Sign in

                    Full Access

                    • Published in

                      cover image ACM Computing Surveys
                      ACM Computing Surveys  Volume 54, Issue 7
                      September 2022
                      778 pages
                      ISSN:0360-0300
                      EISSN:1557-7341
                      DOI:10.1145/3476825
                      Issue’s Table of Contents

                      Copyright © 2021 ACM

                      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                      Publisher

                      Association for Computing Machinery

                      New York, NY, United States

                      Publication History

                      • Published: 18 July 2021
                      • Accepted: 1 May 2021
                      • Revised: 1 January 2021
                      • Received: 1 August 2020
                      Published in csur Volume 54, Issue 7

                      Permissions

                      Request permissions about this article.

                      Request Permissions

                      Check for updates

                      Qualifiers

                      • research-article
                      • Research
                      • Refereed

                    PDF Format

                    View or Download as a PDF file.

                    PDF

                    eReader

                    View online with eReader.

                    eReader

                    HTML Format

                    View this article in HTML Format .

                    View HTML Format