Skip to main content
Log in

Extended early meets late for assessment of conduction block along an ablation line

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to investigate the usefulness of the extended early meets late (EEML) feature of the HD Coloring software for confirmation of bidirectional block along an ablation line.

Methods

A single-center prospective observational study of consecutive patients with atypical atrial flutter or persistent atrial fibrillation submitted to catheter ablation including linear lesions from January 2019 to June 2020, with confirmation of bidirectional block across ablation lines assessed with the feature EEML and a multipolar catheter was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups — those with versus those without bidirectional block — and different EEML thresholds were analyzed to assess which one had the better sensitivity and specificity to predict block.

Results

During the 24-month enrollment period, a total of 94 patients were included (50% males, mean age of 64 ± 10 years, 60% with structural heart disease) — 55 patients with versus 39 patients without confirmed a bidirectional block. Activation maps were performed during atrial pacing, with a median number of 1340 (interquartile range 1135–2060) points acquired in 11 ± 3 min, and a mean mapped cycle length of 287 ± 51 ms. The EEML feature was highly useful in detecting bidirectional block along ablation lines, with a 25% threshold value showing the highest discriminative performance (area under the curve of 0.93), 95% sensitivity and 92% specificity in predicting block.

Conclusions

The EEML feature of the HD Coloring software is a useful addition to the CARTO mapping system for assessment of block across an ablation line. The threshold value of 25% is the most accurate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hamoud NS, Abrich VA, Shen WK, Mulpuru SK, Srivathsan K. Achieving durable mitral isthmus block: Challenges, pitfalls, and methods of assessment. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30:1679–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Goyal R, Markowitz SM, Cheung JW, Lerman BB. Diagnosing pseudo-conduction block across an anteromedial mitral ablation line: Limitations of bidirectional and differential pacing. Heart Rhythm Case Reports. 2020;6:29–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sousa PA, Barra S, António N, Gonçalves L. HD Coloring for assessment of block along an ablation line. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30(9):1692–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sousa PA, Barra S, Elvas L, Gonçalves L. HD Coloring for atypical flutter after mitral valve repair: what’s the mechanism? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020;31(1):252–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Asferg C, Chen X, Pehrson S, Jabocsen PK, et al. Catheter ablation of atypical flutter using new 3-dimensional electroanatomical mapping software focusing on areas of conduction block. Heart Rhythm Case Reports. 2019;5:225–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shah D, Haissaguerre M, Takahashi A, Jais P, Hocini M, Clémenty J. Differential pacing for distinguishing block from persistent conduction through an ablation line. Circulation. 2000;102:1517–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shah AJ, Pascale P, Miyazaki S, Liu X, Roten L, Derval N, et al. Prevalence and types of pitfall in the assessment of mitral isthmus linear conduction block. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012;5:957–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tada H, Oral H, Sticherling C, Chough SP, Baker RL, Wasmer K, et al. Double potentials along the ablation line as a guide to radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter. JACC. 2001;38(3):750–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Issa ZF, Miller JM, Zipes DP. Clinical arrhythmology and electrophysiology: a companion to Braunwald’s heart disease. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wong KC, Betts TR. A review of mitral isthmus ablation. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2012;12(4):152–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hocini M, Jais P, Sanders P, Takahashi Y, Rotter M, Rostock T, et al. Techniques, evaluation and consequences of linear block at the left atrial roof in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized study. Circulation. 2005;112(24):3688–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cosio FG, Lopez-Gil M, Giocolea A, Arribas F, Barros JL. Radiofrequency ablation of the inferior vena cava tricuspid valve isthmus in common atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol. 1993;71:705–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mikhaylov EN, Mitrofanova LB, Vander MA, Tatarskiy RM, Kamenev AV, Abramov ML, et al. Biatrial tachycardia following linear anterior wall ablation for the perimitral reentry: incidence and electrophysiological evaluations. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26:28–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hügl B, Butcher B, Doneva Z, Geissler A, Sell L, Tso T, et al. Combined use of a high-density multi-electrode mapping catheter and a magnetically navigated ablation catheter for atrial fibrillation procedures: a feasibility study. J Innov Cardiac Rhythm Manag. 2016;7:2413–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chae S, Oral H, Good E, Dey S, Wimmer A, Crawford T, et al. Atrial tachycardia after circumferential pulmonary vein ablation of atrial fibrillation: mechanistic insights, results of catheter ablation, and risk factors for recurrence. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:1781–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sang C, Jiang C, Dong J, Liu X, Yu R, Long D, et al. A new method to evaluate linear block at the left atrial roof: is it reliable without pacing? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21:741–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jais P, Hocini M, O’Neil MD, Klein GJ, Knecht S, Sheiiro M, et al. How to perform linear lesions. Heart Rhythm. 2007;4:803–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Markowitz SM, Thomas G, Liu CF, Cheung JW, Ip JE, Lerman BB. Approach to catheter ablation of left atrial flutters. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30:3057–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huemer M, Wutzler A, Parwani AS, Attanasio P, Heiderfazel S, Ewertsen NC, et al. Left atrial appendage conduction jump for real-time evaluation of conduction block over the anterior mitral annulus line. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26:730–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Morgan JM, Haywood G, Schirdewan A, Brugada P, Geelen P, Meyerfeldt U, et al. “Double” potentials define linear lesion conduction block using a novel mapping/linear lesion ablation catheter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003;14:236–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro A. Sousa.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee.

Conflict of interest

PAS has received speaker fees from Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and St. Jude Abbott. SB received training grants from Biosense Webster and Biotronik. Ms Catarina Sousa is an employee of Biosense Webster. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 920 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sousa, P.A., Barra, S., Puga, L. et al. Extended early meets late for assessment of conduction block along an ablation line. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 63, 431–440 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-021-01036-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-021-01036-5

Keywords

Navigation