Elsevier

Vacuum

Volume 192, October 2021, 110460
Vacuum

Short communication
UFSW tool pin profile effects on properties of aluminium-steel joint

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2021.110460Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Effects of dissimilar underwater FSW tool pin profiles were studied on aluminum-steel joints.

  • Relation between FSW tool pin profile and mechanical properties of AA5182 alloy and St-12 steel dissimilar joint evaluated.

  • Thermal history, microstructure analysis, Intermetallic compounds, and hardness of joint lines were assessed.

Abstract

Effects of underwater friction stir welding tool pin profiles were studied on mechanical properties of AA5182 alloy and St-12 steel dissimilar joint. For this purpose, frustum, triangle, cubic, and hexagonal pin profiles were selected. Thermal history, microstructure analysis, tensile strength, and hardness of joint lines were assessed. The obtained results indicated that due to the high cooling rate of water environment conditions, the presence of edges in the tool pin shape (triangle, cubic, and hexagonal) improves internal material flow. Also, edged pin profiles increase the generation of frictional heat, the thickness of Intermetallic Compounds (IMC), and mechanical interlocking at base materials' interface. The hexagonal pin profile had the most significant favourable influence on the aluminium-steel joint properties among selected tool profiles. The chemical composition of IMCs at the materials interface was FeAl3 and Fe2Al5, and the thickest IMC was formed near 6.5 μm. According to the results, the joint's highest tensile strength was ~69% of aluminium alloy strength, which was obtained with a hexagonal pin profile.

Introduction

Hybrid structures are great opportunities to industries for production low weight constructions with tailored dissimilar material properties and high efficiency [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]]. Manufacturing and repair of dissimilar structures at water environments have nonetheless remained challenging, mostly with respect to welding and joining technologies [[7], [8], [9], [10]]. Herein, low-energy, mutable and simple welding methods with advanced traits applicable under different environments are required [[11], [12], [13], [14], [15]]. Friction stir welding (FSW) is relatively new process for the production of hybrid structures. Among various dissimilar joints, FSW of aluminium (Al)-steel (St) structures is very challenging owing to the sensitivity of mechanical properties affected by intermetallic compounds (IMC) at base metals interface [[16], [17], [18]]. Many researches have been performed on FSW of Al-St joints, aiming to optimize of IMC chemical composition and thickness formation through controlling the FSW parameters (at air cooling condition) [19]. Underwater (submerged) FSW is a newly developed process for the fabrication of Al/steel structures in marine environments for control of cooling rate and IMC as a pre-processing condition [20]. Also a few researches show the water environment significantly affects microstructural features and mechanical strength that presents below:

Zhang and Liu demonstrated with optimum underwater friction stir welding (UFSW) parameter, the AA2219 aluminium alloy tensile strength reached 80% of base material and the hardness of stir zone (SZ) has also improved [21,22]. Sabari et al. [23,24] indicated by optimizing of the UFSW parameters, the size of the thermo-mechanical affected zone (TMAZ) and heat affected zone (HAZ) could be minimized in AA2519-T87 aluminium joint. Heirani et al. [25] studied UFSW of Al5083 alloy joint, and showed at UFSW condition, the final joint has higher tensile strength and hardness compared with air-processed FSW joints. Liang et al. [26] proved that strength of UFSWed AA7055 aluminium affected by the change of water temperature. Using high UFSW tool rotational speeds at warm water, AA7055 aluminium alloy joint strength could be improved significantly compared with cold and room temperature water [27,28]. Papahn et al. [29] UFSWed AA7075-T6 alloy sheets and showed that the maximum heat in joint line decreased (near 40%) compare with conventional FSW. They reported UFSW joints were more brittle with higher tensile strength due to the higher cooling rates of water compare air cooling condition. Tan et al. [30] showed that the size of recrystallized grains and the amount of second-phase particles in the SZ was reduced with decreasing the temperature water during UFSW of AA3003 aluminium alloy. Due to available literature, seems UFSW of dissimilar materials are more challenging than similar joints. Zhao et al. [31,32] reported UFSWed AA6013/AZ31 joints strength (~152 MPa) improves 21 MPa compare air-processed FSW specimens with a strength of 131 MPa. They also reported that the formation of Mg2Al3 and Mg17Al12 at the interface of UFSW joint and detected on the fracture surface investigation. Zhang et al. [33] reported the Al–Cu intermetallic compounds thickness could be reduced under UFSW condition. Mahto et al. [34] shown the thickness of IMC at the interface of AA6061-T6 aluminium alloy and AISI 304 steel FSWed joint decreased from 9.5 μm to 0.5 μm in UFSWed sample. The strength of the UFSWed joint revealed improvement due to the formation of finer grains structure in the weld zone compared to FSW condition. Aghajani derazkola and khodabakhshi [18] investigated UFSW of Al–Mg aluminium alloy and A441 AISI steel under various water mediums temperatures. They reported maximum tensile strength (~310 MPa) and elongation (~13%) produced at the room temperature cooling medium.

Limited literatures have been considered effects of UFSW pin profile parameters on Al/steel joints. The aim of this article is to evaluate the mechanical properties and microstructural features of UFSW dissimilar joints between AA5182 aluminium alloy and St-12 steel. The obtained results may pave a way to implement this process for the fabrication of lightweight aluminium/steel hybrid structures.

Section snippets

Experimental procedure

4 × 200 × 150 mm3 pieces cut by using a universal sawing machine from AA5182 aluminum alloy and St-12 steel sheets. The chemical compositions and mechanical properties of raw materials are presented in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively. During the welding procedure, aluminum alloys placed in advancing side (AS) and steel placed in retreating side (RS). A Plexiglas surrounded setup, installed on a high energy milling machine (FP4M, Tabriz, Iran) to implementation of UFSW process. One inlet and

Thermal history

Temperature analysis gives useful information about understanding relationships with UFSW and FSW parameters to material flow and defect formations [[35], [36], [37], [38]]. For this reason, the recorded temperature during UFSW of base materials was analyzed in terms of tool pin profiles.

As a sample, the recorded temperature during UFSW with FPT is shown in Fig. 2a. The obtained results indicated that the generated heat on the steel side is more than the aluminum side. The higher shear strength

Conclusions

The effects of UFSW tool pin profiles on mechanical and metallurgical properties of the aluminum-steel joints were assessed. The knowledge has been useful in expanding the applicability of UFSW tools to the production of new engineering structures. The obtained results presented below:

  • 1

    The more edged pin improves internal plastic deformation, which leads to better internal flow in SZ, while surface materials flow of all joints almost the same. The HPT had optimum internal flow compared to other

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (61)

  • F. Heirani et al.

    Effects of processing parameters on microstructure and mechanical behaviors of underwater friction stir welding of Al5083 alloy

    J. Manuf. Process.

    (2017)
  • Q. Wang et al.

    The adjustment strategy of welding parameters for spray formed 7055 aluminum alloy underwater friction stir welding joint

    Mater. Des.

    (2015)
  • Y.B. Tan et al.

    A study on microstructure and mechanical properties of AA 3003 aluminum alloy joints by underwater friction stir welding

    Mater. Char.

    (2017)
  • Y. Zhao et al.

    Microstructural characterizations and mechanical properties in underwater friction stir welding of aluminum and magnesium dissimilar alloys

    Mater. Des.

    (2015)
  • J. Zhang et al.

    Investigation on dissimilar underwater friction stir lap welding of 6061-T6 aluminum alloy to pure copper

    Mater. Des.

    (2014)
  • R.P. Mahto et al.

    Weldability of AA6061-T6 and AISI 304 by underwater friction stir welding

    J. Manuf. Process.

    (2019)
  • B. Das et al.

    Defect detection in friction stir welding process through characterization of signals by fractal dimension

    Manuf Lett

    (2016)
  • S.F. Miller

    New friction stir techniques for dissimilar materials processing

    Manuf Lett

    (2013)
  • F. Gagliardi et al.

    Investigation of friction stir forming for mechanical interlocking high-performance polymers and aluminium sheets

    Manuf Lett

    (2021)
  • H. Aghajani Derazkola et al.

    Effects of friction stir welding tool tilt angle on properties of Al-Mg-Si alloy T-joint

    CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol

    (2021)
  • H.A. Derazkola et al.

    Development of fed friction-stir (FFS) process for dissimilar nanocomposite welding between AA2024 aluminum alloy and polycarbonate (PC)

    J. Manuf. Process.

    (2020)
  • M.-S. Chen et al.

    Modeling and simulation of dynamic recrystallization behavior for 42CrMo steel by an extended cellular automaton method

    Vacuum

    (2017)
  • K.S. Ashraff Ali et al.

    Modified Friction Stir Clinching of AA5754-O to AA6061-T6: the role of shoulder feature on the metallurgical and mechanical properties

    Vacuum

    (2021)
  • X. Chen et al.

    Effect of friction stir processing on microstructure and tensile properties of as-cast Mg–8Li–3Al–2Sn (wt.%) alloy

    Vacuum

    (2020)
  • T.A. Shehabeldeen et al.

    Improvement of microstructure and mechanical properties of dissimilar friction stir welded aluminum/titanium joints via aluminum oxide nanopowder

    Vacuum

    (2021)
  • H.A. Derazkola et al.

    Evaluation of a polymer-steel laminated sheet composite structure produced by friction stir additive manufacturing (FSAM) technology

    Polym. Test.

    (2020)
  • H. Aghajani Derazkola et al.

    Friction-forging tubular additive manufacturing (FFTAM): a new route of solid-state layer-upon-layer metal deposition

    J Mater Res Technol

    (2020)
  • H. Shan et al.

    Friction stir riveting (FSR) of AA6061-T6 aluminum alloy and DP600 steel

    J. Mater. Process. Technol.

    (2021)
  • M.M. Abd Elnabi et al.

    Evaluation of the formation of intermetallic compounds at the intermixing lines and in the nugget of dissimilar steel/aluminum friction stir welds

    J Mater Res Technol

    (2020)
  • A. Kar et al.

    Elucidation of interfacial microstructure and properties in friction stir lap welding of aluminium alloy and mild steel

    Mater. Char.

    (2020)
  • Cited by (37)

    • Dissimilar welding of aluminium to steel: A review

      2024, Journal of Manufacturing Processes
    • Multiphase CFD simulation and experimental investigation of friction stir welded high strength shipbuilding steel and aluminum alloy

      2022, CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Apart from the numerical modeling, the researchers conducted an experimental study on the FSW of different grades of steel and Al alloys, such as 6061-T6 Al/TRIP steel [31,32], commercially pure Al/304 stainless steel [33], A6061 Al/SS400 steel [34], 5052-H32 Al/DP1200 steel [35], 5186 Al/mild steel [36], 1100 Al/St37 steel [37], A5754 Al/DX54 steel [38], AA1100 Al/A441 AISI steel [8,39], AA5182 Al/St-12 steel [40], AA5083 Al/A441 AISI steel [41], and AA3003 Al/A441 AISI steel [42]. Mostly, the researchers were focused on the optimization of welding parameters, such as rotational speed [8,31,33,34,47], welding speed [8,34,36,37], tool offset [3,8,31], tool tilt angle [39], and tool geometry [32,36,40] on the material and mechanical characterization of the joints. Experimental methods, such as the particle image velocimetry (PIV) technique [43] and X-ray radiography [44] were used to find the material flow movement during the FSW process.

    • Experimental investigation of joining aluminum alloy sheets by stepped mechanical clinching

      2022, Journal of Materials Research and Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In contrast to welding technology, the conventional clinching process joins sheets without chemical reactions. The defect that the mechanical properties of welded joints are very sensitive to the influence of intermetallic compounds at the base metal interface is overcome [33]. The clinching process using a stepped punch (for the sake of simplicity, the process is referred to as SCP below) has the identical basic principles as the conventional clinching process using a round or rectangular punch.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text