Skip to main content
Log in

Pump efficacy in a two-dimensional, fluid–structure interaction model of a chain of contracting lymphangions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The transport of lymph through the lymphatic vasculature is the mechanism for returning excess interstitial fluid to the circulatory system, and it is essential for fluid homeostasis. Collecting lymphatic vessels comprise a significant portion of the lymphatic vasculature and are divided by valves into contractile segments known as lymphangions. Despite its importance, lymphatic transport in collecting vessels is not well understood. We present a computational model to study lymph flow through chains of valved, contracting lymphangions. We used the Navier–Stokes equations to model the fluid flow and the immersed boundary method to handle the two-way, fluid–structure interaction in 2D, non-axisymmetric simulations. We used our model to evaluate the effects of chain length, contraction style, and adverse axial pressure difference (AAPD) on cycle-mean flow rates (CMFRs). In the model, longer lymphangion chains generally yield larger CMFRs, and they fail to generate positive CMFRs at higher AAPDs than shorter chains. Simultaneously contracting pumps generate the largest CMFRs at nearly every AAPD and for every chain length. Due to the contraction timing and valve dynamics, non-simultaneous pumps generate lower CMFRs than the simultaneous pumps; the discrepancy diminishes as the AAPD increases. Valve dynamics vary with the contraction style and exhibit hysteretic opening and closing behaviors. Our model provides insight into how contraction propagation affects flow rates and transport through a lymphangion chain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We use the term “source” liberally throughout this work to obviate the need for repeating “source or sink”.

  2. By virtual, we describe something that is implicitly rather than explicitly included in the physical model domain.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Simulations were run at the Center for High-Performance Computing (CHPC) at the University of Utah. HE acknowledges partial support under NSF RTG-1148230. ALF was supported in part by NSF grant DMS-1716898. ALF and AB were supported in part by NHLBI grant 1U01HL143336. VS was supported by grant NSF CCF 1714844.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hallie Elich.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 62 KB)

Supplementary material 2 (pdf 7289 KB)

Supplementary material 3 (mov 25028 KB)

Supplementary material 4 (mov 25306 KB)

Supplementary material 5 (mov 24641 KB)

Supplementary material 6 (mov 23467 KB)

Supplementary material 7 (mov 22730 KB)

Supplementary material 8 (mov 24538 KB)

Supplementary material 9 (mov 1593 KB)

Supplementary material 10 (mov 7522 KB)

Supplementary material 11 (mov 8019 KB)

Supplementary material 12 (mov 7339 KB)

Supplementary material 13 (mov 7314 KB)

Supplementary material 14 (mov 6964 KB)

Supplementary material 15 (mov 6951 KB)

Supplementary material 16 (mov 7739 KB)

Supplementary material 17 (mov 7904 KB)

Supplementary material 18 (mov 7748 KB)

Supplementary material 19 (mov 7407 KB)

Supplementary material 20 (mov 7970 KB)

Supplementary material 21 (mov 8078 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elich, H., Barrett, A., Shankar, V. et al. Pump efficacy in a two-dimensional, fluid–structure interaction model of a chain of contracting lymphangions. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 20, 1941–1968 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-021-01486-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-021-01486-w

Keywords

Navigation