Abstract
Optional lists of turbogenerator equipment for a 1-MW heat-recovery thermal power complex operating on isopentane are examined. It has been found that, with the selected initial conditions, the axial turbine used as a direct drive of the generator with a standard speed of 3000 rpm should have five or six stages with the first stage having a partial admission of the working fluid. An alternative 6500 rpm, high-speed five-stage turbine for driving a generator with subsequent conversion of the current frequency has approximately halved the diametrical overall dimensions and the increased internal efficiency due to the elimination of the partial admission of isopentane vapor, reduction of the losses caused by clearance leakages and disc friction, yielding a total of at least than 3%. Should a 8400 rpm high-speed turbine be used, the number of stages may be reduced to three. High-speed turbines are less labor intensive to manufacture. The turbine generator can be made suitable for using heat sources different in power and temperature potential by modifying the basic design of the turbine through adding or removing the first or the last stages. A prototype of a heat-recovery power complex can be created using commercial equipment, conventional technologies, and standards adopted for the manufacture of high-pressure cylinders (HPC) of steam turbines. At the same time, a turbine generator with commercial prospects should be a high-speed unit integrated into a closed loop featuring minimal manufacturing and operating costs using equipment specially designed for this service.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
G. V. Tomarov, A. A. Shipkov, and E. V. Sorokina, “Improving geothermal power plants with a binary cycle,” Therm. Eng. 62, 878–885 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601515120101
G. V. Tomarov, A. A. Shipkov, and E. V. Sorokina, “Choice of optimal working fluid for binary power plants at extremely low temperature brine,” Therm. Eng. 63, 887–895 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601516120065
G. V. Tomarov and A. A. Shipkov, “Modern geothermal power: GeoPP with geothermal steam turbines,” Therm. Eng. 64, 190–200 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601517030089
O. O. Milman, B. A. Shifrin, V. B. Perov, V. V. Lukin, and S. V. Chebanuk, “The working medium for the megawatt class utilization heat and power complex based on Organic Rankine Cycle,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1105, 012094 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1105/1/012094
V. A. Grigor’ev and V. M. Zorin, Thermal and Nuclear Power Plants: Handbook (Energoizdat, Moscow, 1982) [in Russian].
O. O. Mil’man, V. B. Perov, and B. A. Shifrin, “Heat recovery plant with a hermetically sealed closed circuit,” RF Patent No. 182819 U1 (2018).
O. O. Mil’man, V. B. Perov, and B. A. Shifrin, “Double-flow turbogenerator for Organic Rankine Cycle,” RF Patent No. 191940 U1 (2019).
O. O. Mil’man, V. B. Perov, and B. A. Shifrin, “Turbogenerator for Organic Rankine Cycle,” RF Patent No. 192073 U1 (2019).
Funding
The investigations into the options of the heat-recovery thermal power complex were financially supported by the Skolkovo Fund (agreement nos. 40113/07002/1373-2019 of December 19, 2019, no. 40113/07002/1372-2019 of December 19, 2019, and no. 40113/07002/1371-2019 of December 19, 2019).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated by T. Krasnoshchekova
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shifrin, B.A., Perov, V.B. & Tolkachev, V.M. Turbogenerator Options for a Heat-Recovery Thermal Power Complex on the Basis of a Low-Boiling Working Fluid. Therm. Eng. 68, 535–542 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601521070041
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601521070041