Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Molecular authentication of medicinal and edible plant Gnaphalium affine (cudweed herb, “Shu-qu-cao”) based on DNA barcode marker ITS2

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Physiologiae Plantarum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cudweed herb is not only a conventional health-protection wild vegetable, but also a traditional Chinese medicine known as “Shu-qu-cao”, refers to Gnaphalium affine D. Don (renamed as Pseudognaphalium affine), an annual plant in the family Asteraceae. However, due to the similarity of phenotypic characteristics between G. affine and some related species, it is difficult to identify G. affine accurately; besides, “Shu-qu-cao” is usually sold dried, making traditional identification methods difficult, to a certain extent, it caused the species confusion of Gnaphalium medicinal plants, which threatened the safety and effectiveness of cudweed herb in clinical treatment. To more accurately distinguish cudweed herb from its adulterants, DNA barcoding was used in this study. Leaves of not only G. affine, but also the potential adulterant species were also collected. After DNA extraction, PCR amplification, gene sequencing, GeneBank searching and annotation, ITS2 sequences were obtained. 34 ITS2 sequences representing 5 genera (Gnaphalium, Leontopodium, Pulsatilla, Potentilla, Datura) and 13 species (Gnaphalium affine, Gnaphalium sylvaticum, Gnaphalium norvegicum, Gnaphalium supinum, Gnaphalium tranzschelii, Gnaphalium hypoleucum, Gnaphalium luteoalbum, Gnaphalium adnatum, Gnaphalium japonicum, Leontopodium leontopodioides, Pulsatilla chinensis, Potentilla chinensis, Datura stramonium) were analyzed by MEGA7.0 software. GC content, intraspecific and interspecific genetic distance of K2P (Kimura 2-parameter) were calculated. The neighbor joining (NJ) method was used to construct the genetic cluster tree, and bootstrap (self expanding support rate 1000 times) was used to test the supporting rate of each branch. The ITS2 secondary structures were predicted by the ITS2 Database. The results showed that a barcoding gap existed among all tested taxa, and the difference in the secondary structures of ITS2 also indicates that cudweed herb and its potential adulterants can be distinguished. Therefore, ITS2 barcode can be used for accurate identification of cudweed herb and its adulterants, and provide the basis for safety and accuracy of rational use of G. affine in clinical application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Biffin E, Harrington M, Crisp M et al (2007) Structural partitioning, paired-sites models and evolution of the ITS transcript in Syzygium and Myrtaceae. Mol Phylogenet Evol 43:124–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SL, Yao H, Han JP et al (2010) Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant species. PLoS ONE 1:e8613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SL, Yao H, Han JP et al (2013) Principles for molecular identification of traditional Chinese materia medica using DNA barcoding. China J Chin Mater Med 2:141–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinese Academy of Sciences Northwest Institute of Botany (1985) Flora tsinlingensis. Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission (2015) Chinese Pharmacopoeia. China Medical Science Press, Beijing

  • Chiou SJ et al (2007) Authentication of medicinal herbs using PCR-amplified ITS2 with specific primers. Planta Med 73:1421–1426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman AW (2007) Pan-eukaryote ITS2 homologies revealed by RNA secondary structure. Nucl Acids Res 35:3322–3329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman AW (2009) Is there a molecular key to the level of”biological species”in eukaryotes? A DNA guide. Mol Phylogenet Evol 50:197–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman AW, Mai JC (1997) Ribosomal DNA and ITS-2 sequence comparisons as a tool for predicting genetic relatedness. J Mol Evol 45:168–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Commission SP (2015) Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China Part I. China Medical Science and Technology Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf issue. Phyotochem Bull 19:11–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao HY (2016) Study on chemical constituents and bioactivities of Gnaphalium affine D. Don. Dissertation, Qiqihar University

  • González-Pérez MA, Sosa PA, González-González EA et al (2008) Gnaphalium teydeum and Gnaphalium luteo-album: two taxa of the Canary Islands with different genetic histories. Plant Syst Evol 276:39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grajales A, Aguilar C, Sánchez JA (2007) Phylogenetic reconstruction using secondary structures of internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2, rDNA): finding the molecular and morphological gap in Caribbean gorgonian corals. BMC Evol Biol 7:90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL et al (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci 270:313–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hiscock SJ (2000) Self-incompatibility in Senecio squalidus L. (Asteraceae). Ann Bot 85:181–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hou XY, Gong J, Gao A et al (2011) Pharmaceutical research overview of the genus Gnaphalium. J Shandong Univ TCM 4:372–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang TG (2016) Authentication of traditional Chinese medicine. CPTCM, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller A, Schleicher T, Förster F et al (2008) ITS2 data corroborate a monophyletic chlorophycean DO-group (Sphaeropleales). BMC Evol Biol 8:218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller A, Schleicher T, Schultz J et al (2009) 5.8S-28S rRNA interaction and HMM-based ITS2 annotation. Gene 430:50–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keller A, Förster F, Müller T et al (2010) Including RNA secondary structures improves accuracy and robustness in reconstruction of phylogenetic trees. Biol Direct 5:4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koetschan C, Hackl T, Müller T et al (2012) ITS2 database IV: interactive taxon sampling for internal transcribed spacer 2 based phylogenies. Mol Phylogenet Evol 63:585–588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liang YM, Xu L, Chen SY et al (2018) Classification of Pulsatilla Adans and molecular identification of DNA barcodes based on ITS2 sequence in Liaoning province. Chin J Exp Tradit Med Formulae 14:36–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Geng YP, Wang F et al (2020) Identification of Astragalus and its adulterants based on ITS2 sequence and secondary structure. Acta Pharm Sinica 3:522–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu S (2005) Reasons for Chaphalium affine treated as pulsatilla and analysis. LiShiZhen Med Mater Med Res 4:335–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu B, Lu HX (2001) Potentilla chinensis and Chaphalium affine are not Pulsatilla chinensis. Strait Pharm J 2:87–88

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mai JC, Coleman AW (1997) The internal transcribed spacer 2 exhibits a common secondary structure in green algae and flowering plants. J Mol Evol 44:258–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Müller T, Philippi N, Dandekar T et al (2007) Distinguishing species. RNA 13:1469–1472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren YY, Zhang L, Xie B et al (2018) Identification and analysis on medicinal plants of moraceae from e’mei area using ITS2 sequences. World Sci Technol Modern Tradit Chin Med Mater Med 1:140–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz J, Wolf M (2009) ITS2 sequence-structure analysis in phylogenetics: a how-to manual for molecular syhelixatics. Mol Phylogenet Evol 52:520–523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz J, Maisel S, Gerlach D et al (2005) A common core of secondary structure of the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) throughout the Eukaryota. RNA 11:361–364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shao PZ, Cao H, Wang J et al (2004) Molecular identification of traditional Chinese medicine. Fudan University Press, Shanghai

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinicae Agendae Academiae Sinicae Edita (1979) Flora reipublicae popularis sinicae. Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Q (2012) Studies on the chemical constituents from Gnaphalium hypoleucum D.C. Dissertation, Soochow University

  • Telford MJ, Wise MJ, Gowri-Shankar V (2005) Consideration of RNA secondary structure significantly improves likelihood-based estimates of phylogeny: examples from the bilateria. Mol Biol Evol 22:1129–1136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tian R, Wu Y, Gu W et al (2021) Molecular identification of erythrinae cortex and its adulterants based on ITS2 sequence. Chin Tradit Herb Drugs 1:211–218

    Google Scholar 

  • van Nues RW, Rienoes JMJ, van der Sande CAFM et al (1994) Separate struetural elements within intemal transcribed spacer 1 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae precursor ribosomal RNA direct the formation of 17S and 26S rRNA. Nucleic Acids Res 22:912–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang SK, Pan M, Ren LY (2005) Analysis of amino acids in Chaphalium affine D. Don and its nutritional evaluation. Amino Acid Biotic Resour 1:37–39

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf M, Achtziger M, Schultz J et al (2005) Homology modeling revealed more than 20,000 rRNA internal transcribed spacer 2(ITS2) secondary structures. RNA 11:1616–1623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng XY, Cui QF, Liu JM et al (2015) Studies on the chemical constituents of Gnaphalium adnatum. J Yunnan Univ (nat Sci Edition) 2:279–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu XL, Meng Y, Lin J et al (2019) Study on the processing technology of Chaphalium affine D. Don cake. Agric Jilin 9:110–111

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by Shaanxi science and technology funds (2021JQ-782).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmacy, Xi’an Medical University, Xi’an, 710021, China

    Mengdi Zheng, Die Liu, Han Zhang & Yan Zhang

Authors
  1. Mengdi Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Die Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Han Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mengdi Zheng.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Zhao.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1627 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, M., Liu, D., Zhang, H. et al. Molecular authentication of medicinal and edible plant Gnaphalium affine (cudweed herb, “Shu-qu-cao”) based on DNA barcode marker ITS2. Acta Physiol Plant 43, 119 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-021-03293-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-021-03293-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation