Abstract
The paths or ways to the transcendental reduction are a pivotal phenomenological notion in Husserl’s philosophy. The metaphor of path, in fact, alludes to the demonstrative proofs of transcendental phenomenology. Nonetheless, Husserlian scholarship has not yet been able to end the disputes surrounding this topic, and as a result, competing interpretations continue to prevail. Since existing theories about the paths have not yet been cataloged or analyzed in their global context, I intend to classify the main existing theories about the paths and evaluate the trend established by Iso Kern. Thus, this paper answers the following questions: how many kinds of theories about the paths are there? And, how plausible is the trend and approach initiated by Kern? In order to evaluate each theory, I will compare the interpretation with its exemplary cases. The key contribution of this investigation is therefore twofold: to distinguish with unequivocal concepts the two main trends of hermeneutical theories in play and to evaluate the plausibility of the aforementioned Kernian one. The paper also attempts to show that the hermeneutical approach initiated by Kern has no contextual examples for its conceptual scheme and should consequently be abandoned in favor of an alternative solution.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Depraz is inconsistent with this conceptual division. She (Husserl 2001, p. 7), for instance, also affirms that the psychological path includes the intersubjective reduction.
References
Bernet, R., Kern, I., & Marbach, E. (1989). Edmund husserl: Darstellung seines denkens. Hamburg: Meiner. English edition: Bernet, R., Kern, I., & Marbach, E. An introduction to Husserlian phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1999.
De Palma, V. (2012). Die Welt und die Evidenz. Zu Husserls Erledigung des Cartesianismus. Husserl Studies, 28(3), 201–224.
De Warren, N. (2009). Husserl and the promise of time: subjectivity in transcendental phenomenology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Depraz, N. (1995). Transcendance et incarnation: le statut de l’intersubjectivité comme altérité à soi chez Husserl. Paris: Vrin.
Depraz, N. (2012). Empathy and second-person methodology. Continental Philosophy Review, 45(3), 447–459.
Drummond, J. J. (1975). Husserl on the ways to the performance of the reduction. Man and World, 8(1), 47–69.
Drummond, J. J. (1990). Husserlian intentionality and non-foundational realism: Noema and object. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1987). Neuere Philosophie I. Hegel, Husserl, Heidegger. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.
Geniusas, S. (2012). The origins of the horizon in Husserl’s phenomenology. Dordrecht: Springer.
Hua I. Husserl, E. (1991). Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. S. Strasser (Ed.). Den Haag: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hua II. Husserl, E. (1973). Die Idee der Phänomenologie. Fünf Vorlesungen. W. Biemel (Ed.). Den Haag: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hua III/1, 2. Husserl, E. (1976). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie. K. Schuhmann (Ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hua V. Husserl, E. (1971). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Drittes Buch: Die Phänomenologie und die Fundamente der Wissenschaften. M. Biemel (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
Hua VI. Husserl, E. (1976). Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie. W. Biemel (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
Hua VII. Husserl, E. (1956). Erste Philosophie (1923/24). Erste Teil: Kritische Ideengeschichte. R. Boehm (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
Hua VIII. Husserl, E. (1959). Erste Philosophie (1923/24). Zweiter Teil: Theorie der phänomenologischen Reduktion. R. Boehm (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
Hua IX. Husserl, E. (1968). Phänomenologische Psychologie: Vorlesungen Sommersemester 1925. W. Biemel (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
Hua XIII. Husserl, E. (1973). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlaß. Erster Teil: 1905-1920. I. Kern (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
Hua XV. Husserl, E. (1973). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlaß. Dritter Teil: 1929-1935. I. Kern (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
Hua XVII. Husserl, E. (1974). Formale und transzendentale Logik. Versuch einer Kritik der logischen Vernunft. Mit ergänzenden Texten. P. Janssen (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
Hua XXIV. Husserl, E. (1984). Einleitung in die Logik und Erkenntnistheorie Vorlesungen 1906/07. U. Melle (Ed.). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
Hua XXIX. Husserl, E. (1993). Die Krisis der Europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Ergänzungsband: Texte aus dem Nachlass 1934-1937. R. N. Smid (Ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hua XXV. Husserl, E. (1987). Aufsätze und Vorträge (1911-1921). T. Nenon and H. R. Sepp (Eds.). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
Hua XXVIII. Husserl, E. (1988). Vorlesungen über Ethik und Wertlehre (1908-1914). U. Melle (Ed.). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
Hua XXXV. Husserl, E. (2002). Einleitung in die Philosophie. Vorlesungen 1922/23. B. Goossens (Ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hua XLI. Husserl, E. (2012). Zur Lehre vom Wesen und zur Methode der eidetischen Variation. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1891–1935). D. Fonfara (Ed.). Dordrecht: Springer.
HuaDok II/1. Husserl, E. (1988). VI. Cartesianische Meditation. Teil 1: Die Idee einer transzendentalen Methodenlehre. H. Ebeling, J. Holl, and G. Van Kerckhoven (Eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
HuaDok III/3. Husserl, E. (1993). Briefwechsel. Teil 3: Die Göttinger Schule. E. Schuhmann, and K. Schuhmann (Eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
HuaDok III/6. Husserl, E. (1993). Briefwechsel. Teil 6: Philosophenbriefe. E. Schuhmann, and K. Schuhmann (Eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
HuaMat IX. Husserl, E. (2012). Einleitung in die Philosophie 1916-1920. H. Jacobs (Ed.). Dordrecht: Springer.
Husserl, E. (1930). Was ist das: psychologische Reduktion? Nachlass von Edmund Husserl (B I 9 I/III). Husserl-Archiv Köln: Universität zu Köln.
Husserl, E. (1989). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology an to a phenomenological philosophy. Second book: studies in the phenomenology of constitution. R. Rojcewicz, and A. Schuwer (Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Husserl, E. (2001). Sur l’intersubjectivité I. N. Depraz (Trans.). Paris: PUF.
Kern, I. (1962). Die drei Wege zur transzendental-phänomenologischen Reduktion in der Philosophie Edmund Husserls. Tijdschrift voor Filosofie, 24(2), 303-349. English edition: Kern, I. The three ways to the transcendental phenomenological reduction in the philosophy of Edmund Husserl. In F. Elliston, and P. McCormick (Eds.), Husserl. Expositions and appraisals (pp. 126-149). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1977. Spanish edition: Kern, I. Tres caminos a la reducción fenomenológica trascendental en la fenomenología de Husserl. A. Simón Lorda (Trans.). In A. Serrano de Haro (Ed.), La posibilidad de la Fenomenología (pp. 259-294). Madrid: Editorial Complutense, 1997. French version: Kern, I. Les trois voies de la réduction phénomenologique transcendantale dans la philosophie de Edmund Husserl. Alter, 11, 285-323, 2003b.
Kern, I. (1964). Husserl und Kant. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
Kern, I. (2003a). Edmund Husserl, natur und geist, vorlesungen sommersemester 1927. Husserl Studies, 19(2), 167–177.
Kortooms, T. (1994). Following Edmund Husserl on one of the paths leading to the transcendental reduction. Husserl Studies, 10, 163–180.
Landgrebe, L. (1963). Der Weg der Phänomenologie. Das Problem einer ursprünglichen Erfahrung. Gerd Mohn: Gütersloher Verlagshaus.
Luft, S. (2002). Phänomenologie der Phänomenologie. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Luft, S. (2004). Husserl’s theory of the phenomenological reduction: between life-world and cartesianism. Research in Phenomenology, 34(1), 198–234.
Luft, S. (2011). Subjectivity and lifeworld in transcendental phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Luft, S. (2015). Husserl y la filosofía trascendental. Enrahonar. Quaderns de Filosofia, 57, 15–34.
Overgaard, S. (2002). Epoché and solipsistic reduction. Husserl Studies, 18(3), 209–222.
Perkins, P. A. (2014a). Acerca de la interpretación de Landgrebe sobre el cartesianismo de Husserl. Investigaciones Fenomenológicas, 11, 203–222.
Perkins, P. A. (2014b). La relación filosófica entre Husserl y Avenarius en Problemas fundamentales de la fenomenología. Diánoia, 49(72), 25–48.
Perreau, L. (2013). Le monde social selon Husserl. Dordrecht: Springer.
Rinofner-Kreidl, S. (2000). Edmund Husserl. Zeitlichkeit und Intentionalität. Freiburg/München: Karl Alber.
San Martín, J. (1997). La despedida de Husserl del cartesianismo según Landgrebe. Agora, 16(2), 101–121.
San Martín, J. (2005). La estructura del método fenomenológico. Madrid: UNED.
Simón Lorda, A. (2001a). Intersubjetividad y experiencia del otro en Ideas de Husserl. Agora, 20(2), 55–81.
Simón Lorda, A. (2001b). La experiencia de alteridad en la fenomenología trascendental. Madrid: José Manuel Caparrós.
Simón Lorda, A. (2005). ¿Resuelve la doble reducción fenomenológica el problema de la intersubjetividad? In C. Moreno Márquez & A. M. De Mingo Rodríguez (Eds.), Signo, intencionalidad, verdad. Estudios de fenomenología. Sevilla: Sociedad Española de Fenomenología y Universidad de Sevilla.
Sokolowski, R. (1970). The formation of Husserl’s concept of constitution. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
Spiegelberg, H. (1994). The phenomenological movement. A historical introduction. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
Staiti, A. (2012a). The pedagogic impulse of Husserl’s ways into transcendental phenomenology. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 33(1), 39–56.
Staiti, A. (2012b). Human culture and the One structure: On Luft’s reading of the late Husserl. Comparative and Continental Philosophy, 4(2), 317–330.
Walton, R. J. (2012). Levels and figures in phenomenological analysis. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 50(2), 285–294.
Welton, D. (2000). The other Husserl: The horizons of transcendental phenomenology. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
Zahavi, D. (2003). Husserl’s phenomenology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Perkins, P.A. A Critical Taxonomy of the Theories About the Paths into the Reduction. Husserl Stud 33, 127–148 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10743-016-9206-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10743-016-9206-8