Abstract
The objective of this article is to explore people’s attitudes toward responsibility in the allocation of public health care resources. Special attention is paid to conceptualizations of responsibility involving blame and sanctions. A representative sample of the Norwegian population was asked about various responsibility mechanisms that have been proposed in the theoretical literature on health care and personal responsibility, from denial of treatment to a tax on unhealthy consumer goods. Survey experiments were employed to study treatment effects, such as whether fairness considerations affect attitudes about responsibility. We find that, overall, a substantial minority of the respondents find it fair to let the health care system sanction people—in one way or another—for voluntary behaviors that increase the risk of becoming ill. Quite surprisingly, we find that people are more prone to report that they should themselves be held responsible for unhealthy lifestyles than others.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
See, e.g., The Norwegian Tax Administration (2020).
To illustrate, a value of, for example, .1 means that it is 10% more likely that a respondent answered “yes” (agreed to lower priority) in the treatment group than in the control group.
References
Albertsen, A. (2015). Feiring’s concept of forward-looking responsibility: A dead end for responsibility in healthcare. Journal of Medical Ethics, 41(2), 161–164.
Albertsen. A. (2016). Drinking in the last chance saloon: Luck egalitarianism, alcohol consumption, and the organ transplant waiting list. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 19(2), 325–338.
Alesina, A., & Angeletos, G. M. (2005). Fairness and redistribution. American Economic Review, 95(4), 960–980.
Aresen, S., Bærøe, K., Cappelen, C., & Carlsen, B. (2018). Could information about herd immunity help us achieve herd immunity? Evidence from a population representative survey experiment. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 46(8), 854–858.
Arneson, R. J. (1989). Equality and equal opportunity for welfare. Philosophical Studies, 56(1), 77–93.
Bærøe, K., & Cappelen, C. (2015). Phase-dependent justification: The role of personal responsibility in fair healthcare. Journal of Medical Ethics, 41(10), 836–840.
Blekesaune, M., & Quadagno, J. (2003). Public attitudes toward welfare state policies: A comparative analysis of 24 nations. European Sociological Review, 19(5), 415–427.
Bright, B. (2006). Many Americans back higher costs for people with unhealthy lifestyles. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB115324313567509976. Accessed 18 Nov 2020.
Bringedal, B., & Feiring, E. (2011). On the relevance of personal responsibility in priority setting: A cross-sectional survey among Norwegian medical doctors. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(6), 357–361.
Buyx, A. M. (2008). Personal responsibility for health as a rationing criterion: Why we don’t like it and why maybe we should. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34(12), 871–874.
Cappelen, A. W., & Norheim, O. F. (2005). Responsibility in health care: A liberal egalitarian approach. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(8), 476–480.
Cohen, G. A. (1989). On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics, 99(4), 906–944.
Donckier, V., Lucidi, V., Gustot, T., & Moreno, C. (2014). Ethical considerations regarding early liver transplantation in patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis not responding to medical therapy. Journal of Hepatology, 60(4), 866–871.
Dworkin, R. (1981). What is equality? Part 2: Equality of resources. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 10(4), 283–345.
Dworkin, R. (2000). Sovereign virtue: The theory and practice of equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Feiring, E. (2008). Lifestyle, responsibility and justice. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34(1), 33–36.
Fleurbaey, M. (1995). Three solutions for the compensation problem. Journal of Economic Theory, 65(2), 505–521.
Fleurbaey, M. (2001). Egalitarian opportunities. Law and Philosophy, 20, 499–530.
Freidman, A. S., Schpero, W. L., & Busch, S. H. (2016). Evidence suggests that the ACA’s tobacco surcharges reduced insurance take-up and did not increase smoking cessation. Health Affairs, 35(7), 1176–1183.
Goodchild, M., Perucic, A. M., & Nargis, N. (2016). Modelling the impact of raising tobacco taxes on public health and finance. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 94(4), 250–257.
Jha, P., & Peto, R. (2014). Global effects of smoking, of quitting, and of taxing tobacco. New England Journal of Medicine, 370(1), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1308383.
Knight, C. (2009). Luck egalitarianism: Equality, responsibility, and justice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
LeGrand, J. (1991). Equity and choice: An essay in economics and applied philosophy. London: Harper Collins.
Lim, J. K., & Keeffe, E. B. (2004). Liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease: Current concepts and length of sobriety. Liver Transplantation, 10(10 Suppl 2), S31-38.
Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2016). Luck egalitarianism. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Moore, M. J. (1996). Death and tobacco taxes. Rand Journal of Economics, 27(2), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555934.
Nagel, T. T. (1991). Equality and partiality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Norges Offentuge Utreninger. (1987). Retningslinjer for prioritering innen norsk helsetjeneste, 23. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget. https://www.nb.no/statsmaktene/nb/eba24a34a2dd190d925925fc9d902cc4#0. Accessed 18 Nov 2020.
Norges Offentuge Utreninger (2014). Åpent og rettferdig—prioriteringer i helsetjenesten, 12. Oslo: Departementenes servicesenter. https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/16a0834c9c3e43fab452ae1b6d8cd3f6/no/pdfs/nou201420140012000dddpdfs.pdf. Accessed 18 Nov 2020.
Rakowski, E. (1991). Equal justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Resnik, D. B. (2007). Responsibility for health: Personal, social, and environmental. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33(8), 444–445.
Richardson, H. S. (1999). Institutionally divided moral responsibility. Social Philosophy and Policy, 16(2), 218–249.
Roemer, J. E. (1993). A pragmatic theory of responsibility for the egalitarian planner. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 22(2), 146–166.
Scanlon, T. M. (2002). The diversity of objections to inequality. In M. Clayton & A. Williams (Eds.), The ideal of equality (pp. 41–59). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Schmidt, H. (2009). Just health responsibility. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35(1), 21–26.
Schmidt, H. (2007). Personal responsibility for health—Developments under the German Healthcare Reform 2007. European Journal of Health Law, 14(3), 241–250.
Segall, S. (2009). Health, luck, and justice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Steel, N. (2017). Global, regional, and national age-sex specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet, 390(10100), 1151–1210.
Stroh, G., Rosell, T., Dong, F., & Forster, J. (2015). Early liver transplantation for patients with acute alcoholic hepatitis: Public views and the effects on organ donation. American Journal of Transplantation, 15(6), 1598–1604.
The Norwegian Tax Administration. (2020). Sugar tax. https://www.skatteetaten.no/en/business-and-organisation/vat-and-duties/exciseduties/about-the-excise-duties/sugar/. Available 18 Nov 2020.
The Public Health Law Center. (2014). How the affordable care act affects tabacco use and control. https://publichealthlawcenter.org/sites/default/files/tclc-fs-aca-&-tobacco-control-2014_0.pdf
Ubel, P. A., DeKay, M., Baron, J., & Asch, D. A. (1996). Public preferences for efficiency and racial equity in kidney transplant allocation decisions. Transplantation Proceedings, 28(5), 2997–3002.
Van Parijs, P. (1995). Real freedom for all: What (if anything) can justify capitalism? Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Wlezien, C. (1995). The public as thermostat: Dynamics of preferences for spending. American Journal of Political Science, 39(4), 981–1000.
Wolff, J. (1998). Fairness, respect, and the egalitarian ethos. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 27(2), 97–122.
World Health Organization. (2002). The World health report: 2002: Reducing the risks, promoting healthy life. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42510. Accessed 18 Nov 2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cappelen, C., Midtbø, T. & Bærøe, K. Responsibility Considerations and the Design of Health Care Policies: A Survey Study of the Norwegian Population. HEC Forum 34, 115–138 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-020-09430-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-020-09430-8