Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Master’s Research Supervision and Academic Support: A Benchmarking of Best Practice at a New Zealand Research-Intensive University

  • Article
  • Published:
New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Postgraduate research candidature support, support of supervisory teams, and assistance with examination and assessment requirements are some of the crucial elements in a successful postgraduate student’s study experience. While there is a large body of research on Doctoral supervision, less is available on Master’s level supervision and support. Benchmarking studies that gauge the quality of higher education processes and practices, are gaining momentum as a research tool, and reflective mechanism for enhancing student experiences at higher education institutions. This paper reports on a small-scale study that used a holistic benchmarking framework at a research-intensive New Zealand university, in an effort to gauge the quality of the level of postgraduate Master’s research student support and supervision. Twenty-three academics and 17 students completed the survey, which assessed key performance indicators (KPIs): student support; postgraduate candidature development; student supervision; and assessment and examination support. Both students and academics were happy with orientation and induction, but students felt more information was needed regarding possible changes to research. Overall academics and students had confidence in the level of academic research guidance. Although academics felt assessment policies and procedures were explicit, students were not always in agreement. Moreover, students thought that evaluative feedback on their experience should be gathered more frequently. The findings suggest that, in broad terms, the university in question is tracking well and meeting most of the benchmarking principles and their associated KPIs. However, both academics and students highlighted areas where the University can improve practices to better support the experience of Master’s research students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All raw data is available on request via email to the corresponding author, subject to anonymity.

Notes

  1. Author roles comprised: Tracey Millin was an Assistant Research Fellow; Rachel Spronken-Smith was the Dean of the Graduate Research School, and the Mark Millin was a Doctoral candidate.

  2. Discourse is borrowed from the field of applied language studies and refers to the ways of believing, seeing, doing, writing and saying within a specific community. The community here refers to the academic research community. When talking about Discourse, we argue that you are apprenticed into a specific Discourse community.

References

  • Abiddin, N., & West, M. (2007a). Effective meeting in graduate research student supervision. Journal of Social Science, 3, 27–35. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2007.27.35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abiddin, N., & West, M. (2007b). Supervision practices for foreign graduate research students. American Journal of Applied Science, 4, 360–370. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2007.362.370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aitken, G., Smith, K., Fawns, T., & Jones, D. (2020). Participatory alignment: A positive relationship between educators and students during online masters [sic] Dissertation Supervision. Teaching in Higher Education, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1744129

  • Ali, P., Watson, R., & Dhingra, K. (2016). Postgraduate research students’ and their supervisors’ attitudes towards supervision. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 227–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C., Day, K., & McLaughlin, P. (2006). Mastering the disseration: Lecturers representations of the purpopses and processes of master’s level dissertation supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comley-White, N., & Potterton, J. (2018). The perceived barriers and facilitators in completing a Master’s Degree in physiotherapy. South African Journal of Physiotherapy, 74(1), 445. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v74i1.445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius, S., & Nicol, S. (2016). Understanding the needs of masters dissertation supervisors: Supporting students in professional contexts. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 4(1), 2–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. (2019). Students’ perceptions of supervisory qualities: What do students want? What do they believe they receive? International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 14, 431–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. (2020). The ideal supervisor from the candidate’s perspective: What qualities do students actually want? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(9), 1220–1232. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1669772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Kleijn, R., Meijer, P., Pilot, A., & Brekelmans, M. (2014). The relationship between feedback perception and the supervisor–student relationship in thesis master’s projects. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(4), 336–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrova, R. (2016). Ingredients of good PhD supervision: Evidence from a student survey at Stockholm University. Utbildning & Larande, 10(1), 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drennan, J., & Clarke, M. (2009). Coursework master’s programmes: The student’s experience of research and research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 34(5), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802597150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dysthe, O., Samara, A., & Westrheim, K. (2006). Multivoiced supervision of Master’s Students: A case study of alternative supervision practices in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), 299–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600680562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filippou, K. (2019). Identifying thesis supervisors’ attitudes: Indications of responsiveness in international master’s degree programmes. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(3), 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1621764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filippou, K., Kallo, J., & Mikkilä-Erdmann, M. (2021). Supervising master’s theses in international master’s degree programmes: Roles, responsibilities and models. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1636220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frischer, J., & Larsson, K. (2000). Laissez-faire in Research Education - An inquiry into a Swedish Doctoral Program. Higher Education Policy, 13, 131–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-8733(99)00022-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, G. (2002). Universities: The Recovery and an idea. Thorverton: Imprint Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggis, T. (2002). Exploring the “Black Box’’ of process: A comparison of the theoretical notions of the ‘adult learner’ with accounts of postgraduate learning experience.” Studies in Higher Education, 27(2), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070220119986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halse, C. (2011). Becoming a supervisor: The impact of Doctoral supervision on supervisor’s learning. Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.594593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, N., & Petrić, B. (2017). Experiencing master’s supervision: Perspectives of international students and their supervisors. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, N., & Petrić, B. (2018). Adaptive master’s dissertation supervision: A longitudinal case study. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(1), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1541881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holdaway, E. (1997). Quality issues in postgraduate education. In R. Burgess (Ed.), Beyond the first degree (pp. 60–78). Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, A. (2018). Directive, collaborative, or non-directive? Thesis supervision approaches in the United Arab Emirates. Issues in Educational Research, 28(3), 679–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juusola, H., & Räihä, P. (2019). Quality conventions in the exported finnish master’s degree programme in teacher education in Indonesia. Higher Education, 79, 675–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00430-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karunaratne, T. (2018). Blended supervision for thesis projects in higher education. Electronic Journal of E- Learning, 16(2), 79–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiley, M. (2019). Doctoral supervisory quality from the perspective of senior academic managers. The Australian Universities’ Review, 61(1), 12–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kordestani Moghaddam, A., Esmaillzadeh, A., & Azadbakht, L. (2019). postgraduate research mentorship program: An approach to improve the quality of postgraduate research supervision and mentorship in Iranian students. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 8(1), 109. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_37_19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latona, K., & Browne, M. (2001). Factors associated with completion of research degrees. Higher Education Series, 37, 1615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 267–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luca, J. (2014) Good practice for research training in Australia: Steering us in the right direction towards research training quality. 11th Biennial Quality in Postgraduate Research Conference (QPR2014), 9th-14th April, Adelaide, South Australia.

  • Macfadyen, A., English, C., & Coates, M. (2020). Articulating and developing supervisory skills through collaborative action research. International Journal for Academic Development, 25(4), 32–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2020.1726760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macfadyen, A., English, C., Kelleher, M., Coates, M., Cameron, C., & Gibson, V. (2019). ‘Am i doing it right?’ Conceptualising the practice of supervising master’s dissertation students. Higher Education Research and Development, 38(5), 985–1000. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1597024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackinnon, J. (2004). Academic supervision: Seeking metaphors and models for quality. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 28(4), 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877042000298876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marnewick, A. L. (2020). A supervision approach to facilitate learning during the master’s research journey. Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1811223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matin, M. A., & Khan, M. A. (2017). Common problems faced by postgraduate students during their thesis works in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Education, 8, 22–27. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjme.v8i1.32245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCallin, A., & Nayar, S. (2012). Postgraduate research supervision: A critical review of current practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.590979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murareneza, C., Mtshali, N., & Bvumbwe, T. (2020). Challenges in postgraduate research supervision in nursing education: Integrative review. Nurse Education Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neupane-Bastola, M., & Hu, G. (2020). Supervisory feedback across disciplines: Does it meet students’ expectations? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(3), 407–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1780562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, E. (2007). Negotiating academicity: Postgraduate research supervision as category boundary work. Studies in Higher Education, 32, 475–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, E., & Pugh, D. (2000). How to get a PhD: A handbook for students and their supervisors. Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyhalto, K., Stubb, J., & Lonka, K. (2009). Developing scholarly communities as learning environments for doctoral students. International Journal for Academic Development, 14(3), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440903106551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roach, A., Christensen, B. K., & Rieger, E. (2019). The essential ingredients of research supervision: A discrete-choice experiment. Journal of Education Psychology, 111(7), 1243–1260. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rönn, K. V., & Petersen, K. L. (2018). Collective supervision of master’s thesis students: Experiences, expectations and new departures from the security risk management programme. Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift, 13(25), 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sá, M. J., Santos, A. I., & Serpa, S. (2021). The academic supervisor of higher education students’ final projects: A gatekeeper of quality? Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(1), 152–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook, S., Stewart, J., & Roberts, C. (2008). Doctoral supervision: A view from above, below and the middle! Journal of Further and Higher Education, 32, 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770701781473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spedding, T. (2020). Stories of supervision. Education Sciences, 10(93), 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10040093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talebloo, B., & Baki, R. (2013). Challenges faced by international postgraduate students during their first year of studies. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3, 138–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D., Kirkman, S., Watson, R., & Stewart, S. (2005). Improving research supervision in nursing: Some guiding principles. Nurse Education Today, 25, 283–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, M., Bannister, P., & Clegg, S. (2004). Independent inquiry and the undergraduate dissertation: Perceptions and experiences of final year social science students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(3), 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000188285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, B., & Harper, B. (2012). Conducting educational research (6th ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vereijken, M. W. C., van der Rijst, R. M., van Driel, J. H., & Dekker, F. W. (2018). Novice supervisor’s practices and dilemmatic space in supervision of student research projects. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(4), 522–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1414791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagener, B. (2018). The importance of affects, self-regulation and relationships in the writing of a master’s thesis. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(2), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1379480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisker, G., & Kiley, M. (2014). Professional learning: Lessons from supervision from doctoral examining. International Journal for Academic Development, 19(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2012.727762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, T. (2010). Postgraduate research students: People in context. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 31, 209–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/0306988031000102379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youngman, M. (1994). Supervisors’ and students’ experiences of supervision. In R. Burgess (Ed.), Postgraduate education and training in the social sciences. London: Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Yu, S., & Yuan, K. (2018). Understanding master’s students’ peer feedback practices from the academic discourse community perspective: A rethinking of postgraduate pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(2), 126–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Y., Yu, S., Wang, B., & Zhang Y. (2020). Exploring student engagement with supervisor feedback on master’s thesis: Insights from a case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(2), 186-197

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tracey Millin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Not applicable.

Ethics Approval

Ethics approval was granted by the institution’s ethics committee—application number D17/046.

Consent to Participate

All participants gave consent to participate in the study.

Consent for Publication

All participants gave consent for their anonymous data to be used for publication purposes.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Millin, T., Spronken-Smith, R. & Millin, M. Master’s Research Supervision and Academic Support: A Benchmarking of Best Practice at a New Zealand Research-Intensive University. NZ J Educ Stud 57, 231–252 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-021-00215-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-021-00215-2

Keywords

Navigation