Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Teacher Agency in Social-Justice Aspirations and Inquiry-Based Science Instruction

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inquiry-based science instruction (IBSI) has the potential to contribute to social justice through widening participation and success in science. However, teachers struggle to implement IBSI because of contextual factors. The purpose of this paper is to explore the use of agency as a framework for understanding teachers’ decision-making, by asking the question: what was the agency of six science teachers in their social-justice aspirations and use of IBSI? An agency framework recognizes that teachers’ decisions are informed by their internal conversations at the intersection of personal aspects (their history, repertoire, and aspirations) with the cultural and structural constraints and resources of their contexts. However, research on IBSI has focussed on teachers’ personal aspects or their perceptions of contextual factors. The sample had learnt IBSI through service learning in the context of a science fair. From teacher interviews, it emerged that these teachers had strong social-justice aspirations to serve disadvantaged students. The teachers linked their social-justice aspirations to their choice of school rather than their use of IBSI. The teachers at better-resourced schools initiated participation in science fairs at their schools, whilst the rest judged that science fairs were not appropriate for their students. The results suggest that, rather than prescribing particular pedagogies, teacher education programmes should aim to increase teachers’ pedagogical repertoires, in order to enrich their agency in whatever contexts they teach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data will be made available on request.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Alant, B. P. (2010). “We cross night”: Some reflections on the role of the ESKOM Expo for Young Scientists as a means of accommodating disadvantaged learners into the field of Science and Technology. Perspectives in Education, 28(4), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. S. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bencze, J. L., & Bowen, G. M. (2009). A national science fair: Exhibiting support for the knowledge economy. International Journal of Science Education, 31(18), 2459–2483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya, S., Volk, T., & Lumpe, A. (2009). The influence of an extensive inquiry-based field experience on pre-service elementary student teachers’ science teaching beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(3), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9129-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 132–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunderson, E. D., & Anderson, T. (1996). Preservice elementary teachers’ attitudes toward their past experience with science fairs. School Science and Mathematics, 96(7), 371–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1996.tb15855.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, D., & Areepattamannil, S. (2019). Exploring the relations of inquiry-based teaching to science achievement and dispositions in 54 countries. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9639-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capps, D. K., & Crawford, B. A. (2013). Inquiry-based instruction and teaching about nature of science: Are they happening? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 497–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9314-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cian, H., Dsouza, N., Lyons, R., & Cook, M. (2017). Influences on the development of inquiry-based practices among preservice teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2016.1277832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudu, W. T., & Vhurumuku, E. (2012). Teachers’ practices of inquiry when teaching investigations: A case study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(6), 579–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9287-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ensor, P., & Galant, J. (2005). Knowledge and pedagogy: Sociological research in mathematics education in South Africa. In R. Vithal, J. Adler, & C. Keitel (Eds.), Researching mathematics education in South Africa. HSRC Press https://www.hsrcpress.ac.za/books/researching-mathematics-education-in-south-africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, M., Danaia, L., & McKinnon, D. H. (2019). Barriers inhibiting inquiry-based science teaching and potential solutions: Perceptions of positively inclined early adopters. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 543–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9623-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2005). Reframing justice in a globalizing world. New Left Review, 36(Nov/Dec), 69–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geier, R., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., & Clay-Chambers, J. (2008). Standardized test outcomes for students engaged in inquiry-based science curricula in the context of urban reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 922–939. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrington, D. G., Bancroft, S. F., Edwards, M. M., & Schairer, C. J. (2016). I want to be the inquiry guy! How research experiences for teachers change beliefs, attitudes, and values about teaching science as inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9450-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, J., & Keinonen, T. (2018). The effect of student-centered approaches on students’ interest and achievement in science: Relevant topic-based, open and guided inquiry-based, and discussion-based approaches. Research in Science Education, 48(4), 865–885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9590-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. C., Lee, C. K.-P., Lam, I. C.-M., Kwok, P. W., & So, W. W.-M. (2018). Inquiry science learning and teaching: A comparison between the conceptions and attitudes of pre-service elementary teachers in Hong Kong and the United States. Research in Science Education, 50, 227–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9687-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpe, A. T., Haney, J. J., & Czerniak, C. M. (2000). Assessing teachers’ beliefs about their science teaching context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(3), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200003)37:3<275::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-2.

  • Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. Science Education, 95(5), 877–907. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M., & Ngcobo, J. (2015). Social justice as a conduit for broadening curriculum access: Stories from classroom teachers. Perspectives in Education, 33(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.10520/EJC168539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mbowane, C. K., De Villiers, J. J. R., & Braun, M. W. H. (2017). Teacher participation in science fairs as professional development in South Africa. South African Journal of Science, 113(7/8), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, C. A., & MacFadden, B. J. (2014). At the elbows of scientists: Shaping science teachers’ conceptions and enactment of inquiry-based instruction. Research in Science Education, 44(6), 927–947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9408-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melville, W., Fazio, X., Bartley, A., & Jones, D. (2008). Experience and reflection: Preservice science teachers’ capacity for teaching inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(5), 477–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9104-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction-What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molefe, M. L. (2007). The attainment of technological skills processes and learning outcomes in a Science Talent Quest project comparing two model boats. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 6(1), 165–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, F. M. (2007). Agency, identity, and social justice education: Preservice teachers’ thoughts on becoming agents of change in urban elementary science classrooms. Research in Science Education, 38(5), 589–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9065-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mupezeni, S., & Kriek, J. (2018). Out-of-school activity: A comparison of the experiences of rural and urban participants in science fairs in the Limpopo Province, South Africa. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(8), em1577. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/92041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ndlovu, M. (2014). Understanding factors supporting student participation in the Expo for Young Scientists. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, 13–16 January 2014.

  • Ndlovu, M. (2015). Learner perceptions of inquiry in science fair projects: A case study of a regional science fair in South Africa. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(2), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2015.11917622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nghishongwa, F. N. (2017). Challenges faced by senior secondary school learners when preparing science fair projects in the Omusati educational region, Namibia (MEd dissertation). University of Namibia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M., McConney, A., & Woods-McConney, A. (2019). The efficacy of inquiry-based instruction in science: A comparative analysis of six countries using PISA 2015. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09901-0.

  • Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley, M., Edwards, R., Priestley, A., & Miller, K. (2012). Teacher agency in curriculum making: Agents of change and spaces for manoeuvre. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(2), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00588.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramnarain, U. D. (2014). Teachers’ perceptions of inquiry-based learning in urban, suburban, township and rural high schools: The context-specificity of science curriculum implementation in South Africa. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.11.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahin, A. (2013). STEM clubs and science fair competitions: Effects on post-secondary matriculation. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 14(1), 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seung, E., Park, S., & Jung, J. (2014). Exploring preservice elementary teachers’ understanding of the essential features of inquiry-based science teaching using evidence-based reflection. Research in Science Education, 44(4), 507–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9390-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tate, W. (2001). Science education as a civil right: Urban schools and opportunity-to-learn considerations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(9), 1015–1028. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1045.

  • Taylor, D. L. (2011). ‘They are using laptops, we are using boxes’: township learners’ conceptions of Expo. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(1), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2011.10740702

  • Taylor, D. L., & Booth, S. (2015). Secondary physical science teachers’ conceptions of science teaching in a context of change. International Journal of Science Education, 37(8), 1299–1320. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069

  • Taylor, D. L., & Lelliott, A. D. (2015). Dialogic talk in diverse physical science classrooms. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(3), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2015.1089678

  • Treagust, D. F., Qureshi, S. S., Vishnumolakala, V. R., Ojeil, J., Mocerino, M., & Southam, D. C. (2020). Process-oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) as a culturally relevant pedagogy (CRP) in Qatar: A perspective from grade 10 chemistry classes. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 813–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9712-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Uum, M. S. J., Peeters, M., & Verhoeff, R. P. (2019). Professionalising primary school teachers in guiding inquiry-based learning. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9818-z.

  • Wanka, F. A., & Rena, R. (2019). The impact of educational attainment on household poverty in South Africa: A case study of Limpopo province. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 11(5), 597–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2018.1557368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. E., Bradbury, L. U., & McGlasson, M. A. (2015). Integrating service-learning pedagogy for preservice elementary teachers’ science identity development. [journal article]. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9425-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wray, K. A., & Richmond, G. (2018). Factors shaping the agency of beginning science teachers working in high-poverty schools. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(8), 785–803. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1514824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, H.-G., Joung, Y. J., & Kim, M. (2012). The challenges of science inquiry teaching for pre-service teachers in elementary classrooms: Difficulties on and under the scene. Research in Science Education, 42(3), 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9212-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zion, M., Schwartz, R. S., Rimerman-Shmueli, E., & Adler, I. (2020). Supporting teachers’ understanding of nature of science and inquiry through personal experience and perception of inquiry as a dynamic process. Research in Science Education, 50(4), 1281–1304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9732-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The research leading to these results received funding from the South African National Research Foundation Thuthuka grant GUND008.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Both authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Dale Taylor. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Dale Taylor, and both authors had input to subsequent drafts. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dale L. Taylor.

Ethics declarations

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Department of Education and the relevant university for the study from which the data for this paper is drawn. All research subjects gave informed consent and were free to withdraw at any time.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taylor, D.L., Lelliott, A.D. Teacher Agency in Social-Justice Aspirations and Inquiry-Based Science Instruction. Res Sci Educ 52, 1375–1386 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10015-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10015-9

Keywords

Navigation