Abstract
Climate change adaptation requires the engagement of multiple actors in different sectors and at various levels of governance. The different roles played by policy actors and their interactions shape the process of adaptation governance. Nevertheless, to date, there has been limited attention paid to how the structure of relations and their associated power dynamics between these actors affect adaptation governance process at different levels. In this study, we analyzed the structure, processes, and power dynamics entailed in the multilevel governance of adaptation to floods in coastal areas of Bangladesh. We used social network analysis approach to map and unpack the interactions between actors that influence the adaptation governance. We categorized five types of organizations based on the structural attributes of the governance network and their functions. Our analysis shows that the organizations with high influence over the governance process reside at the national level and the adaptation governance process is influenced by elite-pluralism. We found that both top-down and bottom-up processes co-exist in different phases of adaptation governance (planning, implementation, and monitoring). Lastly, we conclude that a more equitable redistribution of power (roles and responsibilities) may diminish the negative implications of federal centralization in adaptation governance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adger WN, Arnell NW, Tompkins EL (2005) Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Glob Environ Change 15(2):77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005
Amundsen H, Berglund F, Westskogh H (2010) Overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation-a question of multilevel governance? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 28(2):276–289. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0941
Ayers JM, Huq S, Faisal AM, Hussain ST (2014) Mainstreaming climate change adaptation into development: a case study of Bangladesh. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 5(1):37–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.226
Bache I, Bartle I, Flinders M (2016) Multi-level governance. In: In handbook on theories of governance
Bauer A, Steurer R (2014) Multi-level governance of climate change adaptation through regional partnerships in Canada and England. Geoforum 51:121–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.10.006
Bauer A, Feichtinger J, Steurer R (2012) The governance of climate change adaptation in 10 OECD countries: challenges and approaches countries: challenges and approaches. J Environ Policy Plan 14(3):279–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2012.707406
Bisaro A, Hinkel J, Kranz N (2010) Multilevel water, biodiversity and climate adaptation governance: evaluating adaptive management in Lesotho. Environ Sci Policy 13:637–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.08.004
Bulkeley H (2012) Governance and the geography of authority: modalities of authorisation and the transnational governing of climate change. Environ Plan A 44(10):2428–2444. https://doi.org/10.1068/a44678
Bulkeley H, Moser SC (2007) Responding to climate change: governance and social action beyond Kyoto. Glob Environ Polit 7(2):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2007.7.2.1
Calliari E, Michetti M, Farnia L, Ramieri E (2019) A network approach for moving from planning to implementation in climate change adaptation: evidence from southern Mexico. Environ Sci Policy 93:146–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.11.025
Cash DW, Adger WN, Berkes F, Garden P, Lebel L (2006) Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecol Soc 11(2):8–8
Clegg SR (1989) Frameworks of power. SAGE
Cole DH (2015) Advantages of a polycentric approach to climate change policy. Nat Clim Chang 5(2):114. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2490
Crona B, Bodin Ö (2010) Power asymmetries in small-scale fisheries: a barrier to governance transformability? Ecol Soc 15(4)
Dahl R (1982) Dilemmas of pluralist democracy: autonomy vs. control. Yale University Press
Di Gregorio M, Fatorelli L, Paavola J, Locatelli B, Pramova E (2019) Multi-level governance and power in climate change policy networks. Glob Environ Change 54(April 2018):64–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.10.003
Duit A, Galaz V, Eckerberg K, Ebbesson J (2010) Governance, complexity, and resilience. Glob Environ Change 20(3):363–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.006
Eakin HC, Patt A (2011) Are adaptation studies effective, and what can enhance their practical impact? Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 2(2):141–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.100
Eriksen S, Lind J (2009) Adaptation as a political process: adjusting to drought and conflict in Kenya’s drylands. Environ Manage 43(5):817–835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9189-0
Eriksen SH, Nightingale AJ, Eakin H (2015) Reframing adaptation: the political nature of climate change adaptation. Glob Environ Change 35:523–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.014
Eriksen S, Aldunce P, Bahinipati CS, Martins RD, Molefe JI (2011) When not every response to climate change is a good one: identifying principles for sustainable adaptation. Clim Dev 3(1):7–20. https://doi.org/10.3763/cdev.2010.0060
Fidelman PIJ, Leitch AM, Nelson DR (2013) Unpacking multilevel adaptation to climate change in the great barrier reef, Australia. Glob Environ Change 23(4):800–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.016
Fuchs D, Glaab K (2011) Material power and normative conflict in global and local agrifood governance: the lessons of ‘Golden Rice’in India. Food Policy 36(6):729–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.07.013
Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration. Polity Press
Gillard R, Gouldson A, Paavola J, Van Alstine J (2017) Can national policy blockages accelerate the development of polycentric governance? Evidence from climate change policy in the United Kingdom. Glob Environ Change 45(October 2016):174–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.06.003
Hanssen GS, Mydske PK, Dahle E (2013) Multi-level coordination of climate change adaptation: by national hierarchical steering or by regional network governance? Local Environ 18(8):869–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2012.738657
Hayward C, Lukes S (2008) Nobody to shoot? Power, structure, and agency: a dialog. J Power 1(1):5–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17540290801943364
Ishtiaque A, Sangwan N, Yu DJ (2017) Robust-yet-fragile nature of partly engineered social-ecological systems: a case study of coastal Bangladesh. Ecology and Society 22(3). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09186-220305
Ishtiaque A, Eakin H, Chhetri N, Myint SW, Dewan A (2019) Examination of coastal vulnerability framings at multiple levels of governance using spatial MCDA approach. Ocean and Coast Manag 171(January):66–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.01.020
Jordan AJ, Huitema D, Hildén M, Van Asselt H, Rayner TJ (2015) Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects. Nat Clim Change 5(11):977. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2725
Juhola S, Westerhoff L (2011) Challenges of adaptation to climate change across multiple scales: a case study of network governance in two European countries. Environ Sci Policy 14(3):239–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.12.006
Keskitalo, E. C. H. ed. (2010). Developing adaptation policy and practice in Europe: multi-level governance of climate change. Developing adaptation policy and practice in Europe: multi-level governance of climate change. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Marks G (1993) Structural policy and multilevel governance in the EC. In: Cafruny A, Rosenthal G (eds) The state of the European community. Lynne Rienner, pp 391–410
Marsh D (2002) Pluralism and the study of British politics. In: Hay C (ed) British politics today
Moser SC, Ekstrom JA (2010) A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS USA) 107(51):22026–22031. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1007887107
Nightingale AJ (2017) Power and politics in climate change adaptation efforts: struggles over authority and recognition in the context of political instability. Geoforum 84(June 2016):11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.05.011
Ojha HR, Ghimire S, Pain A, Nightingale A, Khatri DB (2016) Policy without politics: technocratic control of climate change adaptation policy making in Nepal. Clim Policy 16(4):415–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.1003775
Orsini A (2013) Multi-forum non-state actors: navigating the regime complexes for forestry and genetic resources. Glob Environ Polit 13(3):34–55. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00182
Ostrom E (2010) Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Am Econ Rev 100(3):641–672. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.641
Poteete A (2012) Levels, scales, linkages, and other ‘multiples’ affecting natural resources. Int J Commons 6(2)
Rahman MS, Tosun J (2018) State bureaucracy and the management of climate change adaptation in Bangladesh. Rev Policy Res 35(6):835–858. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12289
Rahman MS, Sarker PK, Giessen L (2021) Super-bureaucracy in climate adaptation governance in Bangladesh. Climate and Development:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2021.1937029
Ratner B, Cohen P, Barman B, Mam K, Nagoli J (2013) Governance of aquatic agricultural systems: analyzing representation, power, and accountability. Ecology and Society 18(4)
Schipper ELF (2007) Climate change adaptation and development: exploring the linkages. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research Working Paper 107:13
Schmitter PC (2004) Neo-functionalism. In: Wiener, Diez (eds) European integration theory. Oxford University Press, pp 45–74
Sherman MH, Ford J (2014) Stakeholder engagement in adaptation interventions: an evaluation of projects in developing nations. Clim Policy 14(3):417–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.859501
Smucker TA, Nijbroek R (2020) Foundations for convergence: sub-national collaboration at the nexus of disaster risk reduction, climate change adaptation, and land restoration under multi-level governance in Kenya. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 51:101834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101834
Stehle F, Hickmann T, Lederer M, Höhne C (2020) Urban climate politics in emerging economies: a multi-level governance perspective. Urbanization:2455747120913185
Sova CA, Thornton TF, Zougmore R, Helfgott A, Chaudhury AS (2017) Power and influence mapping in Ghana’s agricultural adaptation policy regime. Clim Dev 9(5):399–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2016.1154450
Stein, M., & Turkewitsch, L. (2014). Multilevel governance and federalism: new theoretical perspectives. Paper presented at the IPSA 23rd world congress of political science in Montréal
Termeer CJAM, Dewulf A, Van Lieshout M (2010) Disentangling scale approaches in governance research: comparing monocentric, multilevel, and adaptive governance. Ecol Soc 15(4):29
Verkerk J, Teisman G, Van Buuren A (2015) Synchronizing climate adaptation processes in a multilevel governance setting: exploring synchronization of governance levels in the Dutch Delta. Policy and Politics 43(4):579–596. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557312X655909
Vij S, Biesbroek R, Groot A, Termeer K, Parajuli BP (2018a) Power interplay between actors: using material and ideational resources to shape local adaptation plans of action (LAPAs) in Nepal. Clim Policy 0(0):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1534723
Vij S, Biesbroek R, Groot A, Termeer K (2018b) Changing climate policy paradigms in Bangladesh and Nepal. Environ Sci Policy 81(November 2017):77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.12.010
Vij S, Biesbroek R, Stock R, Gardezi M, Ishtiaque A, Groot A, Termeer K (2021) ‘Power-sensitive design principles’ for climate change adaptation policy-making in South Asia. Earth System Governance 9:100109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2021.100109
Weber M (1947) The theory of social and economic organizations. Oxford University Press
Wilbanks TJ, Kates RW (1999) Global change in local places. Clim Change 43:601–628. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005418924748
Warrick RA, Ahmad, Q. K. (Eds.). (2012) The implications of climate and sea-level change for Bangladesh. Springer Science & Business Media
Acknowledgements
We cordially thank Sheikh Mofizul Islam (then Director, National Institute of Local Government), Moktar Hossain (then Additional Deputy Commissioner, Patuakhali District Administration), and Dr. Md. Bashirul Alam (then Deputy Commissioner, Barguna District Administration) for their help in arranging interviews during the field survey.
Funding
This research was partially funded by the Matthew G. Bailey Fellowship from Arizona State University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Robbert Biesbroek
Note
The interviews were conducted using a semi-structured questionnaire approved by the Institutional Review Board of Arizona State University (IRB ID: STUDY00006262).
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ishtiaque, A., Eakin, H., Vij, S. et al. Multilevel governance in climate change adaptation in Bangladesh: structure, processes, and power dynamics. Reg Environ Change 21, 75 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-021-01802-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-021-01802-1