Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanical property of U-Shaped 65Mn steel bumpers for seismic base isolation

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study proposes a novel U-shaped 65Mn steel bumper as the displacement restraining device for base-isolated structures with laminated elastomeric rubber bearings. A series of bumpers with different geometric parameters were designed and tested under monotonic and cyclic quasi-static loading protocols. The experimental results from a total of 232 specimens were analyzed to develop an analytical model to calculate the backbone curve and the maximum elastic restoring force for U-shaped 65Mn bumpers. Thus, the analytical equations to calculate the elastic, hardening, and unloading stiffness of U-shaped 65Mn bumpers, as well as their maximum elastic restoring force, are validated by using an additional ten groups of bumpers with varying radiuses. These analytical equations can accurately predict the mechanical parameters of U-shaped 65Mn steel bumpers for a design purpose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken I, Kelly J, and Tajirian F (1989), Mechanics of Low Shape Factor Elastomeric Seismic Isolation Bearings, Report No. UCB/EERC-89/13, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui X (2015), “Study on Mechanical Property of U-Shaped 65Mn Steel Plate Buffer and Soft Steel Damper,” M.S. Thesis, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing, China. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng K, Pan P and Wang C (2013), “Development of Crawler Steel Damper for Bridges,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 85: 140–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng K, Pan P, Su Y and Xue Y (2015), “Shape Optimization of U-Shaped Damper for Improving Its Bi-Directional Performance Under Cyclic Loading,” Engineering Structures, 93: 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dicleli M (2008), “Performance of Seismic-Isolated Bridges with and without Elastic-Gap Devices in Near-Fault Zones,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 37(6): 935–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du H and Han M (2014), “Impact and Energy Analysis of Deformation-Limited Base-Isolated Structure in Shaking Table Test,” Applied Mechanics and Materials, 638–640:1811–1817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du H, Han M and Yan W (2014), “Study on the Calculation Method of Mechanical Characteristics for Constrained U-Shaped Steel Plates,” China Civil Engineering Journal, 47(S2): 158–163. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrein L and Azevedo J (1996), “Impact Problems on Base-Isolated Structures,” Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico.

  • Han M and Li X (2006), “Testing Studies on Automatic Resilience of U-Shape Combination Buffers,” World Earthquake Engineering, 22(2): 110–113. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Han M and Zhou X (1999), “Analysis of Soft-Collision Safety for Base Isolated Buildings,” Building Science, 15(1): 14–20. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra L and Krawinkler H (2005), Global Collapse of Frame Structures Under Seismic Excitations, Report No. 29–51. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiao Y, Kishiki S, Yamada S, Diana E, Konishi Y, Hoashi Y and Terashima M (2015), “Low Cyclic Fatigue and Hysteretic Behavior of U-Shaped Steel Dampers for Seismically Isolated Buildings Under Dynamic Cyclic Loadings,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 44(10): 1523–1538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Li J and Chen X (2015), “Effects of X-Shaped Elastic-Plastic Steel Shear Keys on Transverse Seismic Responses of a Simply-Supported Girder Bridge,” Journal of Vibration and Shock, 34(2): 143–149. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Masroor A and Mosqueda G (2012a), “Experimental Simulation of Base-Isolated Buildings Pounding Against Moat Wall and Effects on Superstructure Response,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 41(14): 2093–2109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masroor A and Mosqueda G (2012b), “Impact Model for Simulation of Base Isolated Buildings Impacting Flexible Moat Walls,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 42(3): 357–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavronicola EA, Polycarpou PC and Komodromos P (2017), “Spatial Seismic Modeling of Base-Isolated Buildings Pounding Against Moat Walls: Effects of Ground Motion Directionality and Mass Eccentricity,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 46(7): 1161–1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh SH, Song SH, Lee SH and Kim HJ (2013), “Seismic Response of Base Isolating Systems with U-Shaped Hysteretic Dampers,” International Journal of Steel Structures, 12(2): 285–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pant DR and Wijeyewickrema AC (2014), “Performance of Base-Isolated Reinforced Concrete Buildings Under Bidirectional Seismic Excitation Considering Pounding with Retaining Walls Including Friction Effects,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 43(10): 1521–1541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polycarpou PC, Komodromos P and Polycarpou AC (2013), “A Nonlinear Impact Model for Simulating the Use of Rubber Shock Absorbers for Mitigating the Effects of Structural Pounding During Earthquakes,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 42(1): 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner RL, Robinson WH and McVerry GH (1993), An Introduction to Seismic Isolation, John Wiley Sons Ltd., 268–269.

  • Suzuki K, Watanabe A and Saeki E (2005), “Development of U-shaped Steel Damper for Seismic Isolation System,” Nippon Steel Technical Report No. 92, Tokyo, Japan.

  • Tagawa H and Gao J (2012), “Evaluation of Vibration Control System with U-Dampers Based on Quasi-Linear Motion Mechanism,” Journal of Construction Steel Research, 70: 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y and Ibarra L (2015), “Seismically Optimization of Modified Base-Isolated Systems for Next Generation Nuclear Structures,” Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Manchester, UK, August, 10–14.

  • Wang Y, Ibarra L and Pantelides C (2016), “Seismic Retrofit of a Three-Span RC Bridge with Buckling-Restrained Braces,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, 21(11): 04016073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Ibarra L and Pantelides C (2019), “Collapse Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Skewed Bridges Retrofitted with Buckling-Restrained Braces,” Engineering Structures, 184: 99–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie X, Chen SX and Zhou X (2018), “A Simplified Analytical Model for U-Shaped Steel Dampers Considering Horizontal Bidirectional Deformation,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 16(12): 6243–6268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye K, Li L and Zhu H (2009), “A Modified Kelvin Impact Model for Pounding Simulation of Base-Isolated Building with Adjacent Structures,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 8(3): 433–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou FL and Tan P (2018), “Recent Progress and Application on Seismic Isolation Energy Dissipation and Control for Structures in China,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 17(1): 19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Du Hongkai.

Additional information

Supported by: National Science Foundation of China for the Financial Support for This Research under Grant Nos. 51378047 and 51408027

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miao, H., Yuandong, W., Hongkai, D. et al. Mechanical property of U-Shaped 65Mn steel bumpers for seismic base isolation. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 20, 791–802 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-021-2052-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-021-2052-5

Keywords

Navigation