Skip to main content
Log in

The benefit of manufacturer encroachment considering consumer’s environmental awareness and product competition

  • S.I. : OR for Sustainability in Supply Chain Management
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate a manufacturer’s encroachment decision in a dual-channel supply chain with substitutable green products. The manufacturer makes green investment and pricing decisions and sells through its own retail store as well as an independent retailer. We make a major contribution by incorporating consumer green awareness as well as product competition into game-theoretic models of the dual-channel supply chain. Specifically, we explicitly analyze the impacts of consumer green awareness and product substitutability on profitability, social welfare, and environmental performance of the supply chain and its firms. Our main findings include the followings. First, with encroachment, higher consumer green awareness and product substitutability always benefit the manufacturer. However, they benefit the retailer only when the manufacturer encroachment cost is sufficiently high. Second, for the green manufacturer, the encroachment strategy can outperform the no-encroachment strategy in terms of profitability, social welfare, and environmental performance. We also employ numerical examples to further illustrate our analytical findings and gain more managerial and policy insights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Accenture. More than one-third has no awareness of level of emissions in their supply chain network, 2009. https://newsroom.accenture.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=4801.

  • Ahmad, R., Farzad, D., Behnam, F., et al. (2017). Green supply chain network design with stochastic demand and carbon price. Annals of Operations Research, 250(2), 463–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altug, M. S. (2016). Supply chain contracting for vertically differentiated products. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 34–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aysegul, T., & Bilgesu, C. (2017). How supply chain coordination affects the environment: A carbon footprint perspective. Annals of Operations Research, 250(2), 487–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, C., Dhavale, D., & Sarkis, J. (2016). Complex investment decisions using rough set and fuzzy c-means: An example of investment in green supply chains. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(2), 507–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. K., & Ulya, M. A. (2019). Analyses of the reward-penalty mechanism in green closed-loop supply chains with product remanufacturing. International Journal of Production Economics, 210, 211–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Liang, L., & Yao, D. (2019). Factory encroachment and channel selection in an outsourced supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 215, 73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K. Y., Kaya, M., & Ozer, O. (2008). Dual sales channel management with service competition. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 10(4), 654–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. Attitudes of Europeans citizens towards the environment. Eurobarometer, 2008, 295. http:// www.ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_295_en.pdf.

  • Conrad, K. (2005). Price competition and product differentiation when consumers care for the environment. Environment and Resource Economics, 31, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, S. F., Tang, W. Z., Zhao, J. J., et al. (2018). Sell to whom? Firm’s green production in competition facing market segmentation. Annals of Operations Research, 270(1–2), 125–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumrongsiri, A., Fan, M., Jain, A., & Moinzadeh, K. (2008). A supply chain model with direct and retail channels. European Journal of Operational Research, 187(3), 691–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fattahi, M., & Govindan, K. (2017). Integrated forward/reverse logistics network design under uncertainty with pricing for collection of used products. Annals of Operations Research, 253(1), 193–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frostenson, M., & Prenkert, F. (2015). Sustainable supply chain management when focal firms are complex: A network perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, J., Xiao, Z., Wei, H., et al. (2018). Active or passive? Sustainable manufacturing in the direct-channel green supply chain: A perspective of two types of green product designs. Transportation Research Part D, 65, 332–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindan K., Sarkis J., Jabbour C.J.C., Zhu Q, Geng Y. Eco-efficiency based green supply chain management: Current status and opportunities. European Journal of Operational Research 2014, 233(2): 293–298.

  • Hafezalkotob, A. (2015). Competition of two green and regular supply chains under environmental protection and revenue seeking policies of government. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 82, 103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafezalkotob, A. (2017). Competition, cooperation, and coopetition of green supply chains under regulations on energy saving levels. Transportation Research Part E Logistics Transportation Review, 97, 228–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haytko, D. L., & Matulich, L. (2011). Green advertising and environmentally responsible consumer behaviors: Linkages examined. Jounal of Management and Marketing Research, 1, 2–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hervani, A. A., Helms, M. M., & Sarkis, J. (2005). Performance measurement for green supply chain management. Benchmark. and International Journal, 12, 330–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heydari, J., Govindan, K., & Aslani, A. (2019). Pricing and greening decisions in a three-tier dual channel supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 217, 185–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Z., & Guo, X. (2019). Green product supply chain contracts considering environmental responsibilities. Omega, 83, 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, M. B., & Rasti-Barzoki, M. (2018). A game theoretic approach for green and non-green product pricing in chain-to-chain competitive sustainable and regular dual-channel supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1029–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kök, G. A., Fisher, M., & Vaidyanathan, R. (2009). Assortment planning: Review of literature and industry practice. Retail supply chain management. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, 122, 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krass, D., Nedorezov, T., & Ovchinnikov, A. (2013). Environmental taxes and the choice of green technology. Production and Operations Management, 22(5), 1035–1055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei, H., Wang, J., Yang, H., et al. (2020). The impact of ex-post information sharing on a two-echelon supply chain with horizontal competition and capacity constraint. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03598-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, B., Zhu, M., Jiang, Y., & Li, Z. (2016). Pricing policies of a competitive dual-channel green supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2029–2042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, G., Lim, M. K., & Wang, Z. (2020a). Stakeholders, green manufacturing, and practice performance: Empirical evidence from Chinese fashion businesses. Annals of Operations Research, 290(1–2), 961–982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Yang, S., Shi, V., & Zhai, S. (2020b). Partial vertical centralization in competing supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 224(107565), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Yi, L., and Shi, V., et al. Supplier encroachment strategy in the presence of retail strategic inventory: Centralization or decentralization? Omega 2021, 98, 102213.

  • Li, L., & Zhang, H. (2008). Confidentiality and information sharing in supply chain coordination. Management Science, 54(8), 1467–1481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, P., Rao, C., Goh, M., Yang, Z. Pricing strategies and profit coordination under a double echelon green supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020, In press, 123694.

  • Li, T. T., Xie, J. X., & Zhao, X. B. (2015). Supplier encroachment in competitive supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 165, 120–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B., & Pietro, D. G. (2019). Green process innovation through Industry 4 0 technologies and supply chain coordination. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03498-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Li, J., Ren, W., et al. (2020). Differentiated products pricing with consumer network acceptance in a dual-channel supply chain. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 39,

  • Liu, Z., Anderson, T. D., & Cruz, J. M. (2012). Consumer environmental awareness and competition in two-stage supply chains. European Journal of Operational Research, 218, 602–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manez, J.A., Waterson, M. (2001) Multiproduct firms & product differentiation: A survey University of Warwick Economics Department Working Paper No. 594, U.K: Warwick.

  • Martinez, E. Eco friendly fashion. 2010. http://www.eco- friendly- digest.com/ eco- friendly- fashion.html.

  • Meng, J. Buying air conditioners online has become a fun task. China Daily 2016. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/ business/tech/ 2016–07 /04/content_25951639.htm.

  • Moorthy, K. S. (1984). Market segmentation, self-selection, and product line design. Marketing Science, 2, 288–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moriarty, R. T., & Moran, U. (1990). Managing hybrid marketing systems. Harvard Business Review, 68(6), 146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mussa, M., & Rossen, S. (1978). Monopoly and product quality. J. Econ. Theory, 18, 310–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney, A., & Li, D. (2015). A supply chain network game theory model with product differentiation, outsourcing of production and distribution, and quality and price competition. Annals of Operations Research, 226(1), 479–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palevich, R. The lean sustainable supply chain: How to create a green infrastructure with lean technologies. Ft Press, 2012.

  • Patra, P. (2018). Distribution of profit in a smart phone supply chain under green sensitive consumer demand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 192, 608–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietro, D. G. (2014). Environmental collaboration in a closed-loop supply chain with a reverse revenue sharing contract. Annals of Operations Research, 220(1), 135–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radhi, M., & Zhang, G. (2019). Optimal cross-channel return policy in dual-channel retailing systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 210, 184–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopalan, S., & Xia, N. (2012). Product variety, pricing and differentiation in a supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 217, 84–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranjan, A., & Jha, J. K. (2019). Pricing and coordination strategies of a dual-channel supply chain considering green quality and sales effort. Journal of Cleaner Production, 218, 409–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha, S., Sarmah, S. P., & Modak, N. M. (2018). Single versus dual-channel: A strategic analysis in perspective of retailer’s profitability under three-level dual-channel supply chain. Asia Pacif. Manag. Review, 23(2), 148–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao, X. F. (2013). Integrated product and channel decision in mass customization. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 60(1), 30–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syam, N. B., Ruan, R., & Hess, J. D. (2005). Customized products: A competitive analysis. Marketing Science, 24(4), 569–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taleizadeh, A. A., Kannan, G., & Nasim, E. (2020). The effect of promotional cost sharing on the decisions of two-level supply chain with uncertain demand. Annals of Operations Research, 290(1), 747–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsay, A. A., & Agrawal, N. (2004). Channel conflict and coordination in the ecommerce age. Production and Operations Management, 13(1), 93–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turken, N., Carrillo, J., & Verter, V. (2020). Strategic supply chain decisions under environmental regulations: When to invest in end-of-pipe and green technology. European Journal of Operational Research, 283(2), 601–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., & Ng, C. T. (2020). New retail versus traditional retail in e-commerce: Channel establishment, price competition, and consumer recognition. Annals of Operations Research, 291(1–2), 921–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia, N., & Rajagopalan, S. (2009). A competitive model of customization with lead-time effects. Decision Sciences, 40(4), 727–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, T., Choi, T. M., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2014). Product variety and channel structure strategy for a retailer-Stackelberg supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 233(1), 114–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, H., Liu, Z. Z., & Zhang, S. H. (2012). A strategic analysis of dual-channel supply chain design with price and delivery lead time considerations. International Journal of Production Economics, 139(2), 654–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, D., Xiao, T., & Huang, J. (2019). Dual-channel structure choice of an environmental responsibility supply chain with green investment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 134–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yenipazarli, A. (2017). To collaborate or not to collaborate: Prompting upstream eco-efficient innovation in a supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 260(2), 571–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, D. H. (2016). Supplier encroachment and investment spillovers. Production and Operations Management, 25(11), 1839–1854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Li, S., Zhang, S., & Dai, R. (2019). Manufacturer encroachment with quality decision under asymmetric demand information. European Journal of Operational Research, 273(1), 217–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Wang, J., & You, J. (2015). Consumer environmental awareness and channel coordination with two substitutable products. European Journal of Operational Research, 241(1), 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S., & Zhang, J. (2020). Agency selling or reselling: E-tailer information sharing with supplier offline entry. European Journal of Operational Research, 280(1), 134–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. (2012). Examining the effects of green supply chain management practices and their mediations on performance improvements. International Journal of Production Research, 50, 1377–1394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Dr. Li’s research is supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China (19BGL194); Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LY20G020006); the Fundamental Research Funds for the Provincial Universities of Zhejiang (JR202102). Dr. Shi is supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Grant # 213090). Dr. Zhu is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71771188) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. JBK18JYT02, JBK1805008 and JBK190504). The authors are listed alphabetically and contribute equally.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victor Shi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix

Proof of Lemma 1

Under the no-encroachment strategy, the game is solved using backward induction. At stage 1, solving (6) yields the equilibrium wholesale price \(w^{N}\) and green level \(g_{r}^{N}\) in the following:

\(w^{N} = \frac{a}{2} + \frac{{3Ht^{2} }}{4}\), \(g_{r}^{N} = tH\).

Plugging these values of \(w^{N}\) and \(g_{r}^{N}\) into Eq. (5), we thus obtain the equilibrium retail price:

\(p_{r}^{N} = \frac{{3a}}{4} + \frac{{7Ht^{2} }}{8}\).

Substituting them again into (4) and (6), we have the equilibrium profits:

\(\Pi _{m}^{N} = \frac{{(2a + Ht^{2} )^{2} }}{{32}}\) and \(\Pi _{r}^{N} = \frac{{(2a + Ht^{2} )^{2} }}{{64}}\). □

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, J., Liang, J., Shi, V. et al. The benefit of manufacturer encroachment considering consumer’s environmental awareness and product competition. Ann Oper Res (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04185-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04185-y

Keywords

Navigation