Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of tree species on mineral soil C, N, and P, litter and root chemical compositions: cross-sites comparisons and their relationship decoupling in Northeast China

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Trees Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Key message

Mineral soil, litter and root from 4 tree species at 4 sites were compared in this study. Excluding site interference increased the discriminability of interspecific difference. Mineral SOC (soil organic carbon) and soil N (nitrogen) were 20−40% higher in Elm. Soil P (phosphorous) was 40% lower in poplar, and pine litter was more recalcitrant.

Abstract

Effects of tree species on mineral soil, litter and root properties are found to be inconsistent, and understanding general cross-site pattern and possible mechanism is important for enhancing the forest ecological service through proper tree species selection. In this study, four tree species including larch (Larix gmelinii), pine (Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica), poplar (Populus spp.), and elm (Ulmus pumila) at four sites were selected; and 34 parameters comprised of mineral soil C, N, and P, litter and root chemical compositions, and stand structure were measured to compare the interspecies differences across different sites. Different statistical methods were used to compare their discriminability of interspecies differences, and site-effect exclusion could increase the discriminability, especially Two-way MANOVA (multivariate analysis of variance). Cross-site pooled data statistics showed that mineral SOC and soil N concentrations in elm were 40% and 20% higher and mineral soil P in poplar was 40% lower as compared with those in other tree species across sites. No interspecies difference was found in soil C/N, C/P, and N/P ratios. Pine had the peak litter C, C/N, C/P, cellulose, and holocellulose, while no interspecies difference was found in root chemical compositions across sites. Variation partitioning found that interspecies differences were strongly interacted with site-geoclimatic conditions. Interspecies variation on mineral soils could be explained more by the geoclimatic conditions (> 95%), while much less was for litter (50%) and roots (20%). Our results indicated that elm could capture more mineral SOC and soil nutrients, poplar induced mineral soil P depletion, and pine litter was of more recalcitrance for decomposition; However, general differences among four taxonomic species were not always observed across sites. Future afforestation practices in this region should fully consider matching tree species with site conditions, such as in the Three North Shelterbelt Projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aber JD, Melillo JM, McClaugherty CA (1990) Predicting long-term patterns of mass loss, nitrogen dynamics, and soil organic matter formation from initial fine litter chemistry in temperate forest ecosystems. Can J Bot 68:2201–2208

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali A (2019) Forest stand structure and functioning: Current knowledge and future challenges. Ecol Ind 98:665–677

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali A, Mattsson E (2017) Individual tree size inequality enhances aboveground biomass in homegarden agroforestry systems in the dry zone of Sri Lanka. Sci Total Environ 575:6–11

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez E, Marcos MLF, Torrado V, Sanjurjo MJF (2007) Dynamics of macronutrients during the first stages of litter decomposition from forest species in a temperate area (Galicia, NW Spain). Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 80:243–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Augusto L, Bonnaud P, Ranger J (1998) Impact of tree species on forest soil acidification. Forest Ecology Management 105:67–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Bao S (2000) Soil Agricultural Chemistry Analysis. China Agriculture Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Bao G (2015) Mongolian pines (Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica) in the Hulun Buir steppe, China, respond to climate in adjustment to the local water supply. Int J Biometeorol 59:1–10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baranov A, Gordeev T, Kuzmin V (1955) Index florae Harbinensis. Heilongjiang Publishing Group, Harbin

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg B (2000) Litter decomposition and organic matter turnover in northern forest soils. For Ecol Manage 133:13–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger TW, Neubauer C, Glatzel G (2002) Factors controlling soil carbon and nitrogen stores in pure stands of Norway spruce (Picea abies) and mixed species stands in Autria. For Ecol Manage 159:3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Binkley D, Giardina C (1998) Why do tree species affect soils? The warp and woof of tree-soil interactions. Biogeochemistry 42:89–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Binkly D (1995) The influence of tree species on forest soils: processes and patterns. Special Publication-Agronomy Society of New Zealand 10:1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird JA, Kleber M, Torn MS (2008) 13 C and 15 N stabilization dynamics in soil organic matter fractions during needle and fine root decomposition. Org Geochem 39:465–477

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield J, Vogt KA, Vogt DJ (1993) Decay rate and substrate quality of fine roots and foliage of two tropical tree species in the Luquillo Experimental Forest, Puerto Rico. Plant Soil 150:233–245

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boca A, Van Miegroet H, Gruselle MC (2014) Forest Overstory Effect on Soil Organic Carbon Storage: A Meta-analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 78:S35–S47

    Google Scholar 

  • Cha JY, Cha Y, Oh NH (2019) The Effects of Tree Species on Soil Organic Carbon Content in South Korea. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 124:708–716

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland CC, Liptzin D (2007) C: N: P stoichiometry in soil: is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass? Biogeochemistry 85:235–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotrufo MF, Wallenstein M, Boot CM, Denef K (2013) The Microbial Efficiency-Matrix Stabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic matter stabilization: do labile plant inputs form stable soil organic matter? Glob Change Biol 19:988–995

    Google Scholar 

  • Dănescu A, Albrecht AT, Bauhus J (2016) Structural diversity promotes productivity of mixed, uneven-aged forests in southwestern Germany. Oecologia 182:319–333

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson EA, Janssens IA (2006) Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature 440:165–173

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Pinés E, Rubio A, Miegroet HV, Montes F, Benito M (2011) Does tree species composition control soil organic carbon pools in Mediterranean mountain forests? Forest Ecology Management 262:1895–1904

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong L, Mao Z, Sun T (2016) Condensed tannin effects on decomposition of very fine roots among temperate tree species. Soil Biol Biochem 103:489–492

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fang J, Chen A, Peng C, Zhao S, Ci L (2001) Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998. Science 292:2320–2322

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fang J, Guo Z, Piao S, Chen A (2007) Terrestrial vegetation carbon sinks in China, 1981–2000. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences 50:1341–1350

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2018) The State of the World’s Forests 2018 - Forest pathways to sustainable development. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Finzi AC, Breemen NV, Canham CD (1998) Canopy tree–soil interactions within temperate forests: species effects on soil carbon and nitrogen. Ecol Appl 8:440–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher R (1971) The design of experiments. Oliver and Boyd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Geng N, Li X, Gu D, Liu L (2013) Determination of tannic acid content in gallnut by Folin-Denis spectrophotometry. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Science 41:11848–11850, 11915

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gruba P, Socha J (2019) Exploring the effects of dominant forest tree species, soil texture, altitude, and pHH2O on soil carbon stocks using generalized additive models. For Ecol Manage 447:105–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Hättenschwiler S, Hagerman AE, Vitousek PM (2003) Polyphenols in litter from tropical montane forests across a wide range in soil fertility. Biogeochemistry 64:129–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbie SE, Oleksyn J, Eissenstat DM, Reich PB (2010) Fine root decomposition rates do not mirror those of leaf litter among temperate tree species. Oecologia 162:505–513

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huston M (1980) Soil nutrients and tree species richness in Costa Rican forests. J Biogeography 7:147–157

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA

  • Johnson AH, Frizano J, Vann DR (2003) Biogeochemical implications of labile phosphorus in forest soils determined by the Hedley fractionation procedure. Oecologia 135:487–499

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keselman HJ, Huberty CJ, Lix LM, Olejnik S, Cribbie RA, Donahue B, Kowalchuk RK, Lowman LL, Petoskey MD, Keselman JC, Levin JR (1998) Statistical practices of educational researchers: An analysis of their ANOVA, MANOVA, and ANCOVA analyses. Rev Educ Res 68:350–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleber M (2010) What is recalcitrant soil organic matter? Environ Chem 7:320

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Langenbruch C, Helfrich M, Flessa H (2012) Effects of beech (Fagus sylvatica), ash (Fraxinus excelsior) and lime (Tilia spec.) on soil chemical properties in a mixed deciduous forest. Plant Soil 352:389–403

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Legendre L (2012) Numerical ecology, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Li K, Wang S, Cao M (2004) Vegetation and soil carbon storage in China. Science in China series d earth sciences-english edition 47:49–57

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Li X, Niu L (1998) The degradation of soil fertility in pure larch plantations in the northeastern part of China. Ecol Eng 10:75–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu J, Shen G, Wang Q, Pei z, Ren M, Wei C, Wang W (2017) Larch, Ash, Scots pine and farmland-induced differences on 17 soil parameters and their comprehensive analyses. Acta Ecol Sin 37:3543–3552

    Google Scholar 

  • Lv H, Wang W, He X, Xiao L, Zhou W, Zhang B (2016) Quantifying Tree and Soil Carbon Stocks in a Temperate Urban Forest in Northeast China. Forests 7:200

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DC (2017) Design and analysis of experiments. John Wiley & Sons, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Oglesby KA, Fownes JH (1992) Effects of chemical composition on nitrogen mineralization from green manures of seven tropical leguminous trees. Plant Soil 143:127–132

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oostra S, Majdi H, Olsson M (2006) Impact of tree species on soil carbon stocks and soil acidity in southern Sweden. Scand J For Res 21:364–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Osei R, Titeux H, Bielak K, Bravo F, Collet C, Cools C, Cornelis J-T, Heym M, Korboulewsky N, Löf M, Muys B, Najib Y, Nothdurft A, Pach M, Pretzsch H, del Rio M, Ruiz-Peinado R, Ponette Q (2020) Tree species identity drives soil organic carbon storage more than species mixing in major two-species mixtures (pine, oak, beech) in Europe. Forest Ecol Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostertag R, Marín-Spiotta E, Silver WL, Schulten J (2008) Litterfall and decomposition in relation to soil carbon pools along a secondary forest chronosequence in Puerto Rico. Ecosystems 11:701

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pregitzer KS, Kubiske ME, Yu CK, Hendrik RL (1997) Relationships among root branch order, carbon, and nitrogen in four temperate species. Oecologia 111:302–308

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prescott CE (2010) Litter decomposition: what controls it and how can we alter it to sequester more carbon in forest soils? Biogeochemistry 101:133–149

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prescott CE, Zabek LM, Staley CL, Kabzems R (2000) Decomposition of broadleaf and needle litter in forests of British Columbia: influences of litter type, forest type, and litter mixtures. Can J For Res 30:1742–1750

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin Z, Dunn JB, Kwon H, Mueller S, Wander MM (2016) Soil carbon sequestration and land use change associated with biofuel production: empirical evidence. Gcb Bioenergy 8:66–80

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rasse DP, Rumpel C, Dignac M-F (2005) Is soil carbon mostly root carbon? Mechanisms for a specific stabilisation. Plant Soil 269:341–356

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raulund-Rasmussen K, Vejre H (1995) Effect of tree species and soil properties on nutrient immobilization in the forest floor. Plant Soil 168:345–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice JA (2006) Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis 3rd edition. Duxbury Press, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Sariyildiz T, Anderson JM (2003) Interactions between litter quality, decomposition and soil fertility: a laboratory study. Soil Biol Biochem 35:391–399

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sariyildiz T, Anderson JM, Kucuk M (2005) Effects of tree species and topography on soil chemistry, litter quality, and decomposition in Northeast Turkey. Soil Biol Biochem 37:1695–1706

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schall P, Schulze E-D, Fischer M, Ayasse M, Ammer C (2018) Relations between forest management, stand structure and productivity across different types of Central European forests. Basic Appl Ecol 32:39–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J (2001) Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulp CJE, Nabulars GJ, Verburg PH, de Waal RW (2008) Effect of tree species on carbon stocks in forest floor and mineral soil and implications for soil carbon inventories. For Ecol Manage 256:482–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver WL, Miya RK (2001) Global patterns in root decomposition: comparisons of climate and litter quality effects. Oecologia 129:407–419

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sollins P, Swanston C, Kramer M (2007) Stabilization and destabilization of soil organic matter—a new focus. Biogeochemistry 85:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun T, Mao Z (2011) Functional relationships between morphology and respiration of fine roots in two Chinese temperate tree species. Plant Soil 346:375–384

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun T, Mao Z, Han Y (2013) Slow decomposition of very fine roots and some factors controlling the process: a 4-year experiment in four temperate tree species. Plant Soil 372:445–458

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun T, Hobbie SE, Berg B, Zhang H, Wang Q, Wang Z, Hättenschwiler S (2018) Contrasting dynamics and trait controls in first-order root compared with leaf litter decomposition. Proc Nat Acad Sci 115:10392–10397

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Swift M, Anderson J (1989) Tropical rainforest ecosystems: Biogeographical and ecological studies. In: Leith H, Wergen M (eds) Decomposition. Elsevier, The Netherland, pp 547–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Talkner U, Jansen M, Beese FO (2009) Soil phosphorus status and turnover in central-European beech forest ecosystems with differing tree species diversity. Eur J Soil Sci 60:338–346

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor B, Prescott C, Parsons W, Parkinson D (1991) Substrate control of litter decomposition in four Rocky Mountain coniferous forests. Can J Bot 69:2242–2250

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas FM, Molitor F, Werner W (2013) Lignin and cellulose concentrations in roots of Douglas fir and European beech of different diameter classes and soil depths. Trees 28:309–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Trumbore S, Costa ESD, Nepstad DE, Camargo PBD, Martinelli LA, Ray D, Restom T, Silver W (2006) Dynamics of fine root carbon in Amazonian tropical ecosystems and the contribution of roots to soil respiration. Glob Change Biol 12:217–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullah S, Muhammad B, Amin R, Abbas H, Muneer M (2019) Sensitivity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in old-growth forests: Direct effect on growth and soil carbon storage. Appl Ecol Environ Res 17:13749–13758

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Soest Pv, Robertson J, Lewis B (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74:3583–3597

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesterdal L, Schmidt IK, Callesen I, Nilsson LO, Gundersen P (2008) Carbon and nitrogen in forest floor and mineral soil under six common European tree species. For Ecol Manage 255:35–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesterdal L, Clarke N, Sigurdsson BD, Gundersen P (2013) Do tree species influence soil carbon stocks in temperate and boreal forests? For Ecol Manage 309:4–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang WJ, Zu YG, Wang HM, Hirano T, Takagi K, Sasa K, Koike T (2005) Effect of collar insertion on soil respiration in a larch forest measured with a LI-6400 soil CO2 flux system. Journal of Forest Research 10:57–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang WJ, Qiu L, Zu YG, Su DX, An J, Wang HY, Zheng GY, Sun W, Chen XQ (2011) Changes in soil organic carbon, nitrogen, pH and bulk density with the development of larch (Larix gmelinii) plantations in China. Glob Change Biol 17:2657–2676

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Liu W, Wang W, Zu Y (2013) Influence of long-term thinning on the biomass carbon and soil respiration in a larch (Larix gmelinii) forest in Northeastern China. Scientific World J. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/865645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Wang H, Zu Y (2014) Temporal changes in SOM, N, P, K, and their stoichiometric ratios during reforestation in China and interactions with soil depths: Importance of deep-layer soil and management implications. For Ecol Manag 325:8–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Wang W, Chang S (2017a) Sampling method and tree-age affect soil organic C and N contents in larch plantations. Forests 8:e28

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang HM, Wang WJ, Chang SX (2017) Sampling Method and Tree-Age Affect Soil Organic C and N Contents in Larch Plantations. Forests. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8010028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Lu J, Du H, Wei C, Wang H, Fu Y, He X (2017c) Ranking thirteen tree species based on their impact on soil physiochemical properties, soil fertility, and carbon sequestration in Northeastern China. For Ecol Manage 404:214–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Liu S, Song Z, Yang Y, Wang J, You Y, Zhang X, Shi Z, Nong Y, Ming A, Lu L, Cai D (2019) Introducing nitrogen-fixing tree species and mixing with Pinus massoniana alters and evenly distributes various chemical compositions of soil organic carbon in a planted forest in southern China. For Ecol Manage 449:117477

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei C, Wang Q, Ren M, Pei Z, Lu J, Wang H, Wang W (2021) Soil aggregation accounts for the mineral soil organic carbon and nitrogen accrual in broadleaved forests as compared to that of coniferous forests in Northeast China: Cross-sites and multiple species comparisons. Land Degradation Development 32:296–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Withington JM, Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Eissenstat DM (2006) Comparisons of structure and life span in roots and leaves among temperate trees. Ecological monographs 76:381–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodrow L (2014) ANOVA, ANCOVA and MANOVA. Writing about Quantitative Research in Applied Linguistics. Springer, Berlin, pp 73–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Wang W (2016) Poplar forests in NE China and possible influences on soil properties: ecological importance and sustainable development. Poplars and willows: cultivation, applications, and environmental benefits. Nova science publishers Inc, New York, pp 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Wang W, Wang Q, Zhong Z, Pei Z, Wang H, Yao Y (2018) Impact of poplar shelterbelt plantations on surface soil properties in northeastern China. Can J For Res 48:559–567

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yi L, Cai T, Man X, Sheng H, Ju C (2015) Canopy interception loss in a Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica forest of Northeast China. Journal of Arid Land 7:831–840

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Wu J, Tang Y (2016) The effects of grazing on the spatial pattern of elm (Ulmus pumila L.) in the sparse woodland steppe of Horqin Sandy Land in northeastern China. Solid Earth 7:631

    Google Scholar 

  • Zu Y, Li R, Wang W, Su D, Wang Y, Qiu L (2011) Soil organic and inorganic carbon contents in relation to soil physicochemical properties in northeastern China. Acta Ecol Sin 31:5207–5216

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41730641), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Project No. 2572021DS01), Heilongjiang Touyan Innovation Team Program for Forest Ecology and Conservation from Heilongjiang province, P. R. China. We appreciate Professor Scott Chang’s advice on the experimental design and language. We are also grateful to Qiong Wang, Zhongxue Pei, Manli Ren, Jiali Lu, and Zhaoliang Zhong for their assistance in field surveys and a grammar-check from Mr. Angali Bawaba Serge.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Forest Plant Ecology (MOE), College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Resource Utilization, Northeast Forestry University, 150040, Harbin, China

    Guang Shen, Huimei Wang & Wenjie Wang

  2. Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 130102, Changchun, China

    Chenhui Wei, Lu Xiao & Wenjie Wang

  3. Heilongjiang Academy of Sciences, 150040, Harbin, China

    Guang Shen

Authors
  1. Chenhui Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lu Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Guang Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Huimei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wenjie Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenjie Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Additional information

Communicated by Mike Aspinwall.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, C., Xiao, L., Shen, G. et al. Effects of tree species on mineral soil C, N, and P, litter and root chemical compositions: cross-sites comparisons and their relationship decoupling in Northeast China. Trees 35, 1971–1992 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-021-02166-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-021-02166-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation