Examining young children's information practices and experiences: A child-centered methodological approach

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2021.101106Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Participatory multi-method approaches have proven to be successful in examining youth's engagement with information.

  • Data collection methods included book discussions, poster activities, photography, and photo-elicitation conversations.

  • Multiple methods enhanced participation by allowing for varying comfort and interest levels in data collection activities.

  • Researchers should focus on establishing trust and comfort with child participants throughout the research process.

Abstract

Researchers interested in children and youth's engagement with information have developed participatory, multi-method approaches of collecting and analyzing data directly with children and youth. However, examples of this approach in studies specifically focused on young children in library and information science are scarce. This article describes the methodological approach used in a study of 5- to 7-year-old children's information practices and experiences related to their individual interests. Drawing on conceptual frameworks from both library and information science and childhood studies, this study used multiple methods of data collection in understanding young children's own perspectives of their information activities. Namely, data was collected through parent surveys, book discussions, poster activities, participant-generated photography using the mobile app PixStori, and photo-elicitation conversations. Participants also contributed to a child-driven content analysis of their photographs. Recommendations for researchers working with young children are provided.

Introduction

Child and youth engagement with information has been a significant area of study within library and information science (LIS) for many years (Agosto, 2018). Through the related lenses of information behavior, information practices, and information experience, LIS researchers have explored the information needs of children and youth, as well as the ways in which they engage in activities such as information search, information seeking, information use, information sharing, and information creation in a variety of contexts. While there is a substantial body of existing research in this area, there remains room for growth, in both the research questions addressed and methodological approaches used. For example, in her review of the extant literature on youth information behavior and practices, Agosto (2018) notes that the LIS field is “in serious need of more studies that collect data directly from young people and of more studies that aim to understand young people's information worlds from their own cultural and personal perspectives” (p. 114). LIS research that directly engages with children and youth in investigating their own life experiences has the potential to “allow information science to create more nuanced and less static descriptions of and knowledge about children and the conditions within which they perform their information activities” (Lundh, 2016, Discussion and conclusion, para. 4). By engaging children directly in research, our knowledge of their lives and experiences can gain both depth and breadth.

Participatory, multi-method approaches have been established as one means of investigating the experiences of children and youth, re-orienting the processes of the traditional research enterprise to one that is focused on doing research with youth rather than research on youth (Christensen & James, 2008b; Harlan, 2016; Meyers, Fisher, & Marcoux, 2007). Central to this approach is attending to and creating space for children's own voices through the use of appropriate methods of data collection and analysis (Greene & Hill, 2005; James, 2007; Woodgate, Tennent, & Barriage, 2020). Within such a participatory approach, researchers often advocate for the use of multiple methods of data collection for a number of reasons, including: to appeal to children's diverse abilities and interests (Hill, 2006); to make room for participants to have choice in how they participate (Darbyshire, MacDougall, & Schiller, 2005; Fargas-Malet, McSherry, Larkin, & Robinson, 2010); to allow for participation in line with children's different communication styles (Clark, 2005); and to increase the likelihood of the researcher understanding the child's meaning (Clark & Moss, 2011; Garbarino & Stott, 1992). Examples of work within LIS using a participatory, multi-method approach to exploring children's engagement with information include Agosto and Hughes-Hassell's (2005) study examining the information seeking behaviors of teens within the context of everyday life, Meyers et al.'s (2007) “Tween Day” methodology used to explore the everyday life information seeking behaviors of 9–13 year olds, and Fisher, Bishop, Fawcett, and Magassa's (2014) “Teen Design Day” methodology that was used to explore the ways in which teens act as information mediaries for their families.

Section snippets

Problem statement

While there are several notable examples of LIS studies that have taken a multi-method, participatory approach to understanding the information practices of older children and youth, studies taking a similar approach to understanding the information practices of young children (those 8 years of age and younger) are quite scarce. The majority of information behavior/ practices research with young children has taken an etic approach, relying on methods such as observing children as they go about

Theoretical and conceptual frameworks

Fargas-Malet et al. (2010) argue that “the particular internal images of childhood that researchers hold will inform their choice of methods, ethical practice, analysis, and interpretation of data” when conducting research that involves children (p. 176). Likewise, the ways in which researchers conceptualize both information itself as well as people's engagement with that information has a significant influence on the design of research investigating phenomena in this area. This research was

Methodology

The overarching research question driving this study was: How do young children between 5 and 7 years of age experience information within the context of their individual interests?1 More specifically, the study sought to understand young children's information wants and information activities related to their individual

Methodological strengths

As previously noted, each individual method of data collection used in this study had its own specific advantages in exploring the information practices of young children. However, the most significant strengths of this study came from the combination of these multiple methods of data collection.

In addition to combining both parents' and children's perspectives in constructing an understanding of young children's information practices, the multiple methods of collecting data directly with

Conclusion

In response to the need for research exploring young children's engagement with information from the perspective of the children themselves, a participatory, multi-method approach to data collection and analysis was developed. By utilizing child-centered methods of data collection and analysis, this study provided a unique approach to understanding the ways in which young children experience information. As Greene and Hill (2005) argue, “without some kind of access to the content of a person's

Funding sources

This study was supported by a dissertation support grant from the Department of Library & Information Science at Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.

Declaration of Competing Interest

None.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Drs. Ross Todd, Marie Radford, Vikki Katz, and Roger Hart for their guidance and support in developing this study, as well as the children and parents who generously gave of their time and energy and allowed the researcher to learn from them.

Sarah Barriage is an Assistant Professor in the School of Information Science at the University of Kentucky. She completed her PhD in communication, information, and library studies in the School of Communication & Information at Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. Her research interests include the information practices of children and youth, social justice in information institutions, and the development and use of child-centered research methods. Her work has been published in

References (57)

  • S. Barriage et al.

    Mobile apps for visual research: Affordances and challenges for participant-generated photography

    Library & Information Science Research

    (2020)
  • S. Barriage et al.

    Astronauts and sugar beets: Young girls’ information seeking in family interactions

    Proceedings of the Association for Information Science & Technology

    (2015)
  • M.H. Bornstein

    Parents' reports about their children's lives

  • K. Charmaz

    Constructing grounded theory

    (2014)
  • P. Christensen et al.

    Childhood diversity and commonality: Some methodological insights

  • P. Christensen et al.

    Introduction: Researching children and childhood cultures of communication

  • A. Clark

    Ways of seeing: Using the Mosaic approach to listen to young children’s perspectives

  • A. Clark et al.

    Listening to young children: The mosaic approach

    (2011)
  • M. Clark-Ibanez

    Gender and "being bad": Inner-city students' photographs

  • W.A. Corsaro

    The sociology of childhood

    (2014)
  • A.M. Cox

    Information in social practice: A practice approach to understanding information activities in personal photography

    Journal of Information Science

    (2013)
  • P. Darbyshire et al.

    Multiple methods in qualitative research with children: More insight or just more?

    Qualitative Research

    (2005)
  • J. Einarsdottir

    Playschool in pictures: Children's photographs as a research method

    Early Child Development & Care

    (2005)
  • J. Evans

    Do you live a life of Riley? Thinking and talking about the purpose of life in picturebook responses

    New Review of Children's Literature and Librarianship

    (2011)
  • M. Fargas-Malet et al.

    Research with children: Methodological issues and innovative techniques

    Journal of Early Childhood Research

    (2010)
  • K.E. Fisher et al.

    InfoMe: A field-design methodology for research on ethnic minority youth as information mediaries

  • E. Foss et al.

    Children’s search roles at home: Implications for designers, researchers, educators, and parents

    Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology

    (2012)
  • Sarah Barriage is an Assistant Professor in the School of Information Science at the University of Kentucky. She completed her PhD in communication, information, and library studies in the School of Communication & Information at Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. Her research interests include the information practices of children and youth, social justice in information institutions, and the development and use of child-centered research methods. Her work has been published in scholarly journals such as Library & Information Science Research, Information Research, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, and Journal of Childhood Studies.

    View full text