Elsevier

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volume 151, August 2021, 106179
Biomass and Bioenergy

Assessing the implementation levels of oil palm waste conversion methods in Malaysia and the challenges of commercialisation: Towards sustainable energy production

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106179Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Malaysian oil palm wastes have the potential to improve the share of bioenergy in the country's energy mix.

  • Fermentation of the palm waste is at lab scale.

  • Gasification and anaerobic digestion of palm waste has reached pilot scale.

  • Combustion and pyrolysis have attained commercialisation.

  • Commercialisation is possible through factors such as proper logistics, technology, human capital and workable policies.

Abstract

The conversion of oil palm waste to valuable fuels via biological and thermochemical means has witnessed much interest from researchers. Increasing tonnes of palm waste resulting from about 400 palm oil mills across Malaysia necessitates a rethink towards its conversion to energy to curb soil and air pollution, underground water contamination, and pest habitats. Converting these palm wastes to fuel at a commercial scale is necessary to advance Malaysia's bioenergy. This will ensure cleaner production and sustainability by providing low carbon energy that could be used in industrial, transport, and residential sectors. However, what is the technology readiness levels of these conversion methods in Malaysia? Have they reached commercialisation? What hinders them from attaining it? This study conducted an intensive literature review on five conversion technologies broadly classified as thermochemical (combustion, gasification and pyrolysis) and biological (anaerobic digestion and fermentation) to identify the extent to which each process has been adopted. For each of the technologies, the following were established: (1) Studies conducted by researchers using different palm wastes; (2) Challenges faced; (3) Technology readiness level. The significant findings revealed that fermentation is still at a lab scale, gasification and anaerobic digestion have reached pilot-scale while combustion and pyrolysis have attained commercialisation. Significant commercialisation challenges include technical and economic issues, communal consciousness, and stakeholder gap. Current research gaps, recommendations, future outlooks, and the way forward were discussed, along with developing a framework that features the key barriers, enablers, and stakeholders responsible for commercialisation.

Introduction

Biomass wastes have colossal energy potential as renewable energy resources, and conversion of such wastes solves environmental problems and energy demands, thus leading to sustainability and cleaner production. Oil palm wastes are lignocellulosic biomass made up of primarily lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose constituents. Oil palm waste happens to be the most abundant biomass waste in Malaysia. However, this biomass waste has been underutilized, limited to landfills and soil amendment purposes. However, palm waste can be converted to numerous sources of clean energy and end products, which do not add carbon to the atmosphere. Obtaining clean energy and end products can be achieved through thermochemical and biological conversion methods [1]. Biomass thermochemical conversions involve using heat to transform the biomass into value-added fuels through majorly gasification, pyrolysis, and combustion. On the other hand, biological conversion occurs naturally through the use of bacteria, microorganism, and enzymes to produce green fuels through fermentation and anaerobic digestion. Thus subjecting the oil palm waste through sustainable methods (thermochemical and biological) to yield green fuels such as syngas, bio-oil, biochar, biogas, and ethanol will ensure a cleaner environment and energy, thus ensuring sustainable development and cleaner production.

Malaysia is the world's second-largest producer of palm oil, as depicted in Fig. 1. Its massive palm oil import is based on its vast oil-palm plantation of about 5.4 million hectares, which generates about 90% of lignocellulosic biomass waste in Malaysia [2]. Palm oil processing companies produce several types of wastes when a tonne of fresh fruit bunch (FFB) is processed. These wastes include empty fruit bunch (EFB) (23%), mesocarp fiber (MF) (12%), palm kernel shell (PKS) (5%), and palm oil mill effluent (POME) (60%). Apart from the mentioned mill wastes, there is also the oil palm frond (OPF), and oil palm trunk (OPT) obtained from the plantation [3]. EFB is obtained when the fresh palm fruits are removed from the fibre-like bag that holds them together. It is a hairy fibrous biomass. MF is the leftover fibrous remaining obtained when oil is extracted from the palm fruits. The PKS is the hard black shell residue left after the nut is removed during fruit crushing in the mill. The OPT is obtained when the palm tree is felled down, while the OPF is the palm tree branches obtained during replanting and pruning periods. In 2018, the planted area was reported by the Malaysian palm oil board (MPOB) as 5,849,330 ha with a large replanted area and a considerable amount of (million tonnes) of freshly harvested fruits that were processed in 400 mills across Malaysia [4]. This vast process generated varying amounts of biomass based on standard extraction rate [[5], [6], [7]], as shown in Table 1. In addition, other waste also obtained via the replanting process include OPT and OPF. The total amount of palm-oil-based biomass waste obtained from milling, pruning, and replanting activities added up to 49.16 Mt (dwb) in 2018 [8].

Among the palm-oil biomass, only mesocarp fibers (MF) and palm kernel shell (PKS) are being utilized on a large scale in processing mills as boiler feed for cogeneration of heat and power (CHP) systems. Thus commercial utilization of palm-oil waste will provide a huge opportunity to launch it as a renewable energy enterpriser. If it is properly adapted, it will decrease the country's dependency on fossil fuel for energy [2].

The expansion in palm-oil plantation activities resulted in soaring rates of produced waste quantities during the replanting and fruit harvesting periods. During the annual harvesting of FFB, about 24% of OPF is accounted for from each palm-oil tree, while OPT obtained during replanting reaches up to 70% [10]. This translates to increased availability potential of both palm waste (OPT and OPF) throughout the year. Apart from the two palm wastes, other types like EFB, PKS, and waste POME are continuously provided as wastes by the numerous palm-oil mills running across the country [11]. Fig. 2 illustrates the generation of palm oil waste in the palm-oil cycling process in which OPT and OPF were obtained at the plantation site, whereas the EFB, PKS, MF, and POME were obtained after the fresh fruit processing.

As a result of the prohibition of harmful palm waste disposal methods, mill operators abandon the waste at their sites, which results in water and environmental pollution. The area becomes a harbour for pests, generates terrible odour, and adds toxic chemicals to the soil. In a search to handle the ecological challenges resulting from palm waste, scientists have been entrusted and dedicated to investigating ways to convert the abundant palm wastes into significant materials for possible applications in the industry [12]. This will ensure a cleaner environment, and at the same time, means of securing sustainable energy. The palm waste can generate green energy sequel to their physicochemical properties given by proximate and ultimate analysis shown in Fig. 6, Fig. 7. This energy that can be tapped and used instead of fossil fuel energy will help reduce the level of carbon released into the atmosphere. Thus achieving cleaner production, sustainability, and more revenue to the palm industry and the country. Other sectors that will benefit from the process include indigenous boiler manufactures, project developers, local energy service industries, energy consulting firms, financial institutions, and policymakers. Over the years, Malaysia has been striving to minimize its fossil fuel consumption to maximize its renewable energy utilization through its abundant palm biomass. This is necessary to enhance the sustainability of the energy supply and reduce the negative impacts of energy generation. It will also ensure control in the waste disposal and significantly recover green energy and high-value chemicals for commercial applications such as syngas. With this obligation, the country has since then improved renewable energy development by fostering joint efforts between government agencies and tertiary institutions to implement the technical and commercial aspects of its mission, including research and development of palm biomass wastes.

Palm waste has been utilized over the years for energy generation in Malaysian oil palm industries, especially in combustion processes to generate steam to process fresh fruits. However, there is a need to scale up the conversion processes to commercialisation levels to exploit palm waste's potential fully. The conversion processes deliver promising products like syngas from gasification, bio-oil/biochar from pyrolysis, Ethanol from fermentation, biogas from anaerobic digestion, and heat from combustion. These products can provide low-carbon energy suitable for use in the industrial, residential, and transport sectors. Additionally, this will pave the way for proper waste management and environmental sanitation, ensuring a steady supply of clean energy. The potential and utilization levels of these biomass wastes by adopting different conversion means in Malaysia are unknown. Hence, this paper intends to;

  • Review the availability and potentials of oil palm waste in Malaysia

  • Provide an overview relating to the current status and potentials of the two biomass conversion techniques that are applied in the country that is thermochemical (gasification, pyrolysis, and combustion) and biological (fermentation, and anaerobic digestion), showcasing the technology level of implementation of the various processes, that have been applied to the different oil palm wastes through past studies, and

  • Identify challenges in the development and commercialisation of the conversion techniques

Malaysia is committed to developing its renewable energy sector through biomass conversion. It has led to launching projects like the bio-economy transformation program (BTP) to initiate biomass-based industries (2016). Similarly, the national biomass strategy (NBS) for biomass value-added goods (2020) was introduced (details of the renewable energy policies are discussed in Section 3). Hence, the present study is critical in providing the relevant stakeholders of such projects with vital information on the development levels of the biomass conversion technologies, the challenges that face them, and the areas that need improvement. Promoting the technologies to a commercialisation scale will go a long way in helping Malaysia achieve its goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, promote sustainable and low carbon energy. This will assist in tackling global climate issues and environmental challenges. The information will allow the stakeholders to strategize policies that will propel the commercialisation of the techniques. Those techniques in the lab-scale will be enhanced by more funding through grants to universities and research centers to improve advanced research and collaboration to reach pilot scale and eventually to commercialisation. The study also identified gaps and future research opportunities associated with conversion technologies.

Given the above, therefore, this review article seeks to address the following questions:

  • 1.

    What are the levels of technology of the conversion methods employed on palm-oil waste in Malaysia?

  • 2.

    What are the challenges facing the different conversion methods and hindrances to the commercialisation of these processes?

  • 3.

    What are the potential barrier breakers to reaching the commercialisation scale?

The literature review was carried out using various materials, including journal articles, conference papers, and internet sources. In addition, relevant articles were retrieved through Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. Some of the following keywords were used for the literature search “oil-palm waste,” “oil palm waste conversion,” “thermochemical conversion of palm waste,” “biological conversion of oil palm waste,” and “conversion of oil palm waste.”

The paper is structured as follows; Introduction was given in section 1. Section 2 discusses an overview of palm-oil plantation and palm waste potential in Malaysia. Next, the Malaysian government policies and capacity for renewable energy were discussed in Section 3. Section 4 gives a detailed review of the conversion techniques base on the; (i) the studies conducted on the individual palm wastes (OPT, OPF, PKS, MF, EFB, and POME) for the different conversion techniques (ii) Challenges and level of implementation. Section 5 gives the recommendation and way forward for commercialisation. Section 6 presents the summary/discussion. Lastly, section 7 presents the concluding part, emphasising the benefits of upgrading conversion systems to commercialisation.

Section snippets

Overview of palm-oil plantation and palm waste potential in Malaysia

The palm oil tree (Elaeis Guineensis) originated from Africa and was imported to Malaysia as a decoration plant in 1871 [13]. A palm-oil tree commences fruit bearing after 30 months of sowing and continues bearing fruit for a period of 2–3 decades, guaranteeing a continuous oil supply. The matured bunch is referred to as the Fresh Fruit Bunch (FFB). Malaysia's palm-oil plants are mainly tenera, a crossbreed between dura and pisifera. This species produces approximately 4–5.0 tons of crude palm

Malaysian government policies and capacity for renewable energy

Biomass utilization in Malaysia had initiated almost 30 years ago when the National Depletion Policy (NDP) was introduced in 1980 to cut down the nation's full dependence on oil and promote alternative energy resources, including coal hydropower and gas [34]. Later, in the next five years from 1981 to 1985, other indigenous renewables energy means like palm-oil biomass, solar energy, hydropower, municipal waste, landfill biogas, and wind energy were also identified as energy sources that could

Oil palm biomass conversion

The conversion of palm-oil biomass to renewable energy fuel has been achieved majorly using two ways, biological means and thermochemical means. The biological conversion is based on the activities of microorganisms under certain conditions. The thermochemical conversion involves the introduction of heat to the biomass. In combination with the medium, the intensity of the heat applied to the medium, reaction parameters, and reactor type determines the final products. Fig. 4 illustrates the

Recommendations and the way forward to commercialisation

The most important aspect of commercialisation is stakeholder's participation and commitment, as their roles synchronise with one another. To successfully implement the conversion processes, all the stakeholders involved must cooperate and be ready to work collectively. It is pertinent to enhance the technologies with a reduced amount of expenditure and simultaneously, providing significant progress in handling and utilizing the products produced. It is also important to conduct life cycle

Summary/discussions

The palm oil waste potential in Malaysia has been presented in section 2, while section 3 shows the policies of renewable energy implementation by the Malaysian government, its commitment, and capacity for renewable energy. However, what relevance is the capacity of Malaysian palm waste in bioenergy generation and technology levels in the country? What do these technology levels mean for the future of bioenergy in Malaysia? How will they propel the transition to low carbon energy? Malaysia has

Conclusion

Although several review articles have been published on oil palm biomass conversion processes in Malaysia in recent years, none of the researches specially focused on a comprehensive review of the six waste palm biomass (OPF, OPT, PKS, EFB, MF, and POME) conversions through gasification, pyrolysis, combustion, fermentation and anaerobic digestion, and their resulting challenges of commercialisation aiming at the sustainability and cleaner production concept. This paper has showcased the various

References (149)

  • N.B. Alias et al.

    Investigation of oil palm wastes' pyrolysis by thermo-gravimetric analyzer for potential biofuel production

    J. Energy Procedia

    (2015)
  • B.K. Sovacool et al.

    Examining the small renewable energy power (SREP) program in Malaysia

    Energy Pol.

    (2011)
  • R. Kardooni et al.

    Renewable energy technology acceptance in Peninsular Malaysia

    Energy Pol.

    (2016)
  • B.S. How et al.

    An outlook of Malaysian biomass industry commercialisation: perspectives and challenges

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2019)
  • P. McKendry

    Energy production from biomass (part 3): gasification technologies

    J. Bioresour. Technol.

    (2002)
  • A. Sagastume Gutiérrez et al.

    The energy potential of agriculture, agroindustrial, livestock, and slaughterhouse biomass wastes through direct combustion and anaerobic digestion. The case of Colombia

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2020)
  • B.A. Saylor et al.

    Effect of microbial inoculation and particle size on fermentation profile, aerobic stability, and ruminal in situ starch degradation of high-moisture corn ensiled for a short period

    J. Dairy Sci.

    (2020)
  • C. Cimon et al.

    Effect of biochar and wood ash amendment on biochemical methane production of wastewater sludge from a temperature phase anaerobic digestion process

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2020)
  • M.F. Awalludin et al.

    An overview of the oil palm industry in Malaysia and its waste utilization through thermochemical conversion, specifically via liquefaction

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2015)
  • A.A. Ahmad et al.

    Assessing the gasification performance of biomass: a review on biomass gasification process conditions, optimization and economic evaluation

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2016)
  • F.J. Sáez-Martínez et al.

    Drivers of sustainable cleaner production and sustainable energy options

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2016)
  • W.-X. Peng et al.

    Syngas production by catalytic co-gasification of coal-biomass blends in a circulating fluidized bed gasifier

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2017)
  • P. Chaiwatanodom et al.

    Thermodynamic analysis of biomass gasification with CO2 recycle for synthesis gas production

    Appl. Energy

    (2014)
  • R. Omar et al.

    Characterization of empty fruit bunch for microwave-assisted pyrolysis

    Fuel

    (2011)
  • F.M. Guangul et al.

    Gasifier selection, design and gasification of oil palm fronds with preheated and unheated gasifying air

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2012)
  • F. Abnisa et al.

    Utilization of oil palm tree residues to produce bio-oil and bio-char via pyrolysis

    Energy Convers. Manag.

    (2013)
  • F. Abnisa et al.

    Utilization possibilities of palm shell as a source of biomass energy in Malaysia by producing bio-oil in pyrolysis process

    Biomass Bioenergy

    (May 2011)
  • M.J. Chin et al.

    Biogas from palm oil mill effluent (POME): opportunities and challenges from Malaysia's perspective

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2013)
  • N. Nipattummakul et al.

    Steam gasification of oil palm trunk waste for clean syngas production

    Appl. Energy

    (2012)
  • P. Ninduangdee et al.

    Study on burning oil palm kernel shell in a conical fluidized-bed combustor using alumina as the bed material

    J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng.

    (2013)
  • A. Molino et al.

    Synthetic natural gas SNG production from biomass gasification–Thermodynamics and processing aspects

    Feul

    (2015)
  • M.A.A. Mohammed et al.

    Hydrogen rich gas from oil palm biomass as a potential source of renewable energy in Malaysia

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2011)
  • M. Shahbaz et al.

    Application of response surface methodology to investigate the effect of different variables on conversion of palm kernel shell in steam gasification using coal bottom ash

    Appl. Energy

    (2016)
  • S.M. Atnaw et al.

    Syngas production from downdraft gasification of oil palm fronds

    Energy

    (2013)
  • M. Inayat et al.

    Catalytic co-gasification of coconut shells and oil palm fronds blends in the presence of cement, dolomite, and limestone: parametric optimization via Box Behnken Design

    J. Energy Inst.

    (2019)
  • P. Lahijani et al.

    Gasification of palm empty fruit bunch in a bubbling fluidized bed: a performance and agglomeration study

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2011)
  • K. Ismail et al.

    The effect of particle size of CaO and MgO as catalysts for gasification of oil palm empty fruit bunch to produce hydrogen

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2012)
  • M. Shahbaz et al.

    Optimization of hydrogen and syngas production from PKS gasification by using coal bottom ash

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2017)
  • M. Inayat et al.

    Application of response surface methodology in catalytic co-gasification of palm wastes for bioenergy conversion using mineral catalysts

    Biomass Bioenergy

    (2020)
  • R.A. Moghadam et al.

    Syngas production from palm kernel shell and polyethylene waste blend in fluidized bed catalytic steam co-gasification process

    Energy

    (2014)
  • M.U. Monir et al.

    Co-gasification of empty fruit bunch in a downdraft reactor: a pilot scale approach

    Bioresour. Technol. Rep.

    (2018)
  • Z. Khan et al.

    Hydrogen production from palm kernel shell via integrated catalytic adsorption (ICA) steam gasification

    Energy Convers. Manag.

    (2014)
  • M. Shahbaz et al.

    Parametric study and optimization of methane production in biomass gasification in the presence of coal bottom ash

    Procedia Eng.

    (2016)
  • M.S. Mastuli et al.

    Catalytic gasification of oil palm frond biomass in supercritical water using MgO supported Ni, Cu and Zn oxides as catalysts for hydrogen production

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2017)
  • O. Siddiqui et al.

    Development of a novel renewable energy system integrated with biomass gasification combined cycle for cleaner production purposes

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2019)
  • B. Acharya et al.

    An investigation into steam gasification of biomass for hydrogen enriched gas production in presence of CaO

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (Feb 2010)
  • Z. Khan et al.

    Integrated catalytic adsorption (ICA) steam gasification system for enhanced hydrogen production using palm kernel shell

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (5 2014)
  • A. Inayat et al.

    Process modeling for parametric study on oil palm empty fruit bunch steam gasification for hydrogen production

    Fuel Process. Technol.

    (2012)
  • S. Anis et al.

    Tar reduction in biomass producer gas via mechanical, catalytic and thermal methods: a review

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2011)
  • L. Liu et al.

    Experimental study of biomass gasification with oxygen-enriched air in fluidized bed gasifier

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2018)
  • Cited by (25)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text