DNA helicases in homologous recombination repair

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2021.06.009Get rights and content

Helicases are in the spotlight of DNA metabolism and are critical for DNA repair in all domains of life. At their biochemical core, they bind and hydrolyze ATP, converting this energy to translocate unidirectionally, with different strand polarities and substrate binding specificities, along one strand of a nucleic acid. In doing so, DNA and RNA helicases separate duplex strands or remove nucleoprotein complexes, affecting DNA repair and the architecture of replication forks. In this review, we focus on recent advances on the roles and regulations of DNA helicases in homologous recombination repair, a critical pathway for mending damaged chromosomes and for ensuring genome integrity.

Introduction

Homologous recombination (HR) is critical for normal development and for stable propagation of the newly replicated genome. Defects in this process give rise to debilitating disorders, including predisposition to cancers, premature aging, reduced fertility and other congenital and developmental defects [1,2]. Functionally, HR is required to repair double strand breaks (DSBs), which arise due to replication errors or as a result of exogenous and endogenous DNA damage. In addition, HR factors stabilize stalled replication forks and guide filling of gaps arising during replication to the newly synthesized chromatid to facilitate replication completion [3]. The presence of daughter-strand gaps, rather than stalled or collapsed forks or DSBs, has recently emerged as the underlying feature of HR-defective cancers and of their chemotherapeutic sensitivity [4]. HR is most of the time error-free in outcome as the newly synthesized chromatid or the homologous chromosome is used as template for DNA repair [3]. However, in certain cases, HR can cause genome rearrangement and instability, for instance when induced at DNA repeat elements [5]. Importantly, formation, maturation and processing of HR intermediates, induced by both breaks and stalled replication forks, is intricately mediated or reversed by DNA helicases, which thus play critical roles in genome stability [6,7].

HR repair can be divided in several pathways, and the underlying mechanisms include gene conversion, when both sides of the break are homologous to the donor and participate in repair, and break-induced replication, when only one end of the break can find a homologous template [5]. The latter pathway of break-induced replication, recently discussed in a dedicated review [8], relates to situations arising at eroded telomeres or when replication forks collapse at nicked DNA. Another critical context for HR repair is the one of gap-filling by template switching, in which replication-associated DNA gaps ensured by repriming downstream the lesion [9,10] are being engaged by postreplicative repair coordinated by PCNA polyubiquitylation and HR factors. In HR-mediated gap-filling, the information from the newly synthesized sister chromatid is used to bypass the DNA damage postreplicatively [3,11••]. In addition, HR factors play roles in stabilizing and restarting stalled replication forks through fork remodeling [12].

Several steps are common to HR repair pathways and include: (1) resection of DSB ends or extension of the gaps before gap-filling; (2) assembly of the Rad51 helical filament known as the presynaptic complex; (3) homology search and strand invasion with the formation of a D-loop (Figure 1). In gene conversion, the D-loop is extended via DNA synthesis after which it can be disassembled by DNA helicases in a process known as synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA) leading to noncrossover recombinants (Figure 2). Alternative to SDSA, D-loop extension can be combined with second end capture, leading to the formation of a double Holliday junction (dHJ) (Figure 2) or a pseudo-dHJ intermediate if the context is gap-filling. Subsequently, dHJs are either dissolved by a helicase-topoisomerase complex (Sgs1-Top3-Rmi1, known as STR in budding yeast, and BLM-TOPIIIα-RMI1-RMI2 in vertebrates) to noncrossovers or resolved by structure-specific endonucleases, with the potential of forming crossovers [13] (Figure 2). Importantly, most steps involved in HR repair rely on the action of DNA helicases (Figure 1, Figure 2).

Basic functions of DNA helicase and how they affect various or specific HR steps have been recently described in a review [14]. Here, we focus on recent insights on how DNA helicases modulate HR, how their activity is influenced by posttranslational modifications and interaction with other proteins, and how in certain cases the helicase activity modulation is context or cell cycle specific. Although we occasionally refer to recently gained insights from other model systems, we largely focus on recent work in budding yeast related to helicase-mediated repair of DSBs and filling of daughter-strand gaps arising during replication as a consequence of repriming.

Section snippets

Helicases facilitating DNA end resection

A common step in different HR pathways is the one of end resection, which generates extended 3′ single stranded DNA tails (Figure 1). Briefly, the resection process is initiated by the MRX complex (Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 in budding yeast and MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 in mammalian cells) and the Sae2/CtIP nuclease, which together create an entry point for the Exo1 exonuclease, the Sgs1/BLM helicase and the Dna2 nuclease that mediate long resection [15]. Several recent findings showed that the activity of Sgs1

RPA, RNA-DNA hybrids and Rad51 filament nucleation on resected ends

Following DNA end resection, RPA is generally thought to coat the exposed ssDNA until the Rad51 filament is assembled and HR can proceed [32]. Besides forming a barrier to the formation of the Rad51 nucleoprotein filament, RPA opens secondary structures in ssDNA [33], an activity which in certain cases is supported by specific DNA helicases, such as WRN in case of hairpins caused by TA-dinucleotide repeats [34,35] and DDX11 and possibly other helicases in case of G quadruplex structures [28••] (

The dynamic Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments and D-loop structures

The Rad51 nucleofilament assembled on ssDNA is a dynamic structure subjected to competing activities that promote its stabilization or disassembly. Rad51 paralogues promote the stability of the Rad51 filament and can restrain its disassembly mediated by certain DNA helicases [2]. The budding yeast Srs2 helicase has been amply characterized in this regard, but several other RecQ helicases, including mammalian RECQL5 and budding yeast Sgs1 [43] possess Rad51 removal activity. Matching these

D-loop unwinding versus dHJ dissolution

While D-loop disassembly promotes noncrossover and prevents dHJ formation, it can redirect events to different recombination pathways as this early intermediate can undergo additional rounds of invasion and disassembly. On the other hand, when dHJ formation is entailed by dissolution by the STR complex, this process not only leads exclusively to noncrossover but also terminates the recombination process (Figure 2). The Sgs1/BLM helicase is unique in its ability to function with Top3 to

Concluding remarks and open questions

The HR repair regulation by DNA helicases is an intricate process with effects on genome alterations and integrity, frequency of crossovers and chromosome structure. Some of the DNA helicases discussed here are regulated via posttranslational modifications events that affect their processivity or activity, binding affinity to genomic regions, DNA substrates and interacting partners. Future work will be needed to reveal whether noncrossover and crossover pathways of HR repair are sequentially

Conflict of interest statement

Nothing declared.

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

We apologize to our colleagues whose contributions are not cited due to space limitations. DB acknowledges the Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC IG 23710) and the European Research Council (Consolidator grant 682190) for funding.

References (55)

  • D. Menolfi et al.

    Essential roles of the Smc5/6 complex in replication through natural pausing sites and endogenous DNA damage tolerance

    Mol Cell

    (2015)
  • M.E. Moynahan et al.

    Mitotic homologous recombination maintains genomic stability and suppresses tumorigenesis

    Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol

    (2010)
  • B. Bonilla et al.

    RAD51 gene family structure and function

    Annu Rev Genet

    (2020)
  • N.J. Panzarino et al.

    Replication gaps underlie BRCA deficiency and therapy response

    Cancer Res

    (2021)
  • R. Scully et al.

    DNA double-strand break repair-pathway choice in somatic mammalian cells

    Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol

    (2019)
  • H. Lu et al.

    Human RecQ helicases in DNA double-strand break repair

    Front Cell Dev Biol

    (2021)
  • H. Niu et al.

    Multifunctional roles of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Srs2 protein in replication, recombination and repair

    FEMS Yeast Res

    (2017)
  • Z.W. Kockler et al.

    Repair of DNA breaks by break-induced replication

    Annu Rev Biochem

    (2021)
  • L.J. Bainbridge et al.

    Repriming DNA synthesis: an intrinsic restart pathway that maintains efficient genome replication

    Nucleic Acids Res

    (2021)
  • R.P. Wong et al.

    Processing of DNA polymerase-blocking lesions during genome replication is spatially and temporally segregated from replication forks

    Mol Cell

    (2020)
  • M. Berti et al.

    The plasticity of DNA replication forks in response to clinically relevant genotoxic stress

    Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol

    (2020)
  • J. Matos et al.

    Holliday junction resolution: regulation in space and time

    DNA Repair (Amst)

    (2014)
  • E. Gobbini et al.

    The 9-1-1 complex controls Mre11 nuclease and checkpoint activation during short-range resection of DNA double-strand breaks

    Cell Rep

    (2020)
  • C. Xue et al.

    Regulatory control of Sgs1 and Dna2 during eukaryotic DNA end resection

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2019)
  • Z. Yan et al.

    Rad52 restrains resection at DNA double-strand break ends in yeast

    Mol Cell

    (2019)
  • M. Tittel-Elmer et al.

    Cohesin association to replication sites depends on rad50 and promotes fork restart

    Mol Cell

    (2012)
  • I. Litwin et al.

    Error-free DNA damage tolerance pathway is facilitated by the Irc5 translocase through cohesin

    EMBO J

    (2018)
  • Cited by (7)

    • Editorial overview: Recombination — the ends justify the means

      2021, Current Opinion in Genetics and Development
    • Control of structure-specific endonucleases during homologous recombination in eukaryotes

      2021, Current Opinion in Genetics and Development
      Citation Excerpt :

      Controlling the balance between SDSA and DSBR is therefore critical in determining the genetic outcome of the recombination process. As reviewed in this issue, DNA helicases are key enzymes that weigh into that balance reversing D-loops and other intermediates to promote SDSA or eliminating dHJs in DSBR [8]. We will see how elaborate spatio-temporal control mechanisms of HJ-processing SSEs also contribute (Figure 4b).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text