Skip to main content
Log in

The MOBILISE study: utilisation of ambulatory pumps in the inpatient setting to administer continuous antibiotic infusions—a randomised controlled trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the inpatient setting, antibiotics are generally administered via bedside pumps with multiple daily dosing. Utilisation of a continuous antibiotic infusion (CAI) instead might have patient and nursing satisfaction, workflow efficiencies and infection control benefits. We aimed to study the utilisation of CAI in the inpatient setting for routine antibiotic administration. Patients receiving a peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) for antibiotic administration were screened for the study. The patients were randomised to either (1) standard pump and intermittent antibiotic administration (IAA) or (2) CAI via an ambulatory pump. An accelerometer placed on the ankle was used to assess patient activity. Nursing and patient satisfaction surveys were also carried out. Forty patients met the study criteria for enrolment with 21 patients being enrolled in the CAI arm of the study. One hundred and five days of accelerometer recordings were available for analysis. The geometric mean activity was 45 min/day in the standard arm and 64 min/day in the CAI arm. This represented a 42% (95% CI: −14 to 133%, p = 0.16) difference in activity between the two groups. Nursing staff reported that they spent less time throughout their shift attending the antibiotic line or pump in patients who were in the CAI arm of the study (p < 0.001). In addition, patients in this arm of the study were more likely to recommend this method of administration of antibiotics to a family member (p =0.0001). The MOBILISE study showed nursing and patient satisfaction when CAI were utilised in the inpatient setting. A statistically non-significant difference in mobility was seen. The trial was registered (28/03/2018) with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618000452291).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding on reasonable request.

References

  1. MacKenzie M, Rae N, Nathwani D 2014) Outcomes from global adult outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy programmes: a review of the last decade. Int J Antimicrob Agents 7–16

  2. Durojaiye OC et al (2017) Clinical efficacy, cost analysis and patient acceptability of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT): a decade of Sheffield (UK) OPAT service. Int J Antimicrob Agents

  3. Subedi S et al (2015) Supervised self-administration of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy: a report from a large tertiary hospital in Australia. Int J Infect Dis 161–5

  4. Marsh N, Larsen E, Tapp S (2019) Management of hospital in the home (HITH) peripherally inserted catheters: a retrospective cohort study. Home Health Care Manag Pract

  5. Zisberg A, Shadmi E, Sinoff G et al (2011) Low mobility during hospitalisation and functional decline in older adults. J Am Geriatr 266

  6. Australian Injectable Drugs Handbook (2017) Melbourne : Australian Society of Hospital Pharmacists

  7. Therapeutic Guidlines (2019) Melbourne: Therapeutic Guidlines Limited

  8. Baxter (2019) [Online]. https://www.baxterprofessional.com.au.

  9. Berthoin K, Le Duff CS, Marchand-Brynaert, et al (2010) Stability of meropenem and doripenem solutions for administration by continuous infusion. J Antimicrob Chemother 1073–1075

  10. Manning L, Wrigh C et al (2014) Continuous infusions of meropenem in ambulatory care: clinical efficacy, safety, and stability. PLoS ONE e102023

  11. Foy F, Luna G, Martinez J et al (2019) An investigation of the stability of meropenem in elastomeric infusion devices. Drug Des Devel Ther 2655–2665

  12. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap): a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 377–381

  13. Quan H, Chantal B L et al (2010) Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Pract Epidemiol 676–682

  14. Hobbs JG, Ryan MK, Ritchie B et al (2017) Protocol for a randomised crossover trial to evaluate patient and nurse satisfaction with electronic and elastomeric portable infusion pumps for the continuous administration of antibiotic therapy in the home: the Comparing Home Infusion Device study. BMJ Open e016763

  15. Pezzino S, Florenty S, Fagour C et al (2010) Remedial actions for the physical inactivity of hospitalised patients with type 2 diabetes. Diab Care 1960-1961

  16. Elsiger DW, Rowlands AV, Hurst T (2011) Validation of the GENEA Accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1085–1093

  17. OBrien J, Paquet F, Lindsay R, Valenti D (2013) Insertion of PICCs with minimum number of lumens reduces complications and costs. J Am Coll Radiol 10(11)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Ian Smith, Grace Babiano, Lisa Caufield, Margarette Sommerville, Kim Ta, Chris Accornero, Barbara Hewer and the VASE (Vascular access) team at the RBWH for their assistance with this study and the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital Research Foundation for the project grant awarded to fund the study.

Code availability

Not applicable

Funding

A project grant from the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital Research Foundation was awarded to fund this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualisation and design: KM, THB, AL, and DP. Data collection: KM, THB, and ES. Analysis and interpretation of data: KM, ES, and MC. Drafting the article or revising it critically for intellectual content: KM, THB, ES, AL, MC, and DP. Final version of the version to be submitted: KM, MC, and DP.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. L. McCarthy.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The study was performed in line with the principals of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the RBWH Human Research and Ethics Committee.

Consent to participate and publish

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

DP has relevant financial activities outside the submitted work. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(PDF 144 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McCarthy, K.L., Harris-Brown, T., Smits, E.J. et al. The MOBILISE study: utilisation of ambulatory pumps in the inpatient setting to administer continuous antibiotic infusions—a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 40, 2505–2513 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-021-04294-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-021-04294-3

Keywords

Navigation