Skip to main content
Log in

Increased Demographic Representation in Randomized Control Trials for Gambling Disorder in the United States is Needed: A Systematic Review

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Participants in randomized control trials (RCTs) should be representative of those most likely to experience the disorder of focus, yet reviews of psychology research studies consistently find certain demographic groups are overrepresented at the price of others being unincluded. The present review aimed to characterize the demographic representation of US-based RCTs for gambling disorder and compare findings to the population of individuals most likely to experience the disorder. Thirteen US-based RCTs comprising a total of 2,343 participants were reviewed. We found that although gambling disorder is most prevalent among low SES racial minorities, RCTs are mostly conducted among populations who are white, employed, and have some level of college education. Demographic variables that are related to the likelihood of experiencing gambling disorder are not consistently reported, and there are many groups of individuals who experience gambling disorder that have been virtually left out of all treatment study samples to date. We conclude with recommendations for future gambling focused treatment studies, which are geared towards increasing the convergence between characteristics of participants in RCTs and those who experience gambling disorder in the United States.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychological Association. (2012). Guidelines for psychological practice with lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients. The American Psychologist, 67(1), 10–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, G. M., Welte, J. W., & Tidwell, M. C. O. (2017). Gambling involvement among Native Americans, blacks, and whites in the United States. The American Journal on Addictions, 26(7), 713–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuijpers, P. (2017). Four decades of outcome research on psychotherapies for adult depression: An overview of a series of meta-analyses. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 58(1), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goslar, M., Leibetseder, M., Muench, H. M., Hofmann, S. G., & Laireiter, A. R. (2017). Efficacy of face-to-face versus self-guided treatments for disordered gambling: A meta-analysis. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 6(2), 142–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, L. E., Wilson, D. K., Kitzman-Ulrich, H., Lyerly, J. E., Gause, H. M., & Resnicow, K. (2016). Associations between culturally relevant recruitment strategies and participant interest, enrollment and generalizability in a weight-loss intervention for African American families. Ethnicity & Disease, 26(3), 295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeilly, D. P., & Burke, W. J. (2000). Late life gambling: The attitudes and behaviors of older adults. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16(4), 393–415.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miranda, J., Nakamura, R., & Bernal, G. (2003). Including ethnic minorities in mental health intervention research: A practical approach to a long-standing problem. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 27(4), 467–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Institutes of Health (NIH). (2019). Inclusion of women and minorities as participants in research involving human subjects. NIH Central Resource for Grants and Funding Information. https://grants.nih.gov/policy/inclusion/women-and-minorities.htm

  • NIH Guidelines on the Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research (1994). Federal register, Part VIII (59 FR 14508–14513), March 28.

  • Nowak, D. E., & Aloe, A. M. (2014). The prevalence of pathological gambling among college students: A meta-analytic synthesis, 2005–2013. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30(4), 819–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter, S. C., Brett, E. I., Suda, M. T., Leavens, E. L. S., Miller, M. B., Leffingwell, T. R., Whelan, J. P., & Meyers, A. W. (2019). A meta-analysis of brief personalized feedback interventions for problematic gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 35(2), 447–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petry, N. M., Ginley, M. K., & Rash, C. J. (2017). A systematic review of treatments for problem gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 31(8), 951–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfund, R. A., Peter, S. C., McAfee, N. W., Ginley, M. K., Whelan, J. P., & Meyers, A. W. (2021). Dropout from face-to-face, multi-session psychological treatments for problem and disordered gambling: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfund, R. A., Peter, S. C., Whelan, J. P., Meyers, A. W., Ginley, M. K., & Relyea, G. (2020). Is more better? A meta-analysis of dose and efficacy in face-to-face psychological treatments for problem and disordered gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors., 34(5), 557–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polo, A. J., Makol, B. A., Castro, A. S., Colón-Quintana, N., Wagstaff, A. E., & Guo, S. (2019). Diversity in randomized clinical trials of depression: A 36-year review. Clinical Psychology Review, 67, 22–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santiago, C. D., Kaltman, S., & Miranda, J. (2013). Poverty and mental health: How do low-income adults and children fare in psychotherapy? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69(2), 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smalley, K. B., Yancey, C. T., Warren, J. C., Naufel, K., Ryan, R., & Pugh, J. L. (2010). Rural mental health and psychological treatment: A review for practitioners. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66(5), 479–489.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Tidwell, M. C. O., Hoffman, J. H., & Wieczorek, W. F. (2015). Gambling and problem gambling in the United States: Changes between 1999 and 2013. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31(3), 695–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Systematic Review

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institute of Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse of the National Institutes of Health, award number T32AA018108. The content is the sole responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel C. Peter.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peter, S.C., Pfund, R.A. & Ginley, M.K. Increased Demographic Representation in Randomized Control Trials for Gambling Disorder in the United States is Needed: A Systematic Review. J Gambl Stud 37, 1025–1041 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-021-10055-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-021-10055-w

Keywords

Navigation