Elsevier

Mechatronics

Volume 78, October 2021, 102608
Mechatronics

Experimental characterization of the T-FLEX ankle exoskeleton for gait assistance

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2021.102608Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The static experimental characterization of a variable stiffness exoskeleton is detailed.

  • The element’s influence and the configuration for the best actuator’s performance were measured and determined.

  • The results evidence the device’s applicability in assistive scenarios during human walking.

  • An adaptative stage to counteract the characteristical system times in real scenarios is required.

  • Dynamic test and trials with system configuration’s variation are needed in future studies.

Abstract

Designing robotic devices to assist or emulate the ankle is challenging due to the joint’s complexity and the fundamental role in walking. T-FLEX is an ankle exoskeleton based on vsa for rehabilitation and assistance of people with ankle dysfunctions. This device has presented promising motor recovery results for a stroke patient during a rehabilitation program. However, human walking applications require an electromechanical characterization to measure the device’s capabilities and determine the suitable configuration that responds to this complex task. This work presents T-FLEX’s experimental characterization carried out in a test bench structure. The results showed alterations in system times and actuators’ bandwidth because of the tendons’ force levels. Furthermore, this study determined the most appropriate T-FLEX configuration to obtain the best performance. Thus, this work also presents a preliminary validation under that configuration on a healthy subject in gait assistance to assess the device’s response in different velocities and measure the effects on the user. In conclusion, T-FLEX can assist the human gait for gait cycle duration greater than 0.74 s providing torque on the ankle of up to 12 Nm in propulsion and 20 Nm in dorsiflexion. Nevertheless, it should include an adaptable stage in the control architecture to counteract the stabilization time for providing the maximum torque at the right time.

Introduction

The ankle has a fundamental role during the different phases of the human gait and hence in the execution of other Activities of Daily Living (adl) [1]. These joint functions include specific tasks such as weight distribution, shock absorption, foot-clearance, and controlling the contact of the foot with the ground [1]. In this sense, those tasks require precise motor control and an appropriate amount of energy for the subject [2].

Neurological conditions (i.e., cerebral palsy, stroke, spinal cord injury, and traumatic brain injury) can compromise the performance and execution of those ankle functions [3], [4]. Furthermore, the after-effects produce altered motor control, which affects adl’s accomplishment reducing people’s quality of life [5]. Likewise, the ankle dysfunctions trigger an altered gait pattern, resulting in overloading the other lower limb joints [1]. Consequently, the joints generate a high metabolic cost related to compensatory movements trying to supply those lost functions [6], causing dangerous and permanent impacts on the locomotor system.

To overcome the limitations and recover partially motor skills, the patients perform rehabilitation processes [7]. Traditional physical therapy comprehends exercises such as repetitive movements and task-oriented training, aiming to provide the patient the maximum independence as possible for executing ADL [8]. Nevertheless, although the results for conventional therapy are positive [9], robotic technology’s inclusion improves the patient’s recovery capacity [10], [11].

The ankle dysfunctions can remain in the patients after therapy [12]. Thus, to provide stability and prevent injuries due to the lack of ankle control, passive orthotic devices are prescribed [13]. Those devices are a mechanical structure that only allows the dorsi- plantarflexion movements and restricts the other planes of motion. However, although the use of a passive structure helps the patient execute ADL, the user does not improve the gait pattern. Conversely, the locomotion is affected by both the dysfunction and the ankle restriction [6].

Therefore, robotic devices are being developed to support the rehabilitation processes and assist user gait [5], [14]. Specifically, the powered ankle–foot orthoses (pafos) integrate the principles applied in passive orthotic structures, although they incorporate the advantages of robotics (i.e., energy supply using actuators, user monitoring through sensors, programmed functionality profiles, among others) [14]. Those devices have been divided by the state-of-art according to their purpose and the system actuation that was implemented [15], [16]. In terms of the actuation system, the most common actuators used in pafos are (1) stiff, (2) pneumatic, and (3) series elastic [15], [17]. However, there are other actuation principles based on the previous actuators, such as the variable stiffness actuators (vsa) and cable-driven actuators (cda) [17].

vsa uses the same concept as series elastic (i.e., an elastic element with a spring between the actuator and the load), although this principle includes a variable stiffness spring instead of a constant value [17], [18], [19]. The core feature of actuators based on vsa is changing the system output stiffness in different interaction cases with the environment (e.g., constant load and constant position) [18]. Moreover, this principle also presents advantages in shock loads and backdrivability, in the same way as the series elastic actuators [17], [19]. Considering the mentioned advantages, this actuation type is widely recommended for robotic applications where the robot interacts intensively with humans [20], [21]. Specifically, a study evidenced an influence on the reduction of the metabolic cost related to the stiffness level of the actuator [21].

Against this background, T-FLEX is a wearable and portable ankle exoskeleton based on vsa (see Fig. 1) used to assist the dorsi-plantarflexion movements without restricting the other ankle motions [22]. This pafo comprises of two servomotors attached to bioinspired tendons whose mechanical behavior is similar to the human Achilles tendon [23]. Furthermore, T-FLEX includes a bidirectional system of stiff filaments to help assistive movements and correct the foot pathological postures. This device is manually adjustable and usable for both limbs. Moreover, it includes two operational modes: (1) therapy that consists of repetitions following velocity and frequency defined by the user, and (2) gait assistance, which integrates an inertial sensor and a machine-learning algorithm [24] to detect the gait phase and assist the movement.

The T-FLEX exoskeleton (see Fig. 1) comprehends a four-bar mechanism by each actuator, where one of them is a spring with variable stiffness. Despite the advantages in aspects related to the human–machine interaction, the inclusion of elastic materials limits the actuator’s features in terms of bandwidth, supplied torque, response time, among others [25]. The knowledge of those features and the device’s capabilities allows improving aspects such as control strategies, human–robot interaction, and robot performance [17], [26], [27], [28]. For this purpose, static or dynamic benches have been deployed to assess the actuator’s variables (i.e., force, torque, angular or linear velocity) through different input signals such as step signal or following a goal value, chirp signal, between others [17], [26].

In terms of application, a study showed the potential to use the T-FLEX exoskeleton in stationary therapy of stroke patients [29]. Specifically, the study showed that the use of the device in 18 sessions promotes motor recovery (i.e., improvement in range of motion and spatiotemporal parameters), reduces the spasticity level, and improves ankle control in gait (i.e., reduction in toe drag) [29]. However, considering the other application of T-FLEX for assistive scenarios to improve the gait pattern and reduce the risk of falls, an electromechanical characterization is necessary to measure the device’s capabilities and determine the suitable configuration that responses to this complex task.

Several ankle exoskeletons have applied mechanisms similar to the T-FLEX’s actuation principle. Specifically, a cable-driven parallel robot involves a platform composed of linear actuators attached to flexible cables to assist 3 degrees of freedom dof [30]. Thus, this device can support ankle movements and avoid inertial impactions that are common in rehabilitation scenarios. Likewise, another ankle exoskeleton based on a cable-driven architecture is the CABLEankle [31]. This device includes a lightweight foot platform actuated by servomotors to assist the ankle joint in stationary scenarios, where the system’s response varies concerning the tension in the actuated cables. Notwithstanding, although these robots include novel mechanisms to assist the ankle and exhibit potential in the stationary rehabilitation field, their designs preclude a possible application in gait assistance. Moreover, this is one of the principal activities addressed in a rehabilitation program to guarantee independence and improve the quality of life [32].

On the other hand, studies focused on experimental characterizations for ankle exoskeletons are limited [17], [26], [33], [34], [35]. In general terms, those experiments have been aimed at measuring the system response through the high-level controllers immersed in the device’s application. However, some studies determined this response through simulated environments that could differ from a real scenario. In other cases, the experiments intended to determine the device capabilities for ideal conditions. Therefore, few studies have been focused on the actuator performance, modifying both (1) the initial setup and (2) the scenario to estimate several device’s responses [26], [35].

This work presents the experimental characterization of the T-FLEX ankle exoskeleton (see Fig. 1). The main goals are to determine the appropriate device’s configuration for assisting the human gait with the best performance and measure the device’s capabilities. Therefore, this study assessed the different systems incorporated in T-FLEX (i.e., the bidirectional system and the variable stiffness system) for three initial force levels. Moreover, a case study was carried out on a healthy user to assess the T-FLEX’s performance in a real application and the device’s effects on him.

Section snippets

T-FLEX’s mechanical design

T-FLEX (see Fig. 1) integrates two main mechanical principles to support the ankle functions in gait: (1) variable stiffness actuation and (2) bidirectional movement (i.e., agonist and antagonist configuration). The first principle intends to modify the stiffness level of the system according to the gait phases. For this purpose, the device includes a novel composite tendon whose mechanical behavior, tested in stress trials, is similar to the human Achilles tendon (i.e., Young’s modulus between

Step response

The step function measured both the T-FLEX’s response and the composite tendon’s behavior under tension. In general terms, the data used in the results included 20 out of 30 repetitions. These data were determined from the responses with the highest intra-test consistency during the experiment. Fig. 7A shows the mean curve obtained for the tendons alone configuration with an initial force on the tendon of 10 N during the dorsi-plantarflexion movements. The first set-point (i.e., segmented black

Discussion

This paper shows each element’s influence that composes the T-FLEX ankle exoskeleton and analyzes the system’s response changes concerning the different configurations and movements. Likewise, this study aims to determine the device’s feasibility for assistive application in human gait. Thus, the step response results allowed determining a first approximation of the most appropriate T-FLEX configuration to provide its maximum capabilities in a real scenario. The parameters assessed in this

Conclusion

The trials exhibited similarity in the delay time related to the tendon’s elastic behavior for the assessed initial force levels. Likewise, the highest force level did not evidence faster rise and stabilization times, as expected. By contrast, it caused saturations limiting the actuators’ capabilities. On the other hand, the inclusion of stiff elements did not improve the device performance and reduced the frequency response reflected in the bandwidth values. From that, the best setup for the

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Daniel Gomez-Vargas: Conceptualization of this study, Methodology, Software, Hardware, Experimental procedure, Data curation, Writing - original draft. Felipe Ballen-Moreno: Conceptualization of this study, Methodology, Hardware, Writing - original draft. Carlos Rodriguez-Guerrero: Conceptualization of this study, Methodology, Writing - review & editing, Supervision. Marcela Munera: Conceptualization of this study, Methodology, Writing - review & editing, Supervision, Project administration,

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología (MinCiencias grant ID No. 801-2017), CYTED research network, REASISTE (grant 216RT0504), and funding from the Colombian School of Engineering Julio Garavito . The authors would like to thank the members of the Center for Biomechatronics at Colombian School of Engineering for supporting this research.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Colombian School of Engineering Julio Garavito ethics committee approved the experimental protocol of this study. The volunteer was

Daniel Gomez-Vargas received a B. Sc. in electronic engineering from the Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería Julio Garavito (ECIJG), Bogotá, Colombia, in 2018. Currently, he is a Research Assistant at the Center for Biomechatronics, a Master’s degree candidate, and a teaching assistant in the Department of Electronic Engineering at ECIJG. During the time at the Center for Biomechatronics, he has participated in multidisciplinary projects focused on the development of robotic tools to support

References (43)

  • Van PeppenR PS et al.

    The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what’s the evidence?

    Clin Rehabil

    (2004)
  • DamM. et al.

    The effects of long-term rehabilitation therapy on poststroke hemiplegic patients

    Stroke

    (1993)
  • DobkinBruce H.

    Training and exercise to drive poststroke recovery

    Nat Clin Pract Neurol

    (2008)
  • DimyanMichael A. et al.

    Neuroplasticity in the context of motor rehabilitation after stroke

    Nature Reviews Neurology

    (2011)
  • GrahamJon

    Foot drop: explaining the causes, characteristics and treatment

    Br J Neurosci Nurs

    (2010)
  • Belda-LoisJuan-Manuel et al.

    Rehabilitation of gait after stroke: a review towards a top-down approach

    J Neuroeng Rehabil

    (2011)
  • MoltedoMarta et al.

    Powered ankle-foot orthoses: the effects of the assistance on healthy and impaired users while walking

    J Neuroeng Rehabil

    (2018)
  • WeerasinghaA.H et al.

    Powered ankle exoskeletons: Existent designs and control systems

    Proc Int Conf Artif Life Robot

    (2018)
  • Sanchez-VillamañanMaria Del Carmen et al.

    Compliant lower limb exoskeletons: A comprehensive review on mechanical design principles

    J Neuroeng Rehabil

    (2019)
  • WolfSebastian et al.

    Variable stiffness actuators: Review on design and components

    IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatronics

    (2015)
  • JamwalPrashant K. et al.

    Review on design and control aspects of ankle rehabilitation robots

    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol

    (2013)
  • Cited by (11)

    • North America and Caribbean region: Colombia

      2023, Rehabilitation Robots for Neurorehabilitation in High-, Low-, and Middle-Income Countries: Current Practice, Barriers, and Future Directions
    • Recent advances in wearable actuated ankle-foot orthoses: Medical effects, design, and control

      2023, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine
    • Neuro-Rehabilitation Therapy with T-FLEX Ankle Exoskeleton and Serious Games: A Case Study

      2023, IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics
    • Exploring Multimodal Gait Rehabilitation and Assistance through an Adaptable Robotic Platform

      2023, Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Daniel Gomez-Vargas received a B. Sc. in electronic engineering from the Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería Julio Garavito (ECIJG), Bogotá, Colombia, in 2018. Currently, he is a Research Assistant at the Center for Biomechatronics, a Master’s degree candidate, and a teaching assistant in the Department of Electronic Engineering at ECIJG. During the time at the Center for Biomechatronics, he has participated in multidisciplinary projects focused on the development of robotic tools to support rehabilitation processes. His research interests include robotics applied to physical rehabilitation in terms of control strategies, development of biomedical sensors, design of actuators, human–robot interfaces, and machine learning. He has been the leader of the technical development of an ankle exoskeleton listed as one of “five history-changing ideas in Latin America” in 2017.

    Felipe Ballen-Moreno received a B. Sc. in mechanical engineering from Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería Julio Garavito (ECIJG), Bogotá, Colombia, in 2018. Currently, he is a research assistant at the Center for Biomechatronics at ECIJG. He is a Master’s degree candidate in electronic engineering at ECIJG. During his participation in different projects, he supported them through mechanical design and prototyping for 3D printing technology aimed at robotic devices as well as wearable devices. His research interests lie in rehabilitation robotics and wearable robots involving the development and design of physical interfaces to enhance its kinematic compatibility.

    Carlos Rodriguez-Guerrero is a Guest Professor and Senior Researcher at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel. He received his bachelor’s degree in Mechatronics engineering from Universidad Militar Nueva Granada in 2005. He was granted the CYTED scholarship of excellence in 2008 to continue his studies in Spain, where he received his M.Sc and Ph.D. degrees from Universidad de Valladolid. His research contributions have been focused on developing theoretical and applied solutions to improve physical human–robot interaction, using human-centered approaches that include the human morphology, physiology, and psychology into the loop. He has more than 13 years of research and working experience (in both academia and industry) in different fields of applied robotics, in particular in the design, control, and testing of assistive, augmentation, and rehabilitation technologies (both exoskeletons and end effector) with state of the art actuation and control systems.

    Marcela Munera received her Ph.D. in Mechanics and Biomechanics from Université de Reims Champagne Ardenne thanks to a FEDER, Region Champagne Ardenne-Doctoral Grant. She graduated as a Bioengineer from Universidad de Antioquia and the Ecole Nationale de Metz with a Master’s degree in Mechanics and Materials. During her Ph.D. and after, as a Lecturer at Université de Reims Champagne Ardenne (France), she worked in industrial research projects in biomechanical assessment related to sports performance and injury prevention. Currently, she is an assistant professor in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito, where she contributes to projects in rehabilitation, particularly in the objective assessment of robotic devices and systems in different scenarios, and the assessment of the human response at the Center for Biomechatronics. Her research interests are focused on biomechanics, movement analysis, and assessment in rehabilitation and sports.

    Carlos A. Cifuentes is a Professor with the Department of Biomedical Engineering and Head of the Center for Biomechatronics at the Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito (ECIJG). He has been a Visiting Professor at the Universidade Federal do Espirito Santo, University of Cauca, Plymouth University, and the EPF Graduate School of Engineering. He is broadly interested in human–robot interaction and rehabilitation robotics in the context of developing countries. He was born in Bogota, Colombia. He received his B.Sc. degree in Electronic Engineering from the ECIJG and his M.Sc. degree in Biomedical Engineering from the Universidad Nacional de Entre Rios, Argentina. In 2012, he joined the Robotics and Industrial Automation Group at UFES to pursue his Ph.D. degree. In 2017 his work was lauded as one of “five history-changing ideas in Latin America” by the History Channel.

    This paper was recommended for publication by Associate Editor Sinan Haliyo.

    View full text