Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling dependence in two-tier stochastic frontier models

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The two-tier stochastic frontier model has seen widespread application across a range of social science domains. It is particularly useful in examining bilateral exchanges where unobserved side-specific information exists on both sides of the transaction. These buyer and seller specific informational aspects offer opportunities to extract surplus from the other side of the market, in combination also with uneven relative bargaining power. Currently, this model is hindered by the fact that identification and estimation relies on the potentially restrictive assumption that these factors are statistically independent. We present three different models for empirical application that allow for varying degrees of dependence across these latent informational/bargaining factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Papadopoulos (2021a), for a detailed literature review.

  2. As one variable goes to , the other cannot, by definition, go below 0.

  3. The long mathematical derivations of this Section are collected in a Technical Appendix that is available from the authors upon request.

  4. A closely related result, for a different truncation schema, was obtained by Arnold et al. (1993).

  5. The HN density for the zero-correlation case was also mentioned in Horrace (2005).

  6. The distribution is known as "Freund’s Bivariate (Mixture) Exponential extension," see Kotz et al. (2000) pp. 355-362 and Balakrishnan and Lai (2009) ch.10.3, for a survey of the literature, properties and applications of the distribution. This section is based on Chapter 4 of the PhD thesis of Papadopoulos (2018), where one can find also the related mathematical derivations.

  7. This is an inconsequential assumption because while if it does not hold it will change the expressions for the marginal densities to avoid division by zero, it will not affect the marginal moments, or any other derived expression in the model.

  8. Note that for the Clayton Copula we have Kendall’s τ = θ/(2 + θ).

References

  • Amsler C, Prokhorov A, Schmidt P (2014) Using copulas to model time dependence in stochastic frontier models. Econom Rev 33(5-6):497–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amsler C, Prokhorov A, Schmidt P (2020) A new family of copulas, with application to estimation of a production frontier system. J Prod Anal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-020-00590-w

  • Arnold BC, Beaver RJ, Groeneveld RA, Meeker WQ (1993) The nontruncated marginal of a truncated bivariate normal distribution. Psychometrika 58(3):471–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan N, Lai C-D (2009) Continuous bivariate distributions, Springer, New York, USA

  • Chawla M (2002) Estimating the extent of patient ignorance of the health care market. In: Devarajan S, Rogers FH (eds) World Bank Economists’ Forum. Vol. 2, World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA

  • Clayton DG (1978) A model for association in bivariate life tables and its application in epidemiological studies of familial tendency in chronic disease incidence. Biometrika 65(1):141–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtiss J, Jelínek L, Medonos T, Hruška M, Hüttel S (2021) Investors’ impact on czech farmland prices: a microstructural analysis. Eur Rev Agric Econ 48(1):97–157

    Google Scholar 

  • El Mehdi R, Hafner CM (2014) Inference in stochastic frontier analysis with dependent error terms. Mathematics Comput Simul 102:104–116.

  • Ferona A, Tsionas EG (2012) Measurement of excess bidding in auctions. Econ Lett 116(2):377–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank MJ (1979) On the simultaneous associativity of f(x, y) and x + y − f(x, y). Aequationes Mathematicae 19(1):194–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freund JE (1961) A bivariate extension of the exponential distribution. J Am Stat Assoc 56(296):971–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fried T, Tauer L (2019) Efficient wine pricing using stochastic frontier models. J Wine Econ 14(2):164–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaynor M, Polachek SW (1994) Measuring information in the market: an application to physician services. Southern Econ J 60(4):815–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genest C (1987) Frankas family of bivariate distributions. Biometrika 74(3):549–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groot W, van den Brink HM (2007) Optimism, pessimism and the compensating income variation of cardiovascular disease: a two-tiered quality of life stochastic frontier model. Social Sci Med 65(7):1479–1489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumbel EJ (1960) Bivariate exponential distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 55(292):698–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horrace WC (2005) Some results on the multivariate truncated normal distribution. J Multivariate Anal 94(2):209–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Z, Pei K (2020) Bi-directional r&d spillovers and operating performance: a two-tier stochastic frontier model. Econ Lett 195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109485

  • Jamalizadeh A, Pourmousa R, Balakrishnan N (2009) Truncated and limited skew-normal and skew-t distributions: properties and an illustration. Commun Stat Theory Methods 38(16-17):2653–2668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jondrow J, Lovell CAK, Materov IS, Schmidt P (1982) On the estimation of technical efficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. J Econom 19(2/3):233–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinukawa S, Motohashi K (2010) Bargaining in technology markets: an empirical study of biotechnology alliances. RIETI Discussion Paper Series 10-E-200.

  • Kinukawa S, Motohashi K (2016) What determines the outcome of licensing deals in market for technology? empirical analysis of sellers and buyers in biotechnology alliances. J Technol Manag 70(4):257–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaassen C, Wellner J (1997) Efficient estimation in the bivariate normal copula model: normal margins are least favourable. Bernoulli 3(1):55–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotz S, Balakrishnan N, Johnson NL (2000) Continuous multivariate distributions vol 1: Models and Applications (2nd ed.), John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA

  • Kumbhakar SC, Parmeter CF (2009) The effects of match uncertainty and bargaining on labor market outcomes: evidence from firm and worker specific estimates. J Prod Anal 31(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar SC, Parmeter CF (2010) Estimation of hedonic price functions with incomplete information. Empirical Econ 39(1):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran PAP (1967) Testing for correlation between non-negative variates. Biometrika 54(3-4):385–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelsen R (1986) Properties of a one-parameter family of bivariate distributions with specified marginals. Commun Stat Theory Methods 15(11):3277–3285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelsen R (2006) An Introduction to Copulas (2nd ed.), Springer Science & Business Media, New York

  • Papadopoulos A (2015) The half-normal specification for the two-tier stochastic frontier model. J Prod Anal 43(2):225–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos A (2018) The two-tier stochastic frontier framework: theory and applications, models and tools, PhD thesis, Athens University of Economics and Business

  • Papadopoulos A (2021a) The two-tier stochastic frontier framework (2TSF): Measuring frontiers wherever they may exist. In: Parmeter C.F., Sickles R.C. (eds) Advances in Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. NAPW 2018. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47106-4_8

  • Papadopoulos A (2021b) Stochastic frontier models using the Generalized Exponential distribution. J Prod Anal 55(1):15–29

  • Papadopoulos A (2021c) Accounting for endogeneity in regression models using copulas: a step-by-step guide for empirical studies. J. Econom Methods. https://doi.org/10.1515/jem-2020-0007

  • Park S, Gupta S (2012) Handling endogenous regressors by joint estimation using copulas. Marketing Sci 31(4):567–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmeter CF (2018) Estimation of the two-tiered stochastic frontier model with the scaling assumption. J Prod Anal 49(1):37–47.

  • Poggi A (2010) Job satisfaction, working conditions and aspirations. J Econ Psychol 31(6):936–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polachek SW, Yoon BJ (1987) A two-tiered earnings frontier estimation of employer and employee information in the labor market. Rev Econ Stat 69(2):296–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokhorov A, Schmidt P (2009) Likelihood-based estimation in a panel setting: robustness, redundancy and validity of copulas. J Econom 153(1):93–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psarakis S, Panaretos J (2000) On some bivariate extensions of the folded normal and the folded t distributions. J Appl Stat Sci 10(2):119–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajapaska D (2015) Floods and property values: a hedonic property and efficiency analysis, PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology.

  • Seifert S, Kahle C, Hüttel S (2020) Price dispersion in farmland markets: what is the role of asymmetric information?. Am J Agric Econ https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12153

  • Smith M (2008) Stochastic frontier models with dependent error components. Econom J 11(1):172–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song P (2000) Multivariate dispersion models generated from Gaussian copula. Scand J Stat 27(2):305–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomini S, Groot W, Pavlova M (2012) Paying informally in the Albanian health care sector: a two-tiered stochastic frontier model. Eur J Health Econ 13:777–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran K, Tsionas E (2015) Endogeneity in stochastic frontier models: Copula approach without external instruments. Econ Lett 133:85–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y (2016) The effect of bargaining on US economic aid. International Interactions 42(3):479–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y (2018) Bargaining matters: an analysis of bilateral aid to developing countries. J Int Relat Dev 21(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm S, Manjunath B (2015) tmvtnorm: truncated multivariate normal and Student t distribution. R package version 1.4-10. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tmvtnorm

  • Xu C, Yang L, Zhang B, Song M (2020) Bargaining power and information asymmetry in china’s water market: an empirical two-tier stochastic frontier analysis. Empirical Econ https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01972-7

  • Zhang H, Zhang J, Yang Y, Zhou Q (2018) Bargaining power in tourist shopping. J Travel Res 57(7):947–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Alecos Papadopoulos, Christopher F. Parmeter or Subal C. Kumbhakar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Papadopoulos, A., Parmeter, C.F. & Kumbhakar, S.C. Modeling dependence in two-tier stochastic frontier models. J Prod Anal 56, 85–101 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-021-00611-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-021-00611-2

Keywords

Navigation