Abstract
Previous studies mainly focused on second- and third-order gravitational potential gradients that these values are already measurable or that appropriate measurement principles are being developed. Although the higher-order (i.e. the order is larger than or equal to four) gravitational potential gradients cannot be observed now, with the development of science and technology, it will be hoped to measure these parameters in the future. Once the values of higher-order gradients are observable, they can express the higher frequency of the Earth’s gravity field and have the higher sensitivity to the shallower structures of the Earth’s subsurface, which will be applied for the global and regional gravity field modelling and geoid determination in geodesy and the mass density mapping of the subsurface and shallower structures in geophysics. In this paper, the higher-order gravitational potential gradients in spherical coordinates are focused on by tensor analysis. Firstly, the rule of the covariant derivative of a tensor is revised based on Casotto and Fantino (2009). Secondly, the general expressions for the natural components of the fourth-order up to seventh-order gravitational potential gradients are derived based on the revised rule. Specifically, we derive the expressions for physical components of the fourth-order gravitational potential derivatives as an example. Thirdly, Laplace’s equation with a uniform tesseroid using the spherical integral kernels has been applied to validate these newly derived expressions’ correctness. The expressions for the physical components of higher-order gradients up to m order can theoretically be derived based on this paper’s research results.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Zenodo with the identifier http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4059174.
References
Anderson EG (1976) The effect of topography on solutions of Stokes’ problem. UNISURV S-14, School of Surveying, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia
Asgharzadeh M, Von Frese R, Kim H (2008) Spherical prism magnetic effects by Gauss-Legendre quadrature integration. Geophys J Int 173(1):315–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03692.x
Asgharzadeh MF, von Frese RRB, Kim HR, Leftwich TE, Kim JW (2007) Spherical prism gravity effects by Gauss-Legendre quadrature integration. Geophys J Int 169(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03214.x
Asgharzadeh MF, Hashemi H, von Frese RR (2018) Comprehensive gravitational modeling of the vertical cylindrical prism by Gauss-Legendre quadrature integration. Geophys J Int 212(1):591–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggx413
Balakin AB, Daishev RA, Murzakhanov ZG, Skochilov AF (1997) Laser-interferometric detector of the first, second and third derivatives of the potential of the Earth gravitational field. Izv Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zaved Seriya Geol Razved 1:101–107
Baykiev E, Ebbing J, Brönner M, Fabian K (2016) Forward modeling magnetic fields of induced and remanent magnetization in the lithosphere using tesseroids. Computers Geosci 96:124–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2016.08.004
Benedek J, Papp G, Kalmár J (2018) Generalization techniques to reduce the number of volume elements for terrain effect calculations in fully analytical gravitational modelling. J Geodesy 92(4):361–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1067-1
Bidel Y, Zahzam N, Blanchard C, Bonnin A, Cadoret M, Bresson A, Rouxel D, Lequentrec-Lalancette MF (2018) Absolute marine gravimetry with matter-wave interferometry. Nat Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03040-2
Bidel Y, Zahzam N, Bresson A, Blanchard C, Cadoret M, Olesen AV, Forsberg R (2020) Absolute airborne gravimetry with a cold atom sensor. J Geodesy 94(2):20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-020-01350-2
Blakely RJ (1996) Potential Theory Gravity Magn Appl. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Bongs K, Holynski M, Vovrosh J, Bouyer P, Condon G, Rasel E, Schubert C, Schleich WP, Roura A (2019) Taking atom interferometric quantum sensors from the laboratory to real-world applications. Nat Rev Phys 1(12):731–739. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-019-0117-4
Brieden P, Müller J, Flury J, Heinzel G (2010) The mission OPTIMA - novelties and benefit. Geotechnologien Sci Rep 17:134–139. https://doi.org/10.2312/GFZ.gt.17.20
Bucha B, Janák J (2013) A MATLAB-based graphical user interface program for computing functionals of the geopotential up to ultra-high degrees and orders. Computers Geosci 56:186–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2013.03.012
Bucha B, Janák J (2014) A MATLAB-based graphical user interface program for computing functionals of the geopotential up to ultra-high degrees and orders: Efficient computation at irregular surfaces. Computers Geosci 66:219–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2014.02.005
Bucha B, Hirt C, Kuhn M (2019) Divergence-free spherical harmonic gravity field modelling based on the Runge-Krarup theorem: a case study for the Moon. J Geodesy 93(4):489–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-018-1177-4
Casotto S, Fantino E (2009) Gravitational gradients by tensor analysis with application to spherical coordinates. J Geodesy 83(7):621–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0276-z
Chen C, Ouyang Y, Bian S (2019) Spherical harmonic expansions for the gravitational field of a polyhedral body with polynomial density contrast. Surv Geophys. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-019-09515-1
Chen Q, Shen Y, Francis O, Chen W, Zhang X, Hsu H (2018) Tongji-Grace02s and Tongji-Grace02k: High-precision static GRACE-only global Earth’s gravity field models derived by refined data processing strategies. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 123(7):6111–6137. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jb015641
Claessens SJ, Hirt C (2013) Ellipsoidal topographic potential: new solutions for spectral forward gravity modeling of topography with respect to a reference ellipsoid. J Geophys Res (Solid Earth) 118(11):5991–6002. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jb010457
Claessens SJ, Hirt C (2015) A surface spherical harmonic expansion of gravity anomalies on the ellipsoid. J Geodesy 89(10):1035–1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-015-0832-2
Deng XL, Ran J, (2020) Comment on “Integral formulas for transformation of potential field parameters in geosciences” by P. Novák, M. Šprlák, R. Tenzer, and M. Pitoňák [Earth-Science Reviews, 164, (2017) 208–231]. Earth-Science Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103440
Deng XL, Shen WB (2018a) Evaluation of gravitational curvatures of a tesseroid in spherical integral kernels. J Geodesy 92(4):415–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1073-3
Deng XL, Shen WB (2018b) Evaluation of optimal formulas for gravitational tensors up to gravitational curvatures of a tesseroid. Surv Geophys 39(3):365–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-018-9460-8
Deng XL, Shen WB (2019) Topographic effects up to gravitational curvatures of tesseroids: A case study in China. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 63(3):345–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-018-0772-4
Deng XL, Grombein T, Shen WB, Heck B, Seitz K (2016) Corrections to “A comparison of the tesseroid, prism and point-mass approaches for mass reductions in gravity field modelling”(Heck and Seitz, 2007) and “Optimized formulas for the gravitational field of a tesseroid”(Grombein et al., 2013). Journal of Geodesy 90(6):585–587, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-016-0907-8
Deng XL, Shen WB, Kuhn M, Hirt C, Pail R (2020) Magnetic curvatures of a uniformly magnetized tesseroid using the Cartesian kernels. Surv Geophys 41(5):1075–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-020-09595-4
Deng XL, Shen WB, Yang M, Ran J (2021) Tensor invariants for gravitational curvatures. EGU General Assembly 2021 pp EGU21–312, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-312
DiFrancesco D, Meyer T, Christensen A, FitzGerald D (2009) Gravity gradiometry-today and tomorrow. 11th SAGA Biennial technical meeting and exhibition, September 13–18, 2009. Swaziland, South Africa, pp 80–83
Douch K, Foulon B, Christophe B, Diament M, Pajot-Métivier G, Panet I (2013) A new planar electrostatic gravity gradiometer for airborne surveys. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2013, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2013-1122.1
Dransfield MH, Christensen AN (2013) Performance of airborne gravity gradiometers. Lead Edge 32(8):908–922. https://doi.org/10.1190/tle32080908.1
Du J, Chen C, Lesur V, Lane R, Wang H (2015) Magnetic potential, vector and gradient tensor fields of a tesseroid in a geocentric spherical coordinate system. Geophys J Int 201(3):1977–2007. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv123
D’Urso MG (2012) New expressions of the gravitational potential and its derivatives for the prism. In: VII Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 137, pp 251–256, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22078-4_38
D’Urso MG (2013) On the evaluation of the gravity effects of polyhedral bodies and a consistent treatment of related singularities. J Geodesy 87(3):239–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-012-0592-1
D’Urso MG (2014) Analytical computation of gravity effects for polyhedral bodies. J Geodesy 88(1):13–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-013-0664-x
D’Urso MG (2015) The gravity anomaly of a 2D polygonal body having density contrast given by polynomial functions. Surv Geophys 36(3):391–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-015-9317-3
D’Urso MG, Trotta S (2017) Gravity anomaly of polyhedral bodies having a polynomial density contrast. Surv Geophys 38(4):781–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-017-9411-9
Fairhead JD, Odegard ME (2002) Advances in gravity survey resolution. Lead Edge 21(1):36–37. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1445845
Fantino E, Casotto S (2009) Methods of harmonic synthesis for global geopotential models and their first-, second-and third-order gradients. J Geodesy 83(7):595–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0275-0
Ghobadi-Far K, Sharifi MA, Sneeuw N (2016) 2D Fourier series representation of gravitational functionals in spherical coordinates. J Geodesy 90(9):871–881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-016-0916-7
Grinfeld P (2013) Introduction to tensor analysis and the calculus of moving surfaces. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7867-6
Grombein T, Seitz K, Heck B (2013) Optimized formulas for the gravitational field of a tesseroid. J Geodesy 87(7):645–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-013-0636-1
Hamáčková E, Šprlák M, Pitoňák M, Novák P (2016) Non-singular expressions for the spherical harmonic synthesis of gravitational curvatures in a local north-oriented reference frame. Computers Geosci 88:152–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2015.12.011
Heck B, Seitz K (2007) A comparison of the tesseroid, prism and point-mass approaches for mass reductions in gravity field modelling. J Geodesy 81(2):121–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-006-0094-0
Helms LLV (2014) Potential theory. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6422-7
Hinze WJ, Von Frese RR, Saad AH (2013) Gravity and magnetic exploration: principles, practices, and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hotine M (1969) Mathematical geodesy. US Environmental Science Services Administration
Ince ES, Barthelmes F, Reißland S, Elger K, Förste C, Flechtner F, Schuh H (2019) ICGEM – 15 years of successful collection and distribution of global gravitational models, associated services, and future plans. Earth Syst Sci Data 11(2):647–674. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-647-2019
Jekeli C (1993) A review of gravity gradiometer survey system data analyses. Geophysics 58(4):508–514. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443433
Jekeli C (2006) Airborne gradiometry error analysis. Surv Geophys 27(2):257–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-005-3826-4
Jiang L, Liu J, Zhang J, Feng Z (2018) Analytic expressions for the gravity gradient tensor of 3D prisms with depth-dependent density. Surv Geophys 39(3):337–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-017-9455-x
Kellogg O (1967) Foundations of potential theory. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York
Kuhn M (2003) Geoid determination with density hypotheses from isostatic models and geological information. J Geodesy 77(1):50–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-002-0297-y
Li Z, Hao T, Xu Y, Xu Y (2011) An efficient and adaptive approach for modeling gravity effects in spherical coordinates. J Appl Geophys 73(3):221–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.01.004
Liang W, Li J, Xu X, Zhang S, Zhao Y (2020) A high-resolution Earth’s gravity field model SGG-UGM-2 from GOCE, GRACE, satellite altimetry, and EGM2008. Engineering 6(8):860–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2020.05.008
Lin M, Denker H (2019) On the computation of gravitational effects for tesseroids with constant and linearly varying density. J Geodesy 93(5):723–747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-018-1193-4
Lin M, Denker H, Müller J (2020) Gravity field modeling using tesseroids with variable density in the vertical direction. Surv Geophys 41:723–765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-020-09585-6
Lu B, Luo Z, Zhong B, Zhou H, Flechtner F, Förste C, Barthelmes F, Zhou R (2018) The gravity field model IGGT\_R1 based on the second invariant of the GOCE gravitational gradient tensor. J Geodesy 92(5):561–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1089-8
MacMillan WD (1930) The theory of the potential. Dover, New York
Marussi A (1951) Fondamenti di geodesia intrinseca. Stamperia Cesare Tamburini
Marussi A (1961) Intrinsic Coordinates in Practical Geodesy. Geophys J Int 4:83–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1961.tb06805.x
Moritz H (1967) Kinematical geodesy. Ohio State University, Columbus, Department of Geodetic Science
Moritz H (1971) Kinematical geodesy II. Ohio State University, Columbus, Department of Geodetic Science
Nagy D, Papp G, Benedek J (2000) The gravitational potential and its derivatives for the prism. J Geodesy 74(7–8):552–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001900000116
Novák P, Šprlák M, Tenzer R, Pitoňák M (2017) Integral formulas for transformation of potential field parameters in geosciences. Earth-Sci Rev 164:208–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.10.007
Novák P, Pitoňák M, Šprlák M, Tenzer R (2019) Higher-order gravitational potential gradients for geoscientific applications. Earth-Sci Rev 198(102):937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102937
Pavlis NK, Holmes SA, Kenyon SC, Factor JK (2012) The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008). J Geophys Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jb008916
Petrović S (1996) Determination of the potential of homogeneous polyhedral bodies using line integrals. J Geodesy 71(1):44–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001900050074
Pitoňák M, Eshagh M, Šprlák M, Tenzer R, Novák P (2018) Spectral combination of spherical gravitational curvature boundary-value problems. Geophys J Int 214(2):773–791. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy147
Pitoňák M, Novák P, Šprlák M, Tenzer R (2019) On Combining the Directional Solutions of the Gravitational Curvature Boundary-Value Problem. In: IX Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy, Springer International Publishing, pp 41–47, https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2019_68
Polyanin AD, Nazaikinskii VE (2016) Handbook of linear partial differential equations for engineers and scientists, Second Edition, Updated. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton-London-New York, Revised and Extended
Qiu L, Chen Z (2020) Gravity field of a tesseroid by variable-order Gauss-Legendre quadrature. J Geodesy 94(12):114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-020-01440-1
Reed GB (1973) Application of kinematical geodesy for determining the short wave length components of the gravity field by satellite gradiometry. PhD thesis, The Ohio State University
Ren Z, Chen C, Pan K, Kalscheuer T, Maurer H, Tang J (2017) Gravity anomalies of arbitrary 3D polyhedral bodies with horizontal and vertical mass contrasts. Surv Geophys 38(2):479–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-016-9395-x
Ren Z, Zhong Y, Chen C, Tang J, Kalscheuer T, Maurer H, Li Y (2018) Gravity gradient tensor of arbitrary 3D polyhedral bodies with up to third-order polynomial horizontal and vertical mass contrasts. Surv Geophys 39(5):901–935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-018-9467-1
Ren Z, Chen C, Zhong Y, Chen H, Kalscheuer T, Maurer H, Tang J, Hu X (2020) Recursive analytical formulae of gravitational fields and gradient tensors for polyhedral bodies with polynomial density contrasts of arbitrary non-negative integer orders. Surv Geophys 41(4):695–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-020-09587-4
Rexer M, Hirt C, Claessens S, Tenzer R (2016) Layer-based modelling of the Earth’s gravitational potential up to 10-km scale in spherical harmonics in spherical and ellipsoidal approximation. Surv Geophys 37(6):1035–1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-016-9382-2
Ricci M, Levi-Civita T (1900) Méthodes de calcul différentiel absolu et leurs applications. Mathematische Annalen 54(1–2):125–201
Rim H, Li Y (2016) Gravity gradient tensor due to a cylinder. Geophysics 81(4):G59–G66. https://doi.org/10.1190/GEO2015-0699.1
Romeshkani M, Sharifi MA, Tsoulis D (2020) Joint estimation of gravity anomalies using second and third order potential derivatives. Geophys J Int 220(2):1197–1207. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz517
Romeshkani M, Sharifi MA, Tsoulis D (2021) Estimation of gravitational curvature through a deterministic approach and spectral combination of space-borne second-order gravitational potential derivatives. Geophys J Int 224(2):825–842. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa466
Rosi G, Cacciapuoti L, Sorrentino F, Menchetti M, Prevedelli M, Tino GM (2015) Measurement of the gravity-field curvature by atom interferometry. Phys. Rev. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.013001
Roy KK (2008) Potential theory in applied geophysics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72334-9
Rummel R (1986) Satellite gradiometry. In: Mathematical and Numerical Techniques in Physical Geodesy. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, vol 7, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg., pp 317–363, https://doi.org/10.1007/bfb0010135
Rummel R (2015) GOCE: Gravitational gradiometry in a satellite. Handbook of Geomathematics: Second Edition pp 211–226, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54551-1_4
Rummel R, Yi W, Stummer C (2011) GOCE gravitational gradiometry. J Geodesy 85(11):777–790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-011-0500-0
Shako R, Förste C, Abrikosov O, Bruinsma S, Marty JC, Lemoine JM, Flechtner F, Neumayer H, Dahle C (2013) EIGEN-6C: A high-resolution global gravity combination model including GOCE data. In: Advanced Technologies in Earth Sciences, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp 155–161, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32135-1_20
Sharifi MA, Romeshkani M, Tenzer R (2017) On inversion of the second-and third-order gravitational tensors by Stokes’ integral formula for a regional gravity recovery. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 61(3):453–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-016-0831-7
Shen WB, Deng XL (2016) Evaluation of the fourth-order tesseroid formula and new combination approach to precisely determine gravitational potential. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 60(4):583–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-016-0402-y
Shen WB, Moritz H (1996a) On the separation of gravitation and inertia and the determination of the relativistic gravity field in the case of free motion. J Geodesy 70(10):633–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00868225
Shen WB, Moritz H (1996b) On the separation of gravitation and inertia in airborne gradiometry. Bollettino di Geodesia e Scienze Affini 55(2):145–159
Soler SR, Pesce A, Gimenez ME, Uieda L (2019) Gravitational field calculation in spherical coordinates using variable densities in depth. Geophys J Int 218(3):2150–2164. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz277
Šprlák M, Novák P (2016) Spherical gravitational curvature boundary-value problem. J Geodesy 90(8):727–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-016-0905-x
Šprlák M, Novák P, Pitoňák M (2016) Spherical harmonic analysis of gravitational curvatures and its implications for future satellite missions. Surv Geophys 37(3):681–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-016-9368-0
Tenzer R, Hamayun Z, Prutkin I (2010) A comparison of various integration methods for solving Newton’s integral in detailed forward modelling. In: Mertikas SP (ed) International Association of Geodesy Symposia, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, vol 135, pp 361–368, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10634-7_48
Tino GM (2021) Testing gravity with cold atom interferometry: Results and prospects. Quantum Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/abd83e
Torta JM (2019) Modelling by spherical cap harmonic analysis: a literature review. Surv Geophys 41(2):201–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-019-09576-2
Tsoulis D (2012) Analytical computation of the full gravity tensor of a homogeneous arbitrarily shaped polyhedral source using line integrals. Geophysics 77(2):F1–F11. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2010-0334.1
Uieda L, Barbosa V, Braitenberg C (2016) Tesseroids: Forward-modeling gravitational fields in spherical coordinates. Geophysics pp F41–F48, https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2015-0204.1
van Leeuwen EH (2000) BHP develops airborne gravity gradiometer for mineral exploration. Lead Edge 19(12):1296–1297. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1438526
Wan L, Zhang J (2019) Analytical solutions of gravity vector and gravity gradient tensor caused by a 2D polygonal body with a 2D polynomial density contrast. Surv Geophys 40(5):1151–1183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-019-09542-y
Wild-Pfeiffer F (2008) A comparison of different mass elements for use in gravity gradiometry. J Geodesy 82(10):637–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0219-8
Wu L (2018) Efficient modeling of gravity fields caused by sources with arbitrary geometry and arbitrary density distribution. Surv Geophys 39(3):401–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-018-9461-7
Wu L (2019) Fourier-domain modeling of gravity effects caused by polyhedral bodies. J Geodesy 93(5):635–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-018-1187-2
Wu L, Chen L, Wu B, Cheng B, Lin Q (2019) Improved Fourier modeling of gravity fields caused by polyhedral bodies: with applications to asteroid Bennu and comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. J Geodesy 93(10):1963–1984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-019-01294-2
Yang M, Hirt C, Pail R (2020) TGF: a new MATLAB-based software for terrain-related gravity field calculations. Remote Sens 12(7):1063. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12071063
Zhang Y, Mooney WD, Chen C (2018) Forward calculation of gravitational fields with variable resolution 3D density models using spherical triangular tessellation: Theory and Applications. Geophys J Int 215(1):363–374. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy278
Zhang Y, Mooney WD, Chen C, Du J (2019) Interface inversion of gravitational data using spherical triangular tessellation: an application for the estimation of the Moon’s crustal thickness. Geophys J Int 217(1):703–713. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz026
Zingerle P, Pail R, Gruber T, Oikonomidou X (2020) The combined global gravity field model XGM2019e. J Geodesy 94(7):66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-020-01398-0
Zund J (2012) Foundations of differential geodesy. Springer, New york
Zund J, Nolten J, Chovitz B, Whitten C (2012) Differential geodesy. Springer, New York
Acknowledgements
We are very grateful to Prof. Kusche, the Editor and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions, which help to improve the manuscript. This study is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41974094) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2021M691402).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
X.L. Deng derived the formulae, wrote the manuscript and provided the data that support the findings of this study as Appendix 3 and 4. X.L. Deng and J. Ran revised the manuscript. All authors have reviewed and approved the final submitted version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Christoffel symbol of the second kind and its first-order up to fifth-order derivatives
In Casotto and Fantino (2009), the matrix forms of the Christoffel symbol of the second kind and first-order derivatives (\( \varGamma ^{s}_{pq}\) and \(\varGamma ^{s}_{pq,r}=\partial \varGamma ^{s}_{pq} / \partial u^{r}\) with \(p, q, s, r \in \{1,2,3\}\)) were provided. In order to maintain the integrity of the derivation process, the detailed expressions for the nonzero Christoffel symbol (\(\varGamma ^{s}_{pq}\) with \(p, q, s \in \{1,2,3\}\)) and first-order derivatives (\(\varGamma ^{s}_{pq,r}\) with \(p, q, r, s \in \{1,2,3\}\)) are expressed in Table 2 and 3, respectively. Other expressions for \(\varGamma ^{s}_{pq}\) and \(\varGamma ^{s}_{pq,r}\) are equal to zero. It should be noted that not only Christoffel symbol is symmetric in the lower indices (\(\varGamma ^{s}_{pq} = \varGamma ^{s}_{qp}\)), but also the same for first-order derivatives (\(\varGamma ^{s}_{pq,r} = \varGamma ^{s}_{qp,r}\)).
In addition, the detailed expressions for the nonzero second-order up to fifth-order derivatives of Christoffel symbol of the second kind (\(\varGamma ^{s}_{pq,rt}\) \(=\partial \varGamma ^{s}_{pq} / (\partial u^{r} \partial u^{t})\), \(\varGamma ^{s}_{pq,rtx}\) \(=\partial \varGamma ^{s}_{pq} / (\partial u^{r} \partial u^{t} \partial u^{x})\), \(\varGamma ^{s}_{pq,rtxy}\) \(=\partial \varGamma ^{s}_{pq} / (\partial u^{r} \partial u^{t} \partial u^{x} \partial u^{y})\), and \(\varGamma ^{s}_{pq,rtxyz}\) \(=\partial \varGamma ^{s}_{pq} / (\partial u^{r} \partial u^{t} \partial u^{x} \partial u^{y} \partial u^{z})\) with p, q, r, s, t, x, y, z \(\in \{1,2,3\}\)) are expressed in Table 4 – 7, where other expressions are equal to zero. It can be interestingly found that the second-order up to fifth-order derivatives of Christoffel symbol have symmetry not only for the original lower indices of Christoffel symbol (e.g. \(\varGamma ^{1}_{12,22} = \varGamma ^{1}_{21,22}\), \(\varGamma ^{1}_{13,33} = \varGamma ^{1}_{31,33}\), \(\varGamma ^{1}_{12,222}=\varGamma ^{1}_{21,222}\), \(\varGamma ^{1}_{13,3333}=\varGamma ^{1}_{31,3333}\), and \(\varGamma ^{1}_{12,22222}=\varGamma ^{1}_{21,22222}\)), but also for the partial derivative parameters in the lower indices (e.g. \(\varGamma ^{3}_{11,23}=\varGamma ^{3}_{11,32}\), \(\varGamma ^{3}_{11,223} = \varGamma ^{3}_{11,232}=\varGamma ^{3}_{11,322}\), \(\varGamma ^{3}_{11,2223}=\varGamma ^{3}_{11,2232} = \varGamma ^{3}_{11,2322}=\varGamma ^{3}_{11,3222}\), and \(\varGamma ^{3}_{11,22223}=\varGamma ^{3}_{11,22232}=\varGamma ^{3}_{11,22322} = \varGamma ^{3}_{11,23222}=\varGamma ^{3}_{11,32222}\)).
Appendix 2: Physical components of the fourth-order gravitational potential gradients in spherical coordinates in the topocentric ENU reference system
In order to keep the symbols consistent with Casotto and Fantino (2009), \(V^{*}_{ijkl}\) = \(V^{*}_{;pqrt}\) is adopted by dropping the colon sign (;), \(\partial _{i} V\) = \(V_{,p}\), \(\partial _{ij} V\) = \(V_{,pq}\), \(\partial _{ijk} V\) = \(V_{,pqr}\) and \(\partial _{ijkl} V\) = \(V_{,pqrt}\) are provided by dropping the comma sign (,), where \(i, j, k, l \in \{\lambda , \varphi , r\}\).
Following the general rule of the properties of the potential field parameters (Deng and Ran 2020), the total number for the physical components of the fourth-order gravitational potential gradients is \(3^4 = 81\) and the defining number is \( (4+1)(4+2)/2 = 15\). Furthermore, the new notation for the physical components of the fourth-order gradients can be given as \(V^{*}_{(\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma )}\) with \(\alpha , \beta , \gamma \in \{0, 1, 2, 3, 4\}\) and \(\alpha + \beta + \gamma = 4\), where \(\alpha \) is the total number of \(\lambda \), \(\beta \) is the total number of \(\varphi \), and \(\gamma \) is the total number of r in the expression of \(V^{*}_{ijkl}\).
The 15 defining physical components of the fourth-order gravitational potential gradients in spherical coordinates in the topocentric ENU reference system are expressed in Eqs. (33) – (47).
It should be noted that \(\partial _{ij} V\), \(\partial _{ijk} V\), and \(\partial _{ijkl} V\) are symmetrical, which means subscript symbols (i.e. i, j, k, and l) are interchangeable for the place. For example, \(\partial _{ij} V\) = \(\partial _{ji} V\) and \(\partial _{ijk} V\) = \(\partial _{ikj} V\) = \(\partial _{jik} V\) = \(\partial _{kij} V\) = \(\partial _{jki} V\) = \(\partial _{kji} V\). The same rule can be applied for the \(\partial _{ijkl} V\).
Appendix 3: Expressions for the components of first-order up to fourth-order gravitational potential gradients of a uniform tesseroid using the spherical integral kernels
The 3 defining expressions of \(\partial _{i} V\), 6 defining expressions of \(\partial _{ij} V\), 10 defining expressions of \(\partial _{ijk} V\), and 15 defining expressions of \(\partial _{ijkl} V\) are the natural gravitational components. Due to the complex forms of these expressions, the Mathematica code (AppendixC.nb) is provided at https://www.github.com/xiaoledeng/higher-order-gravitational-potential-gradients. AppendixC.nb provides the expressions for the kernels of the different order derivatives of a uniform tesseroid using the spherical integral kernels, it should add the related triple integral symbols as \(G \rho \int _{\lambda _{1}}^{\lambda _{2}} \int _{\varphi _{1}}^{\varphi _{2}} \int _{r_{1}}^{r_{2}} (kernels) \mathrm {d} r^{\prime } \mathrm {d} \varphi ^{\prime } \mathrm {d} \lambda ^{\prime }\).
Appendix 4: Validation with Laplace’s equation for physical components of the fourth-order gravitational potential gradients of a uniform tesseroid in spherical integral kernels
To demonstrate the detailed proof steps, the Mathematica code (AppendixD.nb) is provided at https://www.github.com/xiaoledeng/higher-order-gravitational-potential-gradients. After running all the codes in AppendixD.nb, the expressions for Laplace’s equation (i.e. Laplace1, Laplace2, Laplace3, Laplace4, Laplace5, and Laplace6) are all equal to zero. Thus, the expressions for the 15 defining physical components of the fourth-order gravitational potential gradients as Eqs. (33) – (47) in Appendix 2 are correct.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Deng, XL., Ran, J. Higher-order gravitational potential gradients by tensor analysis in spherical coordinates. J Geod 95, 88 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-021-01539-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-021-01539-z