Abstract
Through design-based research, this study examines a digital badging system to support online, independent teacher Professional development (PD) in Science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) subjects. Sociocultural learning theory, in conjunction with the mediation triangle, provided a lens through which digital badging systems were examined as cultural tools for planning and wayfinding. This framework supported personalized teacher professional development in the digital badging system, Teacher learning journeys (TLJ), and the study examined teacher planning through goal articulation and wayfinding through teacher selection of professional development activities. Data consisted of teacher-generated artifacts, including goal statements, orientation activity reflections, intended PD activities, and completed PD activities. Data collection occurred during two 3-month iterations of teacher interaction with TLJ (I-1 = 30, I-2 = 29), and analyses were conducted using qualitative coding and statistical investigation including independent samples t tests and Pearson r correlations. Findings for teacher planning include a positive impact of reflective writing supports for activity completion, a broadening search for content, and four common objectives in written goal statements. Findings for teacher wayfinding discuss how participants used structures of the digital badging system for organizing and completing professional development in different ways. Analyses uncover differences in organizing intended professional development, three time-based patterns of use, and a non-significant relationship between intentions to complete an activity and the completion of activities. The intended and actual use of the TLJ system along with impacts on the teacher-leaners provide valuable insight into design considerations for developers and designers of independent teacher professional development.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003
Butcher, K. R., & Sumner, T. (2011). Self-directed learning and the sensemaking paradox. Human-Computer Interaction, 26(1–2), 123–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2011.556552
Cheng, Z., Richardson, J. C., & Newby, T. J. (2019). Using digital badges as goal-setting facilitators: A multiple case study. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09240-z
Cheng, Z., Watson, S. L., & Newby, T. J. (2018). Goal setting and open digital badges in higher education. TechTrends, 62(2), 190–196.
Cole, M. (1996). Putting culture in the middle. Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline (pp. 117–141). Harvard University Press.
Gamrat, C., & Zimmerman, H. T. (2015). An online badging system supporting educators’ STEM learning. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop for Open Badges in Education (pp. 12–23). Retrieved October 19, 2017, from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1358/paper2.pdf
Gamrat, C., Zimmerman, H. T., Dudek, J., & Peck, K. (2014). Personalized workplace learning: An exploratory study on digital badging within a teacher professional development program. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45, 1136–1148. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12200
Gutiérrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25.
Janssen, J., Tattersall, C., Waterink, W., van den Berg, B., van Es, R., Bolman, C., & Koper, R. (2007). Self-organising navigational support in lifelong learning: How predecessors can lead the way. Computers and Education, 49, 781–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.022
Kaplan, A., Middleton, M. J., Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2002). Achievement goals and goal structures. In C. Midgley (Ed.), Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning (pp. 21–53). Lawerence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Kearney, M., Schuck, S., Burden, K., & Aubusson, P. (2012). Viewing mobile learning from a pedagogical perspective. Research in Learning Technology, 20(1063519), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0/14406
Land, S. M., & Hannafin, M. J. (1996). A conceptual framework for the development of theories-in-action with open-ended learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(3), 37–53.
Newby, T. J., & Cheng, Z. (2019). Instructional digital badges: Effective learning tools. Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09719-7
Rughinis, R. (2013). Talkative objects in need of interpretation. Re-thinking digital badges in education. In CHI’13 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2099–2108).
Sandoval, W. (2014). Conjecture mapping: An approach to systematic educational design research. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(1), 18–36.
Sandoval, W. A., & Bell, P. (2004). Design-based research methods for studying learning in context: Introduction. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 199–201.
Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273–286.
Taminiau, E. M. C., Kester, L., Corbalan, G., Alessi, S. M., Moxnes, E., Gijselaers, W. H., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2013). Why advice on task selection may hamper learning in on-demand education. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.028
Tattersall, C., Manderveld, J., Van den Berg, B., Van Es, R., Janssen, J., & Koper, R. (2005). Self-organising wayfinding support for lifelong learners. Education and Information Technologies, 10, 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-005-6750-9
Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Watson, W. R., & Watson, S. L. (2017). Principles for personalized instruction. In C. Reigeluth, B. Beatty, & R. Myers (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models (Vol. iv): The learner-centered paradigm of education (pp. 93–120). New York: Routledge.
Wills, C., & Xie, Y. (2016). Toward a comprehensive theoretical framework for designing digital badges. In D. Ifenthaler, N. Bellin-Mularski, & D. K. Mah (Eds.), Foundation of digital badges and micro-credentials: Demonstrating and recognizing knowledge and competencies (pp. 261–272). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15425-1_14
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge research team members Jaclyn Dudek, Kyle Peck, and Katharine Grills for their collaborations with this work. The development of the Teacher Learning Journeys system and its research were partially supported by NASA. This work is written in honor and memory of Margaret “Peggy” Maher. Without her leadership and encouragement, Teacher Learning Journeys would not have been possible.
Funding
This research was made possible through support from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA) Aerospace Education Services Project (employer of the first author from 2008 to 2013).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were according to the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (University Institutional Review Board, IRB#: 44633) and the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gamrat, C., Zimmerman, H.T. Digital badging systems as a set of cultural tools for personalized professional development. Education Tech Research Dev 69, 2615–2636 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10028-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10028-1