Skip to main content
Log in

Stochastic Model of Network Formation with Asymmetric Players

  • MATHEMATICAL GAME THEORY AND APPLICATIONS
  • Published:
Automation and Remote Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose a network formation model using the theory of stochastic games with random terminal time. Initially, the leader proposes a joint project in the form of a network to the players. Then the players have opportunities to form new links with each other to update the network proposed by the leader. Any player’s payoff is determined at any step by the network structure. It is also assumed that the formation of the links proposed by the players is random. The duration of the game is random as well. As a result of the players’ actions and the implementation of random steps of the Nature, a network is formed. We consider a cooperative approach to network formation and use the CIS-value as a cooperative solution. In this paper, we obtain a recursive formula to derive this value in any cooperative subgame. The paper also investigates the dynamic consistency of the CIS-value. The theoretical results are illustrated by a numerical example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Gromova, E.V. and Petrosyan, L.A., On an approach to constructing a characteristic function in cooperative differential games, Autom. Remote Control, 2017, vol. 78, no. 9, pp. 1680–1692.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Mazalov, V.V. and Chirkova, Yu.V., Setevye igry (Network Games), St. Petersburg: Lan’, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Petrosyan, L.A., Stability of solutions in differential games with many players, Vestn. Leningr. Univ. Ser. 1: Mat. Mekh. Astron., 1977, no. 19, pp. 46–52.

  4. Petrosyan, L.A. and Danilov, N.N., Stability of solutions in nonzero-sum differential games with transferable payoffs, Vestn. Leningr. Univ. Ser. 1: Mat. Mekh. Astron., 1979, no. 1, pp. 52–59.

  5. Petrosyan, L.A. and Sedakov, A.A., Multistage network games with perfect information, Autom. Remote Control, 2014, vol. 75, no. 8, pp. 1532–1540.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Petrosyan, L.A., Sedakov, A.A., and Bochkarev, A.O., Two-stage network games, Autom. Remote Control, 2016, vol. 77, no. 10, pp. 1855–1866.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Aumann, R.J. and Myerson, R.B., Endogenous formation of links between players and of coalitions: an application of the Shapley value, in The Shapley Value, 1988, pp. 175–191.

  8. Aumann, R.J. and Peleg, B., Von Neumann–Morgenstern solutions to cooperative games without side payments, Bull. Am. Math. Soc., 1960, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 173–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Avrachenkov, K.E., Kondratev, A.Y., Mazalov, V.V., and Rubanov, D.G., Network partitioning algorithms as cooperative games, Comput. Soc. Networks, 2018, vol. 5, no. 1, article ID 11.

  10. Bala, V. and Goyal, S., A noncooperative model of network formation, Econometrica, 2000, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 1181–1229.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Chander, P. and Tulkens, H., The core of an economy with multilateral environmental externalities, in Public Goods, Environmental Externalities, and Fiscal Competition, Boston, MA: Springer, 2006, pp. 153–175.

  12. Driessen, T.S.H. and Funaki, Y., Coincidence of and collinearity between game theoretic solutions, OR Spektrum, 1991, vol. 13, pp. 15–30.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Gao, H., Petrosyan, L., Qiao, H., and Sedakov, A., Cooperation in two-stage games on undirected networks, J. Syst. Sci. Complexity, 2017, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 680–693.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Gao, H., Petrosyan, L., and Sedakov, A., Dynamic Shapley value for repeated network games with shock, 27th Chin. Control Decis. Conf. (2015 CCDC) (2015), pp. 6449–6455.

  15. Gromova, E.V. and Plekhanova, T.M., On the regularization of a cooperative solution in a multistage game with random time horizon, Discrete Appl. Math., 2019, vol. 255, pp. 40–55.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Haurie, A. and Zaccour, G., Differential game model of power exchange between interconnected utilities, Proc. IEEE Conf. Decis. Control (1986), pp. 262–266.

  17. Jackson, M.O. and Watts, A., On the formation of interaction networks in social coordination games, Games Econ. Behav., 2002, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 265–291.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. König, M.D., Tessone, C.J., and Zenou, Y., Nestedness in networks: a theoretical model and some applications, Theor. Econ., 2014, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 695–752.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuzyutin, D., Gromova, E., and Smirnova, N., On the cooperative behavior in multistage multicriteria game with chance moves, in Mathematical Optimization Theory and Operations Research. MOTOR 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12095, Kononov, A., Khachay, M., Kalyagin, V., and Pardalos, P., Eds., Cham: Springer, 2020, pp. 184–199.

  20. Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O., Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 1947.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Parilina, E., Solutions of cooperative stochastic games with transferable payoffs, Doctoral (Phys.-Math.) Dissertation, 2018.

  22. Parilina, E.M., A survey on cooperative stochastic games with finite and infinite duration, Contrib. Game Theory Manage., 2018, vol. 11, no. 0, pp. 129–195.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Parilina, E. and Petrosyan, L., On a simplified method of defining characteristic function in stochastic games, Mathematics, 2020, vol. 8, no. 7, article ID 1135.

  24. Parilina, E.M. and Tampieri, A., Stability and cooperative solution in stochastic games, Theory Decis., 2018, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 601–625.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Parilina, E.M. and Zaccour, G., Node-consistent Shapley value for games played over event trees with random terminal time, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 2017, vol. 175, pp. 236–254.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Petrosyan, L. and Zaccour, G., Time-consistent Shapley value allocation of pollution cost reduction, J. Econ. Dyn. Control, 2003, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 381–398.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Pin, P. and Rogers, B., Stochastic network formation and homophily, in Oxford Handbook on the Economics of Networks, Bramoullé, Y., Galeotti, A., and Rogers, B., Eds., Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2016.

  28. Reddy, P.V. and Zaccour, G., A friendly computable characteristic function, Math. Soc. Sci., 2016, vol. 82, pp. 18–25.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Shapley, L.S., Stochastic games, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 1953, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1095–1100.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Sun, P. and Parilina, E., Two-stage network formation game with heterogeneous players and private information, Contrib. Game Theory Manage., 2019, vol. XII, pp. 316–324.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work was funded by Shandong Province “Double-Hundred Talent Plan” (No. WST2017009).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ping Sun or E. M. Parilina.

Additional information

Translated by V. Potapchouck

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ping Sun, Parilina, E.M. Stochastic Model of Network Formation with Asymmetric Players. Autom Remote Control 82, 1065–1082 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117921060072

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117921060072

Keywords

Navigation