Skip to main content
Log in

Security and urban satisfaction: developing a model based on safe urban park design components extracted from users' preferences

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Security Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays, the feeling of fear and the lack of security in urban environment, in particular parks, are considered as the main concerns in public health. Thus, users’ characteristics should be considered for meeting the requirements for planning and designing urban parks. The aim of the study is to explain influential factors and to develop users' preferences model related to components affecting security in urban parks. Our research method is based on descriptive-survey and attitude measurement. Therefore, we extracted the variables from the distributed open-ended questionnaire among the 250 park users based on content analysis technique. Then, we determined the effective factors and criteria for the sense of security, using approaches suggested by theorists, literature reviews on urban security and interviews with experts in urban planning. We therefore developed a closed questionnaire to measure users’ preferences and distributed the questionnaire to the 250 park users one more time. By analysing the extracted data using Exploratory Factor Analysis in SPSS, we obtained eight explanatory factors based on the users' preferences, including artificial elements design, control and surveillance, planting design, readability, physical accessibility, aesthetics, activity patterns, and space size and extent. The approximate share of each eight factors in explaining variance was 9.304, 7.673, 7.485, 7.310, 7.260, 6.146, 6.024, and 5.592, respectively. Finally, we extracted an empirical model from eight exploratory factors in Amos.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, R.E., and R.T. Serpe. 2000. Social integration, fear of crime, and life satisfaction. Sociological Perspectives 43 (4): 605–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L.M., and G.S. Stokes. 1989. Planting in parking lots to improve perceived attractiveness and security. Journal of Arboriculture 15 (1): 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, M.A., P.J. Brantingham, and J.B. Kinney. 2010. Classics in environmental criminology, 1st ed. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, R., and L. Monchuk. 2019. What is CPTED? Reconnecting theory with application in the words of users and abusers. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 13 (3): 312–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, D.M., L.A. Furr, and M. Spine. 2002. The effects of neighborhood conditions on perceptions of safety. Journal of Criminal Justice 30 (5): 417–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basto, M., and J.M. Pereira. 2012. An SPSS R-menu for ordinal factor analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 46 (4): 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beirne, P. 1987. Adolphe Quetelet and the origins of positivist criminology. American Journal of Sociology 92 (5): 1140–1169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, R.L., and C.R. Block. 1995. Space, place and crime: hot spot areas and hot places of Liquor-Related crime. In Crime and place, ed. J.E. Eck and D. Weisburd. New York: Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham, P.L., and P.J. Brantingham. 1993. Nodes, paths and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 13 (1): 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, D. J., France, J. 1980. Landscape Evaluation: A comparative study. Journal of Environmental Management 10: 263–275.

  • Brown, G., M.F. Schebella, and D. Weberd. 2014. Using participatory GIS to measure physical activity and urban park benefits. Landscape and Urban Planning 121: 34–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, E.W. 1916. Juvenile delinquency in a small city. Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology 6 (5): 724–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, J.A., and J. Wolch. 2009. Nature, race, and parks: Past research and future directions for geographic research. Progress in Human Geography 33 (6): 743–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catton, W.R. 1994. Foundations of human ecology. Sociological Perspectives 37 (1): 75–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiesura, A. 2004. The role of urban parks for sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning 68 (1): 129–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, B., E. Yildiz, and S. Yildiz. 2014. Handbook of research on effective marketing in contemporary globalism. Hersey: IGI Global.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R., ed. 1992. Situational crime prevention: Successful case studies, 1st ed. New York: Harrow & Heston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R., and J. Eck. 2005. Crime analysis for problem solvers in 60 small steps. Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS), US Department of Justice.

  • Clarke, R., and J.E. Eck. 2003. Become a problem solving crime analyst in 55 small steps. Jill Dando Institute: University College London, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colman, J. 1987. Opportunities for innovation in urban design education. Australian Planners 25 (4): 28–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordeiro, M., P. Kwenda, and M. Ntuli. 2020. Crime and life satisfaction: Evidence from South Africa—Gauteng Province. Applied Research in Quality of Life 15 (3): 715–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costello, A.B., and J. Osborne. 2005. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation. 10 (7): 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozens, P. 2008. Crime prevention through environmental design in Western Australia: Planning for sustainable urban futures. Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning. 3 (3): 272–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cozens, P., G. Saville, and D. Hillier. 2005. Crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED): A review and modern bibliography. Property Management 23 (5): 328–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, T.D. 2000. Crime prevention through environmental design: Applications of architectural design and space management concepts, 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth- Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dakin, S. 2003. There’s more to landscape than meets the eye: Towards inclusive landscape assessment in resource and environmental management. Canadian Geographer 47 (2): 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De. Vaus, D.A. 1986. Surveys in social research. London: George, Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dower, N. 1995. Peace and security: Some conceptual notes. In Essays on peace: Paradigms for global order, ed. M. Salla, W. Tonettto, and E. Martinez, 18–23. Rockhampton: Central Queensland University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom, P. 2011. Deconstructing CPTED … and reconstructing it for practice, knowledge management and research. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 17 (1): 7–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felson, M., and R.V. Clarke. 1998. Opportunity makes the thief, police research series, paper 98. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, S. 1992. City shape communicating and evaluating community design. Journal of the American Planning Association 58 (2): 177–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotham, K.F. 2003. Toward an understanding of the spatiality of urban poverty: The urban poor as spatial actors. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 27 (3): 723–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartig, T., M. Mang, and G.W. Evans. 1991. Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behavior 23: 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haughton, G., and C. Hunter. 1994. Sustainable Cities Regional Policy and Development. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, D.G., and W.H. Weitzer. 1984. The public’s image of urban parks: Past amenity, present ambivalence, uncertain future. Urban Ecology 8 (3): 243–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedblom, M., B. Gunnarsson, I. Knez, P. Thorsson, and J. Lundström. 2018. Urban parks and forests reduce physiological stress while cities do not: Comparisons of visual virtual realities, bird songs and natural smells. 5th European Congress of Conservation Biology, Finland.

  • Hu, L., and P.M. Bentler. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (1): 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. 1961. The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, A., and D. Appleyard. 1987. Toward an Urban Design Manifesto. Journal of the American Planning Association 53 (1): 112–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, C.R. 1971. Crime prevention through environmental design. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongejan, A., and T. Woldendrop. 2013. A successful CPTED approach; The Dutch ‘Police Label Secure Housing.’ Built Environment 39 (1): 31–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R.B. 2015. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 4th ed. New York: The Guilford press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutsson, J. 1997. Restoring public order in a city park. In Policing for prevention: Reducing crime, public intoxication and injury, vol. 7, ed. R. Homel. Criminal Justice Press, 133–151. New York: Monsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. 1938. The culture of cities. London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

  • Li, C.L. 2020. Quality of life: The perspective of urban park recreation in three Asian cities. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 29: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linden, R. 2007. Situational crime prevention: Its role in comprehensive prevention initiatives. IPC Review 1: 139–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, T., and M.R. Nilsen. 2012. Safety in residential areas. Tijdschrift Voor Economis-Che En Sociale Geografie 103: 196–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, P., J. Spence, L. Nelson-Carr, and W. Pitt. 2007. Crime prevention through environmental design guidelines for Queensland, Part a: Essential features of safer places. www.Police.Qld.gov.au/programs/crimeprevention.

  • Lyytimäki, J., and M. Sipilä. 2009. Hopping on one leg—The challenge of ecosystem disservices for urban green management. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 8 (4): 309–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machlis, G.E., T. Hanson, Z. Špirić, and J.E. McKendry, eds. 2011. Warfare ecology: A new synthesis for peace and security. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madge, C. 1997. Public parks and the geography of fear. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Social Geografie 88 (3): 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mak, B.K.L., and C.Y. Jim. 2018. Examining fear-evoking factors in urban parks in Hong Kong. Landscape and Urban Planning 171: 42–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruthaveeran, S. 2017. Exploring the urban park use, preference and behaviours among the residents of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 25: 85–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruthaveeran, S., and C. Bosch. 2014. A socio-ecological exploration of fear of crime in urban green spaces—A systematic review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 13 (1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruthaveeran, S., and C. Bosch. 2015. Fear of crime in urban parks-What the residents of Kuala Lumpur to say? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 14 (3): 702–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mass, J., P. Spreeuwenberg, M.V. Winsum-Westra, R.A. Verheij, S. Vries, and P. Groenewegen. 2009. Is green space in the living environment associated with people’s feelings of social safety? Environment and Planning A. 41 (7): 1763–1777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuoka, R.H., and R. Kaplan. 2008. People needs in the urban landscape: Analysis of landscape and urban planning contribution. Landscape and Urban Planning. 84 (1): 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormack, G.R., M. Rock, A.M. Toohey, and D. Hignell. 2010. Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use and physical activity: A review of qualitative research. Health & Place 16 (4): 712–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, J.G., and S.M. Holland. 2015. Strategies in use to reduce incivilities, provide security and reduce crime in urban parks. Security Journal 28 (4): 374–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melo, S.N.D., M.A. Andresen, and L.F. Matias. 2017. L.F. Geography of crime in a Brazilian context: An application of social disorganization theory. Urban Geography 38: 1550–1572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasar, J.L., B. Fisher, and M. Grannis. 1993. Proximate physical cues to fear of crime. Landscape and Urban Planning 26: 161–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemeth, J., and S. Schmidt. 2007. Toward a methodology for measuring the security of publicly accessible spaces. Journal of the American Planning Association 73 (3): 283–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, O. 1972. Defensible space: Crime prevention through urban design. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the deputy prime minister. 2004. Safer places: The planning system and crime prevention, London: HMSO. www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningandbuilding/pdf/147627.pdf.

  • Park, R., and E. Burgess. 1925. The city: Suggestions for investigation of human behavior in the urban environment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushing, J.R., M.D. Needham, A. D’Antonio, and E.C. Metcalf. 2019. Barriers to attachment? Relationships among constraints, attachment, and visitation to urban parks. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 27: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russ, T.H. 2009. Site Planning and design handbook, 2ed ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, H. 1989. Environment, behavior, and design research on urban forests. In Advances in environment, behavior, and design, vol. 2, ed. E. Zube and G. Moore, 87–117. New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, H.W., and L.M. Anderson. 1984. Perception of personal safety in urban recreation sites. Journal of Leisure Research 16 (2): 178–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soltani, M. 2008. Formation process in Iranian contemporary: From garden to park, the case study of Tehran. Bagh-e-Nazar 4 (8): 48–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics of Tehran City. 2019. (Statistical Yearbook of Tehran City), 2019, Publications of Information and Communication Technology Organization of Tehran Municipality, Tehran.

  • Taylor, R., and A. Harrell. 1996. Physical environment and crime. Washington: National Institute of Justice Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thani, S.K.S.O., N.H.M. Hashim, and W.H.W. Ismail. 2016. Surveillance by design: Assessment using principles of crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) in urban parks. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 234: 506–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilalta, C.J., P. Lopez, G. Fondevila, and O. Siordia. 2019. Testing broken windows theory in Mexico City. Social Science Quarterly 101 (2): 558–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vito, G.F., J.R. Maahs, and R.M. Holmes. 2015. Criminology: Theory, research and policy, 4th ed. Burlington: Jones and Bartlett Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wales, H.R.H. 1989. A vision of britain: A personal view of architecture, 1st ed. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, A., and C. Hemmens. 2008. Introduction to criminology: A text/ reader. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, C.F., and B.R. Bausell. 1981. Nursing research: Design statistics and computer analysis. New York: Davis FA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wekerle, G.R., and C. Whitzman. 1995. Safe cities: Guidelines for planning, design and management. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellesley, D.J. 1988. Urban living the individual in the city. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J.Q., and G.L. Kelling. 1982. Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety. Atlantic Monthly 249 (3): 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jamal-e-Din MahdiNejad.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Research involving human rights

We provided questionnaires to park users with different demographic characteristics based on their availability and willingness to respond.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gholipour, S., MahdiNejad, JeD. & Saleh Sedghpour, B. Security and urban satisfaction: developing a model based on safe urban park design components extracted from users' preferences. Secur J 35, 863–892 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-021-00303-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-021-00303-4

Keywords

Navigation