Abstract
This article presents a review on performance, thermal modeling and numerical modeling of spray-assisted solar desalination systems (SLTD). Spray assisted has the benefits of higher rates of heat and mass transfer, the ability to work at moderately low-temperature differences, ease of system design, less scaling and fouling issues, and lower initial cost than conventional thermal desalination. Thermal models are handy tools to expect the performance of well-designed SLTD before its fabrication and saves cost and time. Software applications play a crucial role in developing and analyzing the mathematical model and assessing the performance of SLTD. CFD simulation is useful in the analysis as it can show the precise distribution of temperature inside the evaporation tower. It is used to model and analyze the evaporation process of brine spray and a powerful tool for guiding the selection of operating conditions. Highest productivity obtained as 9 L/m2 per day, and the maximum daily efficiency was 87%. Maximum value of the performance ratio reached 1.42 in the double stage constant heat source spray assisted desalination system. Steam jet ejector contributes over 40% of the total energy degradation. Rate of production and performance ratio increases with the increase in top brine temperature. Productivity of SLTD was more compared to conventional distillation systems due to higher rate of heat transfer and a higher rate of evaporation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of Data and Material
This is a review article of previous work. Critical analysis has been done with reference to earlier research work. Hence, there is no data used.
Abbreviations
- A :
-
Area, m2
- BPE:
-
Boiling point elevation
- C :
-
Specific heat, kJ/kg
- C p :
-
Specific heat, kJ/kg
- C ps :
-
Specific heat of seawater (J/kgK)
- C pv :
-
Specific heat of vapor (J/kgK)
- C pw :
-
Specific heat of water (J/kgK)
- D :
-
Diameter (m)
- \(\dot{D}\) :
-
Production rate, (kg/s)
- \(\dot{E}\) :
-
Exergy destruction rate, (kw)
- g :
-
Gravitational acceleration constant (m/sec2)
- h :
-
Specific enthalpy, (kJ/kg), enthalpy (J/kg), heat transfer coefficient(W/m2K)
- h fg :
-
Latent heat of vaporization (J/kg)
- H :
-
Solar radiation, (W/m2)
- I :
-
Solar irradiance (W/m2)
- k :
-
Thermal conductivity (W/mK)
- L :
-
Latent heat of water, J/kg
- m :
-
Flow rate, l/h
- M :
-
Productivity (l/h), mass
- \(\dot{m}\) :
-
Mass flow rate, (kg/s)
- \(\dot{M}\) :
-
Mass flow rate, (kg/s)
- \(\left( {{\text{MC}}} \right)_{d}\) :
-
Thermal capacity
- Nu:
-
Nusselt number, dimensionless
- P :
-
Pressure (Pa), pumping power (W)
- p :
-
Pressure (Pa)
- PCF:
-
Motive steam pressure correction factor
- P p :
-
Pump power (W)
- Pr:
-
Prandtl number, dimensionless
- PR:
-
Production ratio, performance ratio
- Q :
-
Heat flux (kW), heat transfer rate between condenser and cooling seawater (W)
- R :
-
Universal gas constant (J/k-mol)
- r :
-
Recycling ratio, dimensionless
- Re:
-
Reynolds number, dimensionless
- s :
-
Specific entropy (kJ/kg-K)
- Sc:
-
Schmidt number, dimensionless
- Sh:
-
Sherwood number, dimensionless
- T :
-
Temperature, °C
- t :
-
Time, min
- TCF:
-
Entrained vapor temperature correction factor
- ∆t :
-
Differential time element
- U :
-
Overall heat transfer coefficient (W/m2K)
- w :
-
Entrainment ratio
- w :
-
Power, W
- X :
-
Salinity (g/kg
- t, t + ∆t :
-
Value of the parameter at this time instant
- 0 :
-
Ambient
- a :
-
Ambient
- amb:
-
Ambient
- Av:
-
Average
- ave:
-
Average
- b :
-
Brine
- c :
-
Condenser, condensation
- ci:
-
Cold inlet
- c, in:
-
Condenser inlet
- c, out:
-
Condenser outlet
- co:
-
Cold outlet
- cond:
-
Condenser
- cs:
-
Condenser surface
- cw:
-
Cooling water
- d :
-
Distillate, destruction, daily
- dist:
-
Distillate
- e :
-
Evaporator, entrainment, evaporation
- ev:
-
Evaporator water column
- evap:
-
Evaporator
- f :
-
Feed
- H :
-
Heating
- h :
-
Heating, hourly
- hi:
-
Hot inlet
- ho:
-
Hot outlet
- i :
-
iTh stage, inner
- in:
-
Inlet
- l :
-
Liquid
- loss:
-
Temperature loss in demister, heat loss
- o :
-
Outlet, outer
- p :
-
Positive steam
- ps:
-
Distillate column
- R :
-
Heat recovery
- s :
-
Surface
- S :
-
Solar water collector
- sat:
-
Saturation
- sc:
-
Solar collector
- sc, in:
-
Solar collector inlet
- sc, out:
-
Solar collector outlet
- sl:
-
Solar collector
- st:
-
Storage Tank
- sw:
-
Seawater
- u :
-
Useful
- v :
-
Vapor
- v, eq:
-
Vapour at equilibrium
- vs:
-
Vapor space
- w :
-
Water
- II:
-
Second-law
- η :
-
Efficiency
- θ :
-
Dimensionless temperature difference
- ∆ :
-
Difference
- μ :
-
Dynamic viscosity (pa s)
- v :
-
Kinematic viscosity (m2/s)
- ρ :
-
Density (kg/m3
- CC:
-
Cooling coil
- CV:
-
Control valve
- EC:
-
Condensation tower
- ET:
-
Evaporation tower
- FM:
-
Flow meter
- FWR:
-
Fresh water reservoir
- GOR:
-
Gain output ratio
- HDH:
-
Humidification-dehumidification
- SS:
-
Solar still
- SLTD:
-
Spray assisted low-temperature desalination
- HEX:
-
Heat exchanger
- MED:
-
Multiple effect distillation
- MSF:
-
Multi-stage flash
- PR:
-
Productivity rate
- SWC:
-
Solar water collector
- TC:
-
Thermocouples
- TDS:
-
Total dissolved solids
- TES:
-
Thermal energy Storage
References
Kumar, A.; Prakash, O.: Solar Desalination Technology. Springer, Berlin (2019) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6887-5
Kant, R.; Prakash, O.; Tripathi, R.; Kumar, A.: Exergy Analysis of Active and Passive Solar Still. In: Kumar, A.; Prakash, O. (Eds.) Solar Desalination Technology. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Singapore (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6887-5_12
Rani, A.; Suresh, S.; Kumar, A.: Review on thermal modeling of solar desalination systems. Res. J. Chem. Environ 23, 90–102 (2019)
Pugsley, A.; Zacharopoulos, A.; Mondol, J.D.: Solar Desalination Potential Around the World. Renewable Energy Powered Desalination Handbook, p. 47–90. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815244-7.00002-7
Fathy, M.; Hassan, H.; Ahmed, M.S.: Experimental study on the effect of coupling parabolic trough collector with double slope solar still on its performance. Sol. Energy 163, 54–61 (2018)
Sohani, A.; Hoseinzadeh, S.; Berenjkar, K.: Experimental analysis of innovative designs for solar still desalination technologies; An in-depth technical and economic assessment. J. Energy Storage (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2020.101862
Kariman, H.; Hoseinzadeh, S.; Heyns, P.S.: Energetic and exergetic analysis of evaporation desalination system integrated with mechanical vapor recompression circulation. Case Stud. Thermal Eng. 16, 100548 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2019.100548
Jamil, F.; Ali, H.M.: Sustainable desalination using portable devices: a concise review. Sol. Energy 194, 815–839 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.10.085
Chen, Q.; Kum, J.M.; Li, Y.; Chua, K.J.: Experimental and mathematical study of the spray flash evaporation phenomena. Appl. Therm. Eng. 130, 598–610 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.11.018
Araghi, A.H.; Khiadani, M.; Sada, M.H.; Hooman, K.: A numerical model and experimental veri fi cation for analysing a new vacuum spray fl ash desalinator utilising low grade energy. Desalination 413, 109–118 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.03.014
Chen, Q.; Kum Ja, M.; Li, Y.; Chua, K.J.: Energy, economic and environment(3E) analysis and multi-objective optimization of a spray-assisted low-temperature desalination system. Energy (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.051
Chen, Q.; Kum Ja, M.; Li, Y.; Chua, K.J.: Energy, exergy and economic analysis of a hybrid spray-assisted low- temperature desalination/thermal vapor compression system. Energy 166, 855–871 (2019)
Eltawil, M.A.; Omara, Z.M.: Enhancing the solar still performance using solar photovoltaic, flat plate collector and hot air. Desalination 349, 1–9 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.06.021
El-agouz, S.A.; El-aziz, G.B.; Awad, A.M.: Solar desalination system using spray evaporation. Energy 76, 276–283 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.08.0090360-5442
Ikegami, Y.; Sasaki, H.; Gouda, T.; Uehara, H.: Experimental study on a spray flash desalination (influence of the direction of injection). Desalination 194, 81–89 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.10.026
Chen, Q.; Kum Ja, M.; Li, Y.; Chua, K.J.: Evaluation of a solar-powered spray-assisted low-temperature desalination technology. Appl. Energy 211, 997–1008 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.11.103
Miyatake, O.; Tomimura, T.; Ide, Y.; Fuj, T.: An experimental study of spray flash evaporation. Desalination 36, 113–128 (1981)
Kabeel, A.E.; El-said, E.M.S.: Experimental study on a modified solar power driven hybrid desalination system. Desalination 443, 1–10 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.05.017
Muthunayagam, A.E.; Ramamurthi, K.; Paden, J.R.: Low temperature flash vaporization for desalination. Desalination 180, 25–32 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2004.12.028
Abdul-wahab, S.A.; Reddy, K.V.; Al-weshahi, M.A.; Al-hatmi, S.; Tajeldin, Y.M.: Development of a steady-state mathematical model for multistage flash (MSF) desalination plant. Int. J. Energy Res. 36, 710–723 (2012)
Maroo, S.C.; Goswami, D.Y.: Theoretical analysis of a single-stage and two-stage solar driven fl ash desalination system based on passive vacuum generation. Dealination 249, 635–646 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.12.055
Xuening, F.; Lei, C.; Yuman, D.; Min, J.; Jinping, F.: CFD modeling and analysis of brine spray evaporation system integrated with solar collector. Desalination (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.02.027
Ra, Y.; Reitz, R.D.: A vaporization model for discrete multi-component fuel sprays. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 35, 101–117 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2008.10.00
Taylor, P.; Wellmann, J.; Neuhäuser, K.; Behrendt, F.; Lehmann, M.: Modeling an innovative low-temperature desalination system with integrated cogeneration in a concentrating solar power plant. Desalin. Water Treat. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.940212
Hoseinzadeh, S.; Sohani, A.: Using computational fluid dynamics for different alternatives water fl ow path in a thermal photovoltaic (PVT) system. Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow 31, 1618–1637 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/HFF-02-2020-0085
Prakash, O.; Laguri, V.; Pandey, A.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, A.: Review on various modelling techniques for the solar dryers. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 62, 396–417 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.028
Acknowledgements
Authors are thankful to Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India, to support this study under "India-Iran Bilateral Scientific and Technological Cooperation" (DST/INT/Iran/P-11/2018).
Funding
Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India for supporting this study under "India-Iran Bilateral Scientific and Technological Cooperation" (DST/INT/Iran/P-11/2018) (information that explains whether and by whom the research was supported).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AK was involved in conceptualization, visualization, writing—review and editing, supervision, investigation. RK contributed to methodology, writing—original draft, S was involved in supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Human and Animal Rights
Additional declarations for articles in life science journals that report the results of studies involving humans and/or animals.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, A., Kant, R. & Samsher Review on Spray-Assisted Solar Desalination: Concept, Performance and Modeling. Arab J Sci Eng 46, 11521–11541 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-05846-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-05846-7