External knowledge search, opportunity recognition and industry 4.0 adoption in SMEs

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108234Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Industry 4.0 (I4.0) adoption by SMEs is driven by how they search broadly and deeply among external partners.

  • External knowledge search depth and breadth enable SMEs to recognise I4.0 opportunities.

  • Depth of search enables the recognition of digital design and digital manufacturing opportunities.

  • Breadth of search enables the recognition of digital servitisation opportunities.

  • According to the opportunities recognised different I4.0 technologies are adopted by SMEs.

Abstract

Technologies related to Industry 4.0 require Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) to understand their potential applications before they are adopted. In this paper, we test empirically a framework that links SME search strategies within their ecosystem (i.e., breadth of search vs. depth of search) to the capability of SMEs to recognise digital opportunities associated with Industry 4.0 (i.e., digital design, digital manufacturing and digital servitisation opportunities). We analyse a sample of 174 manufacturing SMEs operating in Italy. Our results illustrate the distinguishing traits of the knowledge search paths required to implement Industry 4.0 technologies in an SME manufacturing setting. In particular, they indicate that the recognition of digital opportunities in both product design and manufacturing processes require a depth of collaboration in the innovation process to capture firm and industry-specific company needs and to create mutual trust among the parties. Conversely, digital opportunities in the realm of product/service platforms require a breadth of search for SMEs to invest in different information technology layers to support the digitalisation of a product. We also find that all three groups of digital opportunities positively influence the extent of adoption of information and digital technologies (e.g., IoT, big data analytics, simulation). Our findings bring finer-grained evidence on how digital opportunities are linked with the adoption of the different types of Industry 4.0 technologies, reflecting the peculiar traits of manufacturing SMEs. Moreover, they show managers how to set specific collaboration strategies with the ecosystem according to the digital opportunities they are willing to pursue.

Introduction

The fourth industrial revolution – also named Industry 4.0 – provides new types of innovation opportunities for product, process and services (Liao et al., 2017; Chiarello et al., 2018). Such opportunities are enabled by the developments of General-Purpose Technologies (GPTs) (Bresnahan and Trajtenberg, 1995; Culot et al., 2020) – such as the Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence, additive manufacturing, big data and cloud computing (Frank et al., 2019a; Tao et al., 2019a). Faced with such opportunities, many Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) that have so far invested in such technologies have used the financial aid offered by the various national incentive plans available in Europe and have in particular substituted old machinery or have retrofitted existing equipment (Perani et al., 2019).

Previous literature on Industry 4.0 technology adoption (e.g., Raj et al., 2020) mainly treated the implementation process of such technologies as a black box, overlooking that the recognition of opportunities could favour the extent of the adoption of 4.0 technologies. In the SME context, such an adoption has mainly been described as problematic, pinning these problems on financial issues (e.g., Kamble et al., 2018; Buer et al., 2018). A few notable exceptions (Agostini and Nosella, 2019; Agostini and Filippini, 2019) have provided further nuance by highlighting a positive relationship between the adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies and the level of external social capital,1 or between organisational practices at the supply chain level, firm process level and human resource level. In this vein, Müller et al. (2020a) have found that social capital and the sharing of benefits among partners increases their collaboration levels and the sharing of digital information among firms. However, what is still unknown is how SMEs can actively search for new knowledge in the external environment. In fact, the external environment is instrumental for firms to drive the adoption process of Industry 4.0 technologies from the feasibility study until the full adoption and use of the technologies in the operating processes. This theme is of crucial importance for SMEs. Indeed, it is well known that SMEs have to face hurdles due to limited managerial resource and financial constraints, which can limit their adoption process of Industry 4.0 technologies (Wenking et al., 2016). Even when such financial constraints are removed (e.g., thanks to public financial aid), SMEs may still be bounded in the adoption process due to the lack of clarity on the return on investments in 4.0 technologies (Benitez et al., 2020) or due to a partial capacity of seizing and implementing the radical transformation digital opportunities offered by the adoption of Industry 4.0 (Perani et al., 2019). All these barriers are clearly supported by the empirical evidence that shows a scattered -rather than systemic-impact of technology across functional areas (Martinelli et al., 2019), with a prevalence of projects that are still at the pilot stage (Behrendt et al., 2018).

In this paper, we open this black box by investigating the way by which broad and deep search strategies among the external actors (e.g., system integrators, universities and research centres, suppliers and customers) can help SMEs to adopt Industry 4.0 technologies. We do so by theorising a framework which considers the role that external knowledge sources play in triggering a phase of opportunity recognition (Attewell, 1992), through which SMEs -by understanding and assessing the benefits of 4.0 technologies - develop knowledge about how to deploy such new technologies in their operations (e.g., Zangiacomi et al., 2019; Li et al., 2019).

We empirically tested this position on a sample of 174 manufacturing SMEs operating in the north-west of Italy. Our results indicate that the recognition of digital opportunities, in both product design and manufacturing processes, requires a depth of collaboration with external actors. Conversely, digital opportunities in the realm of product/service platforms require a breadth of search that involves multiple categories of actors with different specialisations. Not surprisingly, all three groups of digital opportunities positively influence the extent of adoption of such multiple information and digital technologies as the Internet of Things (IoT), big data analytics, and simulation. We also find finer-grained evidence of how the pursuit of opportunities in the value chain are related to the adoption of single technologies. In other words, seizing digital opportunities in the design process domain is associated with the adoption of cyber security technologies, whereas recognising digital opportunities in the manufacturing process domain also favours the adoption of such automation technologies as collaborative robots, while identifying digital opportunities, aimed at introducing digitalisation logics into new products/services, favours the adoption of augmented and virtual reality technologies.

These results introduce a new perspective that provides further nuance to the literature on Industry 4.0 technology adoption in the context of SMEs (e.g. Agostini and Nosella, 2019). In particular, we show that collaboration with external partners not only exposes SMEs to complex technological challenges about product development and operation management, which force the adoption of 4.0 technologies by SMEs, as suggested by a stream of recent studies on Industry 4.0 (Agostini and Nosella, 2019; Agostini and Filippini, 2019; Garbellano and Da Veiga, 2019), but also triggers a more purposeful adoption of technologies based on the recognition and interiorisation of a firm's strategic objectives.

Section snippets

Industry 4.0 and SMEs

Industry 4.0 is a new manufacturing phase triggered by different -albeit complementary-general-purpose technologies (Bresnahan and Trajtenberg, 1995) (i.e., the Internet of Things (IoT), big data analytics, artificial intelligence and cloud computing; (Culot et al., 2020; Frank et al., 2019a). Apart from these general-purpose technologies, several other technologies have been classified in the literature as 4.0 (i.e., simulation, autonomous robots, cyber-physical systems, virtual reality and

Why SMEs need external knowledge search and how opportunity recognition can favour industry 4.0 adoption

According to the Resource Based View of a firm, firms may rely on both internal and external resources to gather knowledge that can be applied to gain a competitive advantage (Schroeder et al., 2002). Given the limited internal resources on which SMEs can draw, external knowledge sources represent a crucial element to stimulate the adoption of 4.0 technologies and, in turn, to achieve a superior competitive advantage (Cugno et al., 2021). In this vein, the adoption of 4.0 technologies could be

Data

The data used for this study were taken from a comprehensive survey conducted in 2018 on a population of innovative firms located in Italy, in the Piedmont region. According to the 2017 edition of the Regional Innovation Scoreboard (Hollanders and Es-Sadki, 2017), Piedmont has a high innovation vocation, thanks to the presence of OEMs and SMEs in medium-tech industries, such as the automotive and aerospace fields, to the presence of universities and research centres specialised in technology

Results

In Hypothesis 1, we posited that the recognition of Industry 4.0 digital opportunities has a mediation effect on the capability of SMEs to search broadly and deeply within external knowledge sources and on the adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies. Our analysis shows a different picture for the two variables that represent openness to external knowledge sources, namely search breadth and search depth.

As far as search breadth is concerned, three types of evidence support a mediation effect.

Discussion

Studies conducted on Industry 4.0 have found that a firm's openness to actors in the industrial and innovation ecosystem explains the adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies (Agostini and Nosella, 2019; Müller et al., 2020a). However, literature has not explored how breadth and depth in external knowledge search explain the adoption process associated with Industry 4.0. To fill this gap, we have shown that in the context of manufacturing SMEs, breadth and depth of external knowledge search affect

Theoretical contributions

Our paper contributes to three main strands of literature. The first contribution lies in enriching the current debate that links the adoption of Industry 4.0 by SMEs to their openness to collaboration with external stakeholders (e.g., Agostini and Nosella, 2019). Recent studies (Benitez et al., 2021) have worked on this by focusing on the single contribution brought by each stakeholder (e.g., customers, R&D centres, technology vendors). Our choice has been the one to concentrate on the

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the research support of the Chamber of Commerce of Turin and insights from the participants to the 2019 CINet Conference, 2019 IFKAD Conference and 2019 AiIG Conference. The usual disclaimer applies. This work has been partially supported by “Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca” Award “TESUN-83486178370409 finanziamento dipartimenti di eccellenza CAP. 1694 TIT. 232 ART. 6”.

Riccardo Ricci holds a PhD from Politecnico di Torino. His research interests are mainly focused on Industry 4.0 technologies adoption, organizational and managerial practices, open innovation and technology transfer. His works have been published on International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Management Decision and Journal of Technology Transfer.

References (144)

  • J.L. Ferreras-Méndez et al.

    Depth and breadth of external knowledge search and performance: the mediating role of absorptive capacity

    Ind. Market. Manag.

    (2015)
  • A.G. Frank et al.

    Industry 4.0 technologies: implementation patterns in manufacturing companies

    Int. J. Prod. Econ.

    (2019)
  • A.G. Frank et al.

    Servitization and Industry 4.0 convergence in the digital transformation of product firms: a business model innovation perspective

    Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change

    (2019)
  • D. Garcia-Perez-De-Lema et al.

    Influence of university–firm governance on SMEs innovation and performance levels

    Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change

    (2017)
  • D. Horváth et al.

    Driving forces and barriers of Industry 4.0: do multinational and small and medium-sized companies have equal opportunities?

    Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change

    (2019)
  • J. Jäger et al.

    Advanced complexity management strategic recommendations of handling the ‘industrie 4.0’ complexity for small and medium enterprises

    Procedia CIRP

    (2016)
  • M.B. Jensen et al.

    Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation

    Res. Pol.

    (2007)
  • R. Jiang et al.

    Predicting the future of additive manufacturing: a Delphi study on economic and societal implications of 3D printing for 2030

    Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change

    (2017)
  • S.S. Kamble et al.

    Analysis of the driving and dependence power of barriers to adopt industry 4.0 in Indian manufacturing industry

    Comput. Ind.

    (2018)
  • D. Kiel et al.

    The influence of the Industrial Internet of Things on business models of established manufacturing companies–A business level perspective

    Technovation

    (2017)
  • S. Kobarg et al.

    More is not always better: effects of collaboration breadth and depth on radical and incremental innovation performance at the project level

    Res. Pol.

    (2019)
  • C. Kowalkowski et al.

    Servitization and deservitization: overview, concepts, and definitions

    Ind. Market. Manag.

    (2017)
  • S. Lee et al.

    Open innovation in SMEs—an intermediated network model

    Res. Pol.

    (2010)
  • T. Mahmood et al.

    Balancing innovation and exploitation in the fourth industrial revolution: role of intellectual capital and technology absorptive capacity

    Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change

    (2020)
  • T. Masood et al.

    Industry 4.0: adoption challenges and benefits for SMEs

    Comput. Ind.

    (2020)
  • S. Mittal et al.

    A critical review of smart manufacturing & Industry 4.0 maturity models: implications for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)

    J. Manuf. Syst.

    (2018)
  • D. Mourtzis et al.

    Augmented reality supported product design towarDigital Servitization industry 4.0: a teaching factory paradigm

    Procedia Manufacture.

    (2018)
  • J.M. Müller et al.

    Fortune favors the prepared: how SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.0

    Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change

    (2018)
  • L. Agostini et al.

    Organisational and managerial challenges in the path towarDigital Servitization Industry 4.0

    Eur. J. Innovat. Manag.

    (2019)
  • L. Agostini et al.

    The adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies in SMEs: results of an international study

    Manag. Decis.

    (2019)
  • L. Ardito et al.

    TowarDigital servitization industry 4.0

    Bus. Process Manag. J.

    (2019)
  • M. Ardolino et al.

    The role of digital technologies for the service transformation of industrial companies

    Int. J. Prod. Res.

    (2018)
  • C. Arnold et al.

    How the industrial internet of things changes business models in different manufacturing industries

    Int. J. Innovat. Manag.

    (2016)
  • I. Arráiz et al.

    Supplier development programs and firm performance: evidence from Chile

    Small Bus. Econ.

    (2013)
  • P. Attewell

    Technology diffusion and organisational learning: the case of business computing

    Organisation science

    (1992)
  • D. Battaglia et al.

    Dealing with the tensions between innovation and internationalisation in SMEs: a dynamic capability view

    J. Small Bus. Manag.

    (2020)
  • A. Behrendt et al.

    The Digital Manufacturing - Escaping the Pilot Purgatory

    (2018)
  • G.B. Benitez et al.

    Industry 4.0 innovation ecosystems: an evolutionary perspective on value cocreation

    Int. J. Prod. Econ.

    (2020)
  • G.B. Benitez et al.

    Industry 4.0 technology provision: the moderating role of supply chain partners to support technology providers

    Supply Chain Manag.: Int. J.

    (2021)
  • P. Bharati et al.

    SMEs and competitiveness: the role of information systems

    Int. J. E Bus. Res.

    (2015)
  • J. Björkdahl

    Strategies for digitalization in manufacturing firms

    Calif. Manag. Rev.

    (2020)
  • N. Bloom et al.

    Why do management practices differ across firms and countries?

    J. Econ. Perspect.

    (2010)
  • J. Bokrantz et al.

    Smart Maintenance: a research agenda for industrial maintenance management

    Int. J. Prod. Econ.

    (2019)
  • J. Bokrantz et al.

    Smart Maintenance: an empirically grounded conceptualisation

    Int. J. Prod. Econ.

    (2019)
  • L. Bosman et al.

    How manufacturing firm characteristics can influence decision making for investing in Industry 4.0 technologies

    J. Manuf. Technol. Manag.

    (2019)
  • M. Brettel et al.

    How Virtualization, Decentralization and Network Building Change the Manufacturing LanDigital Servitizationcape: an Industry 4.0 Perspective

    (2014)
  • S.V. Buer et al.

    The link between Industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing: mapping current research and establishing a research agenda

    Int. J. Prod. Res.

    (2018)
  • P.D.U. Coronado et al.

    Part data integration in the Shop Floor Digital Twin: mobile and cloud technologies to enable a manufacturing execution system

    J. Manuf. Syst.

    (2018)
  • G. Culot et al.

    Integration and scale in the context of Industry 4.0: the evolving shapes of manufacturing value chains

    IEEE Eng. Manag. Rev.

    (2019)
  • G. Culot et al.

    Behind the definition of Industry 4.0: analysis and open questions

    Int. J. Prod. Econ.

    (2020)
  • Cited by (73)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Riccardo Ricci holds a PhD from Politecnico di Torino. His research interests are mainly focused on Industry 4.0 technologies adoption, organizational and managerial practices, open innovation and technology transfer. His works have been published on International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Management Decision and Journal of Technology Transfer.

    Daniele Battaglia is Assistant Professor at Politecnico di Torino. His research interests are in the area of strategic management in the context of SMEs, entrepreneurship and university-industry technology transfer. His works have been published in journals such as Research Policy, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Technovation, Journal of Small Business Management and R&D Management.

    Paolo Neirotti is Full Professor of Strategic Management and Organization Theory at Politecnico di Torino. His research interests are mainly focused on IS business value and on its implications for competitive dynamics, strategy, organization design and skills. On these topics he has authored studies published on journals like Journal of Product Innovation Management, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Information & Management, Long Range Planning, Industrial and Corporate Change, and Cities.

    View full text