Abstract
Shifts in temperature as a result of climate change play an important role in the long-term dynamics of resource use and resulting species interactions. Functional responses can give ecologically relevant insights of context-specific density-dependent resource use with low intensity animal use. This is especially useful when working with vulnerable species. The Rondegat River in South Africa’s Cape Fold Ecoregion (CFE) was subjected to an invasive species removal program and although the threatened cyprinid populations are in a state of recovery, they are still at risk from abiotic stressors. This community is characterised by an oligotrophic environment, shared ancestry and spatial overlap, suggesting high food resource competition between species. Functional responses of two cyprinid species were compared between two prey types (mosquito and chironomid larvae) at different field-representative temperatures (18 °C and 25 °C) in laboratory trials, with the aim to infer response and resilience to global change. Labeobarbus seeberi consistently outperformed Sedercypris calidus across prey types and temperature treatments at high prey densities. This was driven primarily by shorter handling times in L. seeberi, despite higher attack parameters in S. calidus under certain prey/temperature scenarios. Temperature increase had differential effects on prey consumption dependent on fish species and prey type. However, neither species showed significant intraspecific differences in functional response between temperature conditions for either prey species, indicating community resilience to thermal change in the CFE. Context-dependent experiments can be used in tandem with field data to identify conditions of potential ecological tipping points in imperilled systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The raw data generated and used in the analysis will be publicly available at the Knowledge Network for Biocomplexity (knb.ecoinformatics.org), URL: urn:uuid:29674dde-0b53-4434-be2e-52cf93f7b191.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Albert JS, Destouni G, Duke-Sylvester SM et al (2020) Scientists’ warning to humanity on the freshwater biodiversity crisis. Ambio. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01318-8
Alves GHZ, Figueiredo BRS, Manetta GI et al (2017) Trophic segregation underlies the coexistence of two piranha species after the removal of a geographic barrier. Hydrobiologia 797:57–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-017-3159-6
Bellingan TA, Hugo S, Woodford DJ et al (2019) Rapid recovery of macroinvertebrates in a South African stream treated with rotenone. Hydrobiologia 834:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-019-3885-z
Boddy NC, Booker DJ, McIntosh AR (2020) Heterogeneity in flow disturbance around river confluences influences spatial patterns in native and non-native species co-occurrence. Biol Invasions 22:3457–3475
Bolker B (2010) bbmle: tools for general maximum likelihood estimation. R package version 0.9
Bunn SE, Arthington AH (2002) Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environ Manag 30:492–507
Dallas HF (2013) Ecological status assessment in Mediterranean rivers: complexities and challenges in developing tools for assessing ecological status and defining reference conditions. Hydrobiologia 719:483–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1305-8
Dallas HF, Rivers-Moore N (2014) Ecological consequences of global climate change for freshwater ecosystems in South Africa. S Afr J Sci 110.https://doi.org/10.1590/sajs.2014/20130274
de Moor FC, Day JA (2013) Aquatic biodiversity in the Mediterranean region of South Africa. Hydrobiologia 719:237–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-013-1488-7
Dell AI, Pawar S, Savage VM (2014) Temperature dependence of trophic interactions are driven by asymmetry of species responses and foraging strategy. J Anim Ecol 83:70–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12081
Dick JTA, Alexander ME, Jeschke JM et al (2014) Advancing impact prediction and hypothesis testing in invasion ecology using a comparative functional response approach. Biol Invasions 16:735–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0550-8
Dick JTA, Laverty C, Lennon JJ et al (2017) Invader Relative Impact Potential: a new metric to understand and predict the ecological impacts of existing, emerging and future invasive alien species. J Appl Ecol 54:1259–1267. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12849
Dickey JWE, Cuthbert RN, South J et al (2020) On the RIP: using Relative Impact Potential to assess the ecological impacts of invasive alien species. NeoBiota 55:27–60. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.55.49547
Ellender BR, Wasserman RJ, Chakona A et al (2017) A review of the biology and status of Cape Fold Ecoregion freshwater fishes. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 27:867–879. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2730
Ellender BR, Weyl OLF, Alexander ME et al (2018) Out of the pot and into the fire: explaining the vulnerability of an endangered small headwater stream fish to black-bass Micropterus spp. invasion. J Fish Biol 92:1035–1050. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13562
Englund G, Öhlund G, Hein CL, Diehl S (2011) Temperature dependence of the functional response. Ecol Lett 14:914–921. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01661.x
Gebauer R, Veselý L, Vanina T et al (2019) Prediction of ecological impact of two alien gobiids in habitat structures of differing complexity. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 76:1954–1961. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2018-0346
Gilbert B, Tunney TD, McCann KS et al (2014) A bioenergetic framework for the temperature dependence of trophic interactions. Ecol Lett 17:902–914. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12307
Holling CS (1959) The components of predation as revealed by a study of small-mammal predation of the European Pine Sawfly. Can Entomol 91:293–320. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent91293-5
Holling CS (1965) The functional response of predators to prey density and its role in mimicry and population regulation. Mem Entomol Soc Can 97:5–60
Huey RB, Stevenson R (1979) Integrating thermal physiology and ecology of ectotherms: a discussion of approaches. Am Zool 19:357–366
Impson D (2016) Capacity development. Have our provincial aquatic scientists become critically endangered? Water Wheel 15:20–23
Impson ND, Bills IR, Wolhuter LE (2008) Technical report on the state of yellowfishes in South Africa 2007. Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa
Juliano SA (2001) Nonlinear curve fitting: predation and functional response curves. Des Anal Ecol Exp 2:178–196
Kadye WT, Chakona A, Jordaan MS (2016) Swimming with the giant: coexistence patterns of a new redfin minnow Pseudobarbus skeltoni from a global biodiversity hot spot. Ecol Evol 6:7141–7155. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2328
Killen S (2011) Energetics of foraging decisions and prey handling. In: Farrell AP (ed) encyclopedia of fish physiology: from genome to environment, vol 3. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 1588–1595
Lenth R, Singmann H, Love J, et al (2018) Emmeans: estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means
Lowe SR, Woodford DJ, Impson DN, Day JA (2008) The impact of invasive fish and invasive riparian plants on the invertebrate fauna of the Rondegat River, Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Afr J Aquat Sci 33:51–62. https://doi.org/10.2989/AJAS.2007.33.1.6.390
Luger AM, South J, Alexander ME et al (2020) Ecomorphology of largemouth bass relative to a native trophic analogue explains its high invasive impact. Biol Invasions 22:2223–2233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-020-02252-2
Manna LR, Miranda JC, Rezende CF, Mazzoni R (2020) Feeding strategy and morphology as indicators of habitat use and coexistence of two loricariid fishes from a Brazilian coastal stream. Biota Neotrop 20:e20190764. https://doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2019-0764
Marr SM, Impson ND, Tweddle D (2012) An assessment of a proposal to eradicate non-native fish from priority rivers in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Afr J Aquat Sci 37:131–142. https://doi.org/10.2989/16085914.2012.666654
Meijer CG, Warburton HJ, McIntosh AR (2021) Disentangling the multiple effects of stream drying and riparian canopy cover on the trophic ecology of a highly threatened fish. Freshw Biol 66:102–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13620
Neubauer P, Andersen KH (2019) Thermal performance of fish is explained by an interplay between physiology, behaviour and ecology. Conserv Physiol 7.https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coz025
Nthimo M (1997) The reproductive and feeding biology of Clanwilliam redfin minnow, Barbus calidus (Pisces: Cyprinidae). Unpublished Honours project, Rhodes University
Orr JA, Vinebrooke RD, Jackson MC et al (2020) Towards a unified study of multiple stressors: divisions and common goals across research disciplines. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 287:20200421. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.0421
Pepi A, Grof-Tisza P, Holyoak M, Karban R (2018) As temperature increases, predator attack rate is more important to survival than a smaller window of prey vulnerability. Ecology 99:1584–1590. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2356
Pörtner HO, Bennett AF, Bozinovic F et al (2006) Trade-offs in thermal adaptation: the need for a molecular to ecological integration. Physiol Biochem Zool 79:295–313. https://doi.org/10.1086/499986
Pritchard DW, Paterson RA, Bovy HC, Barrios-O’Neill D (2017) FRAIR: an R package for fitting and comparing consumer functional responses. Methods Ecol Evol 8:1528–1534. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12784
Rall BC, VUCIC-PESTIC O, Ehnes RB et al (2010) Temperature, predator–prey interaction strength and population stability. Glob Change Biol 16:2145–2157
Reizenberg J-L, Bloy LE, Weyl OLF, et al (2019) Variation in thermal tolerances of native freshwater fishes in South Africa’s Cape Fold Ecoregion: examining the east-west gradient in species’ sensitivity to climate warming. J Fish Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13866
Rogers D (1972) Random search and insect population models. J Anim Ecol 41:369–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/3474
Shelton JM, Bird M, Marr S (2018a) Evidence for diet partitioning among three coexisting native freshwater fishes in South Africa’s Cape Fold Ecoregion. Afr J Aquat Sci 43:89–100. https://doi.org/10.2989/16085914.2018.1470490
Shelton JM, Weyl OLF, Chakona A et al (2018b) Vulnerability of Cape Fold Ecoregion freshwater fishes to climate change and other human impacts. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 28:68–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2849
Shelton JM, Weyl OLF, Esler KJ et al (2018c) Temperature mediates the impact of non-native rainbow trout on native freshwater fishes in South Africa’s Cape Fold Ecoregion. Biol Invasions 20:2927–2944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1747-7
Solomon M (1949) The natural control of animal populations. J Anim Ecol 18:1–35. https://doi.org/10.2307/1578
South J, McCard M, Khosa D et al (2019) The effect of prey identity and substrate type on the functional response of a globally invasive crayfish. NeoBiota 52:9–24. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.52.39245
South J, Welsh D, Anton A et al (2018) Increasing temperature decreases the predatory effect of the intertidal shanny Lipophrys pholis on an amphipod prey. J Fish Biol 92:150–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13500
Tickner D, Opperman JJ, Abell R et al (2020) Bending the curve of global freshwater biodiversity loss: an emergency recovery plan. Bioscience 70:330–342. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaa002
Tweddle D, Bills R, Swartz E, et al (2009) The status and distribution of freshwater fishes. In: The status and distribution of freshwater biodiversity in southern Africa. p 37
Uiterwaal SF, DeLong JP (2020) Functional responses are maximized at intermediate temperatures. Ecology 101.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2975
Uszko W, Diehl S, Englund G, Amarasekare P (2017) Effects of warming on predator-prey interactions—a resource-based approach and a theoretical synthesis. Ecol Lett 20:513–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12755
Vasseur DA, DeLong JP, Gilbert B et al (2014) Increased temperature variation poses a greater risk to species than climate warming. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 281:20132612. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2612
Vörösmarty CJ, McIntyre PB, Gessner MO et al (2010) Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467:555–561
Wasserman RJ, Alexander ME, Dalu T et al (2016) Using functional responses to quantify interaction effects among predators. Funct Ecol 30:1988–1998. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12682
Weyl OLF, Ellender BR, Woodford DJ, Jordaan MS (2013) Fish distributions in the Rondegat River, Cape Floristic Region, South Africa, and the immediate impact of rotenone treatment in an invaded reach. Afr J Aquat Sci 38:201–209. https://doi.org/10.2989/16085914.2012.753401
Weyl OLF, Finlayson B, Impson ND et al (2014) Threatened endemic fishes in South Africa’s Cape Floristic Region: a new beginning for the Rondegat River. Fisheries 39:270–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/03632415.2014.914924
Woodford DJ (2005) The impact of alien invasive smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu) on the indigenous fish of the Rondegat River: a quantitative assessment with implications for rehabilitation. Master’s thesis, University of Cape Town
Acknowledgements
This study is dedicated to the memory of Professor Olaf Weyl, whose guidance and devotion to South African freshwater ecology made the Rondegat River restoration project and all work flowing therefrom possible. Permission for land access was granted by local conservation authority CapeNature and private land owners. This study was funded by the National Research Foundation (NRF)—South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Innovation (DSI) (Grant No. 110507) and JS acknowledges support from the DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology (CIB). Opinions expressed and conclusions arrived at are those of the author and are not necessarily to be attributed to the NRF. We hereby acknowledge the use of equipment provided by the NRF-SAIAB Marine Remote Imagery Platform and the funding channelled through the NRF-SAIAB Institutional Support System. We acknowledge CapeNature for facilitating our research activities in the Cederberg Wilderness Area. Jannie and Cecile Nieuwoudt (of Keurbos farm), and Jannie and Katrin Nieuwoudt (Grootkloof/Jamaka farms) are thanked for land access. Angus van Wyk assisted in the field; Munetsi Zvavahera and Takudzwa Madzivanzira assisted in the lab and during prey collection.
Funding
The primary author was supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF)—South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Innovation (DSI) Grant no. 110507.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
CJB, JS and OLFW conceived the ideas and designed methodology; CJB collected the data; CJB and JS analysed the data; CJB led the writing of the manuscript. All authors contributed critically to the drafts and gave final approval for publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This study was governed by CapeNature permit CN44-28–8357, CN16-28–8540, the Department of Economic Development, Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEDEAT) permit CRO 124/19CR and TOPS permit 029705. Permission for land access was granted by CapeNature and private land owners where applicable. The experimental work was approved by the Rhodes University Animal Ethics Committee (reference numbers DIFS2118 and 2020–2815-4859) and the SAIAB Animal Ethics Committee (reference number 25/4/1/5_2018-10).
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent to publish
All authors and relevant institutions have indicated approval for publication.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Broom, C.J., South, J. & Weyl, O.L.F. Prey type and temperature influence functional responses of threatened endemic Cape Floristic Ecoregion fishes. Environ Biol Fish 104, 797–810 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-021-01111-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-021-01111-w