Investigation of dense slurry suspensions with coaxial mixers: Influences of design variables through tomography and mathematical modelling
Graphical abstract
Introduction
The significance of two-phase liquid–solid mixing in various industrial utilizations namely cosmetics production, water purification, pulp–paper suspensions, pharmaceutical formulations, sludge disposal, food processing, consumer products manufacturing, minerals slurry processing, and petrochemicals refinement is paramount (Kresta, Etchells, Dickey, & Atiemo-Obeng, 2016; Paul, Atiemo-Obeng, & Kresta, 2004). Most of the research activities reported are limited to examine the impacts of various variables on hydrodynamic characteristics of slurry suspensions in dilute liquid–solid systems (Mishra & Ein-Mozaffari, 2016, 2017; Raghava Rao, Rewatkar, & Joshi, 1988; Zwietering, 1958; Grenville, Mak, & Brown, 2015; Grenville, Giacomelli, & Brown, 2016; Hosseini, Patel, Ein-Mozaffari, & Mehrvar, 2010; Kazemzadeh, Ein-Mozaffari, & Lohi, 2020a; Tahvildarian, Ng, D’Amato, Drappel, & Upreti, 2011; Harrison, Stevenson, & Cilliers, 2012; Liu, Xu, Fan, & Huang, 2018; Williams, Jia, & McKee, 1996). Very few researchers investigated the influences of various factors on hydrodynamic behavior of dense slurry suspensions in an agitated reactor (Ayranci & Kresta, 2011; Drewer, Ahmed, & Jameson, 1994; Jafari, Tanguy, & Chaouki, 2012; Kazemzadeh et al., 2020a, 2020b; Wang, Parthasarathy, Bong, Wu, & Slatter, 2012; Wu, Zhu, & Pullum, 2002; Mishra & Ein-Mozaffari, 2021). The effects of solid–liquid frictions, solid–vessel wall collisions, and solid–solid interactions on hydrodynamic characteristics of slurry suspensions need to be examined to get a better understanding of liquid–solid suspensions and dispersions in dense slurry systems (Bubbico, Di Cave, & Mazzarotta, 1998; Kazemzadeh et al., 2020a, 2020b).
Several approaches namely dispersion method (Barressi & Baldi, 1987; Buurman, Resoort, & Plaschkes, 1985), homogeneity approach (Harrison et al., 2012; Hosseini et al., 2010a, b, Williams et al., 1996), solids cloud height technique (Bittorf & Kresta, 2003; Bujalski et al., 1999), and suspension method (Baldi, Conti, & Alaria, 1978; Davies, 1986; Jafari et al., 2012; Yoshida, Kimura, Yoneyama, & Tezura, 2012; Zwietering, 1958) have been adopted over the years to characterize the solids suspension and dissemination quality in slurry agitated tanks.
Several researchers employed experimental methods to analyse the influences of various key variables such as density of solid and liquid (Ayranci & Kresta, 2014; Buurman et al., 1985; Yoshida et al., 2012; Zwietering, 1958), fluid viscosity (Ibrahim & Nienow, 2009; Wu, Zhu, & Pullum, 2001), liquid depth (Davarajulu & Loganathan, 2016), impeller-pumping mode (Tahvildarian et al., 2011), solids loadings (Godfrey & Zhu, 1994; Hosseini et al., 2010a; Mishra & Ein-Mozaffari, 2016), stirrer clearance (Armenante & Nagamine, 1998; Hicks, Myers, & Bakker, 1997; Micheletti, Nikiforaki, Lee, & Yianneskis, 2003), Stirrer types (Hosseini et al., 2010a; Mishra & Ein-Mozaffari, 2016; Williams et al., 1996), degree of turbulence intensity (Baldi et al., 1978), baffles adjustment (Brucato, Cipollina, Micale, Scargiali, & Tamburini, 2010), shape and roughness of tank bottom (Ghionzoli et al., 2007; Kondo, Motoda, Takahashi, & Horiguchi, 2007), particle diameter (Carletti, Montante, Westerlund, & Paglianti, 2014; Harrison et al., 2012; Tahvildarian et al., 2011; Tamburini et al., 2014), stirrer speed and power (Angst & Kraume, 2006; Hosseini et al., 2010a; Mishra & Ein-Mozaffari, 2016; Wang et al., 2012), and stirrer and tank diameter (Bittorf & Kresta, 2003; Raghava Rao et al., 1988) on hydrodynamic characteristics of slurry suspensions in single stirrer slurry vessels. It has been reported that the axial-flow stirrers are more effective than the radial-flow stirrers in suspending and disseminating the solids in slurry mixing vessels (Kazemzadeh et al., 2020a; Mishra & Ein-Mozaffari, 2020; Paul et al., 2004). Liu et al. (2018) studied the slurry suspensions behavior in a coaxial slurry mixing system operating at very low solids concentration (up to 7.7 v/v).
The effectiveness of electrical resistance tomography (ERT) in visualizing the complex fluid-flow patterns generated by impellers in different mixing systems has been widely reported (Carletti et al., 2014; Hashemi, Ein-Mozaffari, Upreti, & Hwang, 2016; Hosseini et al., 2010a; Kazemzadeh et al., 2020a, 2020b; Kazemzadeh, Ein-Mozaffari, Lohi, & Pakzad, 2016; Mishra & Ein-Mozaffari, 2016; Pakzad, Ein-Mozaffari, Upreti, & Lohi, 2013). The ERT technique provided consistent and reliable results in analyzing complex slurry suspension behavior (Carletti et al., 2014; Harrison et al., 2012; Hosseini et al., 2010a; Mishra & Ein-Mozaffari, 2016).
In recent years, several researchers examined the complex hydrodynamic behavior of slurry suspensions using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approach (2020b, Hosseini, Patel, Ein-Mozaffari, & Mehrvar, 2010; Kazemzadeh et al., 2020a; Mishra & Ein-Mozaffari, 2017; Wadnerkar, Utikar, Tade, & Pareek, 2012; Wadnerkar, Tade, Pareek, & Utikar, 2016; Xie & Luo, 2018). Most researchers employed Eulerian and Eulerian (E–E) multi-phase numerical modeling approach to obtain reliable and accurate results in the case of dense slurry suspension systems (Kazemzadeh et al., 2020a, 2020b; Wadnerkar et al., 2012). Several researchers highlighted the dominant impact of the drag force on the system hydrodynamics in an agitated slurry vessel (Fletcher & Brown, 2009; Khopkar, Kasat, Pandit, & Ranade, 2006; Ljungqvist & Rasmuson, 2001). The impacts of the added mass force, the lift force, and the buoyancy force on slurry suspension behavior depend on the liquid to solid density ratio (Khopkar et al., 2006). Various drag models have been proposed over the years to incorporate the influence of drag force on the system hydrodynamics in slurry vessels (Brucato, Grisafi, & Montante, 1998; Gidaspow, 1994; Khopkar et al., 2006; Wen & Yu, 1966). It has been reported that the standard k–ε turbulent modeling approach provided precise and accurate information regarding the impact of turbulence on hydrodynamic behavior of slurry suspensions (Fradette et al., 2007; Hosseini et al., 2010b; Kazemzadeh et al., 2020a, 2020b; Mishra & Ein-Mozaffari, 2017; Wadnerkar et al., 2016).
Several researchers analyzed the impacts of various key parameters namely solids content (Hosseini et al., 2010b; Xie & Luo, 2018; Wadnerkar et al., 2016; Mishra & Ein-Mozaffari, 2016; Kazemzadeh et al., 2020b), Impeller speed and power (Fradette et al., 2007; Hosseini et al., 2010b; Mishra & Ein-Mozaffari, 2017), particle diameter (Eng & Rasmuson, 2015; Kazemzadeh et al., 2020b; Khopkar et al., 2006; Mishra & Ein-Mozaffari, 2017), impeller types (Gu et al., 2017; Hosseini et al., 2010b; Kazemzadeh et al., 2020a), drag force (Derksen, 2003; Khopkar et al., 2006); turbulence intensity (Kazemzadeh et al., 2020a, 2020b); stirrer off-bottom clearance (Kazemzadeh et al., 2020b; Hosseini et al., 2010b), the specific gravity of solid (Hosseini et al., 2010b; Mishra & Ein-Mozaffari, 2017), and baffles adjustment (Mishra & Ein-Mozaffari, 2017) on hydrodynamic characteristics of the slurry suspension in single impeller slurry mixing systems using the CFD numerical modeling technique.
No information is available in the literature regarding the mixing efficacy of coaxial mixers to suspend and disseminate solids in dense slurry suspension systems. In this research study, the complex slurry suspension and dissemination behavior in a coaxial slurry mixing system (comprised of an outer anchor and an inner axial impeller) was analyzed employing the ERT and CFD methodologies. The impacts of different key parameters namely the impeller spacing, the inner stirrer diameter, and the inner stirrer types on the hydrodynamic characteristics of dense slurry suspension systems were analyzed based on the ERT conductivity data and the CFD simulation results. The solids suspension and dissemination quality in coaxial slurry mixing systems was assessed using three different mixing indexes. The radial and axial velocity profiles of solid particles were generated using the CFD simulations. The influence of turbulent kinetic energy on the system hydrodynamics for a coaxial slurry mixing system was examined using the CFD numerical modeling.
Section snippets
Experimental setup and methodology
Fig. 1 depicts a slurry mixing tank with a tank diameter (T) of 400 mm and a height of 600 mm used in this research investigation to perform all the experiments. The slurry reactor was fixed with a coaxial mixer consisting of an outer anchor with a diameter of 360 mm and an inner axial stirrer as demonstrated in Fig. 1.
In this study, three different types of inner axial-flow stirrer namely the A310, A320, and pitched blade turbine (PBT) were utilized (see Fig. 1). The rotational speed of the
Governing equations
The 3D fluid-flow field created by the coaxial mixer in a dense slurry suspension was simulated using the Eulerian–Eulerian (E–E) multi-phase modeling method (Wadnerkar et al., 2016, Kazemzadeh et al., 2020a, b, Mishra & Ein-Mozaffari, 2017). In this approach of fluid flow, the interpenetration and interaction occur between two phases (solid and liquid) assuming the solid-phase to be continuum (Mishra & Ein-Mozaffari, 2020). The impacts of solid–solid collisions in the dense slurry system were
Results and discussions
The ERT experimental data and the CFD simulation results were utilized in this research work to assess the impacts of various significant design variables such as the inner axial stirrer types, the diameter of inner axial impeller, and the inner impeller spacing on the hydrodynamic characteristics of the slurry suspensions in a coaxial slurry mixing vessel. The influence of the inner axial stirrer types on the solids dissemination quality was assessed using three different mixing indexes. The
Conclusions
In this research study, the complex slurry suspension and dissemination behavior in a coaxial slurry mixing system was analyzed employing the ERT and CFD methodologies. The numerical models were validated by comparing the axial concentration profiles generated using the ERT data and the CFD simulation results. The impacts of various significant parameters such as the diameter of the inner axial impeller and the inner impeller spacing on the hydrodynamic characteristics of the slurry suspensions
Declaration of interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgement
Financial support by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) is greatly appreciated.
References (71)
- et al.
Experimental investigations of stirred solid/liquid systems in three different scales: Particle distribution and power consumption
Chemical Engineering Science
(2006) - et al.
Effect of low off-bottom impeller clearance on the minimum agitation speed for complete suspension of solids in stirred tanks
Chemical Engineering Science
(1998) - et al.
Design rules for suspending concentrated mixtures of solids in stirred tanks
Chemical Engineering Research and Design
(2011) - et al.
Critical analysis of Zwietering correlation for solids suspension in stirred tanks
Chemical Engineering Research and Design
(2014) - et al.
Complete suspension of particles in mechanically agitated vessels
Chemical Engineering Science
(1978) - et al.
Prediction of cloud height for solid suspensions in stirred tanks
Chemical Engineering Research and Design
(2003) - et al.
Particle drag coefficient in turbulent field
Chemical Engineering Science
(1998) - et al.
Particle suspension in top-covered unbaffled tanks
Chemical Engineering Science
(2010) - et al.
Suspension and liquid homogenization in high solids concentration stirred chemical reactors
Chemical Engineering Research and Design
(1999) - et al.
Analysis of solid concentration distribution in dense solid–liquid stirred tanks by electrical resistance tomography
Chemical Engineering Science
(2014)
Particle suspension and mass transfer rates in agitated vessels
Chemical Engineering and Processing Process Intensification
Large eddy simulation of the influence of solids on macro instability frequency in a stirred tank
Chemical Engineering Journal
CFD phenomenological model of solid–liquid mixing in stirred vessels
Computers and Chemical Engineering
The effect of bottom roughness on the minimum agitator speed required to just fully suspend particles in a stirred vessel
Chemical Engineering Research and Design
Suspension of solid particles in vessels agitated by Rushton turbine impellers
Chemical Engineering Research and Design
Suspension of solid particles in vessels agitated by axial flow impellers
Chemical Engineering Research and Design
Design of impeller blades for efficient homogeneity of solid–liquid suspension in a stirred tank reactor
Advanced Powder Technology
Assessing solids concentration homogeneity in Rushton-agitated slurry reactors using electrical resistance tomography (ERT)
Chemical Engineering Science
Analysis of mixing in an aerated reactor equipped with the coaxial mixer through electrical resistance tomography and response surface method
Chemical Engineering Research and Design
Study of solid–liquid mixing in agitated tanks through electrical resistance tomography
Chemical Engineering Science
CFD simulation of liquid phase mixing in solid–liquid stirred reactor
Chemical Engineering Science
Effect of impeller type on mixing of highly concentrated slurries of large particles
Particuology
Hydrodynamics of solid and liquid phases in a mixing tank containing high solid loading slurry of large particles via tomography and computational fluid dynamics
Powder Technology
Experimental study on the solid suspension characteristics of coaxial mixers
Chemical Engineering Research and Design
Numerical simulation of the two-phase flow in an axially stirred vessel
Chemical Engineering Research and Design
Using tomograms to assess the local solid concentrations in a slurry reactor equipped with a Maxblend impeller
Powder Technology
Using computational fluid dynamics to analyze the performance of the Maxblend impeller in solid–liquid mixing operations
International Journal of Multiphase Flow
Using tomography to assess the efficiency of the coaxial mixers in agitation of yield-pseudoplastic fluids
Chemical Engineering Research and Design
Flow and mixing characteristics of a retreat curve impeller in a conical-based vessel
Chemical Engineering Research and Design
Using electrical resistance tomography images to characterize the mixing of micron-sized polymeric particles in a slurry reactor
Chemical Engineering Journal
Dense solid–liquid off-bottom suspension dynamics: Simulation and experiment
Chemical Engineering Research and Design
CFD simulation of solid–liquid stirred tanks
Advanced Powder Technology
CFD simulation of solid–liquid stirred tanks for low to dense solid loading systems
Particuology
Development of slurry mixing models using resistance tomography
Powder Technology
Modeling and simulation of the influences of particle–particle interactions on dense solid–liquid suspensions in stirred vessels
Chemical Engineering Science
Cited by (8)
Numerical investigation on the intensification of coaxial slurry mixing systems
2023, Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process IntensificationNumerical simulation of solid-liquid suspension in a slurry electrolysis stirred tank
2023, Chemical Engineering Research and DesignCitation Excerpt :Mishra et al. (Mishra and Ein-Mozaffari, 2016; Mishra and Ein-Mozaffari, 2017) found that baffles helped in reducing the flow vortex and dead zone in the tank, and the homogeneity of the tank was significantly improved at the same rotational speed, whereas the power consumption increased (Wu et al., 2011). Mishra et al. (Mishra and Ein-Mozaffari, 2022b) further studied the coaxial mixers and found that reducing the pitch helped in reducing the loss of turbulent kinetic energy and enhancing the uniformity in the tank. In addition, some scholars analyzed the impeller off-bottom clearance and impeller diameter of the cylindrical stirred tank to determine the optimal operating conditions (Kazemzadeh et al., 2020).
Scale-up study of aerated coaxial mixing reactors containing non-newtonian power-law fluids: Analysis of gas holdup, cavity size, and power consumption
2022, Journal of Industrial and Engineering ChemistryInvestigation of power consumption, torque fluctuation, and local gas hold-up in coaxial mixers containing a shear-thinning fluid: Experimental and numerical approaches
2022, Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process IntensificationCitation Excerpt :They calculated the torque fluctuation using time-averaged peak to peak data and discovered that an axial-flow impeller had a higher torque fluctuation than a radial-flow impeller. Coaxial mixers comprising of central impeller(s) and one close clearance impeller have recently shown promising performance in improving mixing hydrodynamics and reducing segregation zones for a variety of applications, including single-phase [31,32], solid-liquid [48–50], and particularly gas-liquid mixing [23,25,27]. The close clearance impeller employed in the coaxial mixer eliminates dead zones formed close to the tank wall for high viscous and/or non-Newtonian fluids while the central impeller is responsible of providing sufficient shear rate for bulk fluid mixing.
Using tomography to examine the distribution of poly-disperse solid particles in Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids with the coaxial impellers
2022, Chemical Engineering Research and Design