Skip to main content
Log in

Co-combustion properties of torrefied rice straw-sub-bituminous coal blend and its Hardgrove Grindability Index

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Combustion behavior of rice straw torrefied at 300 °C for different residence time and their blends with sub-bituminous coal was investigated. The torrefied product and its blends were characterized for fuel properties and Hardgrove Grindability Index (HGI). Also, the torrefied product is characterized fordensity, proximate and ultimate analysis, energy yield, and structural analysis by Raman spectroscopy. The calorific value data of blend shows its value is equivalent to the value of sub-bituminous coal, i.e., 17.21 MJ/kg. On the other hand, HGI of torrefied product is 40–45 and that of coal is 80. On blending, the value of HGI up to a certain ratio shows the synergetic effect while higher content of the torrefied product in blend demonstrated non-additivity behavior and it is dominated by coal as a consequence of density difference between torrefied product and coal. Characteristic combustion parameter for blends reveals the synergetic behavior. It is found that the blend of torrefied products and sub-bituminous coal at a ratio of 10:90 and 20:80 had ignition and burnout temperature almost close to coal sample. The ignition and burnout temperature of 10:90 of torrefied product at 300 °C for 60 and 120 min are 295 °C and 507 °C, 301 °C and 505 °C whereas that of sub-bituminous coal is 325 and 515 °C. The change in the fuel properties of the blend suggests there is a certain degree of interaction that occurred during combustion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aho M, Gil A, Taipale R, Vainikka P, Vesala H (2008) A pilot scale fireside deposit study of co-firing Cynara with two coals in a fluidized bed. Fuel 87:58–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Juboori O, Sher F, Khalid U, Niazi MBK, Chen GZ (2020) Electrochemical production of sustainable hydrocarbon fuels from CO2 co-electrolysis in eutectic molten melts. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 8:12877–12890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Shara NK, Sher F, Iqbal SZ, Curnick O, Chen GZ (2021) Design and optimization of electrochemical cell potential for hydrogen gas production Journal of Energy. Chemistry 52:421–427

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arias B, Pevida C, Fermoso J, Plaza M, Rubiera F, Pis J (2008) Influence of torrefaction on the grindability and reactivity of woody biomass. Fuel Process Technol 89:169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2007.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. ASTM (2006) Standard Test Methods for Analysis of Wood Fuels vol E870–82.ASTM International, West Conshohocken.https://doi.org/10.1520/E0870-82R06

  6. Basu P (2018) Biomass gasification, pyrolysis and torrefaction: practical design and theory. Academic press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States

  7. Behera D, Nandi BK, Bhattacharya S (2019) Chemical properties and combustion behavior of constituent relative density fraction of a thermal coal. Energy Sources A Recover Util Environ Effects 41:654–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bridgeman T, Jones J, Shield I, Williams P (2008) Torrefaction of reed canary grass, wheat straw and willow to enhance solid fuel qualities and combustion properties. Fuel 87:844–856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2007.05.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bruckner T et al (2014) Energy systems, In: Edenhofer O et al (ed) Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA

  10. Chen C, Qin S, Chen F, Lu Z, Cheng Z (2019) Co-combustion characteristics study of bagasse, coal and their blends by thermogravimetric analysis. J Energy Inst 92:364–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen WH, Lin BJ, Lin YY, Chu YS, Ubando AT, Show PL, Ong HC, Chang JS, Ho SH, Culaba AB, Petrissans A, Petrissans M (2021) Progress in biomass torrefaction: Principles, applications and challenges. Prog Energy Combust Sci 82:100887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen D, Zheng Z, Fu K, Zeng Z, Wang J, Lu M (2015) Torrefaction of biomass stalk and its effect on the yield and quality of pyrolysis products. Fuel 159:27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.06.078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen D, Zhou J, Zhang Q, Zhu X, Lu Q (2014) Upgrading of rice husk by torrefaction and its influence on the fuel properties. BioResources 9:5893–5905 https://ojs.cnr.ncsu.edu/index.php/BioRes/article/view/BioRes-09_4_5893_Chen_Rice_Husk_Torrefaction_Fuel

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen W-H, Kuo P-C (2010) A study on torrefaction of various biomass materials and its impact on lignocellulosic structure simulated by a thermogravimetry. Energy 35:2580–2586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen W-H, Lin B-J, Colin B, Chang J-S, Pétrissans A, Bi X, Pétrissans M (2018) Hygroscopic transformation of woody biomass torrefaction for carbon storage. Appl Energy 231:768–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen D, Gao A, Cen K, Zhang J, Cao X, Ma Z (2018) Investigation of biomass torrefaction based on three major components :Hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin. Energy Convers Manag 169:228–237229

  17. Chen W-H et al (2021) Progress in biomass torrefaction: Principles, applications and challenges. Prog Energy Combust Sci 82:100887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Coats AW, Redfern J (1964) Kinetic parameters from thermogravimetric data. Nature 201:68–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cui H, Grace JR (2007) Fluidization of biomass particles: A review of experimental multiphase flow aspects. Chem Eng Sci 62:45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dhakate S, et al (2019) Rice straw biomass to high energy yield biocoal by torrefaction: Indian perspective. Curr Sci (00113891) 116

  21. Idris SS, AbdRahman N, Ismail K (2012) Combustion characteristics of Malaysian oil palm biomass, sub-bituminous coal and their respective blends via thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Bioresour Technol 123:581–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kastanaki E, Vamvuka D (2006) A comparative reactivity and kinetic study on the combustion of coal–biomass char blends. Fuel 85:1186–1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kubacki ML, Ross AB, Jones JM, Williams A (2012) Small-scale co-utilisation of coal and biomass. Fuel 101:84–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li J, Yang W, Blasiak W, Ponzio A (2012) Volumetric combustion of biomass for CO2 and NOx reduction in coal-fired boilers. Fuel 102:624–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.06.083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li L, Huang Y, Zhang D, Zheng A, Zhao Z, Xia M, Li H (2018) Uncovering structure–reactivity relationships in pyrolysis and gasification of biomass with varying severity of torrefaction. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6:6008–6017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lu J-J, Chen W-H (2015) Investigation on the ignition and burnout temperatures of bamboo and sugarcane bagasse by thermogravimetric analysis. Appl Energy 160:49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Luo S, Xiao B, Hu Z, Liu S, Guan Y (2009) Experimental study on oxygen-enriched combustion of biomass micro fuel. Energy 34:1880–1884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Manouchehrinejad M, van Giesen I, Mani S (2018) Grindability of torrefied wood chips and wood pellets. Fuel Process Technol 182:45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.10.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mu L, Wang R, Zhai Z, Zhang B, Shang Y, Yin H (2021) Evaluation of thermokinetics methodology, parameters, and coke characterization of co-pyrolysis of bituminous coal with herbaceous and agricultural biomass. Biomass Convers Biorefinery:1–16

  30. Munir S, Nimmo W, Gibbs BM (2010) Co-combustion of agricultural residues with coal: turning waste into energy. Energy Fuels 24:2146–2153. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef901503e

  31. Munir S, Nimmo W, Gibbs B (2010) Shea meal and cotton stalk as potential fuels for co-combustion with coal. Bioresour Technol 101:7614–7623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Negi S, Jaswal G, Dass K, Mazumder K, Elumalai S, Roy JK (2020) Torrefaction: a sustainable method for transforming of agri-wastes to high energy density solids (biocoal). Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 19(2):463–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-020-09532-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Phanphanich M, Mani S (2011) Impact of torrefaction on the grindability and fuel characteristics of forest biomass. Bioresour Technol 102:1246–1253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pimchuai A, Dutta A, Basu P (2010) Torrefaction of agriculture residue to enhance combustible properties. Energy Fuels 24:4638–4645. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef901168f

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ramos-Carmona S, Martínez JD, Pérez JF (2018) Torrefaction of patula pine under air conditions: A chemical and structural characterization. Ind Crops Prod 118:302–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.03.062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Raspolli Galletti A, Antonetti C (2012) Biomass pretreatment: separation of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin–existing technologies and perspectives. In: Aresta M, Dibenedetto A,  Dumeignil F (ed) Biorefinery: From Biomass to Chemicals and Fuels, 1st edn. De Gruyter, Berlin, pp 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110260281.101

  37. Sarkar P, Sahu S, Chakraborty N, Adak A (2014) Studies on potential utilization of rice husk char in blend with lignite for cocombustion application. J Therm Anal Calorim 115:1573–1581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sher F, Yaqoob A, Saeed F, Zhang S, Jahan Z, Klemeš JJ (2020) Torrefied biomass fuels as a renewable alternative to coal in co-firing for power generation. Energy 209:118444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Taş S, Yürüm Y (2012) Co-firing of biomass with coals: Part 2. Thermogravimetric kinetic analysis of co-combustion of fir (Abies bornmulleriana) wood with Beypazari lignite. J Therm Anal Calorim 107:293–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Teixeira P, Lopes H, Gulyurtlu I, Lapa N, Abelha P (2012) Evaluation of slagging and fouling tendency during biomass co-firing with coal in a fluidized bed. Biomass Bioenergy 39:192–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Unar IN, Soomro SA, Maitlo G, Aziz S, Mahar RB, Bhatti ZA (2019) Numerical study of coal composition effects on the performance of gasification through computational fluid dynamic. Int J Chem Reactor Eng 17(11):20180204

    Google Scholar 

  42. Vamvuka D, Loukakou E, Avgoustidis C, Stratakis A, Pavloudakis F, Sfakiotakis S (2019) Co-combustion characteristics of lignite/woody biomass blends. Reactivity and fusibility assessment. Energy Sources A Recover Util Environ Effects 41:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2019.1668885

  43. Vamvuka D, Sfakiotakis S (2011) Combustion behaviour of biomass fuels and their blends with lignite. Thermochim Acta 526:192–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2011.09.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Vamvuka D, Tsamourgeli V, Galetakis M (2014) Study on catalytic combustion of biomass mixtures with poor coals. Combust Sci Technol 186:68–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Van der Stelt M, Gerhauser H, Kiel J, Ptasinski K (2011) Biomass upgrading by torrefaction for the production of biofuels: A review. Biomass Bioenergy 35:3748–3762

    Google Scholar 

  46. Vasileiadou A, Zoras S, Iordanidis A (2021) Bioenergy production from olive oil mill solid wastes and their blends with lignite: thermal characterization, kinetics, thermodynamic analysis, and several scenarios for sustainable practices. Biomass Convers Biorefinery 11:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01518-6

  47. Wang G, Zhang J, Shao J, Ren S (2014) Characterisation and model fitting kinetic analysis of coal/biomass co-combustion. Thermochim Acta 591:68–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zulqarnain AM, Yusoff MHM, Nazir MH, Zahid I, Ameen M, Sher F, Floresyona D, Nursanto EB (2021) A Comprehensive Review on Oil Extraction and Biodiesel Production Technologies. Sustainability 13(2):788

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Director, NPL for his constant encouragement and permission for publishing the work. The authors also thank National Thermal Power Corporation, Noida, India, for financial assistant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. R. Dhakate.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, M., Gupta, A., Yadav, K. et al. Co-combustion properties of torrefied rice straw-sub-bituminous coal blend and its Hardgrove Grindability Index. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 13, 6647–6661 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01696-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01696-3

Keywords

Navigation