Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Amazon forest fragmentation and edge effects temporarily favored understory and midstory tree growth

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Trees Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current increase in deforestation rates of the Brazilian Amazon raises important questions about the resilience of trees in distinct vertical profiles in the world’s largest tropical rainforest. Seeking to prove the existence of temporal differences in tree growth response after forest fragmentation and edge effects through a dendrochronological perspective, we revealed that Theobroma sylvestre Mart. (Malvaceae), a typically understory and midstory strata tree of the Amazon upland forest (terra firme), increased the basal area increment rates compared to the forest interior, mainly over the first 20 years after forest fragmentation and edge effects. This pattern could not be extrapolated to the entire vertical forest profile, considering previous dendrochronological evidences from trees located in the forest canopy that presented an opposite pattern, a negative increment rate after forest fragmentation and edge creation. These divergences suggest that trees under the canopy of Amazon terra firme forest can be more tolerant to environmental stress (i.e. more incidence of droughts) derived by microclimatic and structural changes in forest subjected to forest fragmentation and edge effects processes, however, future dendroclimatic studies may confirm these hypotheses. In this sense, we highlighted that the increase in basal area increment of trees in the understory and midstory exposed to edge effects may indicate an important component of above-ground biomass stock recovery after forest fragmentation. This fact should be considered in forest management and restoration practices, promoting a new perspective on forest resilience ability after forest fragmentation and its strong impact on plant productivity and capacities in long-term carbon storage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albiero-Júnior A, Venegas-González A, Botosso PC et al (2019) What is the temporal extension of edge effects on tree growth dynamics? A dendrochronological approach model using Scleronema micranthum (Ducke) Ducke trees of a fragmented forest in the Central Amazon. Ecol Indic 101:133–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida DRA, Stark SC, Schietti J et al (2019) Persistent effects of fragmentation on tropical rainforest canopy structure after 20 years of isolation. Ecol Appl 29:1221–1235

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman J, Fibich P, Dolezal J, Aakala T (2014) TRADER: a package for tree ring analysis of disturbance events in R. Dendrochronologia 32:107–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker PJ, Bunyavejchewin S (2006) Suppression, release and canopy recruitment in five tree species from a seasonal tropical forest in western Thailand. J Trop Ecol 22:521–529. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266467406003312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berenguer E, Gardner TA, Ferreira J et al (2018) Seeing the woods through the saplings: Using wood density to assess the recovery of human-modified Amazonian forests. J Ecol 106:2190–2203

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bierregaard RO Jr, Lovejoy TE, Kapos V et al (1992) The biological dynamics of tropical rainforest fragments. Bioscience 42:859–866

    Google Scholar 

  • Black BA, Abrams MD, Rentch JS, Gould PJ (2009) Properties of boundary-line release criteria in North American tree species. Ann for Sci 66:205

    Google Scholar 

  • Brienen RJW, Zuidema PA (2006) Lifetime growth patterns and ages of Bolivian rain forest trees obtained by tree ring analysis. J Ecol 94:481–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Brienen RJW, Phillips OL, Feldpausch TR et al (2015) Long-term decline of the Amazon carbon sink. Nature 519:344–348

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Briffa KR (1999) Interpreting high-resolution proxy climate data—the example of dendroclimatology. Analysis of climate variability. Springer, New York, pp 77–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinck K, Fischer R, Groeneveld J et al (2017) High resolution analysis of tropical forest fragmentation and its impact on the global carbon cycle. Nat Commun 8:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Brum M, Vadeboncoeur MA, Ivanov V et al (2019) Hydrological niche segregation defines forest structure and drought tolerance strategies in a seasonal Amazon forest. J Ecol 107:318–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunn AG (2008) A dendrochronology program library in R (dplR). Dendrochronologia 26:115–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunn A, Korpela M (2017) An Introduction to dplR. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/dplR/vignettes/intro-dplR.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2017

  • Camargo JLC, Kapos V (1995) Complex edge effects on soil moisture and microclimate in central Amazonian forest. J Trop Ecol 11:205–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Saunders SC, Crow TR et al (1999) Microclimate in forest ecosystem and landscape ecology: variations in local climate can be used to monitor and compare the effects of different management regimes. Bioscience 49:288–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook ER, Kairiukstis LA (1990) Methods of dendrochronology: applications in the environmental sciences. Kluwer, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuatrecasas J (1964) Cacao and its allies: a taxonomic revision of the genus Theobroma. 35 -6. Smithsonian Institution

  • d’Albertas F, Costa K, Romitelli I et al (2018) Lack of evidence of edge age and additive edge effects on carbon stocks in a tropical forest. For Ecol Manage 407:57–65

    Google Scholar 

  • da Ribeiro JELS, Hopkins MJG, Vicentini A et al (1999) Flora da reserva ducke. INPA; DFID, Manaus

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies-Colley RJ, Payne GW, Van Elswijk M (2000) Microclimate gradients across a forest edge. New Zealand J Ecol 24:111–121

  • de Mesquita R, CG, Massoca PE dos S, Jakovac CC, et al (2015) Amazon rain forest succession: stochasticity or land-use legacy? Bioscience 65:849–861

    Google Scholar 

  • de Paula MD, Groeneveld J, Huth A (2016) The extent of edge effects in fragmented landscapes: Insights from satellite measurements of tree cover. Ecol Indic 69:196–204

  • Dean W (1996) A ferro e fogo: a história e a devastação da Mata Atlântica brasileira. Companhia das Letras, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Didham RK, Lawton JH (1999) Edge structure determines the magnitude of changes in microclimate and vegetation structure in tropical forest fragments 1. Biotropica 31:17–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducke A (1953) As espécies brasileiras do gênero Theobroma L. ALICE, Belém

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L, Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Bennett JR et al (2019) Is habitat fragmentation bad for biodiversity? Biol Conserv 230:179–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira LV, Laurance WF (1997) Effects of forest fragmentation on mortality and damage of selected trees in central Amazonia. Conserv Biol 11:797–801

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher RJ Jr, Didham RK, Banks-Leite C et al (2018) Is habitat fragmentation good for biodiversity? Biol Conserv 226:9–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritts HC, Smith DG, Cardis JW, Budelsky CA (1965) Tree-ring characteristics along a vegetation gradient in northern Arizona. Ecology 46:393–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Gascon C, Bierregaard RO Jr (2001) The biological dynamics of forest fragments project. Lessons from Amazonia: the ecology and conservation of a fragmented forest. Yale University Press, London, pp 31–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP, Pierce S (2012) The evolutionary strategies that shape ecosystems. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grissino-Mayer HD (2001) Evaluating crossdating accuracy: a manual and tutorial for the computer program COFECHA. Tree-Ring Res 57:205–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes RL (1983) Computer-assisted quality control in tree-ring dating and measurement. Tree-Ring Bull 43:69–78

    Google Scholar 

  • INPE - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (2020) Monitoramento da Floresta Amazônica Brasileira por Satélite. http://www.obt.inpe.br/OBT/assuntos/programas/amazonia/prodes. Accessed 23 Apr 2020

  • Kapos V (1989) Effects of isolation on the water status of forest patches in the Brazilian Amazon. J Trop Ecol 5:173–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF, Lovejoy TE, Vasconcelos HL et al (2002) Ecosystem decay of Amazonian forest fragments: A 22-year investigation. Conserv Biol 16:605–618. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01025.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF, Nascimento HEM, Laurance SG et al (2006) Rain forest fragmentation and the proliferation of successional trees. Ecology 87:469–482

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF, Camargo JLC, Fearnside PM et al (2018) An Amazonian rainforest and its fragments as a laboratory of global change. Biol Rev 93:223–247

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Letcher SG, Chazdon RL (2009) Rapid recovery of biomass, species richness, and species composition in a forest chronosequence in northeastern Costa Rica. Biotropica 41:608–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Longo M, Knox RG, Levine NM et al (2018) Ecosystem heterogeneity and diversity mitigate Amazon forest resilience to frequent extreme droughts. New Phytol 219:914–931

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy TE, Bierregard RO, Rylands AB, Malcolm JR, Quintela CE, Harper LH, Brown KS, Powell GVN, Schubart HOR, HAY MB (1986) Edge and Other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments. In: Soule ME (ed) Conservation biology. Sinauer Press, Massachusetts, pp 257–285

  • Lovejoy TE, Nobre C (2018) Amazon tipping point. Sci Adv 4:2340

  • Malcolm JR (1998) A model of conductive heat flow in forest edges and fragmented landscapes. Clim Change 39:487–502

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell NG, Allen CD (2015) Darcy’s law predicts widespread forest mortality under climate warming. Nat Clim Chang 5:669

    Google Scholar 

  • Meir P, Wood TE, Galbraith DR et al (2015) Threshold responses to soil moisture deficit by trees and soil in tropical rain forests: insights from field experiments. Bioscience 65:882–892

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mendivelso HA, Camarero JJ, Gutiérrez E, Zuidema PA (2014) Time-dependent effects of climate and drought on tree growth in a Neotropical dry forest: short-term tolerance vs. long-term sensitivity. Agric for Meteorol 188:13–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller-Rushing AJ, Primackh RB, Devictor V et al (2019) How does habitat fragmentation affect biodiversity? A controversial question at the core of conservation biology. Biol Conserv 232:271–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Murcia C (1995) Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 10:58–62

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nascimento HEM, Laurance WF (2004) Biomass dynamics in Amazonian forest fragments. Ecol Appl 14:127–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehrbass-Ahles C, Babst F, Klesse S et al (2014) The influence of sampling design on tree-ring-based quantification of forest growth. Glob Chang Biol 20:2867–2885

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nepstad DC, Tohver IM, Ray D et al (2007) Mortality of large trees and lianas following experimental drought in an amazon forest. Ecology 88:2259–2269. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1046.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nowacki GJ, Abrams MD (1997) Radial-growth averaging criteria for reconstructing disturbance histories from presettlement-origin oaks. Ecol Monogr 67:225–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver CD, Larson BC (1996) Forest stand dynamics, updated. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto SRR, Mendes G, Santos AMM et al (2010) Landscape attributes drive complex spatial microclimate configuration of Brazilian Atlantic forest fragments. Trop Conserv Sci 3:389–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Pires JM, Prance GT (1985) The vegetation types of the Brazilian Amazon. In: Prance GT, Lovejoy TE (eds) Key environments: Amazonia. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 109–145

  • Poorter L, Bongers F, Aide TM et al (2016) Biomass resilience of Neotropical secondary forests. Nature 530:211–214

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pütz S, Groeneveld J, Henle K et al (2014) Long-term carbon loss in fragmented Neotropical forests. Nat Commun 5:5037

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R core Team R (2017) R language definition. https://www.R-project.org. Accessed 07 Jan 2017

  • Rangel-Pinagé E, Keller M, Duffy P, Longo M, Dos-Santos MN, Morton DC (2019) Long-term impacts of selective logging on Amazon Forest dynamics from multi-temporal airborne LiDAR. Remote Sens 11:709

  • Rowland L, da Costa ACL, Galbraith DR et al (2015) Death from drought in tropical forests is triggered by hydraulics not carbon starvation. Nature 528:119

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rozendaal DMA, Soliz-Gamboa CC, Zuidema PA (2011) Assessing long-term changes in tropical forest dynamics: a first test using tree-ring analysis. Trees 25:115–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarano FR, Ceotto P (2015) Brazilian Atlantic forest: impact, vulnerability, and adaptation to climate change. Biodivers Conserv 24:2319–2331

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shimamoto CY, Botosso PC, Marques MCM (2014) How much carbon is sequestered during the restoration of tropical forests? Estimates from tree species in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. For Ecol Manage 329:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuttleworth WJ, Gash JHC, Lloyd CR et al (1984) Eddy correlation measurements of energy partition for Amazonian forest. Q J R Meteorol Soc 110:1143–1162

    Google Scholar 

  • Sizer N, Tanner EVJ (1999) Responses of woody plant seedlings to edge formation in a lowland tropical rainforest, Amazonia. Biol Conserv 91:135–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith MN, Stark SC, Taylor TC et al (2019) Seasonal and drought-related changes in leaf area profiles depend on height and light environment in an Amazon forest. New Phytol 222:1284–1297

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes MA, Smiles T (1996) An introduction to tree-ring dating. University of Arizona Press, Tucson

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabarelli M, Lopes AV, Peres CA (2008) Edge-effects drive tropical forest fragments towards an early-successional system. Biotropica 40:657–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2008.00454.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabarelli M, Mantovani W, Peres CA (1999) Effects of habitat fragmentation on plant guild structure in the montane Atlantic forest of southeastern Brazil. Biol Conserv 91:119–127

  • Tang H, Dubayah R (2017) Light-driven growth in Amazon evergreen forests explained by seasonal variations of vertical canopy structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114:2640–2644

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ter Steege H, Pitman NCA, Sabatier D et al (2013) Hyperdominance in the Amazonian tree flora. Science (80-) 342:1243092

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore TC (1989) Canopy gaps and the two major groups of forest trees. Ecology 70:536–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams-Linera G, Dominguez-Gastelu V, Garcia-Zurita ME (1998) Microenvironment and floristics of different edges in a fragmented tropical rainforest. Conserv Biol 12:1091–1102

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright SJ, Kitajima K, Kraft NJB et al (2010) Functional traits and the growth–mortality trade-off in tropical trees. Ecology 91:3664–3674

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Albert LP, Lopes AP et al (2016) Leaf development and demography explain photosynthetic seasonality in Amazon evergreen forests. Science (80-) 351:972–976

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Kobayashi H, Stark SC et al (2018) Biological processes dominate seasonality of remotely sensed canopy greenness in an Amazon evergreen forest. New Phytol 217:1507–1520

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Rufford Small Grant for Nature Conservation (http://www.rufford.org/, RSGA application 18762-1), BDFFP Thomas Lovejoy research fellowship program, FAPESP-NSF/PIRE 2017/50085-3; FAPESP 2009/53951-7; CAPES/PROCAD Amazônia 2018, Process: 88881.199859/2018-01; and conducted during a scholarship supported by the International Cooperation Program CAPES/PVE (process: 88887.127558/2016-00) at Laboratorio de Dendrocronología y Ciencias Ambientales from the Instituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales (IANIGLA-CONICET), Mendoza, Argentina. The first author was supported by a Ph.D. scholarship from CAPES—Brazilian Federal Agency for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel. This is the number 818 publication of the Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragment Project (BDFFP—INPA/STRI) Technical Series.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alci Albiero-Júnior.

Additional information

Communicated by A. Bräuning.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 22 KB)

Supplementary file2 (XLSX 21 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Albiero-Júnior, A., Venegas-González, A., Camargo, J.L.C. et al. Amazon forest fragmentation and edge effects temporarily favored understory and midstory tree growth. Trees 35, 2059–2068 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-021-02172-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-021-02172-1

Keywords

Navigation