Abstract
This paper proposes a concept of creativity that stems from a semiotic and linguistic theoretical perspective, in which the formal frame of reference for variation and linguistic change considers and evaluates both the process of general interaction and the contact of languages as a global phenomenon. This method proposes an analysis of creativity that ranges from reflections of ancient philosophy to a contemporary linguistic perspective, incorporates international ideologies, and identifies, within the dimensions of use and social sharing, the principle capable of guiding potentially unlimited forms of linguistic creativity that are self-expressive and communicative, far beyond the grammatical patterns of regularity and norm. Interpreting the paradigm of creativity according to this model means placing the semiotic property in a position of prima inter pares, entrusted not only with the “role” of forming signs (words, sentences, texts), but the function of arbitraire, as a phenomenon of language creation. The following reading references the semiotic contribution of Tullio De Mauro, an Italian linguist who has contributed to the systematization of creativity, overcoming and synthesizing both Saussurian structuralism and Chomskyan generativism.
References
Barry, Donald K. 1996. Forms of life and following rules. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004450363Search in Google Scholar
Berruto, Gaetano. 2018. Tullio De Mauro e la sociolinguistica. In Umberto Cardinale (ed.), Sull’attualità di Tullio De Mauro, 101–119. Bologna: Il Mulino.Search in Google Scholar
Casini, Simone. 2019. In principio erat verbum? Tullio De Mauro e le riflessioni americane di educazione linguistica democratica. Italica 96(1). 94–126.Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783112316009Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1966. Cartesian linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York: Harper & Row.Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1980. Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.10.1017/S0140525X00001515Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures. Dordrecht: Foris.Search in Google Scholar
Cimatti, Felice. 2002. Mente e linguaggio negli animali. Introduzione alla zoosemiotica. Roma: Carocci.Search in Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugen. 1971 [1952]. Teoria del linguaggio e linguistica generale. Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugen. 1981 [1958]. Sincronia, diacronia e storia. Il problema del cambio linguistico. Torino: Boringhieri.Search in Google Scholar
Croce, Benedetto. 1912. Estetica come scienza dell’espressione e linguistica generale, teoria e storia. Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar
De Mauro, Tullio. 1965. Introduzione alla semantica. Roma, Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar
De Mauro, Tullio. 1971. Per una teoria formalizzata del noema lessicale. In Senso e significato. Studi di semantica teorica e storica. Bari: Adriatica Editrice.Search in Google Scholar
De Mauro, Tullio. 1974. Fantasia della grammatica. In R. A. Hinde (ed.), La comunicazione non-verbale, V-XXXI. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar
De Mauro, Tullio. 1982. Minisemantica. Roma, Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar
De Mauro, Tullio. 1984. Ai margini del linguaggio. Roma: Editori Riuniti.Search in Google Scholar
De Mauro, Tullio. 1994. Capire le parole. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar
De Mauro, Tullio. 2002. Prima lezione sul linguaggio. Roma, Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar
De Mauro, Tullio. 2008. Lezioni di linguistica teorica. Roma, Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar
De Mauro, Tullio. 2018. Educazione linguistica democratica. Roma, Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar
De Palo, Marina. 2016. Saussure e gli strutturalismi: Il soggetto parlante nel pensiero linguistico del Novecento. Roma: Carocci.Search in Google Scholar
De Palo, Marina. 2018. Saussure e la scuola linguistica romana: Da Antonino Pagliaro a Tullio De Mauro. Roma: Carocci.Search in Google Scholar
Den Ouden, Bernard D. 1975. Language and creativity: An interdisciplinary essay in Chomskyan humanism. Lisse: Peter De Ridder.10.1515/9783110883473Search in Google Scholar
Di Cesare, Donatella. 2005. Introduzione a La Diversità delle lingue di W. von Humboldt. Roma, Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1984. Semiotica e filosofia del linguaggio. Torino: Einaudi.Search in Google Scholar
Garroni, Emilio. 1977. Ricognizione della semiotica. Roma: Officina.Search in Google Scholar
Garroni, Emilio. 2010 [1978]. Creatività. Macerata: Quodlibet.Search in Google Scholar
Givone, Sergio. 2010. L’idea di creazione tra metafisica ed estetica. In Salvatore Califano & Ernesto Carafoli (eds.), Storia naturale della creatività, 27–38. Roma: Scienze e lettere editore commerciale.Search in Google Scholar
Hauser, D. Marc, Noam Chomsky & W. Tecumseh Fitch. 2002. The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How. Did It Evolve? Science 298. 1569–1579.10.1017/CBO9780511817755.002Search in Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Luis. 1963 [1961]. Prolegomena to a theory of language. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Search in Google Scholar
Humboldt, William von. 1988 [1836]. On language: The diversity of human language. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul. 1984 [1982]. Wittgenstein su regole e linguaggio privato. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.Search in Google Scholar
La Fauci, Nunzio. 2011. Relazioni e differenze: Questioni di linguistica razionale. Palermo: Sellerio.Search in Google Scholar
Ladusaw, William. 1983. Logical forms and conditions on grammaticality. Linguistics and Philosophy 6. 373–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00627482.Search in Google Scholar
Lamb, Sydney. 1966. Outline of stratification grammar. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Nelde, Peter. 1998. Language conflict. In Florian Coulmas (ed.), The handbook of sociolinguistics, 285–300. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781405166256.ch17Search in Google Scholar
Neumann, John V. & Oskar Morgestern. 1944. Theory of games and economic behavior. Pricenton: Pricenton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Prampolini, Massimo. 2001. La creatività nella filosofia di L. Wittgenstein. Il Cannocchiale 3. 133–171.Search in Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 2005 [1922]. Course de linguistique générale. Genève: Arbre d’Or.Search in Google Scholar
Vedovelli, Massimo. 2017. Tullio De Mauro e gli studi linguistici e linguistico-educativi in Italia. Italica 94(1). 5–30.Search in Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1972 [1953]. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1989 [1921]. Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston