Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Strategies for fostering critical thinking dispositions in the technology classroom

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Critical Thinking (CT) consists of two components, namely, skills and dispositions. Although there is a fair amount of literature focusing on CT and the development of CT skills, the literature on CT dispositions and, in particular, strategies to promote the dispositional component of CT is lacking. This means that there is insufficient literature available to guide teachers in their practice regarding the ways in which they could foster CT dispositions. This is particularly problematic for technology teachers as they may not be fully informed on how to use the opportunities offered by the design process, as prescribed by the South African Department of Basic Education. This study thus aimed to investigate and describe how technology teachers use the opportunities presented by the design process to foster CT dispositions. This study engaged in a qualitative research approach and a case study design. Ten purposefully sampled teachers were interviewed, 5 of whom were observed for one design-based lesson. As reported by (Facione in Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts, The California Academic Press, Millbrae, 2011) 7 Dispositions toward CT were used to guide the inquiry. The analysis of the data indicated that the participants used 4 main strategies that acted as a platform for, or led to the use of another 4 supporting strategies. The 4 main strategies are: assessments, questioning, examples, and the classroom environment. The 4 supporting strategies are: discussions, modelling, feedback, and resources. The results and conclusions of this study are not considered as the final answer to the lack of literature, but they provide a starting point for further investigation and development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Adapted from DBE, 2011)

Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Surkes, M. A., Tamim, R., & Zhang, D. (2009). Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: A stage 1 meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1102–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aizikovitsh-Udi, E., & Amit, M. (2011). Developing the skills of critical and creative thinking by probability teaching. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15(2011), 1087–1091.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aizikovitsh-Udi, E., & Cheng, D. (2015). Developing critical thinking skills from dispositions to abilities: Mathematics education from early childhood to high school. Creative Education, 6(March), 455–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Philosophical Association. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. Recommendations prepared for the committee on pre-college philosophy. (No. Doc. No. ED 315–423). California State University, Fullerton: ERIC.

  • Anney, V. N. (2014). Ensuring the quality of the findings of qualitative research: Looking at trustworthiness criteria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 5(2), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.3109/08941939.2012.723954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailin, S., Case, R., Coombs, J. R., & Daniels, L. B. (1999). Conceptualizing critical thinking. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(3), 285–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt, M. D., & Hacker, M. (2004). Informed design: A contemporary approach to design pedagogy. Technology Teacher, 64(1), 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research (4th ed.). Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantittive and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

  • DBE. (2011). Curriculum and Assessment policy statement grades 7–9 technology. Republic of South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (2010). How we think. D. C. Health and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorst, K. (2006). Design problems and design paradoxes. Design Issues, 22(3), 4–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dostál, J. (2015). Theory of problem solving. Social and Behavioural Science, 174, 2798–2805.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duran, M., & Şendağ, S. (2012). A preliminary investigation into critical thinking skills of urban high school students: Role of an IT/STEM program. Creative Education, 3(2), 241–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duron, R., Limbach, B., & Waugh, W. (2006). Critical thinking framework for any discipline. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 160–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., Harney, O. M., & Kavanagh, C. (2017). Facilitating a student-educator conceptual model of dispositions towards critical thinking through interactive management. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(1), 47–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical thinking dispositions: Their nature and assessability. Informal Logic, 18(1996), 165–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facione, P. A. (2000). The disposition toward critical thinking: Its character, measurement, and relationship to critical thinking skill. Informal Logic, 20(1), 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. The California Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facione, P. A., Facione, N. C., & Giancarlo, C. A. F. (1996). The motivation to think in working and learning. New Directions for Higher Education, 96, 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facione, P. A., Sánchez, C. A., & Facione, N. C. (1994). Are college students disposed to think?. In Paper presented at the 6th international conference on thinking. Boston: ERIC Doc: ED 368–311.

  • Fahim, M., & Ghamari, M. R. (2011). Critical thinking in education: Globally developed and locally applied. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(11), 1632–1638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Given, L. M. (2008). The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. (L. M. Given, Ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?id=y_0nAQAAMAAJ&pgis=1.

  • Halpern, D. F. (1999). Teaching for critical thinking. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 80, 69–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (5th ed.). Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Technology and Engineering Educators Association. (2020). Standards for technological and engineering literacy: The role of technology and engineering in STEM education. https://www.iteea.org/STEL.aspx.

  • Jonassen, D. H. (2010). How does problem solving vary? In Learning to Solve Problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments (pp. 1–24). New York: Routledge.

  • Jones, A., Buntting, C., & De Vries, M. J. (2013). The developing field of technology education: A review to look forward. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(2), 191–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kezer, F., & Turker, B. (2012). Comparison of the critical thinking dispositions of (studying in the secondary science and mathematics division) preservice teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46(2012), 1279–1283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, B., & Dorst, K. (2009). Design expertise. Elsevier Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lexico Online Dictionary. (2020a). Attitude. Retrieved 29 July 2020 from https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/attitude.

  • Lexico Online Dictionary. (2020b). Attribute. Retrieved 29 July 2020 from https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/attribute.

  • Mandernach, B. J. (2006). Thinking critically about critical thinking: Integrating online tools to promote critical thinking. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 1(1), 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maree, J. G. (2016). First steps in research (2nd ed.). Pretoria: Van Schaik.

  • Mawson, B. (2003). Beyond ‘the design process’: An alternative pedagogy for technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13(2), 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murawski, L. M. (2014). Critical thinking in the classroom… and beyond. Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 10(1), 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieto, A. M., & Saiz, C. (2011). Skills and dispositions of critical thinking: Are they sufficient? Anales De Psicología, 27(1), 202–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohemeng-Appiah, F. (2014). Teaching the design process in the grade 9 technology class. (Unpublished Master's dissertation), University of KwaZulu-Natal, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

  • Ordem, E. (2017). Developing critical-thinking dispositions in a listening/speaking class. English Language Teaching, 10(1), 50–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2012). Critical thinking: competency standards essential for the cultivation of intellectual skills, part 5. Journal of Developmental Education, 36(1), 30–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponterotto, J. G. (2005). Qualitative research in counseling psychology: A primer on research paradigms and philosophical science. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schooner, P., Nordlöf, C., Klasander, C., & Hallström, J. (2017). Design, system, value: The role of problem-solving and critical thinking capabilities in technology education, as perceived by teachers. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 22(3), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y. T. C., & Chou, H. A. (2008). Beyond critical thinking skills: Investigating the relationship between critical thinking skills and dispositions through different online instructional strategies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 666–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zabit, M. N. (2010). Problem-based learning on students critical thinking skills in teaching business education in Malaysia: A literature review. American Journal of Business Education (AJBE), 3(6), 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Faculty of Education, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

    Joalise Janse van Rensburg & Willem Rauscher

Authors
  1. Joalise Janse van Rensburg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Willem Rauscher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Willem Rauscher.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Janse van Rensburg, J., Rauscher, W. Strategies for fostering critical thinking dispositions in the technology classroom. Int J Technol Des Educ 32, 2151–2171 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09690-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09690-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation