Mounting evidence from the SPRINT trial and the Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists points towards the use of absolute cardiovascular risk assessment to guide blood-pressure management. But who will fall between the cracks? We need to be pragmatic in keeping blood-pressure targets, if only to serve the >1 billion people at risk of cardiovascular disease living in low-resource settings.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Long-term stability of over-the-counter cuffless blood pressure monitors: a proposal
Health and Technology Open Access 23 January 2023
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
GBD 2019 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 396, 1223–1249 (2020).
The SPRINT Research Group. Final report of a trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 1921–1930 (2021).
The Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration. Pharmacological blood pressure lowering for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease across different levels of blood pressure: an individual participant-level data meta-analysis. Lancet 397, 1625–1636 (2021).
Kallioinen, N., Hill, A., Horswill, M. S., Ward, H. E. & Watson, M. O. Sources of inaccuracy in the measurement of adult patients’ resting blood pressure in clinical settings: a systematic review. J. Hypertens. 35, 421–441 (2017).
Fatani, N., Dixon, D. L., Van Tassell, B. W., Fanikos, J. & Buckley, L. F. Systolic blood pressure time in target range and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with hypertension. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 77, 1290–1299 (2021).
Li, Y. et al. Opposing age-related trends in absolute and relative risk of adverse health outcomes associated with out-of-office blood pressure. Hypertension 74, 1333–1342 (2019).
Olsen, M. H. et al. A call to action and a lifecourse strategy to address the global burden of raised blood pressure on current and future generations: the Lancet Commission on hypertension. Lancet 388, 2665–2712 (2016).
Mills, K. T., Stefanescu, A. & He, J. The global epidemiology of hypertension. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 16, 223–237 (2020).
Chapman, N. et al. General practitioners maintain a focus on blood pressure management rather than absolute cardiovascular disease risk management. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13569 (2021).
Rea, F., Corrao, G., Merlino, L. & Mancia, G. Initial antihypertensive treatment strategies and therapeutic inertia. Hypertension 72, 846–853 (2018).
Acknowledgements
The author thanks Josep Sola (Aktiia, Neuchâtel, Switzerland) for providing the 24/7 cuff-less blood-pressure data for Figure 1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
A.E.S. is senior author of the 2020 International Society of Hypertension Practice Guidelines and an advisory board member for Aktiia (Neuchâtel, Switzerland) cuff-less blood-pressure devices.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schutte, A.E. Are blood-pressure targets needed to prevent cardiovascular disease?. Nat Rev Cardiol 18, 615–616 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-021-00595-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-021-00595-4
This article is cited by
-
Long-term stability of over-the-counter cuffless blood pressure monitors: a proposal
Health and Technology (2023)