Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic offer generation in airline revenue management

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management Aims and scope

Abstract

The New Distribution Capability and new retailing platforms will enable airlines to respond to shopping requests with bundled offers of flights and ancillary services, representing an evolution from traditional, flight-focused optimization. Assembling an attractive set of offers to display to customers therefore represents a new joint pricing and assortment optimization problem in airline revenue management. In this paper, we introduce an initial optimization approach for the selection and pricing of a la carte and bundled flight and ancillary offers. First, we propose a customer choice model that captures the impact of ancillary bundles on flight itinerary choice. We then calculate prices for each offer from a continuous range of price points and display the offer set that maximizes expected revenue for a given customer segment. We illustrate the approach using a single-flight, single-ancillary base case and discuss extensions to more complex environments. Tests in the Passenger Origin–Destination Simulator (PODS) show that dynamic offer generation (DOG) can increase net revenue when used by one or more airlines in a competitive network, assuming that the airlines are able to accurately segment incoming requests and estimate the average willingness-to-pay of each segment. We find that the majority of the revenue gains of DOG are due to competitive effects from the dynamic pricing of the flight component of the offer. The bundling mechanism of DOG is a secondary source of revenue gain that can be realized when customers take bundled ancillary services into account when choosing the flight. Our results provide insight for practitioners that are implementing offer optimization systems and processes. For example, in line with the previous literature on bundle pricing, we find that in transparent distribution channels an ancillary service should be bundled with the flight when the valuation for the ancillary is high or when its marginal cost of provision is low. We close by discussing the strategic and managerial implications of a move from traditional distribution strategies to a next-generation, offer-focused approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, W.J., and J.L. Yellen. 1976. Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 90 (3): 475–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belobaba, P. and C. Hopperstad. 2004. Algorithms for revenue management in unrestricted fare markets. Presentation at AGIFORS Reservations and Yield Management Study Group.

  • Bockelie, A. 2019. Ancillary services in the airline industry: Passenger choice and revenue management optimization. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/121879.

  • Bockelie, A., and P. Belobaba. 2017. Incorporating ancillary services in airline passenger choice models. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management 16: 553–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cataldo, A., and J.-C. Ferrer. 2017. Optimal pricing and composition of bundles: A two-step approach. European Journal of Operations Research 259: 766–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dezelak, M., and R. Ratliff. 2018. Towards new industry-standard specifications for air dynamic pricing engines. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management 17: 394–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, G., and S. Kalish. 1988. Positioning and pricing a product line. Marketing Science 7 (2): 107–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, G. 2005. A model of add-on pricing. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 (2): 585–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiig, T., K. Isler, C. Hopperstad, and P. Belobaba. 2010. Optimization of mixed fare structures: Theory and applications. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management 9 (1): 152–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiig, T., R. Härdling, S. Pölt, and C. Hopperstad. 2014. Demand forecasting and measuring forecast accuracy in general fare structures. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management 13: 413–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiig, T., O. Goyons, R. Adelving, and B. Smith. 2016. Dynamic pricing—The next revolution in RM? Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management 15: 360–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiig, T., R. Le. Guen, and M. Gauchet. 2018. Dynamic pricing of airline offers. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management 17: 381–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabaix, X., and D. Laibson. 2006. Shrouded attributes, consumer myopia, and information suppression in competitive markets. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 121 (2): 505–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, W., and R.K. Martin. 1990. Optimal bundle pricing. Management Science 36 (2): 155–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao, E. 2014. Ancillary revenues in the airline industry: impacts of revenue management and distribution. Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/89854.

  • Jagabathula, S., and P. Rusmevichientong. 2017. A nonparametric joint pricing and assortment optimization model. Management Science 63 (9): 3128–3145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R., A. Li, and W. Wang. 2018. Learning and optimizing through dynamic pricing. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management 17: 63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madireddy, M., R. Sundararajan, G. Doreswamy, M.H. Nia, and A. Mital. 2017. Constructing bundled offers for airline customers. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management 16: 532–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J., M. Ferguson, L. Garrow, and T. Jacobs. 2014. Estimation of choice-based models using sales data from a single firm. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 16 (2): 184–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ødegaard, F., and J.G. Wilson. 2016. Dynamic pricing of primary products and ancillary services. European Journal of Operations Research 251: 586–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, R. 1984. Gaussian demand and commodity bundling. The Journal of Business 57 (1–2): 211–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao, S., and G. Kauermann. 2020. Understanding price elasticity for airline ancillary services. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management 19: 74–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, N., A. Kolbeinsson, K. Otwell, L. Marla, and K. Yellepeddi. 2019. Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, pp. 2174–2182.

  • Shulman, J.D., and X. Geng. 2013. Add-on pricing by asymmetric firms. Management Science 59 (4): 899–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. C. and C. W. Penn. 1988. Analysis of alternate origin-destination control strategies. Proceedings of the Twenty Eighth Annual AGIFORS Symposium.

  • Talluri, K., and G. van Ryzin. 2004. Revenue management under a general discrete choice model of consumer behavior. Management Science 50 (1): 15–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinod, B., R. Ratliff, and V. Jayaram. 2018. An approach to offer management: Maximizing sales with fare products and ancillaries. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management 17: 91–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, K.K. 2020. Airline revenue management with dynamic offers: Bundling flights and ancillary services. Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/127110.

  • Westermann, D. 2013. The potential impact of IATA’s New Distribution Capability (NDC) on revenue management and pricing. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management 12 (6): 565–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittman, M.D., and P. Belobaba. 2018. Customized dynamic pricing of airline fare products. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management 17 (2): 78–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittman, M.D., and P.P. Belobaba. 2019. Dynamic pricing mechanisms for the airline industry: A definitional framework. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management 18: 100–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The opinions expressed in this paper represent those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect the positions of their respective employers. The authors are grateful to Peter Belobaba and the members of the MIT PODS Consortium for financial support and for their ideas that culminated in this paper, and to Matthew Berge for assisting with development. We also thank Thomas Fiig and Richard Cléaz-Savoyen for reviewing the paper and offering their thoughtful feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin K. Wang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, K.K., Wittman, M.D. & Bockelie, A. Dynamic offer generation in airline revenue management. J Revenue Pricing Manag 20, 654–668 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41272-021-00349-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41272-021-00349-4

Keywords

Navigation