Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of MgO on Highly Basic Sinters with High Al2O3

  • Published:
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increase of the proportion of high Al2O3 content iron ore fine in iron and steel enterprises has brought about a series of problems such as the increase of the viscosity of blast furnace slag and the difficulty of the separation of slag and iron. In order to solve this problem, the effect of increasing MgO content on the technical and economic index, the cold strength, and metallurgical properties of high basicity and high-alumina sinter was studied through sinter pot test. Nova400NanoSEM field emission scanning electron microscope was used to analyze sinter microstructure. The experimental results show that when the MgO content fraction in the sinter with high basicity and high aluminum increases from 1.72 to 2.49%, the vertical sintering speed decreases by 4.38mm/min, the utilization coefficient decreases by 0.51t/(m2 h), and the low-temperature reduction degradation index increases by 6.7%. When MgO content in sinter is 2.11%, drum index and reducibility index are the highest, reaching 61.93% and 86.39% respectively. Mg2+ is mainly solid dissolved in the magnetite lattice and replaces Fe2+, up to 3.64%. The generated magnesie-containing magnetite inhibits the phase transition from Fe3O4 to Fe2O3 oxidation process in the sinter cooling process, which reduces the generation of secondary hematite and is conducive to improving the low-temperature reduction degradation performance of sinter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Choudhary KM, Bhattachajee D, Bannerjee PS, Lahiri AK (2008) Effect of variation of alumina on development of phases during iron ore sintering. ISIJ Int 48:1804–1806. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.48.1804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lu L, Holmers RJ, Manuel JR (2007) Effects of alumina on sintering performance of hematite iron ores. ISIJ Int 47:349–358. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.47.349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Umadevi, Nelson, Mahapatra, Prabhu, Ranjan (2009) Influence of magnesia on iron ore sinter properties and productivity. Ironmak Steelmak 36(7):515–520. https://doi.org/10.1179/174328109X445741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou M, Yang ST, Jiang T, Xue XX (2015) Influence of MgO in form of magnesite on properties and mineralogy of high chromium, vanadium, titanium magnetite sinters. Ironmak Steelmak 42:320–327. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743281214y.0000000223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Umadevi T, Nelson K, Mahapatra PC, Prabhu M, Ranjan M (2010) Influence of magnesia on iron ore sinter properties and productivity. Ironmak Steelmak 36:515–522. https://doi.org/10.1179/174328109X445741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shen F, Jiang X, Wu G (2006) Proper MgO addition in blast furnace operation. ISIJ Int 46:65–69. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.46.65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang X, Bai H, Lin X, He T, Zhang J, Yuan HM, Zhang ZF (2019) Effect of cooling methods on the strength of silico-ferrite of calcium and aluminum of iron ore sinter during the cooling process. Metals 9:402–420. https://doi.org/10.3390/met9040402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Peng J, Zhang L, Liu LX, An SL (2017) Relationship between liquid fluidity of iron ore and generated liquid content during sintering. Metall Trans B 48:538–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-016-0827-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Maeda T, Nishioka K, Nakashima K, Shimizu M (2004) Formation rate of calcium ferrite melt focusing on SiO2 and Al2O3 component. ISIJ Int 44:2046–2051. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.44.2046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu SL, Su B, Qi YH, Kou MY, Li Y, Zhang WL (2017) Melt absorbability of iron ore nuclei and its influence on suitable liquid content of sintered body. Metall Trans B 48:2469–2480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-017-1059-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhu DQ, Xue YX, Pan J, Yang CC, Guo ZQ, Tian HY, Wang DZ, Shi Y (2020) An investigation into the distinctive sintering performance and consolidation mechanism of limonitic laterite ore. Powder Technol 367:616–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2020.03.066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim HS, Park JH, Cho YC (2013) Crystal structure of calcium and aluminium silicoferrite in iron ore sinter. Ironmak Steelmak 29:266–270. https://doi.org/10.1179/030192302225004511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tang WD, Xue XX, Yang ST, Zhang LH, Huang Z (2018) Influence of basicity and temperature on bonding phase strength, microstructure, and mineralogy of high-chromium vanadium–titanium magnetite. Int. J. Min. Met Mater 25:871–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-018-1636-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Guo H, Shen FM, Zhang HY, Gao QJ, Jiang X (2019) High-temperature reduction and melting mechanism of sinter with different mgo content. Metals 9:510–522. https://doi.org/10.3390/met9050510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Loo CE, Heikkinen J (2012) Structural transformation of beds during iron ore sintering. ISIJ Int 52:2158–2167. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.52.2158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee MS, Shim SC (2007) Influence of lime/limestone addition on the SO2 and NO formation during the combustion of coke pellet. ISIJ Int 44:470–475. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.44.470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ouyang ZQ, Zhu JG, Lu QG, Yao Y, Liu JZ (2014) The effect of limestone on SO2 and NOX emissions of pulverized coal combustion preheated by circulating fluidized bed. Fuel 12:116–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.12.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhou M, Yang ST, Jiang T, Xue XG (2015) Influence of MgO in form of magnesite on properties and mineralogy of high chromium, vanadium, titanium magnetite sinters. JOM 67:1203–1213. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743281214y.0000000223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu SL, Zhang WL, Kou M, Zhou H (2018) The macroscopic flow direction and microscopic distribution of Mg in sintered products and its influence. Metals 8:1008–1020. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8121008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang LH, Gao ZX, Yang ST, Tang WT, Xue XX (2020) Effect of basicity on sintering behavior and metallurgical properties of high-chromium vanadium-titanium magnetite. Metals 10:569–583. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10050569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Matsumura M, Hoshi M, Kawaguchi T (2005) Improvement of sinter softening property and reducibility by controlling chemical compositions. ISIJ Int 45:594–602. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.45.594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang ST, Zhou M, Xue XG, Jiang T, Sun CG (2019) Isothermal reduction kinetics of chromium-bearing vanadium–titanium sinter reduced with CO Gas at 1173. K JOM 71:2812–2820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-019-03533-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the national Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51604199) and the State Key Laboratory of Refractory Materials and Metallurgy (No. 2014QN20) for their support of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhengming Yi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yi, Z., Liu, Q. & Shao, H. Effect of MgO on Highly Basic Sinters with High Al2O3. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 38, 2175–2183 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-021-00445-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-021-00445-4

Keywords

Navigation