Skip to main content
Log in

Decision-making analysis based on bipolar fuzzy N-soft information

  • Published:
Computational and Applied Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this research article, we present a new framework for handling imprecisely acquired bipolar information along with parameterized graded descriptions. The formal model that implements all these desirable features is called bipolar fuzzy N-soft set (also BFNS\(_\text {f}\)S for brevity). We discuss basic operations of our proposed hybrid model, including weak complement, bipolar fuzzy complement, weak bipolar fuzzy complement, extended union, restricted union, extended intersection, restricted intersection, and BFNS\(_\text {f}\)S associated with a threshold. Furthermore, we illustrate some standard algebraic operations on BFNS\(_\text {f}\) numbers and produce related results. Moreover, we develop BFNS\(_\text {f}\)-TOPSIS methods for the solution of multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) and multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) problems defined by bipolar fuzzy N-soft information. In the MAGDM version of the solution, we use the bipolar fuzzy N-soft weighted average operator to aggregate the decisions of all experts according to the performance of alternatives and traits of the attributes. We evaluate the normalized Euclidean distance of alternatives and BFNS\(_\text {f}\) positive and negative ideal solutions, respectively, and relative closeness index to find the most optimal solution. Moreover, three algorithms are proposed to handle MADM problems in the environment of BFNS\(_\text {f}\)S. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the algorithms and the BFNS\(_\text {f}\)-TOPSIS approach for MADM problems, a numerical application regarding the selection of best psychiatrist in Karachi is presented. The validity of the proposed BFNS\(_\text {f}\)-TOPSIS technique for MAGDM is illustrated through an example which examines the best construction company in West Midlands. Finally, we conduct a comparative study with the bipolar fuzzy TOPSIS method to endorse the qualities of the proposed model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

No data were used to support this study.

References

  • Abdullah ML, Salihin W, Abdullah W, Osman A (2004) Fuzzy sets in the social sciences: an overview of related researches. Jurnal Teknologi 41(1):43–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdullah S, Aslam M, Ullah K (2014) Bipolar fuzzy soft sets and its application in decision-making problem. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 27(2):729–742

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Akram SM, Arshad M (2020) Bipolar fuzzy TOPSIS and bipolar fuzzy ELECTRE-I methods to diagnosis. Comput Appl Math. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-019-0980-8

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Adeel A, Alcantud JCR (2018) Fuzzy \(N\)-soft sets: a novel model with applications. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 35(4):4757–4771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Adeel A, Alcantud JCR (2019) Group decision making methods based on hesitant \(N\)-soft sets. Experts Syst Appl 115:95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Ali G, Alcantud JCR (2019) New decision-making hybrid model: intuitionistic fuzzy \(N\)-soft rough sets. Soft Comput 23:9853–9868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Shabir M, Al-Kenani AN, Alcantud JCR (2021) Hybrid decision-making frameworks under complex spherical fuzzy \(N\)-soft sets. J Math. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5563215

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Wasim F, Al-Kenani AN (2021) A hybrid decision-making approach under complex Pythagorean fuzzy \(N\)-soft sets. Int J Comput Intell Syst 14(1):1263–1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Sarwar M, Dudek WA (2021) Graphs for the analysis of bipolar fuzzy information, vol 401. Springer, New York, p 452. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8756-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alcantud JCR (2016) A novel algorithm for fuzzy soft set based decision making from multiobserver input parameter data set. Inf Fusion 29:142–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcantud JCR, Calle RA (2017) The problem of collective identity in a fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 315:57–75

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Alghamdi MA, Alshehri NO, Akram M (2018) Multi-criteria decision-making methods in bipolar fuzzy environment. Int J Fuzzy Syst 20(6):2057–2064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CT (2000) Extension of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen TY, Tsao CY (2008) The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 159(11):1410–1428

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Liu J, Wang H, Augusto JC (2013) Ordering based decision-making a survey. Inf Fusion 14(4):521–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweir F, Meier FA (1996) Application of fuzzy decision-making in facilities layout planning. Int J Prod Res 34(11):3207–3225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fatimah F, Alcantud JCR (2021) The multi-fuzzy N-soft set and its applications to decision-making. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05647-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fatimah F, Rosadi D, Hakim RBF, Alcantud JCR (2018) \(N\)-soft sets and their decision making algorithms. Soft Comput 22(4):3829–3842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng F, Li C, Davvaz B, Ali M (2010) Soft sets combined with fuzzy sets and rough sets: a tentative approach. Soft Comput 14:899–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng F, Akram M, Davvaz B, Fotea VL (2014) Attribute analysis of information systems based on elementary soft implications. Knowl-Based Syst 70:281–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng F, Wang Q, Yager RR, Alcantud JCR, Zhang L (2020) Maximal association analysis using logical formulas over soft sets. Expert Syst Appl 159:113557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiffrida AL, Nagi R (1998) Fuzzy set theory applications in production management research: a literature survey. J Intell Manuf 9(1):39–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herawan T, Deris MM (2009) On multi-soft set construction in information systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 101–110

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hung CC, Chen LH (2009) A fuzzy TOPSIS decision making model with entropy weight under intuitionistic fuzzy environment, In: Proceedings of the international multi conference of engineers and computer scientists, vol 2009(1), March 18–20

  • Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attributes decision making: methods and applications. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kamaci H, Petchimuthu S (2020) Bipolar \(N\)-soft set theory with applications. Soft Comput 24:16727–16743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma X, Liu Q, Zhang J (2017) A survey decision-making method based on certain hybrid soft set models. Artif Intell Rev 47(4):507–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahdavi I, Heidarzade A, Sadeghpour-Gildeh B, Mahdavi-Amiri N (2009) A general fuzzy TOPSIS model in multiple criteria decision making. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 45:406–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maji PK, Roy AR, Biswas R (2001) Fuzzy soft sets. J Fuzzy Math 9(3):589–602

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Molodtsov DA (1999) Soft set theory—first results. Comput Math Appl 37(4–5):19–31

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Molodtsov DA (2004) The theory of soft sets. URSS Publishers, Moscow (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nădăban S, Dzitac S, Dzitac I (2016) Fuzzy TOPSIS: a general view. Proc Comput Sci 91:823–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarwar M (2020) Decision-making approaches based on color spectrum and D-TOPSIS method under rough environment. Comput Appl Math. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-020-01284-7

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wei G, Alsaadi FE, Hayat T, Alsaedi A (2018) Bipolar fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Int J Fuzzy Syst 20(1):1–12

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W-R (1994) Bipolar fuzzy sets and relations: a computational framework for cognitive modeling and multiagent decision analysis. In: Proceedings of the first international joint conference of the North American fuzzy information processing society biannual conference, pp 305–309

  • Zhang Wen-Ran (1998) (Yin) (Yang) bipolar fuzzy sets. IEEE Int Conf Fuzzy Syst 1:835–840

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Jia-Hua D, Yan C (2020) Multi-attribute group decision-making methods based on Pythagorean fuzzy \(N\)-soft sets. IEEE Access 8:62298–6230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou Y, Xiao Z (2008) Data analysis approaches of soft sets under incomplete information. Knowl Based Syst 21(8):941–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bijan Davvaz.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval:

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Communicated by Marcos Eduardo Valle.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akram, M., Amjad, U. & Davvaz, B. Decision-making analysis based on bipolar fuzzy N-soft information. Comp. Appl. Math. 40, 182 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-021-01570-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-021-01570-y

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation