Abstract
In this research article, we present a new framework for handling imprecisely acquired bipolar information along with parameterized graded descriptions. The formal model that implements all these desirable features is called bipolar fuzzy N-soft set (also BFNS\(_\text {f}\)S for brevity). We discuss basic operations of our proposed hybrid model, including weak complement, bipolar fuzzy complement, weak bipolar fuzzy complement, extended union, restricted union, extended intersection, restricted intersection, and BFNS\(_\text {f}\)S associated with a threshold. Furthermore, we illustrate some standard algebraic operations on BFNS\(_\text {f}\) numbers and produce related results. Moreover, we develop BFNS\(_\text {f}\)-TOPSIS methods for the solution of multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) and multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) problems defined by bipolar fuzzy N-soft information. In the MAGDM version of the solution, we use the bipolar fuzzy N-soft weighted average operator to aggregate the decisions of all experts according to the performance of alternatives and traits of the attributes. We evaluate the normalized Euclidean distance of alternatives and BFNS\(_\text {f}\) positive and negative ideal solutions, respectively, and relative closeness index to find the most optimal solution. Moreover, three algorithms are proposed to handle MADM problems in the environment of BFNS\(_\text {f}\)S. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the algorithms and the BFNS\(_\text {f}\)-TOPSIS approach for MADM problems, a numerical application regarding the selection of best psychiatrist in Karachi is presented. The validity of the proposed BFNS\(_\text {f}\)-TOPSIS technique for MAGDM is illustrated through an example which examines the best construction company in West Midlands. Finally, we conduct a comparative study with the bipolar fuzzy TOPSIS method to endorse the qualities of the proposed model.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
No data were used to support this study.
References
Abdullah ML, Salihin W, Abdullah W, Osman A (2004) Fuzzy sets in the social sciences: an overview of related researches. Jurnal Teknologi 41(1):43–54
Abdullah S, Aslam M, Ullah K (2014) Bipolar fuzzy soft sets and its application in decision-making problem. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 27(2):729–742
Akram SM, Arshad M (2020) Bipolar fuzzy TOPSIS and bipolar fuzzy ELECTRE-I methods to diagnosis. Comput Appl Math. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-019-0980-8
Akram M, Adeel A, Alcantud JCR (2018) Fuzzy \(N\)-soft sets: a novel model with applications. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 35(4):4757–4771
Akram M, Adeel A, Alcantud JCR (2019) Group decision making methods based on hesitant \(N\)-soft sets. Experts Syst Appl 115:95–105
Akram M, Ali G, Alcantud JCR (2019) New decision-making hybrid model: intuitionistic fuzzy \(N\)-soft rough sets. Soft Comput 23:9853–9868
Akram M, Shabir M, Al-Kenani AN, Alcantud JCR (2021) Hybrid decision-making frameworks under complex spherical fuzzy \(N\)-soft sets. J Math. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5563215
Akram M, Wasim F, Al-Kenani AN (2021) A hybrid decision-making approach under complex Pythagorean fuzzy \(N\)-soft sets. Int J Comput Intell Syst 14(1):1263–1291
Akram M, Sarwar M, Dudek WA (2021) Graphs for the analysis of bipolar fuzzy information, vol 401. Springer, New York, p 452. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8756-6
Alcantud JCR (2016) A novel algorithm for fuzzy soft set based decision making from multiobserver input parameter data set. Inf Fusion 29:142–148
Alcantud JCR, Calle RA (2017) The problem of collective identity in a fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 315:57–75
Alghamdi MA, Alshehri NO, Akram M (2018) Multi-criteria decision-making methods in bipolar fuzzy environment. Int J Fuzzy Syst 20(6):2057–2064
Chen CT (2000) Extension of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114(1):1–9
Chen TY, Tsao CY (2008) The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 159(11):1410–1428
Chen S, Liu J, Wang H, Augusto JC (2013) Ordering based decision-making a survey. Inf Fusion 14(4):521–531
Dweir F, Meier FA (1996) Application of fuzzy decision-making in facilities layout planning. Int J Prod Res 34(11):3207–3225
Fatimah F, Alcantud JCR (2021) The multi-fuzzy N-soft set and its applications to decision-making. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05647-3
Fatimah F, Rosadi D, Hakim RBF, Alcantud JCR (2018) \(N\)-soft sets and their decision making algorithms. Soft Comput 22(4):3829–3842
Feng F, Li C, Davvaz B, Ali M (2010) Soft sets combined with fuzzy sets and rough sets: a tentative approach. Soft Comput 14:899–911
Feng F, Akram M, Davvaz B, Fotea VL (2014) Attribute analysis of information systems based on elementary soft implications. Knowl-Based Syst 70:281–292
Feng F, Wang Q, Yager RR, Alcantud JCR, Zhang L (2020) Maximal association analysis using logical formulas over soft sets. Expert Syst Appl 159:113557
Guiffrida AL, Nagi R (1998) Fuzzy set theory applications in production management research: a literature survey. J Intell Manuf 9(1):39–56
Herawan T, Deris MM (2009) On multi-soft set construction in information systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 101–110
Hung CC, Chen LH (2009) A fuzzy TOPSIS decision making model with entropy weight under intuitionistic fuzzy environment, In: Proceedings of the international multi conference of engineers and computer scientists, vol 2009(1), March 18–20
Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attributes decision making: methods and applications. Springer, Berlin
Kamaci H, Petchimuthu S (2020) Bipolar \(N\)-soft set theory with applications. Soft Comput 24:16727–16743
Ma X, Liu Q, Zhang J (2017) A survey decision-making method based on certain hybrid soft set models. Artif Intell Rev 47(4):507–530
Mahdavi I, Heidarzade A, Sadeghpour-Gildeh B, Mahdavi-Amiri N (2009) A general fuzzy TOPSIS model in multiple criteria decision making. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 45:406–420
Maji PK, Roy AR, Biswas R (2001) Fuzzy soft sets. J Fuzzy Math 9(3):589–602
Molodtsov DA (1999) Soft set theory—first results. Comput Math Appl 37(4–5):19–31
Molodtsov DA (2004) The theory of soft sets. URSS Publishers, Moscow (in Russian)
Nădăban S, Dzitac S, Dzitac I (2016) Fuzzy TOPSIS: a general view. Proc Comput Sci 91:823–831
Sarwar M (2020) Decision-making approaches based on color spectrum and D-TOPSIS method under rough environment. Comput Appl Math. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-020-01284-7
Wei G, Alsaadi FE, Hayat T, Alsaedi A (2018) Bipolar fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Int J Fuzzy Syst 20(1):1–12
Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353
Zhang W-R (1994) Bipolar fuzzy sets and relations: a computational framework for cognitive modeling and multiagent decision analysis. In: Proceedings of the first international joint conference of the North American fuzzy information processing society biannual conference, pp 305–309
Zhang Wen-Ran (1998) (Yin) (Yang) bipolar fuzzy sets. IEEE Int Conf Fuzzy Syst 1:835–840
Zhang H, Jia-Hua D, Yan C (2020) Multi-attribute group decision-making methods based on Pythagorean fuzzy \(N\)-soft sets. IEEE Access 8:62298–6230
Zou Y, Xiao Z (2008) Data analysis approaches of soft sets under incomplete information. Knowl Based Syst 21(8):941–945
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval:
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Communicated by Marcos Eduardo Valle.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Akram, M., Amjad, U. & Davvaz, B. Decision-making analysis based on bipolar fuzzy N-soft information. Comp. Appl. Math. 40, 182 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-021-01570-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-021-01570-y