Skip to main content
Download PDF

Kdm3b haploinsufficiency impairs the consolidation of cerebellum-dependent motor memory in mice

Molecular Brain volume 14, Article number: 106 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Histone modifications are a key mechanism underlying the epigenetic regulation of gene expression, which is critically involved in the consolidation of multiple forms of memory. However, the roles of histone modifications in cerebellum-dependent motor learning and memory are not well understood. To test whether changes in histone methylation are involved in cerebellar learning, we used heterozygous Kdm3b knockout (Kdm3b+/−) mice, which show reduced lysine 9 on histone 3 (H3K9) demethylase activity. H3K9 di-methylation is significantly increased selectively in the granule cell layer of the cerebellum of Kdm3b+/− mice. In the cerebellum-dependent optokinetic response (OKR) learning, Kdm3b+/− mice show deficits in memory consolidation, whereas they are normal in basal oculomotor performance and OKR acquisition. In addition, RNA-seq analyses revealed that the expression levels of several plasticity-related genes were altered in the mutant cerebellum. Our study suggests that active regulation of histone methylation is critical for the consolidation of cerebellar motor memory.

Introduction

One of the hallmarks of memory consolidation is that it requires changes in gene expression [1, 2]. Since DNA is tightly packaged with histone proteins to form chromatin in the nucleus, chromatin structure should be remodeled to induce gene activation or repression by epigenetic mechanisms, such as modifications of histone proteins and DNA [3]. It has been shown that epigenetic regulation, such as histone modification and DNA methylation, is a key mechanism for memory consolidation from invertebrates to mammals [4, 5].

Post-translational modifications of histone proteins, such as acetylation and methylation, determine whether the gene is in a transcriptionally permissive or repressive state [6, 7]. Methylated histones are generally considered codes for gene repression, but their effects on transcription are very complex [8]. For example, tri-methylation of histone 3 lysine 9 (H3K9me3) represents a repressive code, whereas H3K4me3 is considered an activating code [9]. Histone methylation is dynamically regulated by many histone methyltransferases and demethylases [10]. Lysine demethylase 3b (KDM3B) encodes a demethylase that targets mono-and di-methylated lysine 9 on histone 3 (H3K9me1/2) [11]. KDM3B has been shown to regulate many cellular processes, including gene expression in leukemia, spermatogenesis, and autophagy [11,12,13]. Recent studies have shown that KDM3B mutations are associated with cognitive deficits, including intellectual disability and schizophrenia [14, 15]. However, the functional role of KDM3B in the nervous system remains unclear.

The cerebellum plays a central role in adaptive motor control. For newly formed motor memory to be expressed in an appropriate circumstance, consolidation of motor memory by the cerebellum is essential [16]. Similar to other types of learning, the consolidation of cerebellum-dependent motor memory also requires de novo transcription and translation [17]. However, the epigenetic mechanisms underlying cerebellar learning and memory have rarely been investigated. In this study, we investigated how changes in histone methylation affect cerebellum-dependent motor behavior and gene expression in the cerebellum. Using Kdm3b heterozygous knockout (Kdm3b+/−) mice, we found deficits in retention of cerebellum-dependent motor memory in the mutant mice, demonstrating that regulation of histone methylation in the cerebellum is critical for cerebellum-dependent memory consolidation.

Materials and methods

Animals

Adult (> 7-week-old) male Kdm3b+/− mice and their wild-type (WT) littermates were used. Kdm3b-targetted ES cell line (YTC406) was obtained from International Gene Trap Consortium (https://igtc.org/cgi-bin/annotation.py?cellline=YTC406). Genomic sequencing was performed to identify the targeting vector (pGT0lxf) insertion site in the ES cell line. The heterozygous knockout mice were generated by injecting the ES cells and backcrossed to C57Bl/6N background (Macrogen, Inc). Genotypes of the mice were identified by PCR using the following primers: common forward 5′-GGC ACC AGA CCC TGG GAG CTA G-3′, WT reverse 5′-CAC CCA CGA CCT GGC TTA CAC C-3′, KO reverse 5′-CAC CCA CGA CCT GGC TTA CAC C-3′. The mutant mice were crossed to C57Bl/6J 3–4 times before the experiments. Animals were housed with food and water available ad libitum under a 12-h light/dark cycle. All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the protocols approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Seoul National University.

Tissue sample preparation

To prepare the granule cell-enriched (GCE) and Purkinje-cell-enriched (PCE) tissue samples, sagittal slices of the cerebellar vermis (250 μm thick) were obtained using a vibratome (VT1200, Leica). Vermal slices were manually dissected into GCE and PCE samples under a stereomicroscope, as previously described [18].

Histone purification

In order to extract purified histone protein from tissues, tissues were homogenized with TEB buffer (0.5 × Triton X-100, 2 mM PMSF, 1 × Protease inhibitor cocktail) at 4 °C for 30 min. Homogenized tissues were centrifuged at 7,000 rpm for 2 min at 4 °C. After removing the supernatant, the pellet was washed with additional TEB buffer and centrifuged under the same conditions. After removing the supernatant, 0.5 M HCl was added to the pellet. The tube was rotated overnight at 4 °C. After centrifugation at 13,500 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C, the supernatant (~ 90% of the total volume) was transferred to a fresh tube. Subsequently, 1/3 volume of 100% TCA was added to the tube, which was inverted and placed on ice for 2 h. Occasionally, the tube was vortexed. The tube was centrifuged at 13,500 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was removed and acetone was added. The tube was centrifuged at 13,500 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C. Acetone was air-dried and distilled water was added. The tube was agitated overnight at 4 °C. The tube was centrifuged at 13,500 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant containing the histone extract was then saved.

Western blot analyses

Western blot analysis was performed as described previously [19]. Briefly, tissues were homogenized and sonicated with RIPA buffer (25 mM Tris–HCl [pH 7.6], 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS) with a phosphatase inhibitor cocktail and a protease inhibitor cocktail. Proteins were quantified using bicinchoninic acid (BCA) analysis according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Pierce). Either 3 μg of histone or 20 μg of total tissue extract were used for Western blot analyses. The membranes were imaged with a digital imager (Amersham Imager 600, GE Life Science). Protein quantification was performed using the AI600 software (GE Healthcare), and each band was normalized to α-tubulin or β-actin in the same gel. The following primary antibodies and dilution ratios were used: anti-KDM3B antibody (2621S, 1:500; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-H3 antibody (Millipore, 05-499, 1:2,000), anti-H3K9me2 antibody (Millipore, 07-441, 1:1,000), anti-α-tubulin antibody (Santa Cruz, TU-02, 1:2,000), and anti-β-actin antibody (Santa Cruz, AC-15, 1:2,000).

Behavioral test

The whole procedure, including surgical and behavioral processes, was performed according to a previously described method with minor modifications [18, 20]. Briefly, a headpost was mounted on the head of the mouse using nuts, screws, and dental cement. Mice were administered for at least 24 h after surgery. Optokinetic and vestibular stimuli were generated by a patterned screen and a custom-made turntable with a restrainer attached. Right eye movements were monitored using an infrared video-oculography system. The entire system was controlled by a custom-written LabVIEW (National Instruments, USA) code. To assess basal oculomotor function in mice, the optokinetic response (OKR) and vestibulo-ocular reflex in dark and light (dVOR and lVOR) were measured. The OKR was evoked by sinusoidal oscillation of the screen with a rotation amplitude of 5° and four rotational frequencies (0.1, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 Hz). The VOR was induced by sinusoidal oscillation of the turn-table under the same stimulation conditions for the OKR. Twelve cycles were performed for each measurement.

To induce oculomotor learning in mice, mice were subjected to a 50 min-long sinusoidal oscillation of the screen with an amplitude of 5° and frequency of 0.5. During the training session, the OKR was measured every 10 min. After the training session, mice were subjected to a consolidation session for 24 h in complete darkness. The final OKR was measured immediately after completion of the consolidation session. Data analysis for oculomotor behavior was performed as described in our prior study [21]. The gain was defined as the ratio of eye velocity to stimulus velocity. The phase was defined as the time difference between the two velocity curves.

RNA sequencing analysis

Bulk RNA samples were collected from the GCE of the cerebellar vermis. We obtained two WT and two Kdm3b+/− mice samples for RNA-sequencing analysis [Gene Expression Omnibus Series GSE173255 (GSM5264380–GSM5264383)]. After trimming the low-quality bases, the sequence reads were aligned using the STAR algorithm [22]. We then quantified gene expression using StringTie [23], resulting in 16,447 genes expressed in the cerebellum tissues. For differentially expressed (DEX) gene analysis, we summarized a gene-level expression from transcript-level expression using the tximport R package [24] and performed the DEX analysis using the DESeq2 R package. After removing genes without expression, we normalized the gene expression counts by the total library size. We defined DEX genes with a log2 fold change greater than 1.2, and with an adjusted p-value under 0.05, compared to wild type mice.

Gene ontology (GO) analysis

To investigate the related pathways of DEX genes, we performed GO analysis using gprofiler2 [25]. GO analysis utilizes functional annotations from the GO biological process (GO:BP), cellular component (GO:CC), and molecular function (GO:MF) databases. After multiple comparisons, only significant results were collected (adjusted p < 0.05). These results were used to identify the related genes and pass on to the network construction and analysis.

Network construction and visualization

To represent a functional relationship of the trans-synaptic signaling pathway (GO:0099177), which we found to have significant enrichment for DEX genes, we constructed a gene network using the 28 DEX genes involved in the pathway. We used Cytoscape 3.8.0 software (https://cytoscape.org/) and GeneMANIA plugin [26] to build a gene network where the nodes are the DEX genes and their first-degree interactors, and the edges are defined by physical interaction and co-expression similarity.

Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)

Total RNA of vermal GCE tissue or flocculus was purified sample using the RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Genomic DNA was eliminated by DNase I (QIAGEN). Isolated total RNA was quantified by Nanodrop (ThermoFisher). The same amount of total RNA per sample was reverse transcribed into cDNA using SuperScript III First-Strand (Invitrogen). RT-qPCR was conducted using the CFX Connect system (Bio-Rad) with primers adopted from the previous studies Fam107a [27]; Homer3 [28]; Fgf1 [29]; Car2 [30]; Cplx2 [20]; Ntf3 [31]. Kdm3b mRNA expression was analyzed using the following primers: 5′-CAC ATC ATC GCC TCA GTG GTA-3′ and 5′-CCC ATC GCC ATC TCC TTC AC-3′. Mean Ct values were used relative quantification of mRNA expression between two genotype or behavioral groups using the ∆∆Ct method, with the ratio of the target gene expressed relative to the mean of Gapdh.

Statistics

An independent t-test and two-way repeated-measures ANOVA post-hoc Tukey test were used to evaluate the statistical significance between independent and dependent samples, respectively. All statistical computations were performed using R v3.6. software (http://www.r-project.org). The significance level was set at P < 0.05. Error bar denotes SEM.

Results

Increased H3K9me2 in the cerebellum of Kdm3b +/− mice

To investigate whether the regulation of histone methylation is critically involved in cerebellum-dependent motor learning and memory, we used Kdm3b heterozygous knockout mice. The mutant mice were generated by inserting the pGT0lxf gene trapping vector between exons 12 and 13 of the Kdm3b gene (Fig. 1a). Haploinsufficiency of Kdm3b does not affect gross morphology of the brain (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). We obtained the cerebellar vermis and flocculus from Kdm3b+/+ and Kdm3b+/− mice and quantified Kdm3b protein expression levels (Fig. 1b and c). We confirmed that the Kdm3b protein expression level was significantly reduced in the two cerebellar regions of the mutants compared to those in wild-type (WT) littermates (Fig. 1d; Vermis: df = 6, p < 0.01; Flocculus: df = 5, p < 0.01; independent t-test).

Fig. 1
figure 1

KDM3b expression is decreased in the cerebellum of Kdm3b+/− mice. a Conserved domains in Kdm3b gene and targeting strategy by using pGT0lxf gene trapping system in introns12-13. b Preparation of two cerebellar regions (light blue), the verims and flocculus, for Quantification of KDM3b expression. c Quantification of KDM3b protein expression in the cerebellar vermis (top) and flocculus (bottom) of Kdm3b+/+ and Kdm3b+/− mice using immunoblotting. d Comparison of KDM3b expression in two cerebellar regions between two genotypes. An independent t-test was performed to test statistical significance between two groups. **p < 0.01

Full size image

Since Kdm3b has been reported as a demethylase targeting H3K9me1 and H3K9me2 [11], we examined whether H3K9 methylation levels are altered in the cerebellum of Kdm3b+/− mice. When we assessed H3K9me2 level in the flocculus, a crucial region for cerebellum-dependent oculomotor memory, there is no significant difference in H3K9me2 levels between genotypes (Additional file 1: Fig. S2). Given that the expression pattern of H3K9me2 in the cerebellum remains largely unknown, we attempted a more selective sampling method for quantification of H3K9me2 in the cerebellum using micro-dissection technique which allows us to detect subtle changes in molecular expression [32]. When we micro-dissected the granule-cell-enriched (GCE) and Purkinje-cell-enriched (PCE) samples in the cerebellar vermis (Fig. 2a), we found that H3K9me2 levels were significantly increased in GCE samples from Kdm3b+/− mice compared to those from WT mice (Fig. 2b and c; df = 4, p < 0.01; independent t-test). On the other hand, there was no significant difference in H3K9me2 levels between genotypes in PCE samples (df = 4, p > 0.05; independent t-test), showing that Kdm3b regulates H3K9 methylation in the cerebellum in a layer-specific manner.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Increased H3K9me2 in the cerebellar granule cell layer of Kdm3b+/− mice. a Microdissection of cerebellar vermis to separate granule-cell-enriched (GCE) and Purkinje-cell-enriched (PCE) samples. b, c Layer-specific quantification of H3K9me2 level in GCE and PCE samples from Kdm3b+/+ and Kdm3b+/− mice. N = 3 mice per group. An independent t-test was performed to test statistical significance between two groups. **p < 0.01. n.s indicates p > 0.05

Full size image

No changes in basal oculomotor performance in Kdm3b +/− mice

To test the effects of heterozygous knockout of Kdm3b on cerebellum-dependent behavior, we subjected Kdm3b+/− mice to oculomotor adaptation, which is a simple paradigm of cerebellum-dependent motor learning [20, 33]. First, we tested the basal oculomotor performance in Kdm3b+/− mice in comparison with their WT littermates using two classes of oculomotor reflexes, OKR and VOR. The OKR is a reflexive oculomotor response evoked by the motion of the visual field. The VOR is a compensatory oculomotor response driven by the motion of the head in a direction opposite to the head movement. In our experiment, head-fixed mice were exposed to sinusoidal oscillation of the screen or turn-table to induce OKR or VOR, respectively (Fig. 3a). Kdm3b+/− mice showed comparable gain (strength) and phase (timing) of the OKR, and VOR both in the dark (dVOR) and light (lVOR) (Fig. 3b and c) (Kdm3b+/+, n = 19 mice; Kdm3b+/−, n = 15 mice; p > 0.05 for all comparison pairs, independent t-test), suggesting that haploinsufficiency of Kdm3b does not affect the basal oculomotor performance in mice.

Fig. 3
figure 3

No change in basal oculomotor performance in Kdm3b+/− mice. a Three classes of basal oculomotor function. Optokinetic response (OKR, top), dark (dVOR, middle) and light vestibulo-ocular reflex (lVOR, bottom). b Comparison of gains of OKR, dVOR, and lVOR at different stimulating frequencies between Kdm3b+/+ (n = 19 mice) and Kdm3b+/− (n = 15 mice) groups. c Comparison of phases of OKR, dVOR, and lVOR at different stimulating frequencies between two groups. An independent t-test was performed to test statistical significance between two groups. n.s indicates p > 0.05

Full size image

Cerebellum-dependent memory consolidation deficits in Kdm3b +/− mice

Next, we investigated the ability of Kdm3b+/− mice for cerebellum-dependent learning and consolidation. Long-term exposure of mice to the sinusoidal oscillation of an optokinetic screen induces a gradual increase in OKR gain, which is dependent on the cerebellum [34]. Here, we trained the mice under continuous oscillation of the screen for 50 min with an amplitude of 5° and frequency of 0.5 Hz (Fig. 4a). The OKR was measured before and every 10 min during the training session. To assess the level of memory consolidation, OKR gain was measured in mice after 24 h of consolidation. In the training session, Kdm3b+/− mice exhibited slightly lower OKR gain than wild-type littermates, but this difference was not statistically significant (Fig. 3b and c; Kdm3b+/+, n = 14 mice; Kdm3b+/−, n = 14 mice; p > 0.05, two-way repeated-measures ANOVA). After training, whereas the level of OKR memory in WT littermates was well maintained up to 24 h, the level of OKR memory in Kdm3b+/− mice was significantly reduced (Fig. 3d; Trained p > 0.05; + 24 h p < 0.01; two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey test). Together, our results show that haploinsufficiency of Kdm3b leads to a significant deficit in the consolidation of cerebellar memory without affecting memory formation.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Cerebellum-dependent motor memory consolidation deficits in Kdm3b+/− mice. a Experimental scheme. Eye movement was measured every 10 min in the training session, and after the consolidation session (upside-down triangles). b Representative optokinetic response (OKR) of Kdm3b+/+ (blue) and Kdm3b+/− (red) mice evoked by screen oscillation (black) before and after training. c Changes in OKR gains of Kdm3b+/+ (n = 14 mice) and Kdm3b+/− (n = 14 mice) groups in the training session. d Comparison of OKR gains in Kdm3b+/+ and Kdm3b+/− mice before and after the consolidation sessions. A two-way repeated-measures ANOVA post-hoc Tukey test was used to test statistical significance between two groups. ** and n.s indicate p < 0.01 and p > 0.05, respectively.

Full size image

In addition to the deficit in the consolidation of oculomotor memory in Kdm3b+/− mice, we examined whether Kdm3b expression is regulated by OKR learning in wildtype mice. To this end, C57Bl/6 J mice were subjected to the same behavioral procedures as before (Fig. 4a) and then sacrificed to extract total RNA from the flocculus. The RT-qPCR with reverse transcription result showed that the Kdm3b mRNA level was significantly decreased in trained group compared with control group (Additional file 1: Fig. S3) (df = 4, p < 0.01; independent t-test). Our results suggest that Kdm3b and its activity-dependent gene regulation is critically involved in the consolidation of cerebellar memory.

Altered gene expression in the cerebellum of Kdm3b +/− mice

To evaluate the transcriptional consequences underlying Kdm3b knockout, we examined differentially expressed (DEX) genes in Kdm3b+/− mice by performing RNA sequencing. A total of 509 DEX genes were found in Kdm3b+/− mice compared to WT mice, including 194 upregulated and 315 downregulated genes (Fig. 5a, Additional file 2: Table S1). To identify the biological functions and related pathways of DEX genes, we performed a gene ontology (GO) analysis, which revealed that DEX genes are involved in numerous biological pathways (Additional file 3: Table S2), including the regulation of trans-synaptic signaling pathway (GO:0099177; p-value = 1.4E−02). We further investigated the GO pathways by splitting DEX genes into down-DEX (n = 315) and up-DEX genes (n = 194) and found that down-DEX genes were mostly related to lipid metabolic processes. In particular, 14 down-DEX genes (Dgkz, Akt2, Epha8, Fgf1, Fgfr3, Cyr61, Prkcd, Ptk2b, Srebf1, Slc27a1, Irs2, Angptl4, Pnpla2, Ccdc3) are involved in the positive regulation of lipid metabolic process pathway (GO:0045834, p-value = 1.6E−04) (Fig. 5b, Additional file 3: Table S2). In contrast, up-DEX genes are mostly involved in biological pathways related to translation and biosynthetic processes. Of note, 22 genes, such as Rpl31, Fau, Eif2ak2, Purb, and Rpl21, were shown in the translation pathway (GO:0006412, p-value = 1.7E−05) (Fig. 5c). Among the DEX genes, 28 genes (e.g., Fam107a, Fabp5, Ptk2b, Homer3, F2r, Egr1, Car2, Ntf3, Kcnj10, Plcg1, and Slc6a1) were related to the trans-synaptic signaling pathway (GO:0099177; p-value = 1.4E−02) (Additional file 3: Table S2). We further assessed whether the changes in gene expression in the cerebellar GCE layer in Kdm3b+/− mice are related to synaptic activity. We focused on the 28 genes of the trans-synaptic signaling pathway from the GO results and analyzed their relationships with other genes using gene network analysis (Fig. 5d). As a result, 20 genes were newly identified and assumed to be involved in the trans-synaptic signaling pathway. The hub gene, which is connected to the largest number of nodes, was Pacsin1, followed by Ncdn, Dnm1, and Ntrk2.

Fig. 5
figure 5

RNA-seq analysis in the cerebellar granule cell layer of Kdm3b+/− mice. a Volcano plot of the differentially expressed (DEX) genes in Kdm3b+/− mice compared to WT mice. Y axis is the false discovery rate (FDR) with − log10 used and X axis is the expression values of Kdm3b+/− mice divided by WT mice with log2 used. Two mice per group were used for the analyses. b Gene ontology (GO) analysis of the down-DEX genes compared to wild type mice. Three GO domain, GO biological process (GO:BP), cellular component (GO:CC), and molecular function (GO:MF) were used. Results with term size equal to or bigger than 30 and less than 1000 were used. Y axis is the name of the terms of the GO results and X axis is the FDR with − log10 used. c GO analysis of the up-DEX genes compared to wild type mice. Results were filtered same as in (b). In b and c, the number in parentheses indicates the number of genes belonging to a given GO term. d Gene network analysis using 28 genes, which intersected with the GO term ‘regulation of trans-synaptic signaling’ (GO:0099177; p-value = 1.4E−02). The intersected genes are colored green. e RT-qPCR validation of selected DEX genes. RT-qPCR analysis targeted the six selected genes (Fam107a, Homer3, Fgf1, Car2, Cplx2, and Ntf3) was performed using GCE samples obtained from Kdm3b+/+ and Kdm3b+/− mice (n = 3 per group). An independent t-test was performed to test statistical significance between two groups. **p < 0.01

Full size image

Finally, to validate the RNA-seq results, we performed RT-qPCR analysis using GCE samples obtained from independent groups of Kdm3b+/+ and Kdm3b+/−. Among the 28 DEX genes belonging to the GO term ‘regulation of trans-synaptic signaling’, we selected five genes: Fam107a, Homer3, Car2, Cplx2, and Ntf3. Three of them (Ntf3 [35], Cplx2 [36, 37], Homer3 [38]) were suggested as regulators of learning and memory and Fam107a was known to be expressed in the cerebellar granule cell [39]. In addition to these five genes, we also attempted to validate the downregulation of Fgf1 gene which has been suggested as a crucial gene in regulating the persistence of fear memory in the amygdala [29]. In RT-qPCR analysis, we again found significant increases in Cplx2 and Ntf3 mRNA levels in GCE samples of Kdm3b+/− group compared with those of Kdm3b+/+ group (Fig. 5e; df = 5, p < 0.01; independent t-test). For the other genes, the difference in mRNA levels between the two genotypes did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05), but the same tendency was confirmed when compared with the RNA-seq results, supporting the validity of our RNA-seq results.

Discussion

Here, we report that haploinsufficiency of Kdm3b results in deficits in the consolidation of OKR memory. Moreover, we found that Kdm3b deletion affects the transcription of several plasticity-related genes in the cerebellum, which may also contribute to memory deficits in mutant mice.

Unlike short-term memory, which is dependent on the covalent modifications of pre-existing molecules, long-term memory requires changes in transcription and translation [1, 2, 20]. The requirement for the synthesis of new mRNA and protein for memory consolidation has been demonstrated in multiple forms of learning in diverse species including Aplysia, Drosophila, and mammals. It has been shown that infusing actinomycin D or anisomycin into the mouse cerebellar flocculus before OKR training blocks the increase in OKR gain after 4 h, but not after 1 h, suggesting that transcription and translation are also required for the consolidation of cerebellum-dependent motor learning [17]. In addition, injecting anisomycin into the cerebellar nuclei impairs the retention of conditioned response in the eye blink conditioning task, which is another well-known cerebellar learning paradigm [40]. Recently, Kim et al. have shown that cerebellum-dependent learning triggers changes in protein expression in the cerebellum in a learning paradigm-dependent manner [20]. In addition, the late phase of cerebellar long-term depression, which is considered a cellular mechanism for certain forms of cerebellar learning, was also shown to be dependent on protein synthesis [41]. Despite accumulating evidence for the critical roles of epigenetic regulation on gene expression and memory [4], surprisingly, whether epigenetic mechanisms are involved in cerebellar motor learning has not yet been investigated.

Active changes in histone methylation in response to learning or other external stimuli have been observed in multiple brain regions [42,43,44,45,46]. In particular, H3K9me2 was increased in the hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, and amygdala 1 h after mice were trained in the fear conditioning paradigm [42,43,44]. The expression of the histone lysine methyltransferase G9a increased after fear conditioning, which might be responsible for the increased H3K9me2 [44]. Consistently, inhibiting G9a impaired fear memory, while pharmacological inhibition of the histone lysine demethylase LSD1 (KDM1A) enhanced fear memory [44]. This result is interesting since we found that haploinsufficiency of Kdm3b impairs, rather than enhances, motor memory. A recent study showed that another H3K9 demethylase, plant homeodomain finger protein 2 (PHF2), acts as a positive regulator of hippocampal memory without affecting amygdala-dependent cued fear memory [47], suggesting that each histone demethylase may have a distinct role depending on brain regions and behavioral tasks. It would be interesting to examine the role of other histone-modifying enzymes, including LSD1, in cerebellar learning.

We identified several genes that were differentially expressed in the cerebellar granule cell-enriched layer, which may contribute to the OKR consolidation deficit in Kdm3b+/− mice. Among DEX genes, Cbln1 (log2 fold change = 4.0E−01; p-value = 3.6E−02) was previously reported to be secreted in the cerebellar granule cells and plays an essential role in controlling synaptic structure and plasticity [48]. In addition, Ntf3 (log2 fold change = 7.4E−01; p-value = 3.0E−03), which encodes neurotrophin-3, is mostly secreted by mature granular cells and contributes largely to cerebellar development, such as Purkinje cell maturation [49]. Although we showed that Kdm3b haploinsufficiency did not affect the gross morphology of the cerebellum (Additional file 1: Fig. S1), whether Kdm3b deletion have any subtle effects on the brain development remains to be examined. One of the other DEX genes, Ptn (log2 fold change = 5.6E−01; p-value = 8.5E−03) is also known to be involved in the regulation of cerebellar development. During the first two postnatal weeks, Ptn is known to be associated with the control of granule cell migration. In addition, in adult mice, it controls neuronal plasticity by taking part in perineuronal nets [50].

We showed that H3K9 di-methylation is selectively increased in the cerebellar GCE layer in Kdm3b+/− mice. Considering that the granule cells are major excitatory presynaptic inputs to Purkinje cells, Kdm3b may be critical for regulating the expression of genes involved in presynaptic function. Consistently, we found that the expression of Cplx2 (log2 fold change = 5.9E−01; p-value = 1.70E−05), which is known to be related with synaptic transmission and plasticity, is significantly increased in Kdm3b+/− mice [36, 37, 51, 52]. In the cerebellum, Cplx2 is expected to be expressed at the terminal of granule cells (GCs) because it is considered as a maker for the excitatory presynaptic terminal in the brain [53]. Based on these, we speculate that an altered synaptic transmission or plasticity at GC-Purkinje cell (PC) synapse may result in deficits in the consolidation of OKR memory in Kdm3b+/− mice. In addition, we previously reported that Cplx2 expression is altered by oculomotor learning [20]. Hence, it would be interesting to elucidate the role of Cplx2 in synaptic transmission at GC-PC synapses and in the consolidation of OKR memory. By providing a comprehensive list of molecules related to the trans-synaptic signaling pathway, we offer candidates for future studies on the synaptic control of cerebellum-dependent motor memory consolidation.

To our knowledge, this is the first study to present behavioral and molecular evidence implicating the critical role of histone modification in cerebellar learning. Interestingly, diverse epigenetic mechanisms have been implicated in several diseases affecting the cerebellum, including ataxia, autism spectrum disorders, Fragile X syndrome, and medulloblastoma [54]. Recent genetic studies have revealed Kdm3b as a risk gene for cognitive disorders, such as schizophrenia and intellectual disabilities [14]. Schizophrenia is highly associated with motor deficits, and cerebellar abnormalities are often reported in patients with schizophrenia [55]. Our study contributes to the understanding of the physiological and pathophysiological functions of the epigenetic regulator Kdm3b in the cerebellum.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this published article. RNA-seq data are available from the Gene Expression Omnibus (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo).

Abbreviations

DEX:

Differentially expressed

GO:

Gene ontology

GC:

Granule cell

GCE:

Granule-cell-enriched

H3K9:

Lysine 9 on histone 3

H3K9me1/2:

Mono-and di-methylated lysine 9 on histone 3

OKR:

Optokinetic response

PC:

Purkinje cell

PCE:

Purkinje-cell-enriched

H3K9me3:

Tri-methylation on Histone 3 Lysine 9

VOG:

Video-oculography

VOR:

Vestibulo-ocular reflex

WT:

Wild-type

References

  1. Lee YS, Bailey CH, Kandel ER, Kaang BK. Transcriptional regulation of long-term memory in the marine snail Aplysia. Mol Brain. 2008;1:3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee YS, Silva AJ. The molecular and cellular biology of enhanced cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10:126–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Jaenisch R, Bird A. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat Genet. 2003;33(Suppl):245–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim S, Kaang BK. Epigenetic regulation and chromatin remodeling in learning and memory. Exp Mol Med. 2017;49:281.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cholewa-Waclaw J, Bird A, von Schimmelmann M, Schaefer A, Yu H, Song H, Madabhushi R, Tsai LH. The role of epigenetic mechanisms in the regulation of gene expression in the nervous system. J Neurosci. 2016;36:11427–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Jenuwein T, Allis CD. Translating the histone code. Science. 2001;293:1074–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Turner BM. Cellular memory and the histone code. Cell. 2002;111:285–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jambhekar A, Dhall A, Shi Y. Roles and regulation of histone methylation in animal development. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20:625–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kouzarides T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell. 2007;128:693–705.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bannister AJ, Schneider R, Kouzarides T. Histone methylation: dynamic or static? Cell. 2002;109:801–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim JY, Kim KB, Eom GH, Choe N, Kee HJ, Son HJ, Oh ST, Kim DW, Pak JH, Baek HJ, et al. KDM3B is the H3K9 demethylase involved in transcriptional activation of lmo2 in leukemia. Mol Cell Biol. 2012;32:2917–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Jung H, Seo SB. Histone lysine demethylase 3B (KDM3B) regulates the propagation of autophagy via transcriptional activation of autophagy-related genes. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0236403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu Z, Oyola MG, Zhou S, Chen X, Liao L, Tien JC, Mani SK, Xu J. Knockout of the histone demethylase Kdm3b decreases spermatogenesis and impairs male sexual behaviors. Int J Biol Sci. 2015;11:1447–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Diets IJ, van der Donk R, Baltrunaite K, Waanders E, Reijnders MRF, Dingemans AJM, Pfundt R, Vulto-van Silfhout AT, Wiel L, Gilissen C, et al. De novo and inherited pathogenic variants in KDM3B cause intellectual disability, short stature, and facial dysmorphism. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;104:758–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Whitton L, Cosgrove D, Clarkson C, Harold D, Kendall K, Richards A, Mantripragada K, Owen MJ, O'Donovan MC, Walters J, et al. Cognitive analysis of schizophrenia risk genes that function as epigenetic regulators of gene expression. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2016.

  16. Attwell PJ, Cooke SF, Yeo CH. Cerebellar function in consolidation of a motor memory. Neuron. 2002;34:1011–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Okamoto T, Endo S, Shirao T, Nagao S. Role of cerebellar cortical protein synthesis in transfer of memory trace of cerebellum-dependent motor learning. J Neurosci. 2011;31:8958–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ryu C, Jang DC, Jung D, Kim YG, Shim HG, Ryu HH, Lee YS, Linden DJ, Worley PF, Kim SJ. STIM1 regulates somatic Ca(2+) signals and intrinsic firing properties of cerebellar Purkinje neurons. J Neurosci. 2017;37:8876–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee YS, Yu NK, Chun J, Yang JE, Lim CS, Kim H, Park G, Lee JA, Lee K, Kaang BK, et al. Identification of a novel Shank2 transcriptional variant in Shank2 knockout mouse model of autism spectrum disorder. Mol Brain. 2020;13:54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim YG, Woo J, Park J, Kim S, Lee YS, Kim Y, Kim SJ. Quantitative Proteomics Reveals Distinct Molecular Signatures of Different Cerebellum-Dependent Learning Paradigms. J Proteome Res. 2020;19:2011–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim YG, Kim SJ. Decreased intrinsic excitability of cerebellar Purkinje cells following optokinetic learning in mice. Mol Brain. 2020;13:136.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, Batut P, Chaisson M, Gingeras TR. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pertea M, Pertea GM, Antonescu CM, Chang TC, Mendell JT, Salzberg SL. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33:290–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Soneson C, Love MI, Robinson MD. Differential analyses for RNA-seq: transcript-level estimates improve gene-level inferences. F1000Res. 2015;4:1521.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Raudvere U, Kolberg L, Kuzmin I, Arak T, Adler P, Peterson H, Vilo J. g:Profiler: a web server for functional enrichment analysis and conversions of gene lists (2019 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:W191–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Warde-Farley D, Donaldson SL, Comes O, Zuberi K, Badrawi R, Chao P, Franz M, Grouios C, Kazi F, Lopes CT, et al. The GeneMANIA prediction server: biological network integration for gene prioritization and predicting gene function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:W214–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Stankiewicz AM, Goscik J, Swiergiel AH, Majewska A, Wieczorek M, Juszczak GR, Lisowski P. Social stress increases expression of hemoglobin genes in mouse prefrontal cortex. BMC Neurosci. 2014;15:130.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ruegsegger C, Stucki David M, Steiner S, Angliker N, Radecke J, Keller E, Zuber B, Rüegg Markus A, Saxena S. Impaired mTORC1-dependent expression of homer-3 influences SCA1 pathophysiology. Neuron. 2016;89:129–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yoo M, Park S, Jung I, Han J-H. Persistence of fear memory depends on a delayed elevation of BAF53b and FGF1 expression in the lateral amygdala. J Neurosci. 2020;40:7133.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Pan P-W, Rodriguez A, Parkkila S. A systematic quantification of carbonic anhydrase transcripts in the mouse digestive system. BMC Mol Biol. 2007;8:22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wan G, Gómez-Casati ME, Gigliello AR, Liberman MC, Corfas G. Neurotrophin-3 regulates ribbon synapse density in the cochlea and induces synapse regeneration after acoustic trauma. Elife. 2014;3:e03564.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Han J-K, Kwon S-H, Kim YG, Choi J, Kim J-I, Lee Y-S, Ye S-K, Kim SJ. Ablation of STAT3 in Purkinje cells reorganizes cerebellar synaptic plasticity in long-term fear memory network. Elife. 2021;10:e63291.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Nagao S. Behavior of floccular Purkinje cells correlated with adaptation of horizontal optokinetic eye movement response in pigmented rabbits. Exp Brain Res. 1988;73:489–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ito M. Cerebellar circuitry as a neuronal machine. Prog Neurobiol. 2006;78:272–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Shimazu K, Zhao M, Sakata K, Akbarian S, Bates B, Jaenisch R, Lu B. NT-3 facilitates hippocampal plasticity and learning and memory by regulating neurogenesis. Learn Mem. 2006;13:307–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Gibson HE, Reim K, Brose N, Morton AJ, Jones S. A similar impairment in CA3 mossy fibre LTP in the R6/2 mouse model of Huntington’s disease and in the complexin II knockout mouse. Eur J Neurosci. 2005;22:1701–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Glynn D, Bortnick RA, Morton AJ. Complexin II is essential for normal neurological function in mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12:2431–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rizzo V, Touzani K, Raveendra BL, Swarnkar S, Lora J, Kadakkuzha BM, Liu X-A, Zhang C, Betel D, Stackman RW, et al. Encoding of contextual fear memory requires de novo proteins in the prelimbic cortex. Biol Psychiatry. 2017;2:158–69.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Schmidt MV, Schülke J-P, Liebl C, Stiess M, Avrabos C, Bock J, Wochnik GM, Davies HA, Zimmermann N, Scharf SH, et al. Tumor suppressor down-regulated in renal cell carcinoma 1 (DRR1) is a stress-induced actin bundling factor that modulates synaptic efficacy and cognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:17213.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Bracha V, Irwin KB, Webster ML, Wunderlich DA, Stachowiak MK, Bloedel JR. Microinjections of anisomycin into the intermediate cerebellum during learning affect the acquisition of classically conditioned responses in the rabbit. Brain Res. 1998;788:169–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Linden DJ. A protein synthesis-dependent late phase of cerebellar long-term depression. Neuron. 1996;17:483–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Gupta S, Kim SY, Artis S, Molfese DL, Schumacher A, Sweatt JD, Paylor RE, Lubin FD. Histone methylation regulates memory formation. J Neurosci. 2010;30:3589–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Gupta-Agarwal S, Franklin AV, Deramus T, Wheelock M, Davis RL, McMahon LL, Lubin FD. G9a/GLP histone lysine dimethyltransferase complex activity in the hippocampus and the entorhinal cortex is required for gene activation and silencing during memory consolidation. J Neurosci. 2012;32:5440–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Gupta-Agarwal S, Jarome TJ, Fernandez J, Lubin FD. NMDA receptor- and ERK-dependent histone methylation changes in the lateral amygdala bidirectionally regulate fear memory formation. Learn Mem. 2014;21:351–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Anderson EM, Sun H, Guzman D, Taniguchi M, Cowan CW, Maze I, Nestler EJ, Self DW. Knockdown of the histone di-methyltransferase G9a in nucleus accumbens shell decreases cocaine self-administration, stress-induced reinstatement, and anxiety. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019;44:1370–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Mahan AL, Mou L, Shah N, Hu JH, Worley PF, Ressler KJ. Epigenetic modulation of Homer1a transcription regulation in amygdala and hippocampus with pavlovian fear conditioning. J Neurosci. 2012;32:4651–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Kim HJ, Hur SW, Park JB, Seo J, Shin JJ, Kim SY, Kim MH, Han DH, Park JW, Park JM, et al. Histone demethylase PHF2 activates CREB and promotes memory consolidation. EMBO Rep. 2019;20:e45907.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Hirai H, Pang Z, Bao D, Miyazaki T, Li L, Miura E, Parris J, Rong Y, Watanabe M, Yuzaki M, et al. Cbln1 is essential for synaptic integrity and plasticity in the cerebellum. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:1534–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Fauquier T, Romero E, Picou F, Chatonnet F, Nguyen XN, Quignodon L, Flamant F. Severe impairment of cerebellum development in mice expressing a dominant-negative mutation inactivating thyroid hormone receptor alpha1 isoform. Dev Biol. 2011;356:350–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Basille-Dugay M, Hamza MM, Tassery C, Parent B, Raoult E, Benard M, Raisman-Vozari R, Vaudry D, Burel DC. Spatio-temporal characterization of the pleiotrophinergic system in mouse cerebellum: evidence for its key role during ontogenesis. Exp Neurol. 2013;247:537–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Reim K, Mansour M, Varoqueaux F, McMahon HT, Südhof TC, Brose N, Rosenmund C. Complexins regulate a late step in Ca2+-dependent neurotransmitter release. Cell. 2001;104:71–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Rizo J, Südhof TC. Snares and Munc18 in synaptic vesicle fusion. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3:641–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Harrison PJ, Eastwood SL. Preferential involvement of excitatory neurons in medial temporal lobe in schizophrenia. Lancet (London, England). 1998;352:1669–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Serrano M. Epigenetic cerebellar diseases. Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;155:227–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Andreasen NC, Pierson R. The role of the cerebellum in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2008;64:81–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Jung-Woong Kim for critical comments on the manuscript and Soobin Kim for managing the Kdm3b mouse colony.

Funding

This work was supported by grants to S.B.S. and Y.-S.L. (NRF-2019R1A4A2001609), Y.-S.L. (NRF-2017M3C7A1026959), and S.J.K. (NRF-2018R1A5A2025964) from the National Research Foundation of Korea.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yong Gyu Kim, Myeong Seong Bak, and Ahbin Kim have contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Korea

    Yong Gyu Kim, Myeong Seong Bak, Ahbin Kim, Yang-Sook Chun, Sang Jeong Kim & Yong-Seok Lee

  2. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Korea

    Yong Gyu Kim, Myeong Seong Bak, Ahbin Kim, Ye Lee Kim, Yang-Sook Chun, Sang Jeong Kim & Yong-Seok Lee

  3. Department of Biosystems and Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Korea University, Seoul, 02841, Korea

    Yujin Kim & Joon-Yong An

  4. Department of Integrated Biomedical and Life Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Korea University, Seoul, Korea

    Yujin Kim & Joon-Yong An

  5. Department of Life Science, College of Natural Science, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, 06974, Korea

    Yun-Cheol Chae & Sang-Beom Seo

  6. Ischemic/Hypoxic Disease Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Korea

    Ye Lee Kim & Yang-Sook Chun

  7. Neuroscience Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Korea

    Sang Jeong Kim & Yong-Seok Lee

Authors
  1. Yong Gyu Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Myeong Seong Bak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ahbin Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yujin Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yun-Cheol Chae
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ye Lee Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yang-Sook Chun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Joon-Yong An
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Sang-Beom Seo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Sang Jeong Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yong-Seok Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y-SL and SJK designed the experiments and supervised the research. YGK and MSB performed the behavioral analyses. AK, MSB, Y-CC, and YLK performed the biochemical analyses. SBS generated mice. YK and JYA performed the bioinformatics analyses. SJK and Y-SC edited the manuscript. Y-SL and YGK wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sang Jeong Kim or Yong-Seok Lee.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Seoul National University (SNU-190821-9-1).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

 Supplementary Figures.

Additional file 2: 

Supplementary Table 1. List of differentially expressed (DEX) genes (509 genes). 

Additional file 3:

 Supplementary Table 2. Gene ontology (GO) analysis of DEX genes. 

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, Y.G., Bak, M.S., Kim, A. et al. Kdm3b haploinsufficiency impairs the consolidation of cerebellum-dependent motor memory in mice. Mol Brain 14, 106 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13041-021-00815-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13041-021-00815-5

Keywords

Molecular Brain

ISSN: 1756-6606