Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter April 14, 2021

The effect of cooling rate on crystallization behavior and tensile properties of CF/PEEK composites

  • Guangming Dai , Lihua Zhan EMAIL logo , Chenglong Guan and Minghui Huang

Abstract

In this study, the differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) tests were performed to measure the nonisothermal crystallization behavior of carbon fiber reinforced polyether ether ketone (CF/PEEK) composites under different cooling rates. The characteristic parameters of crystallization were obtained, and the nonisothermal crystallization model was established. The crystallization temperature range of the material at different cooling rates was predicted by the model. The unidirectional laminates were fabricated at different cooling rates in the crystallization temperature range. The results showed that the crystallization temperature range shifted to a lower temperature with the increase of cooling rate, the established nonisothermal crystallization model was consistent with the DSC test results. It is feasible to shorten the cooling control range from the whole process to the crystallization range. The crystallinity and transverse tensile strength declined significantly with the increase of the cooling rate in the crystallization temperature range. The research results provided theoretical support for the selection of cooling conditions and temperature control range, which could be applied to the thermoforming process of semi-crystalline polymer matrixed composites to improve the manufacturing efficiency.


Corresponding author: Lihua Zhan, School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: U1837205

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1837205).

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Wang, W. H., Zhao, Q. C., Chang, H. Y., Wan, J. C. The development of fiber reinforced thermoplastic composite materials from German, Japan and United States based on information processing technology. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2015, 3744, 2946–2949. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.713-715.2946.Search in Google Scholar

2. Liu, J., Liu, H., Kaboglu, C., Kong, X., Ding, Y., Chai, H., Blackman, B. R. K., Kinloch, A. J., Dear, J. P. The impact performance of woven-fabric thermoplastic and thermoset composites subjected to high-velocity soft- and hard-impact loading. Appl. Compos. Mater. 2019, 26, 1389–1410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-019-09786-2.Search in Google Scholar

3. Li, H., Englund, K. Recycling of carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composite wastes from the aerospace industry. J. Compos. Mater. 2016, 51, 1265–1273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998316671796.Search in Google Scholar

4. Gilles-Philippe, P.-M., Arthur, L., Pascal, H. Compression moulding of carbon/polyether ether ketone composites: squeeze flow behavior of unidirectional and randomly oriented strands. Polym. Compos. 2017, 38, 1828–1837. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.23753.Search in Google Scholar

5. Jungmeier, A. The effect of pressure and temperature on microthermoforming thermoplastic films integrated in the injection moulding process. J. Polym. Eng. 2016, 36, 597–605. https://doi.org/10.1515/polyeng-2015-0232.Search in Google Scholar

6. Sun, A., Luo, F., Chen, R., Guo, J., Guo, S., Zhang, S. Effects of sepiolite on crystallization behaviors and properties of sepiolite/polyoxymethylene composites. J. Polym. Res. 2020, 27, 411–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-020-2012-1.Search in Google Scholar

7. Lv, C., Liu, D., Tian, H., Xiang, A. Non-isothermal crystallization kinetics of polyvinyl alcohol plasticized with glycerol and pentaerythritol. J. Polym. Res. 2020, 27, 539–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-020-2038-4.Search in Google Scholar

8. Brauner, C., Peters, C., Brandwein, F., Herrmann, A. S. Analysis of process-induced deformations in thermoplastic composite materials. J. Compos. Mater. 2014, 48, 2779–2791. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998313502101.Search in Google Scholar

9. Yang, X., Wu, Y., Wei, K., Fang, W., Sun, H. Non-isothermal crystallization kinetics of short glass fiber reinforced poly(ether ether ketone) composites. Materials 2018, 11, 2094–2107. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11112094.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Sun, H., Yang, X., Wei, K., Wu, Y., Fang, W. Non-isothermal crystallization kinetics of continuous glass fiber reinforced poly (ether ether ketone) composites. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2019, 138, 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08245-1.Search in Google Scholar

11. Lessard, H., Lebrun, G., Benkaddour, A., Pham, X.-T. Influence of process parameters on the thermostamping of a [0/90]12 carbon/polyether ether ketone laminate. Compos. Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2015, 70, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.12.009.Search in Google Scholar

12. Gao, S. L., Kim, J. K. Cooling rate influences in carbon fibre/PEEK composites. Part 1. Crystallinity and interface adhesion. Compos. Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2000, 31, 517–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1359-835x(00)00009-9.Search in Google Scholar

13. Gao, S. L., Kim, J. K. Correlation among crystalline morphology of PEEK, interface bond strength, and in-plane mechanical properties of carbon/PEEK composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2002, 84, 1155–1167. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.10406.Search in Google Scholar

14. Dai, G., Zhan, L., Guan, C., Huang, M. The effect of moulding process parameters on interlaminar properties of CF/PEEK composite laminates. Adv. Polym. Sci. 2020, 32, 835–841. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954008320903768.Search in Google Scholar

15. Regis, M., Zanetti, M., Pressacco, M., Bracco, P. Opposite role of different carbon fiber reinforcements on the nonisothermal crystallization behavior of poly(etheretherketone). Mater. Chem. Phys. 2016, 179, 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.05.034.Search in Google Scholar

16. Li, S. J., Zhan, L. H., Chen, R., Peng, W. F. The influence of cure pressure on microstructure, temperature field and mechanical properties of advanced polymer-matrix composite laminates. Fibers Polym. 2014, 15, 2404–2409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-014-2404-0.Search in Google Scholar

17. Avrami, M. Kinetics of phase change I – general theory. J. Chem. Phys. 1939, 7, 1103–1112. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1750380.Search in Google Scholar

18. Nakamura, K., Katayama, K., Amano, T. Some aspects of nonisothermal crystallization of polymers II – consideration of the isokinetic condition. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1973, 17, 1031–1041. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1973.070170404.Search in Google Scholar

19. Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Lin, Q., Cao, W., Liu, C., Shen, C. Crystallization behavior of partially melted poly(ether ether ketone). J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2017, 129, 1021–1028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-017-6229-0.Search in Google Scholar

20. Kuoa, M. C., Kuoa, J. S., Yanga, M. H., Huang, J. C. On the crystallization behavior of the nano-silica filled PEEK composites. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2010, 123, 471–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.04.043.Search in Google Scholar

21. Batista, N. L., Olivier, P., Bernhart, G., Rezende, M. C., Botelho, E. C. Correlation between degree of crystallinity, morphology and mechanical properties of PPS/carbon fiber laminates. Mater. Res. 2016, 19, 195–201. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2015-0453.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-12-24
Accepted: 2021-03-28
Published Online: 2021-04-14
Published in Print: 2021-07-27

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 12.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2020-0356/html
Scroll to top button