Skip to main content
Log in

Electron temperature and ion density perturbations prior to the M6.8 Eastern Honshu, Japan earthquake of July 23, 2008

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Detection of Electromagnetic Emissions Transmitted from Earthquake Regions (DEMETER) microsatellite-monitored data (IAP and ISL) were employed in investigating pre- (30 days) and post- (10 days) perturbations in ionospheric parameters associated with the M6.8 Eastern Honshu (Japan) earthquake (EQ) of July 23, 2008. The results constrained by synchronously monitoring geomagnetic indices data: Kernnifzer digit and disturbance storm time (Dst), revealed strong seismic event-induced disturbances three weeks to 5 days before the seismic event. The geomagnetic indices data were used in filtering normal geomagnetic disturbances from the seismic counterparts, thereby constraining the interpretations. The total ion density measured in per cubic centimeter (cm−3) recorded variations of 7.90, 4.51, and 5.92 on days-20, -19, and -16, respectively, from the earthquake day during the night time half orbit observations. Contemporaneously, perturbations of 8.81 were observed for electron temperature measured in Kelvin (K) five days afore the earthquake. The geomagnetically quiet state of the ionosphere during the pre-seismic days suggests that the observed disturbances are seismogenic. More researches should be encouraged in this area to deepen their applications in earthquake monitoring and prediction.

Research Highlights

  • Use of DEMETER data for earthquake prediction.

  • Ionospheric plasma parameters used in detecting seismo-genic induced perturbations.

  • Quiet atmospheric geomagnetic perturbations before the earthquake is seismogenically induced.

  • Seismo-genic anomalies are promising for short-term earthquake prediction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akhoondzadeh M, Parrot M and Saradjian M R 2010 Electron and ion density variations before strong earthquakes (M>6.0) using DEMETER and GPS data; Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 10 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chmyrev V, Smith A, Kataria D, Nestor B and Owen C 2013 Detection and monitoring of earthquake precursor. Twin Sat, A Russia-K satellite project; Adv. Space Res. 52 1135–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cussac T, Clair M, Ultré-Guerard P, Buisson F, Lassalle-Balier G, Ledu M, Elisabelar C, Passot X and Rey N 2006 The Demeter microsatellite and ground segment; Planet. Space Sci. 54 413–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobrovolsky I R, Zubkov S I and Myachkin V I 1979 Estimation of the size of earthquake preparation zones; Pure Appl. Geophys. 117 1025–1044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes J M, Palo S E and Zhang X 2000 Variability of the ionosphere; J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 62 685–693, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(00)00029-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujiwara H, Kamogawa M, Ikeda M, Liu J Y, Sakata H, Chen Y I, Ofuruton H, Muramatsu S, Chuo Y J and Ohtsuki Y H 2004 Atmospheric anomalies observed during earthquake occurrences; Geophys. Res. Lett. 31(17), https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019865.

  • Hayakawa M and Molchanov O A 2002 Seismo-electromagnetics: Lithosphere–atmosphere–ionosphere coupling; Terra Scientific Publishing Company, Tokyo, 477p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibanga J I, Akpan A E, George N J, Ekanem A M and George A M 2017 Unusual ionospheric variations before the strong Auckland Islands, New Zealand earthquake NRIAG; J. Astron. Geophys. 7(1) 149–154, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrjag.2017.12.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junaid A, Shah M, Waqar A Z, Muhammad A A and Iqbal T 2018 Seismo ionospheric anomalies associated with earthquakes from the analysis of the ionosonde data; J. Atmos. 179 450–458, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2018.10.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamogawa M 2006 Pre-seismic lithosphere–atmosphere–ionosphere coupling; EOS Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 87(40) 417–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo C L, Huba J D, Joyce G and Lee L C 2011 Ionosphere plasma bubbles and density variations induced by pre-earthquake rock currents and associated surface charges; J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 116, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA016628.

  • Liu J Y, Chen Y I, Chuo Y J and Chen C S 2006 A statistical investigation of pre-earthquake ionospheric anomaly; J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 111(A5), https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011333.

  • Mendillo M, Rishbeth H, Roble R G and Wroten J 2002 Modelling F2-layer seasonal trends and day-to-day variability driven by coupling with the lower atmosphere; J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 64 1911–1931, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(02)00193-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Namgaladze A A, Klimenko M V, Klimenko V V and Zakharenkova I E 2009 Physical mechanism and mathematical modeling of earthquake ionospheric precursors registered in total electron content; Geomagnet. Aeron. 49(2) 252–262, https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793209020169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyama K I, Kakinami Y, Liu J Y, Kamogawa M and Kodama T 2008 Reduction of electron temperature in low-latitude ionosphere at 600 km before and after large earthquakes; J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 113(A11), https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013367.

  • Parrot M 1995 Use of satellites to detect seismo-electromagnetic effects: Main phenomenological features of ionospheric precursors of strong earthquakes; Adv. Space Res. 15(11) 1337–1347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrot M 2012 Statistical analysis of automatically detected ion density variations recorded by DEMETER and their relation to seismic activity; Ann. Geophys. 55(1) 149–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Píša D, Parrot M and Santolík O 2011 Ionospheric density variations recorded before the 2010 Mw 8.8 earthquake in Chile; J. Geophys. Res. 116 A08309, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA016611.

  • Pulinets S A and Boyarchuk K A 2004 Ionospheric Precursors of Earthquakes, Berlin: Lambert Academic Publishing, Saarbrücken, Germany, 138p.

  • Pulinets S A and Legen’ka A D 2003 Spatial-temporal characteristics of the large-scale disturbances of electron concentration observed in the F-region of the ionosphere before strong earthquakes; Cosmic Res. 41 221–229.

  • Richardson I G, Webb D F, Zhang J, Berdichevsky D B, Biesecker D A, Kasper J C, Kataoka R, Steinberg J T, Thompson B J, Wu C C and Zhukov A N 2006 Major geomagnetic storms (Dst ≤ −100 nT) generated by corotating interaction regions; J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 111(A7), https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011476.

  • Rishbeth H and Mendillo M 2001 Patterns of ionospheric variability; J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 63 1661–1680, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(01)00036-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rong Z, Feng J and Xin-yan O 2008 Ionospheric perturbations before Pu’er earthquake observed on DEMETER; Acta Seismol. Sin. 21(1) 77–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostoker G 1972 Geomagnetic indices; Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 10(4) 935–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozhnoi A, Solovieva M, Molchanov O, Schwingenschuh K, Boudjada M, Biagi P F, Maggipinto T, Castellana L, Ermini A and Hayakawa M 2009 Anomalies in VLF radio signals prior the Abruzzo earthquake (M = 6.3) on 6 April 2009; Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 9 1727–1732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarlis N V, Skordas E S and Varotsos P A 2010 Order parameter fluctuations of seismicity in natural time before and after mainshocks; Europhys. Lett. 91(5) 59001, https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/91/59001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah M and Jin S 2015 Statistical characteristics of seismo-ionospheric GPS TEC disturbances prior to global Mw≥5.0 earthquakes (1998–2014); J. Geodyn. 92 42–49, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2015.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas J E, George N J, Ekanem A M and Nathaniel E U 2020 Preliminary investigation of Earth’s tremor using total electron content (TEC): A case study of July 11th, 2016 Earth’s tremor in parts of Rivers and Bayelsa states, South-eastern Nigeria; NRIAG J. Astron. Geophys. 9 220–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varotsos P, Sarlis N and Skordas E S 2014 Study of the temporal correlations in the magnitude time series before major earthquakes in Japan; J. Geophys. Res. 119 9192–9206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the NOAA for the geomagnetic index and CNRS/LPC2E for the DEMETER data. We are also grateful to the editor and reviewers for their constructive criticisms that helped in improving the quality of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AEA and JET conceived the study, designed the framework and searched for DEMETER data. AME used appropriate software programs to interpret the data, while NJG puts together the write-up using the processed data and performed grammar checks as well as work on the references.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N J George.

Additional information

Communicated by Anand Joshi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thomas, J.E., Ekanem, A.M., George, N.J. et al. Electron temperature and ion density perturbations prior to the M6.8 Eastern Honshu, Japan earthquake of July 23, 2008. J Earth Syst Sci 130, 134 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-021-01645-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-021-01645-8

Keywords

Navigation