Abstract
Cognitive load theory’s incorporation of evolutionary perspectives has generated several instructional designs based on movement, including the tracing effect, occurring when learners benefit from explicit instructions to trace out specific elements of lesson materials with the index finger. Historical descriptions of children’s tracing behaviours while learning with Montessori’s “sandpaper letters” suggest some children would sequence their own learning with sandpaper letters by first tracing the lesson materials with eyes open, then with eyes closed. This description resonates with another cognitive load theory effect — the imagination effect — whereby students with sufficient prior knowledge benefit from imagining rather than studying lesson materials. Across two experiments, we replicated and extended the tracing effect by comparing a no-tracing control condition and a tracing condition to a condition where students traced elements of worked examples initially with eyes open, then with eyes closed. The majority of hypotheses were confirmed via effects on self-reported intrinsic motivation, cognitive load, and/or problem-solving test performance. We conclude with considerations for instructional designers, educators, and researchers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agostinho, S., Tindall-Ford, S., Ginns, P., Howard, S. J., Leahy, W., & Paas, F. (2015). Giving learning a helping hand: Finger tracing of temperature graphs on an iPad. Educational Psychology Review, 27(3), 427–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9315-5.
Atkinson, R. K., Renkl, A., & Merrill, M. M. (2003). Transitioning from studying examples to solving problems: Effects of self-explanation prompts and fading worked-out steps. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 774–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.774.
Bara, F., Gentaz, E., Colé, P., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2004). The visuo-haptic and haptic exploration of letters increases the kindergarten-children’s understanding of the alphabetic principle. Cognitive Development, 19(3), 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2004.05.003.
Bates, E., Camaioni, L., & Volterra, V. (1975). The acquisition of performatives prior to speech. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 21, 205–226.
Bednarik, R. G. (1986). Parietal finger markings in Europe and Australia. Rock Art Research, 3(1), 30–61.
Camaioni, L. (1993). The development of intentional communication: A re-analysis. In J. Nadel & L. Camaioni (Eds.), New perspectives in early communicative development (pp. 82–96). Routledge.
Congdon, E. L., Kwon, M., & Levine, S. C. (2018). Learning to measure through action and gesture: Children’s prior knowledge matters. Cognition, 180, 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.07.002.
Cooper, G. A., Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2001). Learning by imagining. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7(1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1037//1076-898x.7.1.68.
Cumming, G. (2013). Understanding the new statistics: Effect size, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. Routledge.
Dargue, N., Sweller, N., & Jones, M. P. (2019). When our hands help us understand: A meta-analysis into the effects of gesture on comprehension. Psychological Bulletin, 145(8), 765–784. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000202.
de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2009). Towards a framework for attention cueing in instructional animations: Guidelines for research and design. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 113–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9098-7.
Doherty-Sneddon, G., Bonner, L., & Bruce, V. (2001). Cognitive demands of face monitoring: Evidence for visuospatial overload. Memory & Cognition, 29(7), 909–919. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195753.
Doherty-Sneddon, G., Bruce, V., Bonner, L., Longbotham, S., & Doyle, C. (2002). Development of gaze aversion as disengagement from visual information. Developmental Psychology, 38(3), 438–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.3.438.
Doherty-Sneddon, G., Phelps, F. G., & Calderwood, L. (2009). Gaze aversion during children’s transient knowledge and learning. Cognition and Instruction, 27(3), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000903014329.
Driskell, J. E., Copper, C., & Moran, A. (1994). Does mental practice enhance performance? Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.481.
Du, X., & Zhang, Q. (2019). Tracing worked examples: Effects on learning in geometry. Educational Psychology, 39(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1536256.
Geary, D. C. (2008). An evolutionarily informed education science. Educational Psychologist, 43(4), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520802392133.
Geary, D. (2012). Evolutionary educational psychology. In K. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, Vol 1: Theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 597–621). American Psychological Association.
Gerber, R. J., Wilks, T., & Erdie-Lalena, C. (2010). Developmental milestones: Motor development. Pediatrics in Review, 31(7), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.31-7-267.
Ginns, P. (2005). Imagining instructions: Mental practice in highly cognitive domains. Australian Journal of Education, 49(4), 128–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.001.
Ginns, P., & King, V. (in press). Pointing and tracing enhance computer-based learning. Educational Technology Research & Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09997-0.
Ginns, P., & Kydd, A. (2019). Learning human physiology by pointing and tracing. In S. Tindall-Ford, S. Agostinho, & J. Sweller (Eds.), Advances in cognitive load theory: rethinking teaching (pp.119-129). Routledge.
Ginns, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). When imagining information is effective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(2), 229–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00016-4.
Ginns, P., Hu, F.-T., & Bobis, J. (2020). Tracing enhances problem-solving transfer, but without effects on intrinsic or extraneous cognitive load. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(6), 1522–1529. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3732.
Ginns, P., Hu, F. T., Byrne, E., & Bobis, J. (2016). Learning by tracing worked examples. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(2), 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3171.
Glenberg, A. M., Schroeder, J. L., & Robertson, D. A. (1998). Averting the gaze disengages the environment and facilitates remembering. Memory & Cognition, 26(4), 651–658. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211385.
Goh, J. X., Hall, J. A., & Rosenthal, R. (2016). Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: Some arguments on why and a primer on how. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(10), 535–549.
Hancock, G. R., & An, J. (2020). A closed-form alternative for estimating ω reliability under unidimensionality. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 18(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2019.1656049.
Hostetter, A. B., Alibali, M. W., & Kita, S. (2007). I see it in my hands’ eye: Representational gestures reflect conceptual demands. Language & Cognitive Processes, 22(3), 313–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960600632812.
Houston, S. D. (2004). The first writing: Script invention as history and process. Cambridge University Press.
Hu, F. T., Ginns, P., & Bobis, J. (2014). Does tracing worked examples enhance geometry learning? Australian Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 14, 45–49.
Hu, F. T., Ginns, P., & Bobis, J. (2015). Getting the point: Tracing worked examples enhances learning. Learning and Instruction, 35, 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.10.002.
Hulme, C., Monk, A., & Ives, S. (1987). Some experimental studies of multi-sensory teaching: The effects of manual tracing on children’s paired-associate learning. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5(4), 299–307.
Julius, E. (1992). Rapid math tricks & tips: 30 days to number power. Wiley.
Kalenine, S., Pinet, L., & Gentaz, E. (2011). The visual and visuo-haptic exploration of geometrical shapes increases their recognition in preschoolers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025410367443.
Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory: How many types of load does it really need? Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9150-7.
Kalyuga, S., Rikers, R., & Paas, F. (2012). Educational implications of expertise reversal effects in learning and performance of complex cognitive and sensorimotor skills. Educational Psychology Review, 24(2), 313–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9195-x.
Keselman, H. J., Othman, A. R., & Wilcox, R. R. (2013). Preliminary testing for normality: Is this a good practice? Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 12(2), 2–19. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1383278460.
Kissane, M., Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2008). The consequences of fading instructional guidance on delayed performance: The case of financial services training. Educational Psychology, 28(7), 809–822. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410802322069.
Kita, S. (2000). How representational gestures help speaking. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 162–185). Cambridge University Press.
Korbach, A., Park, B., Brünken, R., & Ginns, P. (2020). Should learners use their hands for learning? Results from an eye-tracking study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(1), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12396.
Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load and the imagination effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(7), 857–875. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1061.
Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2005). Interactions among the imagination, expertise reversal and element interactivity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11(4), 266–276. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.11.4.266.
Leopold, C., & Mayer, R. E. (2014). An imagination effect in learning from scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037142.
Leppink, J., Paas, F., Van der Vleuten, C. P., Van Gog, T., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. (2013). Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1058–1072. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0334-1.
Leppink, J., & Pérez-Fuster, P. (2019). Mental effort, workload, time on task, and certainty: Beyond linear models. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-09460-2.
Lespiau, F., & Tricot, A. (2018). Primary knowledge enhances performance and motivation in reasoning. Learning and Instruction, 56, 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.02.007.
Lespiau, F., & Tricot, A. (2019). Using primary knowledge: An efficient way to motivate students and promote the learning of formal reasoning. Educational Psychology Review, 31(4), 915–938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09482-4.
Lillard, A. S. (2005). Montessori: The science behind the genius. Oxford University Press.
Liszkowski, U., Brown, P., Callaghan, T., Takada, A., & De Vos, C. (2012). A prelinguistic gestural universal of human communication. Cognitive Science, 36(4), 698–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01228.x.
Macken, L., & Ginns, P. (2014). Pointing and tracing gestures may enhance anatomy and physiology learning. Medical Teacher, 36(7), 569–601. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.899684.
Matthews, G., Campbell, S. E., Falconer, S., Joyner, L., Huggins, J., Gilliland, K., Grier, R., & Warm, J. S. (2002). Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: Task engagement, distress and worry. Emotion, 2(4), 315–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.2.4.315.
McCauley, E., Duncan, T., & Tammen, V. V. (1989). Psychometric properties of the intrinsic motivation inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1989.10607413.
McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum.
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago Press.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
Montessori, M. (1912). The Montessori method. William Heinemann.
Noguchi, K., Abel, R. S., Marmolejo-Ramos, F., & Konietschke, F. (2020). Nonparametric multiple comparisons. Behavior Research Methods, 52(2), 489–502. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01247-9.
Oswald, F. L., & McCloy, R. A. (2003). Meta-analysis and the art of the average. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), Validity generalization: A critical review (pp. 311–338). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2012). An evolutionary upgrade of cognitive load theory: Using the human motor system and collaboration to support the learning of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 24(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9179-2.
Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & van Gerven, P. W. M. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_8.
Peterson, L. R., & Peterson, M. J. (1959). Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(3), 193–198.
Phelps, F. G., Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Warnock, H. (2006). Helping children think: Gaze aversion and teaching. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24(3), 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151005X49872.
Previc, F. H., Declerck, C., & de Brabander, B. (2005). Why your “head is in the clouds” during thinking: The relationship between cognition and upper space. Acta Psychologica, 118(1–2), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.10.012.
R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing http://www.R-project.org/.
Renkl, A., Atkinson, R. K., & Große, C. S. (2004). How fading worked solution steps works–a cognitive load perspective. Instructional Science, 32(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021815.74806.f6.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.
Schwonke, R., Renkl, A., Krieg, C., Wittwer, J., Aleven, V., & Salden, R. (2009). The worked-example effect: Not an artefact of lousy control conditions. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 258–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.011.
Sepp, S., Howard, S. J., Tindall-Ford, S., Agostinho, S., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive load theory and human movement: Towards an integrated model of working memory. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 293–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09461-9.
Sharpe, K., & Van Gelder, L. (2006). Evidence for cave marking by Paleolithic children. Antiquity, 80(310), 937–947. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00094527.
Steiner, E. T., & Ashcraft, M. H. (2012). Three brief assessments of math achievement. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 1101–1107. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0185-6.
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5.
Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5.
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer.
Sweller, J., Ayres, P. L., Kalyuga, S., & Chandler, P. A. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_4.
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5.
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205.
Tang, M., Ginns, P., & Jacobson, M. J. (2019). Tracing enhances recall and transfer of knowledge of the water cycle. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 439–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09466-4.
The jamovi project (2019). jamovi (Version 0.9.5.17) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org
Tulving, E. (1974). Cue-dependent forgetting: When we forget something we once knew, it does not necessarily mean that the memory trace has been lost; it may only be inaccessible. American Scientist, 62, 74–82 https://www.jstor.org/stable/27844717.
Van Gelder, L. (2015). Counting the children: The role of children in the production of finger flutings in four upper Palaeolithic caves. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 34(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/ojoa.12052.
Vredeveldt, A., Hitch, G. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2011). Eyeclosure helps memory by reducing cognitive load and enhancing visualisation. Memory & Cognition, 39(7), 1253–1263. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0098-8.
Wheeler, R. L., & Gabbert, F. (2017). Using self-generated cues to facilitate recall: A narrative review. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1830. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01830.
Yeo, L. M., & Tzeng, Y. T. (2019). Tracing effect in the worked examples-based learning: An exploration of individual differences in working memory capacity. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15, em1760. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/105482.
Yeo, L. M., & Tzeng, Y. T. (2020). Cognitive effect of tracing gesture in the learning from mathematics worked examples. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(4), 733–751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09987-y.
Zambrano, J., Kirschner, P. A., & Kirschner, F. (2019). How cognitive load theory can be applied to collaborative learning: Collaborative cognitive load theory. In S. Tindall-Ford, S. Agostinho, & J. Sweller (Eds.), Advances in cognitive load theory: rethinking teaching (pp. 30–39). Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, B., Ginns, P. & Mockler, N. Sequencing Tracing with Imagination. Educ Psychol Rev 34, 421–449 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09625-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09625-6