Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analysis of the Geological Heritage and Geodiversity Index of Two Mountainous Areas in Spain: Béjar and El Barco Massifs

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Geoheritage Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article identifies, describes, and characterizes, based on the analysis of 20 geosites, the geological heritage of the Béjar and El Barco massifs. Using 22 characteristics, and weighting coefficients, these geosites were qualitatively and quantitatively assessed (representativeness, accessibility, etc.) and classified into different groups depending on their extension (area, location, and points of geological interest) and potential use (scientific, didactic, tourism, and recreational). Consequently, 9 geosites were selected, owing to their importance and noteworthiness, and the geodiversity index (GI) was calculated using parametric cartographies (geomorphological units, lithology, vegetation and land uses, orientations, and slopes). The abundance of elements present within a given surface area was analyzed for each homogeneous territorial unit, defined by the specific geological, geomorphological, and natural environmental context being analyzed within the study area. Our results show that sites of geomorphological interest (SGI) have great importance and notoriety in relation to the glacial, periglacial, and fluviotorrencial events that occurred during cold periods and deglaciation. Moreover, a GI value of 24.38 was recorded for the highest areas due to the diversity of geoforms and current processes. The information obtained in this work could prove useful in the improvement of geosites, as it would allow geological heritage to be considered at the time of establishing plans for sustainable geoconservation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Babin Vich RB (1978) Caracteres generales de la tectónica tardihercínica de fracturación en la Sierra de Gredos (Región de Béjar- Piedrahita). Bol Geol Min De España 89(6):545–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Brilha J, Andrade C, Azerêdo A, Barriga FJAS, Cachão M, Couto H, Cunha PP, Crispim JA, Dantas P, Duarte LV, Freitas MC, Granja MH, Henriques MH, Henriques P, Lopes L, Madeira J, Matos JMX, Noronha F, Pais J, Piçarra J, Ramalho MM, Relvas JMRS, Ribeiro A, Santos A, Santos V, Terrinha P (2005) Definition of the Portuguese frameworks with international relevance as an input for the European geological heritage characterisation. Episodes 28(3):177–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brilha J (2016) Inventory and quantitative assessment of geosites and geodiversity sites: a review. Geoheritage 8:119–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruschi V, Cendrero A (2009). Direct and parametric methods for the assessment of geosites and geomorphosites. In Reynard E., Coratza P., Regolini-Bissig G. (Eds.): Geomorphosites. Ver-lag Friedrich Pfeil, Munchen, 73–88

  • Bruschi VM, Cendrero A, Albertos JAC (2011) A statistical approach to the validation and optimisation of geoheritage assessment procedures. Geoheritage 3:131–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carcavilla L, Durán JJ, Garcia-Cortés A, López-Martinez J (2009) Geological heritage and geoconservation in Spain: past, present, and future. Geoheritage 1(2–4):75–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco RM (1999). Geomorfologia del Valle del Jerte. Las líneas maestras del paisaje. Ed. Universidadde Extremadura. Serv publicaciones. Cáceres. 246 pp

  • Carrasco RM, Pedraza J, Domínguez-Villar D, Munoz-Rojas J (2008) El glaciarismo Pleistoceno de la Sierra de Bejar (Gredos occidental, Salamanca, España): nuevos datos para precisar su extension y evolucion). Bol R Soc Esp Hist Nat Sec Geol 102(1e4):35–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco RM, Pedraza J, Domínguez-Villar D, Villa J, Willenbring JK (2013) The plateau glacier in the Sierra de Bejar (Iberian Central System) during its maximum extent reconstruction and chronology. Geomorphology 196:83e93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco RM, Pedraza J, Domínguez-Villar D, Willenbring JK, Villa J (2015) Sequence and chronology of the Cuerpo de Hombre paleoglacier (Iberian Central System) during the last glacial cycle. Quat Sci Rev 129:163–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coratza P, Giusti C (2005) Methodological proposal for the assessment of the scientific quality of geomorphosites. Il Quaternario 18:307–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz R, Goy J, Zazo C (2014) Hydrological Patrimony in the mountainous areas of Spain: geodiversity inventory and cataloguing of the Sierras De Béjar and Del Barco (in the Sierra de Gredos of the Central System). Environmental Earth Sciences 71:85–97. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12665-013-2697-0

  • Cruz Ramos R, Goy y Goy JL, Zazo Cardeña C (2013). Geodiversity and hydrological patrimony in high mountain areas. Gredos range: Béjar and El Barco massifs, Spain. In Management of water resource in protected areas. Ed. Springer. 343- 254

  • Cruz R (2006) Análisis geológico-ambiental del Espacio Natural de Gredos Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de Salamanca Cartografía del paisaje e itinerarios geoambientales. Tratamiento y representación mediante SIG 449

  • Cruz R, Goy JL, Zazo C (2007). Las Sierras de Béjar y del Barco durante el Cuaternario. Glaciarismo y Periglaciarismo. En: Libro Guía de la XII Reunión Nacional de Cuaternario (J.L. Goy, C. Zazo, R. Cruz, A. Cabero, eds.), AEQUA, 28 pp

  • Cruz R, Goy JL, Zazo C (2009). El registro periglaciar en la Sierra de Bejar y del Barco (Sistema Central) y su relación con el sistema glaciar pleistoceno. Finisterra XLIV.87, 9–22

  • Elizaga E, Palacios J (1996). Valoración de Puntos y/o lugares de Interés geológico. In: El patrimonio Geológico. Bases para su valoración, protección, conservación y utilización. Ed. MOPTMA, 61- 79

  • Fassoulas C, Mouriki D, Dimitriou-Nikolakis P, Iliopoulos G (2012) Quantitative assessment of geotopes as an effective tool for geoheritage management. Geoheritage 4:177–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Cortés A, Rábano I, Locutura J, Bellido F, Fernández-Gianotti J, Martín-Serrano A, Quesada C, Barnolas A, Durán J (2001) First Spanish contribution to the Geosites Project list of the geological frameworks. Episodes 24(2):79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Cortés Á, Carcavilla L (2009) Documento metodológico para la elaboración del Inventario Español de lugares de interés geológico (IELIG) IGME Madrid 164

  • González-Delgado JA, Martínez-Graña A, Holgado M, Gonzalo JC, Legoinha P (2020). Augmented reality as a tool for promoting the tourist value of the geological heritage around natural filming locations: a case study in “Sad Hill” (The Good, the Bad and the Ugly movie, Burgos, Spain). Geoheritage, 12:34e 12:76

  • Gray M (2004) Geodiversity: valuing and conserving abiotic nature. John Wiley & Sons, Oxford, p 434

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray M (2008) Geoheritage 1. Geodiversity: a new paradigm for valuing and conserving geoheritage. Geosci Can 35:51–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray M (2011) Other nature: geodiversity and geosystem services. Environ Conserv 38:271–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubalíková L, Kirchner K (2016) Geosite and geomorphosite assessment as a tool for geoconservation and geotourism purposes: a case study from Vizovická vrchovina Highland (eastern part of the Czech Republic). Geoheritage 8:5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Graña AM, Goy JL, Cimarra C (2015) 2D to 3D geologic map transformation using virtual globes, flight simulators, and their applications in the analysis of geodiversity in natural areas. Environmental Earth Sciences 73(12):8023–8034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Graña AM, Legoinha P, González-Delgado JA, Dabrio CJ, Pais J, Goy JL, Zazo C, Civis J, Armenteros I, Alonso-Gavilán G, Dias R, Cunha T (2017a) Augmented reality in a hiking tour on the Miocene geoheritage of central Algarve cliffs (Portugal). Geoheritage 9(1):121–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Graña A, Serrano L, González-Delgado JA, Dabrio CJ, Legoinha P (2017b) Sustainable geotourism using digital technologies along a rural georoute in Monsagro (Salamanca, Spain). International Journal of Digital Earth 10(2):121–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Graña AM, Bajo I, González-Delgado JA, Cárdenas-Carretero J, Abad M, Legoinha P (2018) Virtual 3D tour applied to the palaeontological heritage in Sevilla (Guadalquivir Neogene basin, Spain). Geoheritage 10(3):473–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Graña A, Goy JL, González-Delgado JA, Cruz R, Sanz J, Bustamante I (2019) 3D virtual itinerary in the geological heritage from natural parks in Salamanca-Ávila-Cáceres, Spain. Sustainability 11(1):144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page KN, Meléndez G, Gonera M (1999) Protected sites or protected heritage? – Systems and opinions for palaeontological conservation from a trans-European perspective D Barettino M Vallejo E Gallego Eds Towards the balanced management and conservation of the Geological Heritage in the new Millennium Sociedad Geologica de España Madrid 45 51

  • Pereira P, Pereira D (2010) Methodological guidelines for geomorphosite assessment. Geomorphologie: Relief Processus. Environnement 2:215–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Pralong JP, Reynard E (2005) A proposal for the classification of geomorphological sites depending on their tourist value. Quaternario 18(1):315–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E, Panizza M (2005). Geomorphosites: définition, évaluation et cartographie. Une introduction. In: Géomorphologie. Relief, processus, environnement 3: 177–180.

  • Ruban DA (2010) Quantification of geodiversity and its loss. Proc Geol Assoc 121:326–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos I, Henriques R, Mariano G, Pereira DI (2018) Methodologies to represent and promote the geoheritage using unmanned aerial vehicles, multimedia technologies and Augmented Reality. Geoheritage 10:143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano E, Ruiz-Flaño P (2007) Geodiversity: a theoretical and applied concept. Geographica Helvetica 62:140–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simón-Porcar G, Martínez-Graña A, Simón JL, González-Delgado JA, Legoinha P (2020) Ordovician ichnofossils and popular architecture in Monsagro (Salamanca, Spain): ethnopaleontology in the service of rural development. Geoheritage 12:76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwoliński Z, Najwer A, Giardino M (2018) Methods for assessing geodiversity. In: Reynard, E., Brilha, J. (Eds.), Geoheritage: assessment, protection, and management. Elsevier, pp. 27–52.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the project SA044G18 of the Regional Government of Castile and León and the GEAPAGE research group (Environmental Geomorphology and Geological Heritage) of the University of Salamanca.

Funding

Project SA044G18 provided by the Regional Government of Castile and León and the GEOPAGE research group financed by the University of Salamanca.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Martínez-Graña.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (RAR 235 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cruz, R., Martínez-Graña, A., Goy, J.L. et al. Analysis of the Geological Heritage and Geodiversity Index of Two Mountainous Areas in Spain: Béjar and El Barco Massifs. Geoheritage 13, 62 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-021-00587-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-021-00587-3

Keywords

Navigation