Skip to main content
Log in

The Principle of a Closed Feedback Loop of Human Endogenous Rhythms in Modern Neurofeedback and Adaptive Neurostimulation Technologies

  • COMPLEX SYSTEMS BIOPHYSICS
  • Published:
Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was aimed at analyzing features of the closed feedback loop principle for human endogenous rhythms in two perspective technologies of neurointerfaces, which are neurofeedback and adaptive neurostimulation. Based on our experimental data, the main advantages of the adaptive neurostimulation approach have been validated, namely, automatic closing of the feedback loop of human endogenous rhythms and involvement of the processes of perception and processing interoceptive signals in the mechanisms of brain activity that contribute to normalization of the functional state during stimulation procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. N. R. Provenza, E. R. Matteson, A. B. Allawala, et al., Front Neurosci. 13, 152 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Sitaram, T. Ros, L. Stoeckel, et al., Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 18 (2), 86 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. F. Riganello, V. Prada, A. Soddu, et al., Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16 (13), 2336 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Haegens and E. Z. Golumbic, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 86, 150 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. V. C. Goessl, J. E. Curtiss, and S. G. Hofmann, Psychol. Med. 47 (15), 2578 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. V. Deschodt-Arsac, R. Lalanne, B. Spiluttini, et al., PLoS One 13 (7), e0201388 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. P. Lehrer, K. Kaur, A. Sharma, et al., Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback, 45 109 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-020-09466-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. O. Jafarova, K. Mazhirina, E. Sokhadze, and M. Shtark, Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 45 (2), 87 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Zaccaro, A. Piarulli, M. Laurino, et al., Front. Hum. Neurosci. 12, 353 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Blum, C. Rockstroh, and F. S. Goritz, Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 45, 153 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-020-09468-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. I. V. Nuidel’, A. V. Kolosov, V. A. Demareva, and V. G. Yakhno, Sovrem. Tekhnol. Med. 11 (1), 103 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. E. Dessy, O. Mairesse, M. van Puyvelde, et al., Front. Hum. Neurosci. 14, 22 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. D. Valeriani, C. Cinel, and R. Poli, Brain Sci. 9 (2), 22 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. A. I. Fedotchev, Biofizika 41 (3), 718 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  15. T. Oxley and N. Opie, World Neurosurg. 122, 415 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. X. Zhou and J. P. Miller, Neurosurgery 85 (3), E440 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. M. C. Lo and A. S. Widge, Int. Rev. Psychiatry 29 (2), 191 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. B. Yu, M. Funk, J. Hu, and L. Feijs, Behav. Inform. Technol. 37, 800 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1484515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. C. L. Tegeler, H. A. Shaltout, S. W. Lee, et al., Glob. Adv. Health Med. 9, 2164956120923288 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. S. Cheung, E. Han, A. Kushki, et al., Front. Neurosci. 10, 401 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. T.A.Deuel, J.Pampin, J.Sundstrom, and F.Darvas, Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11, 213 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. S. K. Ehrlich, K. R. Agres, C. Guan, and G. Cheng, PLoS One 14 (3), e0213516 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. A. I. Fedotchev, V. M. Kruk, S. J. Oh, and G. I. Semikin, Int. J. Industr. Ergonomics 68, 256 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. A. I. Fedotchev, Biophysics (Moscow) 64 (2), 268 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. A. I. Fedotchev, S. B. Parin, K. N. Gromov, et al., Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat. 69 (2), 187 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. I. Fedotchev, S. B. Parin, and S. A. Polevaya, Vestn. RFFI. Obshchestv. Gumanit. Nauki, No. 1, 144 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  27. L. Quadt, H. D. Critchley, and S. N. Garfinkel, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1428 (1), 112 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. O. R. Dobrushina, L. A. Dobrynina, G. A. Arina, et al., Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat. 70 (2), 206 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  29. S. S. Khalsa, R. Adolphs, O. G. Cameron, et al., Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimag. 3 (6), 501 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work was supported by Russian Foundation for Basic Research, grant nos. 18-013-01225 and 19-013-00095.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. I. Fedotchev.

Ethics declarations

COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS

The paper does not describe studies involving human or animal subjects.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Translated by A. Deryabina

Abbreviations: EEG, electroencephalogram.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fedotchev, A.I., Parin, S.B. & Polevaya, S.A. The Principle of a Closed Feedback Loop of Human Endogenous Rhythms in Modern Neurofeedback and Adaptive Neurostimulation Technologies. BIOPHYSICS 66, 349–351 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006350921020056

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006350921020056

Keywords:

Navigation