Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Discrete Event Simulation and Data-Based Framework for Equipment Performance Evaluation in Underground Coal Mining

  • Published:
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coal is still a part of energy generation worldwide and has a significant role in the sustainable development of countries. The amount of shallow coal deposits is getting scarce, making efficient underground mining operations crucial for both local and global economies. In underground mining operations, longwall mining is a commonly utilized method to extract deep coal deposits. One of the leading engineering goals in longwall mining is increasing the efficiency of the system by investigating the effects of operational factors on equipment. This paper investigates the shearer performance for a longwall top coal caving operation by discrete event simulation that includes modeling the double-drum shearer, belt conveyors, stage loader, and armored face conveyors (AFC) to evaluate system performance by considering the amount of daily coal production of the shearer. As a result, the most influential factor on mine production is determined and a data-based framework is developed. This study suggests a framework for data collection, data analysis, and the interpretation of the operational data to evaluate the primary production unit’s performance. The models developed for the face coal extraction operations in a longwall top coal caving (LTCC) mine have a bi-directional cutting system and can be implemented in other operations readily.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Energy Council (2016) World Energy Resources. https://www.worldenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/World-Energy-Resources-Full-report-2016.10.03.pdf. Accessed 30 August 2020

  2. Ghosh N, Agrawal H, Singh SK, Banerjee G (2020) Optimum chain pillar design at the deepest multi-seam longwall workings in India. Min Metall Explor 37:651–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-019-00138-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kahraman MM, Rogers WP, Dessureault S (2020) Bottleneck identification and ranking model for mine operations. Prod Plan Control 31:1178–1194. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1701231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pendharkar PC, Rodger JA (2000) Nonlinear programming and genetic search application for production scheduling in coal mines. Ann Oper Res 95:251–267. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018958209290

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Edwards DJ, Malekzadeh H, Yisa SB (2001) A linear programming decision tool for selecting the optimum excavator. Struct Surv 19:113–120. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumral M (2004) Genetic algorithms for optimization of a mine system under uncertainty. Prod Plan Control 15:34–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537280310001654844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Faradonbeh RS, Monjezi M, Armaghani DJ (2016) Genetic programing and non-linear multiple regression techniques to predict backbreak in blasting operation. Engineering with Computers 32:123–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-015-0404-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yong W, Zhou J, Armaghani DJ, Tahir MM, Tarinejad R, Pham BT, Van Huynh V (2020)A new hybrid simulated annealing-based genetic programming technique to predict the ultimate bearing capacity of piles. Engineering with Computers.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00932-9

  9. Wang H, Tenorio V, Li G, Hou J, Hu N (2020) Optimization of trackless equipment scheduling in underground mines using genetic algorithms. Min Metall Explor 37:1531–1544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-020-00285-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Asad MWA (2011) A heuristic approach to long-range production planning of cement quarry operations. Prod Plan Control 22:353–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2010.484819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Koushavand B, Askari-Nasab H, Deutsch CV (2014) A linear programming model for long-term mine planning in the presence of grade uncertainty and a stockpile. Int J Min Sci Technol 24:451–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2014.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ben-Awuah E, Richter O, Elkington T, Pourrahimian Y (2016) Strategic mining options optimization: open pit mining, underground mining or both. Int J Min Sci Technol 26:1065–1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2016.09.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhen L, Wang B, Li M, Wang W, Huang L (2019) Inspection routing problem for coal mine safety personnel in underground mines. Comput Ind Eng 130:526–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Banks J, Carson JS, Nelson BL, Nicol DM (2010) Discrete-event system simulation, 5th edn. Pearson Education-Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

  15. Salama A, Greberg J, Schunnesson H (2014) The use of discrete event simulation for underground haulage mining equipment selection. Int J Min Miner Eng 5:256–271. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMME.2014.064486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sturgul JR (2015) Discrete simulation and animation for mining engineers. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Dindarloo SR, Osanloo M, Frimpong S (2015) A stochastic simulation framework for truck and shovel selection and sizing in open pit mines. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 115:209–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Meng C, Nageshwaraniyer SS, Maghsoudi A, Son YJ, Dessureault S (2013) Data-driven modeling and simulation framework for material handling systems in coal mines. Comput Ind Eng 64:766–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2012.12.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Soofastaei A, Aminossadati SM, Kizil MS, Knights P (2016) A discrete-event model to simulate the effect of truck bunching due to payload variance on cycle time, hauled mine materials and fuel consumption. Int J Min Sci Technol 26:745–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2016.05.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Upadhyay SP, Askari-Nasab H (2018) Simulation and optimization approach for uncertainty-based short-term planning in open pit mines. Int J Min Sci Technol 28:153–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2017.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Que S, Awuah-Offei K, Frimpong S (2016) Optimising design parameters of continuous mining transport systems using discrete event simulation. Int J Min Reclam Environ 30:217–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480930.2015.1037056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ozdemir B, Kumral M (2018) Appraising production targets through agent-based Petri net simulation of material handling systems in open pit mines. Simul Model Pract Theory 87:138–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2018.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Salama A, Nehring M, Greberg J (2015) Evaluation of the impact of commodity price change on mine plan of underground mining. Int J Min Sci Technol 25:375–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2015.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Greberg J, Salama A, Gustafson A, Skawina B (2016) Alternative process flow for underground mining operations: analysis of conceptual transport methods using discrete event simulation. Minerals 6:65. https://doi.org/10.3390/min6030065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ozdemir B, Kumral M (2019) Simulation-based optimization of truck-shovel material handling systems in multi-pit surface mines. Simul Model Pract Theory 95:36–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2019.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bernardi L, Kumral M, Renaud M (2020) Comparison of fixed and mobile in-pit crushing and conveying and truck-shovel systems used in mineral industries through discrete-event simulation. Simul Model Pract Theory 103:102100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2020.102100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hong SY, Bal A, Badurdeen F, Agioutantis Z, Hicks S (2020) Evaluation of bunker size for continuous/discrete flow systems by applying discrete event simulation: a case study in mining. Simul Model Pract Theory 105:102155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2020.102155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tarshizi EK (2014) Multiple discrete-event simulation and animation models to assist modern mining operations. Doctoral Thesis in Geoengineering, University of Nevada

  29. Hustrulid WA, Bullock RL (2001) Underground mining methods: engineering fundamentals and international case studies. SME, Littleton

  30. Mozafari N, Tikhomirov D, Sumer Ö, Özkaymak Ç, Uzel B, Yeşilyurt S, Ivy-Ochs S, Vockenhuber C, Sözbilir H, Akçar N (2019) Dating of active normal fault scarps in the Büyük Menderes Graben (western Anatolia) and its implications for seismic history. Quatern Sci Rev 220:111–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Darling P (2011) SME mining engineering handbook, 3rd edn. SME, Littleton

  32. Lolon SA, Brune JF, Bogin GE Jr, Juganda A (2020) Study of methane outgassing and mitigation in longwall coal mines. Min Metall Explor 37:1437–1449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-020-00287-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wu F, Luo Y (2020) An innovative finite tube method for coupling of mine ventilation network and gob flow field: Methodology and application in risk analysis. Min Metall Explor 37:1517–1530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-020-00255-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yadav A, Behera B, Sahoo SK, Singh GSP, Sharma SK (2020) An approach for numerical modeling of gob compaction process in longwall mining. Min Metall Explor 37:631–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-020-00182-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gangrade V, Schatzel SJ, Harteis SP, Addis JD (2019) Investigating the impact of caving on longwall mine ventilation using scaled physical modeling. Min Metall Explor 36:729–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-019-0065-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang J, Yu B, Kang H, Wang G, Mao D, Liang Y, Jiang P (2015) Key technologies and equipment for a fully mechanized top-coal caving operation with a large mining height at ultra-thick coal seams. Int J Coal Sci Technol 2:97–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-015-0071-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lan Y, Gao R, Yu B, Meng X (2018) In situ studies on the characteristics of strata structures and behaviors in mining of a thick coal seam with hard roofs. Energies 11:2470. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11092470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang N, Liu C, Wu X, Ren T (2018) Dynamic random arching in the flow field of top-coal caving mining. Energies 11:1106. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11051106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Öge İF (2018) Prediction of top coal cavability character of a deep coal mine by empirical and numerical methods. J Min Sci 54:793–803. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062739118054903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Xie P, Luo Y, Wu Y, Gao X, Luo S, Zeng Y (2020) Roof deformation associated with mining of two panels in steeply dipping coal seam using subsurface subsidence prediction model and physical simulation experiment. Min Metall Explor 37:581–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-019-00156-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Bai Q, Tu S, Wang F (2019) Characterizing the top coal cavability with hard stone band(s): insights from laboratory physical modelling. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52:1505–1521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-018-1578-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Le TD, Mitra R, Oh J, Hebblewhite B (2017) A review of cavability evaluation in longwall top coal caving. Int J Min Sci Technol 27:907–915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2017.06.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Yang S, Wei W, Zhang J (2020) Top coal movement law of dynamic group caving method in LTCC with an inclined seam. Min Metall Explor 37:1545–1555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-020-00254-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Alehossein H, Poulsen BA (2010) Stress analysis of longwall top coal caving. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47:30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Vakili A, Hebblewhite BK (2010) A new cavability assessment criterion for longwall top coal caving. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47:1317–1329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.08.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Xie J, Gao M, Zhang R, Li S, Tan Q, Qiu Z (2016) Lessons learnt from measurements of vertical pressure at a top coal mining face at Datong Tashan Mines, China. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:2977–2983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-015-0856-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Yu B, Zhao J, Xiao H (2017) Case study on overburden fracturing during longwall top coal caving using microseismic monitoring. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50:507–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-016-1096-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Xie YS, Zhao YS (2009) Numerical simulation of the top coal caving process using the discrete element method. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46:983–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Reid DC, Hainsworth DW, Ralston JC, McPhee RJ, Hargrave CO (2003) Inertial navigation: enabling technology for longwall mining automation. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of Computer Applications in the Mineral Industries, Calgary, Canada

  50. Rossetti MD (2015) Simulation modelling and arena, 2nd edn. Wiley, New Jersey

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Arena® Simulation Software by Rockwell Automation. https://www.arenasimulation.com/. Accessed 08 May 2020

  52. Karayiğit Aİ, Littke R, Querol X, Jones T, Oskay RG, Christanis K (2017) The Miocene coal seams in the Soma Basin (W. Turkey): insights from coal petrography, mineralogy and geochemistry. Int J Coal Geol 173:110–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2017.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Nebert K (1978) Linyit iceren Soma Neojen bölgesi, Bati Anadolu. Miner Res Explor Inst Turkey (MTA) Bull 90:20–69

    Google Scholar 

  54. Öge İF (2018) Determination of deformation modulus in a weak rock mass by using menard pressuremeter. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 112:238–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Öge İF, Çırak M (2019) Relating rock mass properties with Lugeon value using multiple regression and nonlinear tools in an underground mine site. Bull Eng Geol Env 78:1113–1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1179-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mining Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Universiteler Mah, Dumlupinar Blv. No: 1, 06800, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey

    Enver Yilmaz & Mustafa Erkayaoglu

Authors
  1. Enver Yilmaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mustafa Erkayaoglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enver Yilmaz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yilmaz, E., Erkayaoglu, M. A Discrete Event Simulation and Data-Based Framework for Equipment Performance Evaluation in Underground Coal Mining. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 38, 1877–1891 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-021-00455-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-021-00455-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation