Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Physical Effects in the Atmosphere and Geospace due to Ground-Based Events as Exemplified by the Explosion in the City of Beirut on August 4, 2020. Theoretical Modeling Results

  • DYNAMICS AND PHYSICS OF BODIES OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM
  • Published:
Kinematics and Physics of Celestial Bodies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study of direct and reverse, positive and negative interconnections among the subsystems in the Earth (internal spheres)–atmosphere–ionosphere–magnetosphere (EAIM) system is commonly based on high-power active experiments. One of the possible experiments is an impact of large chemical explosions in EAIM system. Examples include active experiments utilizing 5 kt TNT, 1.5 kt TNT, and 2 kt TNT yield explosions. A powerful chemical explosion has been shown earlier to affect all geospheres, viz., it generates seismic waves in the lithosphere, disturbances in the electric field, electromagnetic emissions, acoustic and atmospheric gravity waves (AGWs), traveling ionospheric disturbances, and MHD waves in the near-Earth plasma. The physical effects and ecological consequences of multiple chemical explosions and accompanying fires have also been studied earlier. The main conclusion that has been drawn in these studies is that a response to such an impact can appear in all EAIM system subsystems. This paper aims to describe the principle physical effects in the atmosphere and geospace accompanying the powerful explosion in the city of Beirut on August 4, 2020. A comprehensive analysis of the main physical processes accompanying the explosion has been performed to determine the following. The Beirut explosion yield is estimated to be approximately 1 kt TNT. More than 90% of the explosion energy was transformed into the energy of the shock, while the remaining caused damage leaving a crater roughly of 40 × 103 m3, and a 80 kt mass of the ground was ejected. The damage size and surface area have been estimated. The thermic was estimated to have ∼100 m horizontal size, ∼46 m/s speed of its ascending, and a 1.6 min time of the ascent up to the maximum altitude of approximately 4 km. At a distance of 250 km, near Cyprus, the intensity of sound was estimated to be no less than 76 dB. The shock wave traveling upwards caused significant disturbance in the atmosphere and geospace. The increase in the pressure caused by the wave is estimated to be dozens of percent in a 86–90 km altitude range. Shock wave dissipation in the 80–90 km altitude range could cause atmospheric heating by 10–20% and the generation of AGWs with δp ∼ 0.1 propagating to distances of thousands of kilometers from the epicenter. The secondary waves, on account of the dynamo effect, could generate periodic variations in the geomagnetic field with an amplitude of 0.1–0.3 nT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. V. V. Adushkin and K. I. Gorelyi, “Doppler sounding of the ionosphere above Yugoslavia during military operations in Kosovo,” Dokl. Earth Sci. (Engl. Transl.). 373, 882–884 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. V. Adushkin and S. P. Solov’ev, “Perturbations of atmospheric electric field in the near zone of an underground explosion,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Fiz. Zemli, No. 3, 51–59 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. V. Adushkin, S. P. Solov’ev, and V. V. Surkov, “Electric field arising during ejection explosion,” Combust., Explos. Shock Waves 26, 478–482 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00745095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. V. V. Adushkin, A. A. Spivak, S. P. Solov’ev, L. M. Pernik, and S. B. Kishkina, “Geoecological consequences of mass chemical explosions on careers,” Geoekol. Inzh. Geol. Gidrogeol. Geokriol., No. 6, 554–563 (2000).

  5. K. Aki and P. G. Richards, Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods (W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1980; Mir, Moscow, 1983).

  6. L. S. Al’perovich, M. B. Gokhberg, V. I. Drobzhev, V. A. Troitskaya, and G. V. Fedorovich, “MASSA — A project for studying the magnetosphere–atmosphere coupling during seismoacoustic phenomena,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Fiz. Zemli, No. 11, 5–8 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. S. Al’perovich, E. A. Ponomarev, and G. V. Fedorovich, “Geophysical phenomena modeling by an explosion: A review,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Fiz. Zemli, No. 11, 9–20 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Atmosphere: Handbook (Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 1991) [in Russian].

  9. R. R. Akhmedov and V. E. Kunitsyn, “Simulation of the ionospheric disturbances caused by earthquakes and explosions,” Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.) 44, 95–101 (2004).

  10. N. D. Borisov and B. S. Moiseev, “Generation of MHD disturbances in the ionosphere by a Rayleigh wave,” Geomagn. Aeron. 29, 614–620 (1989).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. P. Boronin, V. N. Kapinos, S. A. Krenev, and V. N. Mineev, “Physical mechanism of electromagnetic field generation during the explosion of condensed explosive charges. Survey of literature,” Combust., Explos. Shock Waves 26, 597–602 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00843137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. P. Boronin, V. N. Kapinos, S. A. Krenev, and V. N. Mineev, “Physical mechanism of electromagnetic field generation with explosion of condensed explosive charges. Results of experimental studies,” Combust., Explos. Shock Waves 26, 603–609 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00843138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. B. Gokhberg and S. L. Shalimov, Influence of Earthquakes and Explosions on the Ionosphere (Nauka, Moscow, 2008) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. V. Danilov and V. A. Dovzhenko, “Excitation of electromagnetic fields by acoustic pulses entering the ionosphere,” Geomagn. Aeron. 27, 772–777 (1987).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. I. A. Devyaterikov, E. A. Ivanov, S. I. Kozlov, and V. P. Kudryavtsev, “Behavior of charged particles in lower ionosphere with acoustical effects,” Kosm. Issled. 22, 238–242 (1984).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ya. I. Drobzheva and V. M. Krasnov, “The spatial structure of the acoustic wave field generated in the atmosphere by a point explosion,” Acoust. Phys. 47, 556–564 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1403545

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Fiz. Zemli, Spets. Vyp., No. 11 (1985).

  18. I. O. Kitov, Seismic and Acoustic Effects of Explosions in the Geophysical Environment, Doctoral Dissertation in Mathematics and Physics (Institute of Geosphere Dynamics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 1995).

  19. A. V. Nikolaev and A. D. Zhigalin, “Geoenvironmental aspects of military operations,” Geoekol. Inzh. Geol. Gidrogeol. Geokriol., No. 1, 23–31 (2003).

  20. A. T. Onufriev, “Theory of the motion of a vortex ring under gravity. Rise of the cloud from a nuclear explosion,” J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 8, 1–7 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00918021

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. S. V. Polyakov, V. O. Rapoport, and V. Yu. Trakhtengerts, “Generation of electric waves in the upper atmosphere,” Geomagn. Aeron. 30, 869–871 (1990).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. V. N. Rodionov, V. V. Adushkin, V. N. Kostyuchenko, V. N. Nikolaevskii, A. N. Romashov, and V. M. Tsvetkov, The Mechanical Effect of an Underground Explosion (Nedra, Moscow, 1971) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  23. O. A. Pokhotelov, V. A. Liperovskii, Yu. P. Fomichev, L. N. Rubtsov, O. A. Alimov, Z. S. Sharadze, and R. Kh. Liperovskaya, “Modification of the ionosphere during military actions in the Persian Gulf region,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 321, 1168–1172 (1991).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. M. A. Sadovskii, “Mechanical action of air blast waves according from experimental data,” Fiz. Vzryva, No. 1, 20–110 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  25. S. P. Solov’ev and V. V. Surkov, “Electric perturbations in the atmospheric surface layer caused by an aerial shock wave,” Combust., Explos. Shock Waves. 30, 117–121 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00787894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. S. P. Solov’ev and V. V. Surkov, “Electrostatic field and lightning generated in the gaseous dust cloud of explosive products,” Geomagn. Aeron. 40, 68–76 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  27. F. D. Stacey and P. M. Davis, Physics of the Earth (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2008; Mir, Moscow, 1972).

  28. V. I. Taran, Yu. I. Pod”yachii, A. N. Smirnov, and L. Ya. Gershtein, “Disturbances of the ionosphere after a ground level burst on supervision by a method of incoherent scatter,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Fiz. Zemli, No. 11, 75–79 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ya. I. Tseitlin and N. I. Smolii, Seismic and Shock Waves in Air Induced by Industrial Explosions (Nedra, Moscow, 1981) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  30. L. F. Chernogor, “Physical processes in the near-Earth environment associated with March–April 2003 Iraq War,” Kosm. Nauka Tekhnol. 9 (2–3), 13–33 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. L. F. Chernogor, “The ammunition explosions on military bases as a source of ecological catastrophe in Ukraine,” Ekol. Resur., No. 10, 55–67 (2004).

  32. L. F. Chernogor, “Geophysical effects and geoecological consequences of mass chemical explosions in military warehouses in the city of Artemovsk,” Geofiz. Zh. 26 (4), 31–44 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  33. L. F. Chernogor, “Geophysical effects and ecological consequences of the fire at the military base near Melitopol city,” Geofiz. Zh. 26 (6), 61–73 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  34. L. F. Chernogor, “Ecological consequences of mass chemical explosions in anthropogenic catastrophe,” Geoekol. Inzh. Geol. Gidrogeol. Geokriol., No. 6, 522–535 (2006).

  35. L. F. Chernogor, “Geoecological consequences of the explosion of an ammunition depot,” Geoekol. Inzh. Geol. Gidrogeol. Geokriol., No. 4, 359–369 (2008).

  36. L. F. Chernogor, Physics and Ecology of Disasters (Khark. Nats. Univ. im. V. N. Karazina, Kharkiv, 2012) [in Russian].

  37. L. F. Chernogor and K. P. Garmash, “Magnetospheric and ionospheric effects accompanying the strongest technogenic catastrophe,” Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.) 58, 673–685 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793218050031.

  38. N. I. Shishkin, “Seismic efficiency of a contact explosion and a high-velocity impact,” J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 48, 145–152 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10808-007-0019-6

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. E. Blanc and A. R. Jacobson, “Observation of ionospheric disturbances following a 5-kt chemical explosion. 2. Prolongated anomalies and stratifications in the lower thermosphere after shock passage,” Radio Sci. 24, 739–746 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1029/RS024i006p00739

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. E. Blanc and D. Rickel, “Nonlinear wave fronts and ionospheric irregularities observed by HF sounding over a powerful acoustic source,” Radio Sci. 24, 279–288 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1029/RS024i003p00279

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. E. Calais, B. J. Minster, M. A. Hofton, and M. A. H. Hedlin, “Ionospheric signature of surface mine blasts from Global Positioning System measurements,” Geophys. J. Int. 132, 191–202 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. T. J. Fitzgerald, “Observations of total electron content perturbations on GPS signals caused by a ground level explosion,” J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 59, 829–834 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. S. Glasstone and P. J. Dolan, Effects of Nuclear Weapons (Department of Defense, Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 1977).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  44. A. R. Jacobson, R. C. Carlos, and E. Blanc, “Observation of ionospheric disturbances following a 5-kt chemical explosion. 1. Persistent oscillation in the lower thermosphere after shock passage,” Radio Sci. 23, 820–830 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1029/RS023i005p00820

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The studies were carried out within the framework of the project of the National Research Foundation of Ukraine (no. 2020.02/0015, Theoretical and Experimental Studies of Global Explosions of Natural and Artificial Origin in the Earth-Atmosphere-Ionosphere System).

The work was also supported in part by the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (state registration no. 0119U002538).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 61022, Kharkiv, Ukraine

    L. F. Chernogor

Authors
  1. L. F. Chernogor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. F. Chernogor.

Additional information

Translated by G. Dedkov

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chernogor, L.F. Physical Effects in the Atmosphere and Geospace due to Ground-Based Events as Exemplified by the Explosion in the City of Beirut on August 4, 2020. Theoretical Modeling Results. Kinemat. Phys. Celest. Bodies 37, 121–134 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0884591321030028

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0884591321030028

Keywords:

Search

Navigation