Abstract
Existing buildings constitute a large portion of the UK’s housing stock. Refurbishment of existing buildings can, therefore, have an important role in achieving the UK government’s CO2 reduction targets. While building regulations and rating frameworks mainly focus on the improvements of the operational performance of buildings, Life Cycle Analysis is considered to be a more appropriate framework to account for long–term CO2 savings. This study evaluates a range of retrofit approaches (simple, medium, and deep), in terms of Life Cycle Carbon Footprint applied on a terraced house—one of the most common housing archetypes in London. The initial state of the original building has also been examined assuming three initial states (never refurbished, refurbished in compliance with the 1976 and with the 2000 building regulations). Results showed that for all initial state scenarios, deep retrofit achieved the lowest life cycle carbon emissions, in absolute figures, compared to the simple and medium retrofits. Simple retrofit packages, on the other hand, achieved quick and significant improvements, especially in buildings with poor initial thermal conditions. The study also indicated that retrofit packages applied on highly efficient building fabrics result in longer carbon payback time periods. The study recommends establishing a ‘staggered’ retrofitting approach, which pushes for ‘older building first’ and ‘simple retrofit packages first’, as these gain quick CO2 savings. Deep retrofit packages and treatment of relatively new buildings should be implemented at a later stage, to push buildings further to Zero–Carbon target.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J., Shiers, D., & Steele, K. (2009). The green guide to specification: An environmental profiling system for building materials and component (4th ed.). HIS BRE Press.
Ashworth, A. (1996). Estimating the life expectancies of building components in life–cycle costing calculations. Journal Structural Survey, 14(2), 6. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630809610122730
Banihashemi, S., Golizadeh, H., Reza, H., & Shakouri, M. (2015). Climatic, parametric and non–parametric analysis of energy performance of double–glazed windows in different climates. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 4(2), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2015.09.002
Blengini, G. A. (2009). Life cycle of buildings, demolition and recycling potential: A case study in Turin, Italy. Building and Environment, 44(2), 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.03.007
BRE (2014). SAP 2012: The Government’s Standard Assessment Procedure for Energy Rating of Dwellings. Retrieved February 13, 2021, from https://www.bre.co.uk/filelibrary/SAP/2012/SAP–2012_9–92.pdf
BRE (2018). Methodology for LCA of Building using EN 15978:2011. Retrieved May 03, 2021, from https://www.greenbooklive.com/filelibrary/EN_15804/PN326–BRE–EN–15978–Methodology.pdf
British Standards Institution (2011). BS EN 15978:2011 Sustainability of construction works – Assessment of environmental performance of buildings – Calculation method. British Standards Institution Group.
Bull, J., Gupta, A., Mumovic, D., & Kimpian, J. (2014). Life cycle cost and carbon footprint of energy efficient refurbishments to 20th century UK school buildings. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 3(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2014.07.002
Capeluto, G. (2019). Adaptability in envelope energy retrofits through addition of intelligence features. Architectural Science Review, 62(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2019.1574707
CIBSE Weather Files for UK Building Regulations (2006). The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers, CIBSE
Chen, Z., Lippke, B. & Stevens, N. (2005). Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions related to the use, maintenance, and disposal of a residential structure. Journal of the Society of Wood Science and Technology, pp. 128–139. Retrieved February 13, 2021, from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.554.5572&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Cluett, R, & Amann. J. (2014). Residential deep energy retrofits. American council for an energy–efficient economy (ACEEE). Retrieved February 13, 2021, from https://c2e2.unepdtu.org/wp–content/uploads/sites/3/2016/03/a1401.pdf
Committee on Climate Change (CCC) (2018). Reducing UK emissions: 2018 Progress Report to Parliament. Retrieved February 13, 2021, from https://www.theccc.org.uk/wp–content/uploads/2018/06/CCC–2018–Progress–Report–to–Parliament.pdf.
Committee on Climate Change (CCC) (2019). Reducing UK emissions – 2019 progress report to parliament. Retrieved February 13, 2021, from https://www.theccc.org.uk/wp–content/uploads/2019/07/CCC–2019–Progress–in–reducing–UK–emissions.pdf
Cuéllar–Franca, R. M., & Azapagic, A. (2012). Environmental impacts of the UK residential sector: Life cycle assessment of houses. Building and Environment, 54(C), 86–99.
Dixit, M., Fernández–Solís, J., Lavy, S., & Culp, C. (2010). Identification of parameters for embodied energy measurement: A literature review. Energy & Buildings, 42(8), 1238–1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.02.016
Dodoo, A., Gustavsson, L., & Sathre, R. (2014). Lifecycle carbon implications of conventional and low–energy multi–storey timber building systems. Energy and Buildings, 82, 194–210.
Dowson, M., Poole, A., Harrison, D., & Susman, G. (2012). Domestic UK retrofit challenge: Barriers, incentives and current performance leading into the Green Deal. Energy Policy, 50(C), 294–305.
Duda, M., & Shaw, J. S. (1997). Life cycle assessment. Society, 35, 38–43.
European Commission (2017). Good practice in energy efficiency, for a sustainable, safer, and more competitive Europe. Retrieved February 13, 2021, from https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/good_practice_in_ee_–web.pdf
European Commission DG Environment (2002). Evaluation of environmental product declaration schemes. Retrieved February 13, 2021, from https://ec.europa.eu/environment/ipp/pdf/epdstudy.pdf
European Commission DG Energy (2018). Support for setting up a smart readiness indicator for buildings and related impact assessment – Final Report. Retrieved February 13, 2021, from https://smartreadinessindicator.eu/sites/smartreadinessindicator.eu/files/sri_1st_technical_study_–_final_report.pdf
Evrard, A., Trachte, S., Hermand, C., Bouillard, P. & De Herde, A. (2016). Sustainable retrofitting of dwellings in brussels capital region: Five Scenarios of evolution using a multi–scale multi–criteria and pre–assessment tool. In: PLEA 2016 Los Angeles – 32nd International Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture.
Finnegan, S., Jones, C., & Sharples, S. (2018). The embodied CO2e of sustainable energy technologies used in buildings: A review article. Energy & Buildings, 181, 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.09.037
Gustavsson, L., Joelsson, A., & Sathre, R. (2010). Life cycle primary energy use and carbon emission of an eight–storey wood–framed apartment building. Energy and Buildings, 42(2), 230–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.08.018
Gustafsson, M., Gustafsson, M. S., Myhren, J., Bales, C., & Holmberg, S. (2016). Techno–economic analysis of energy renovation measures for a district heated multifamily house. Applied Energy, 177(1), 108–116.
Hall, M., Casey, S., Loveday, D., & Gillott, M. (2013). Analysis of UK domestic building retrofit scenarios based on the E.ON Retrofit Research House using energetic hygrothermics simulation – Energy efficiency, indoor air quality, occupant comfort, and mould growth potential. Building and Environment, 70, 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.08.015
Hammond, G., & Jones, C. (2008). Embodied energy and carbon in construction materials. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Energy, 161(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1680/ener.2008.161.2.87
Hammond, G. & Jones, C. (2011). Bath ICE – Inventrory of Carbon & Energy V2.0, Sustainable Energy Research Team (SERT) Department of Mechanical Engineering. Bath.
Harvey, L.D.D. (2006). A Handbook on Low–Energy Buildings and District–Energy Systems: Fundamentals, Techniques and Examples, London: Routledge, pp.543–560, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849770293
Huang, Y., Niu, J., & Chung, T. (2011). Energy and carbon emission payback analysis for energy–efficient retrofitting in buildings—Overhang shading option. Energy & Buildings, 44(1), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.10.027
Ibn–Mohammed, T., Greenough, R., Taylor, S., Ozawa–Meida, L., & Acquaye, A. (2013). Operational vs. embodied emissions in buildings—A review of current trends. Energy & Buildings, 66, 232–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.07.026
Iddon, C., & Firth, S. (2013). Embodied and operational energy for new–build housing: A case study of construction methods in the UK. Energy & Buildings, 67, 479–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.08.041
InterNACHI (2017). Estimated Life Expectancy Chart. Retrieved February 13, 2021, from https://trademarkhomeinspection.com/wp–content/uploads/2017/04/Life–Expectancy–Chart.pdf
Jermyn, D., & Richman, R. (2016). A process for developing deep energy retrofit strategies for single–family housing typologies: Three Toronto case studies. Energy & Buildings, 116, 522–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.01.022
Jones, P., Lannon, S., & Patterson, J. (2013). Retrofitting existing housing: How far, how much? Building Research & Information, 41(5), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2013.807064
Koubogiannis, D. & Nouhou, C. (2016). How much Energy is Embodied in your Central Heating Boiler? IOP Conference Series: Materials science and engineering, 161(1). Retrieved February 13, 2021, from https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757–899X/161/1/012094/pdf
Kutnar, A., & Sinha, A. (2012). Carbon footprint versus performance of aluminum, plastic, and wood window frames from cradle to gate. Buildings, 2(4), 542–553. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings2040542
Leinartas, H. A., & Stephens, B. (2015). Optimizing whole house deep energy retrofit packages: A case study of existing Chicago–area homes. Buildings, 5(2), 323–353. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings5020323
Less, B., Fisher, J. & Walker, I. (2012). Deep Energy Retrofits: Eleven California Case Studies; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory: Berkeley, CA, USA. Retrieved February 13, 2021, from https://eta–publications.lbl.gov/sites/default/files/lbnl–6166e.pdf
Lowe, R., Chiu, L.F., Raslan, R.M. & Altamirano, H. (2012). Retrofit insights: Perspectives from an emerging industry report. Institute for Sustainability UCL.
Lstiburek, J. (2007). A bridge too far. ASHRAE Journal, 49(10).
Moncaster, A., & Symons, K. (2013). A method and tool for ‘cradle to grave’ embodied carbon and energy impacts of UK buildings in compliance with the new TC350 standards. Energy & Buildings, 66(C), 514–523.
Moran, F., Natarajan, S., & Nikolopoulou, M. (2012). Developing a database of energy use for historic dwellings in Bath, UK. Energy & Buildings, 55, 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.12.043
Murray, P., Niffeler, M., Mavromatidis, G. & Orehounig, K. (2019). Optimal retrofitting measures for residential buildings at large scale: A multi–objective approach. Proceedings of Building Simulation 2019: 16th Conference of IBPSA, pp.3742–3748, https://doi.org/10.26868/25222708.2019.211233
Oikonomou, E., Davies, M., Mavrogianni, A., Biddulph, P., Wilkinson, P., & Kolokotroni, M. (2012). Modelling the relative importance of the urban heat island and the thermal quality of dwellings for overheating in London. Building and Environment, 57, 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.04.002
Pelsmakers, S. (2015). The environmental design pocketbook (2nd ed.). RIBA Publishing.
Power, A. (2008). Does demolition or refurbishment of old and inefficient homes help to increase our environmental, social, and economic viability? Energy Policy, 36(12), 4487–4501.
Prestia, E. (2010). Low–energy refurbishments: process from design to construction, Environmental Design and Engineering, Built Environment, Thesis (MSc.). UCL (University College London).
Ramesh, T., Prakash, R., & Shukla, K. (2010). Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview. Energy and Buildings, 42(10), 1592–1600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.05.007
Rodrigues, C., & Freire, F. (2017). Building retrofit addressing occupancy: An integrated cost and environmental life–cycle analysis. Energy & Buildings, 140, 388–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.01.084
Rossi, B. F., Marique, A. F., & Reiter, S. (2012). Life–cycle assessment of residential buildings in three different European locations, case study. Building and Environment, 51, 402–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.11.002
Sartori, I., & Hestnes, A. (2007). Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low–energy buildings: A review article. Energy & Buildings, 39(3), 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.07.001
Schwartz, Y. (2018). An Integrated Thermal Simulation & Generative Design Decision Support Framework for the Refurbishment or Replacement of Buildings: A Life Cycle Performance Optimisation Approach. Thesis (PhD). UCL (University College London).
Schwartz, Y., Raslan, R., & Mumovic, D. (2018). The life cycle carbon footprint of refurbished and new buildings – A systematic review of case studies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81(1), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.061
Semprini, G., Gulli, R., & Ferrante, A. (2017). Deep regeneration vs shallow renovation to achieve nearly Zero Energy in existing buildings: Energy saving and economic impact of design solutions in the housing stock of Bologna. Energy & Buildings, 156, 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.09.044
Shorrock, L.D., Henderson, J., & Utley, J. I. (2005). Reducing carbon emissions from the UK housing stock. Housing Centre BRE Environment, BRE Report BR480. Retrieved February 13, 2021, from http://projects.bre.co.uk/pdf_files/br480reducingcarbonemissionsfromukhousing.pdf
Soares, N., Bastos, J., Pereira, L., Soares, A., Amaral, A., Asadi, E., Rodrigues, E., Lamas, F., Monteiro, H., Lopes, M., & Gaspar, A. (2017). A review on current advances in the energy and environmental performance of buildings towards a more sustainable built environment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 77, 845–860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.027
Spanos, I., Duckers, L., & Holmes, K. (2007). Application of ‘C.A.R.B. financial methodology’ analysis for alternative energy technologies into UK housing. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11(7), 1571–1583.
Stephan, A., Crawford, R., & De Myttenaere, K. (2012). Towards a comprehensive life cycle energy analysis framework for residential buildings. Energy & Buildings, 55(1), 592–600.
Sustainable Development Commission (2007). Building houses or creating communities? Retrieved February 13, 2021, from http://www.sd–commission.org.uk/data/files/publications/SDC_SCP_report_2007.pdf
Tae, S., Shin, S., Kim, H., Ha, S., Lee, J., Han, S., & Rhee, J. (2011). Life cycle environmental loads and economic efficiencies of apartment buildings built with plaster board drywall. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(8), 4145–4155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.06.009
Thormark, C. (2002). A low energy building in a life cycle—its embodied energy, energy need for operation and recycling potential. Building and Environment, 37(4), 429–435.
Tokede, O., Love, P., & Ahiaga–Dagbui, D. (2018). Life cycle option appraisal in retrofit buildings. Energy and Buildings, 178, 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.08.034
Uidhir, T., Rogan, F., Collins, M., Curtis, J., & Gallachóir, B. (2020). Improving energy savings from a residential retrofit policy: A new model to inform better retrofit decisions. Energy and Buildings, 209, 109656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109656
UK Statutory Instruments (1976). The Building Regulations 1976, vol. 1676.
UK Statutory Instruments (2000). The Building Regulations 2000.
UK Statutory Instruments, Building Regulations (2018). Approved Document L1B: conservation of fuel and power in existing dwellings, 2010 edition (incorporating 2010, 2011, 2013, 2016 and 2018 amendments).
UK Green Building Council (2019). Net Zero Carbon Buildings: A Framework Definition. Retrieved February 13, 2021, from https://www.ukgbc.org/wp–content/uploads/2019/04/Net–Zero–Carbon–Buildings–A–framework–definition.pdf
Valančius, K., Vilutienė, T., & Rogoža, A. (2018). Analysis of the payback of primary energy and CO2 emissions in relation to the increase of thermal resistance of a building. Energy & Buildings, 179, 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.08.037
Victoria, M., & Perera, S. (2018). Managing embodied carbon in buildings: A Pareto approach. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 8(5), 504–514.
Website article by Lighting.Philips.com (2019). What does a life of 50,000 hours mean in the case of – LEDs? Retrieved February 13, 2021, from https://www.lighting.philips.com/main/support/support/faqs/life–and–light–output/a–life–of–50000–hours
WRAP (2008). WRAP Net Waste Tool – Guide to Reference Data, Version 1.0. Retrieved February 13, 2021, from http://nwtool.wrap.org.uk/Documents/WRAP%20NW%20Tool%20Data%20Report.pdf
Zavadskas, E., Raslanas, S., & Kaklauskas, A. (2008). The selection of effective retrofit scenarios for panel houses in urban neighborhoods based on expected energy savings and increase in market value: The Vilnius case. Energy and Buildings, 40(4), 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.04.015
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Authors A, B and C conceived of the presented idea and developed the theoretical framework. Author A, took the lead in writing the manuscript, performed the thermal simulations and analysed the data. Authors A and B contributed to the interpretation of the results. Authors B and C supervised the findings of this work. All authors provided critical feedback and helped shape the research, analysis and manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vavanou, A., Schwartz, Y. & Mumovic, D. The life cycle impact of refurbishment packages on residential buildings with different initial thermal conditions. J Hous and the Built Environ 37, 951–1000 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-021-09871-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-021-09871-8